| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT LOS ANGELES |
|
| 157.5 | 72 Final 84 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
611 | CONNECTICUT | +145 | 612 | LOS ANGELES | -165 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, in August or September games. (77-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.4%, +43.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (184-146 since 1997.) (55.8%, +53.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (121-50 since 1997.) (70.8%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (99-43 since 1997.) (69.7%, +42.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more. (100-37 since 1997.) (73%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in August or September games. (57-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.2%, +36 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, on Sunday games. (49-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +34.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (36-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +25.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (55-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +29 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (34-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.1%, +34.4 units. Rating = 6*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (42-9 since 1997.) (82.4%, +27.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (38-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (47-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.1%, +27.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (67-48 since 1997.) (58.3%, +22.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games. (35-18 since 1997.) (66%, +19.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (55-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +32.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, on Sunday games. (41-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +17 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG). (70-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (23-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +12.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more. (71-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +28.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (32-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +14.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG). (60-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +31.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (184-146 since 1997.) (55.8%, +53.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (67-48 since 1997.) (58.3%, +22.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games. (35-18 since 1997.) (66%, +19.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (31-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.1%, +23.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins, in August or September games. (26-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +19.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins, with a winning record on the season. (35-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins. (38-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (76%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (29-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +18.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT | 77 | | 29-71 | 41.1% | 7-21 | 35.7% | 11-16 | 71.0% | 45 | 13 | 15 | LOS ANGELES | 80 | | 31-68 | 44.7% | 7-21 | 31.5% | 13-15 | 84.7% | 44 | 10 | 15 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 601 times, while CONNECTICUT won 370 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 71-45 against the money line (+29.3 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 74.9 | CONNECTICUT is 90-52 against the money line (+25.6 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 20-3 against the money line (+16.6 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 76.7 | LOS ANGELES is 24-23 against the money line (-26.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 78.6 | LOS ANGELES is 71-62 against the money line (-42.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 76.4 | LOS ANGELES is 15-17 against the money line (-16.3 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 79.6 | LOS ANGELES is 14-13 against the money line (-17.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 77.9 | LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-13.4 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 79.5 | LOS ANGELES is 21-19 against the money line (-24.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 81.6 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 4-10 against the money line (-24.5 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 83.0 | CONNECTICUT is 38-66 against the money line (-62.4 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 80.7 | CONNECTICUT is 68-86 against the money line (-36.4 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.9, OPPONENT 74.5 | CONNECTICUT is 7-11 against the money line (-13.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 79.7 | CONNECTICUT is 14-18 against the money line (-25.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 87.7 | CONNECTICUT is 1-4 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 68.0, OPPONENT 84.2 | CONNECTICUT is 3-7 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in road games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 85.4 | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 88.1 | CONNECTICUT is 2-7 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.9, OPPONENT 79.3 | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 70.3 | LOS ANGELES is 133-71 against the money line (+32.3 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 71.4 | LOS ANGELES is 61-11 against the money line (+29.7 Units) in home games when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 70.4 | LOS ANGELES is 282-75 against the money line (+157.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.3, OPPONENT 77.8 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 86-63 against the money line (+28.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-11 against the money line (-11.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-14 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-21 against the money line (-26.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-15 against the money line (-17.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 29-21 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 113-119 against the money line (-50.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-16 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 31-23 against the money line (-23.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 28-20 against the money line (-18.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-6 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-16 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 30-23 against the money line (-24.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-9 against the money line (-12.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-15 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 28-20 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-12 against the money line (-21.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-16 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 26-19 against the money line (-19.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-15 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-13 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-14 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.2, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-11 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-4 against the money line (+5.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 86-64 against the money line (+22.3 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 62-44 against the money line (+19.0 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-2 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-5 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 14-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+10.6 Units) on Sunday games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 136-98 against the money line (+28.1 Units) against Western conference opponents since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after a non-conference game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 33-21 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 136-98 against the money line (+28.1 Units) in non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-7 against the money line (+14.7 Units) off a home win over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-11 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-5 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 96-61 against the money line (+32.4 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-3 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 29-18 against the money line (-21.9 Units) as a favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-14 against the money line (-17.1 Units) against Eastern conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-11 against the money line (-14.1 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-6 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-14 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-15 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 159-116 against the money line (-87.9 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-7 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-24.2 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 8*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-21 against the money line (-24.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-19 against the money line (-27.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-18 against the money line (-30.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-17 against the money line (-33.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-14 against the money line (-22.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-9 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-6 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-10 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-7 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-16 against the money line (-23.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-10 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 14-16 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-16 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-10 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-8 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-7 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-12 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-13 against the money line (-12.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-17 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-16 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-10 against the money line (-13.9 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-11 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-7 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-10 against the money line (-16.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-9 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-11 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-8 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.2, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-10 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in August or September games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-4 against the money line (+11.2 Units) on Sunday games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in home games after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-3 against the money line (+9.6 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.2 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.6 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+6.9 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-2 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in home games after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-1 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in home games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-1 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in home games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 31-10 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.2, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.2 Units) in home games after playing a home game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 20-8 | +3 | 12-15 | 12-16 | 79.0 | 39.8 | 41.6% | 45.6 | 76.0 | 40.2 | 43.0% | 41.4 | Road Games | 6-7 | -7.4 | 3-9 | 5-8 | 74.5 | 39.0 | 38.5% | 45.4 | 79.2 | 42.1 | 43.8% | 44.8 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 2-2 | 3-2 | 81.0 | 41.8 | 43.4% | 42.6 | 78.2 | 42.6 | 43.7% | 43.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.0 | 39.8 | 30-71 | 41.6% | 7-21 | 34.6% | 12-18 | 70.4% | 46 | 11 | 19 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 78 | 39.4 | 29-69 | 41.9% | 7-20 | 33.9% | 13-17 | 79.7% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.5 | 39.0 | 27-71 | 38.5% | 7-22 | 31.9% | 13-19 | 66.9% | 45 | 11 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.0 | 40.2 | 28-66 | 43.0% | 6-20 | 28.3% | 13-17 | 81.2% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 77.9 | 39.6 | 29-68 | 42.0% | 7-20 | 33.3% | 14-17 | 80.8% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.2 | 42.1 | 29-66 | 43.8% | 6-20 | 30.2% | 15-18 | 83.8% | 45 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 17-10 | -0.7 | 15-12 | 15-12 | 79.6 | 39.4 | 42.6% | 41.8 | 77.3 | 39.0 | 41.1% | 44.1 | Home Games | 11-2 | +4 | 9-4 | 8-5 | 82.6 | 42.4 | 44.7% | 42.7 | 74.7 | 38.8 | 39.5% | 43.2 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.2 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 84.4 | 42.0 | 46.1% | 41.0 | 78.4 | 38.2 | 44.0% | 40.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.6 | 39.4 | 30-70 | 42.6% | 7-21 | 34.9% | 12-15 | 83.9% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 78.1 | 39.7 | 29-69 | 41.9% | 7-20 | 33.4% | 14-17 | 80.0% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 82.6 | 42.4 | 31-69 | 44.7% | 8-21 | 36.4% | 13-15 | 83.0% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.3 | 39.0 | 28-68 | 41.1% | 7-20 | 35.4% | 14-18 | 79.5% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 9 | 16 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 77.9 | 39.6 | 29-68 | 42.0% | 7-20 | 33.5% | 14-17 | 80.0% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 74.7 | 38.8 | 27-69 | 39.5% | 7-22 | 33.3% | 13-17 | 79.4% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 17 | 9 | 16 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 71, LOS ANGELES 70.7 |
| | |
|
|
7/19/2019 | ATLANTA | 98-69 | W | -500 | 38-78 | 48.7% | 46 | 8 | 22-58 | 37.9% | 40 | 14 | 7/24/2019 | NEW YORK | 70-63 | W | -550 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 55 | 11 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 49 | 16 | 7/30/2019 | CHICAGO | 100-94 | W | -300 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 45 | 16 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 42 | 14 | 8/1/2019 | PHOENIX | 68-62 | W | -300 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 51 | 16 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 37 | 18 | 8/4/2019 | @ NEW YORK | 94-79 | W | -250 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 41 | 9 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 44 | 17 | 8/9/2019 | @ MINNESOTA | 57-89 | L | -155 | 21-68 | 30.9% | 42 | 20 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 48 | 19 | 8/11/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 81-89 | L | +135 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 39 | 9 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 51 | 16 | 8/14/2019 | @ PHOENIX | 78-71 | W | -300 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 50 | 15 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 40 | 19 | 8/16/2019 | SEATTLE | 79-78 | W | -270 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 39 | 15 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 46 | 27 | 8/18/2019 | DALLAS | 78-68 | W | -500 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 43 | 15 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 37 | 9 | 8/23/2019 | LAS VEGAS | 89-85 | W | -120 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 42 | 10 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 42 | 10 | 8/25/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2019 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/30/2019 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2019 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2019 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2019 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/18/2019 | DALLAS | 69-64 | W | -330 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 36 | 11 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 45 | 15 | 7/20/2019 | @ NEW YORK | 78-83 | L | -125 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 39 | 11 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 42 | 15 | 7/23/2019 | @ ATLANTA | 78-66 | W | -115 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 44 | 13 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 37 | 12 | 8/1/2019 | LAS VEGAS | 76-68 | W | -120 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 42 | 12 | 25-71 | 35.2% | 49 | 14 | 8/4/2019 | SEATTLE | 83-75 | W | -200 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 37 | 16 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 34 | 19 | 8/8/2019 | PHOENIX | 84-74 | W | -250 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 35 | 13 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 44 | 14 | 8/11/2019 | CHICAGO | 84-81 | W | -300 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 39 | 23 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 44 | 24 | 8/14/2019 | @ DALLAS | 78-84 | L | -300 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 38 | 15 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 40 | 18 | 8/16/2019 | @ CHICAGO | 81-91 | L | -120 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 37 | 13 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 44 | 18 | 8/20/2019 | MINNESOTA | 81-71 | W | -250 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 40 | 16 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 38 | 17 | 8/22/2019 | INDIANA | 98-65 | W | -450 | 38-76 | 50.0% | 51 | 13 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 37 | 18 | 8/25/2019 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/29/2019 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/31/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2019 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/5/2019 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2019 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 23-18 (+1.3 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 4-4 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 13-7 (+0.2 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 3-1 (-1.7 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/6/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 158 | Over | 32 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 25 | 7 | 21 | | CONNECTICUT | 89 | -8 | SU ATS | 43 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 38 | 14 | 17 | 5/31/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 70 | -3 | Under | 31 | 24-78 | 30.8% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 63 | 18 | 14 | | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 164 | SU ATS | 38 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 46 | 9 | 10 | 8/19/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 86 | 160.5 | ATS | 41 | 30-76 | 39.5% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 44 | 10 | 11 | | CONNECTICUT | 89 | -5 | SU Over | 52 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 11-20 | 55.0% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 38 | 3 | 16 | 7/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 73 | 162 | SU ATS | 41 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 41 | 6 | 17 | | LOS ANGELES | 72 | -9.5 | Under | 25 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 30 | 6 | 13 | 5/24/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 94 | 162.5 | Over | 47 | 35-64 | 54.7% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 18 | 5 | 11 | | CONNECTICUT | 102 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 40-64 | 62.5% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 40 | 9 | 20 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 41-27 against the money line (+18.9 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 41-27 against the money line (+18.9 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 27-18 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 32-12 against the money line (+13.6 Units) off a home win as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 37-13 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 20-5 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.9, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 42-21 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 24-9 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.4, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 22-13 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 43-26 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 43-23 against the money line (+16.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 60-38 against the money line (+11.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 25-10 against the money line (+22.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 32-21 against the money line (+13.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 14-7 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 44-26 against the money line (+11.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 34-21 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Miller is 8-11 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-24 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 14-22 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 6-9 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 16-21 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 7-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 9-1 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 8-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Fisher is 12-2 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Fisher is 10-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Fisher is 15-5 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 160 times, while the road underdog won straight up 110 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 11 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 9 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 08/23/2019 - Rachel Banham missed last game, is "?" Sunday vs LA Sparks ( Ankle ) | [G] 06/26/2019 - Layshia Clarendon is OUT 3-4 months ( Ankle ) | |
[G] 07/21/2019 - Karlie Samuelson is out indefinitely ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/28/2024 9:10:03 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|