| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
157.5
| 72
Final
84 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 611 | CONNECTICUT | +145 | | 612 | LOS ANGELES | -165 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, in August or September games.
(77-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.4%, +43.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(184-146 since 1997.) (55.8%, +53.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(121-50 since 1997.) (70.8%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(99-43 since 1997.) (69.7%, +42.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more.
(100-37 since 1997.) (73%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in August or September games.
(57-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.2%, +36 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, on Sunday games.
(49-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +34.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(36-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +25.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(55-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +29 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(34-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.1%, +34.4 units. Rating = 6*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(42-9 since 1997.) (82.4%, +27.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(38-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(47-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.1%, +27.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(67-48 since 1997.) (58.3%, +22.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(35-18 since 1997.) (66%, +19.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(55-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +32.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, on Sunday games.
(41-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +17 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG).
(70-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(23-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +12.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more.
(71-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +28.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(32-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +14.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG).
(60-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +31.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(184-146 since 1997.) (55.8%, +53.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(67-48 since 1997.) (58.3%, +22.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(35-18 since 1997.) (66%, +19.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(31-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.1%, +23.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins, in August or September games.
(26-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +19.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins, with a winning record on the season.
(35-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins.
(38-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (76%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(29-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +18.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 77 | | 29-71 | 41.1% | 7-21 | 35.7% | 11-16 | 71.0% | 45 | 13 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 80 | | 31-68 | 44.7% | 7-21 | 31.5% | 13-15 | 84.7% | 44 | 10 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 601 times, while CONNECTICUT won 370 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 71-45 against the money line (+29.3 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 74.9 | CONNECTICUT is 90-52 against the money line (+25.6 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 20-3 against the money line (+16.6 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 76.7 | LOS ANGELES is 24-23 against the money line (-26.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 78.6 | LOS ANGELES is 71-62 against the money line (-42.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 76.4 | LOS ANGELES is 15-17 against the money line (-16.3 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 79.6 | LOS ANGELES is 14-13 against the money line (-17.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 77.9 | LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-13.4 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 79.5 | LOS ANGELES is 21-19 against the money line (-24.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 81.6 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 4-10 against the money line (-24.5 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 83.0 | CONNECTICUT is 38-66 against the money line (-62.4 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 80.7 | CONNECTICUT is 68-86 against the money line (-36.4 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.9, OPPONENT 74.5 | CONNECTICUT is 7-11 against the money line (-13.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 79.7 | CONNECTICUT is 14-18 against the money line (-25.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 87.7 | CONNECTICUT is 1-4 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 68.0, OPPONENT 84.2 | CONNECTICUT is 3-7 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in road games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 85.4 | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 88.1 | CONNECTICUT is 2-7 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.9, OPPONENT 79.3 | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 70.3 | LOS ANGELES is 133-71 against the money line (+32.3 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 71.4 | LOS ANGELES is 61-11 against the money line (+29.7 Units) in home games when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 70.4 | LOS ANGELES is 282-75 against the money line (+157.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.3, OPPONENT 77.8 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 86-63 against the money line (+28.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-11 against the money line (-11.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-14 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-21 against the money line (-26.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-15 against the money line (-17.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 29-21 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 113-119 against the money line (-50.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-16 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 31-23 against the money line (-23.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 28-20 against the money line (-18.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-6 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-16 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 30-23 against the money line (-24.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-9 against the money line (-12.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-15 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 28-20 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-12 against the money line (-21.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-16 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 26-19 against the money line (-19.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-15 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-13 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-14 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.2, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-11 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-4 against the money line (+5.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 86-64 against the money line (+22.3 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 62-44 against the money line (+19.0 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-2 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-5 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| error '80070070'/includes/foxsheetfunctions.asp, line 397 |
|
|