| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA LOS ANGELES |
|
| 157 | 71 Final 81 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
645 | MINNESOTA | +180 | 646 | LOS ANGELES | -220 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, in August or September games. (72-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +40.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.), after a loss by 10 points or more. (133-43 since 1997.) (75.6%, +55.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.), after a loss by 10 points or more. (138-47 since 1997.) (74.6%, +53.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a loss by 10 points or more. (102-30 since 1997.) (77.3%, +51.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a loss by 10 points or more. (98-28 since 1997.) (77.8%, +50.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.), after a loss by 10 points or more. (140-58 since 1997.) (70.7%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a loss by 10 points or more. (102-37 since 1997.) (73.4%, +45.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite, in August or September games. (74-25 since 1997.) (74.7%, +43.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (45-22 since 1997.) (67.2%, +40.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (80-23 since 1997.) (77.7%, +39.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average shooting team (40.5-43.5%), after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (62-42 since 1997.) (59.6%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG). (48-33 since 1997.) (59.3%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (31-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.5%, +31.4 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (35-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +18.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (44-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.7%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 4 or more consecutive overs, poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (19-8 since 1997.) (70.4%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (24-6 since 1997.) (80%, +18.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher against opponent after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better. (65-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (52-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +29.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (35-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.4%, +26.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG). (67-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.6%, +28.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team. (27-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (93.1%, +23.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (44-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.2%, +30.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (34-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.9%, +26.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (40-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.5%, +20.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG). (58-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (58%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (66-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (191-162 since 1997.) (54.1%, +55 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (76-47 since 1997.) (61.8%, +45 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (80-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.3%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off 2 or more consecutive road losses. (25-19 since 1997.) (56.8%, +33.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (41-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +37.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off 2 or more consecutive upset losses as a favorite, playing with 3 or more days rest. (35-22 since 1997.) (61.4%, +27.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (45-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.2%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (57-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.6%, +43.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher against opponent after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better. (65-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games. (30-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +29.5 units. Rating = 4*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA | 75 | | 29-67 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 11-13 | 79.3% | 44 | 12 | 17 | LOS ANGELES | 78 | | 30-68 | 43.5% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 11-13 | 85.3% | 41 | 10 | 15 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 569 times, while MINNESOTA won 398 times. Edge against the money line=MINNESOTA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 71.6 | MINNESOTA is 15-6 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 75.1 | LOS ANGELES is 23-23 against the money line (-27.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 78.8 | LOS ANGELES is 105-90 against the money line (-46.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 73.7 | LOS ANGELES is 15-17 against the money line (-16.3 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 79.6 | LOS ANGELES is 13-13 against the money line (-18.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 78.4 | LOS ANGELES is 20-19 against the money line (-25.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 81.8 | LOS ANGELES is 10-10 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 79.4 |
|
MINNESOTA is 91-104 against the money line (-42.5 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 76.4 | MINNESOTA is 14-15 against the money line (-19.5 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.4, OPPONENT 76.3 | MINNESOTA is 83-90 against the money line (-39.1 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.2, OPPONENT 74.9 | MINNESOTA is 7-12 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.8, OPPONENT 78.2 | MINNESOTA is 47-63 against the money line (-42.0 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 79.7 | MINNESOTA is 1-12 against the money line (-14.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.9, OPPONENT 85.6 | MINNESOTA is 6-12 against the money line (-7.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 81.9 | MINNESOTA is 6-11 against the money line (-10.6 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 77.1 | MINNESOTA is 16-18 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.6, OPPONENT 78.2 | LOS ANGELES is 60-11 against the money line (+28.7 Units) in home games when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 70.4 | LOS ANGELES is 280-75 against the money line (+155.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.3, OPPONENT 77.8 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 12-14 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-21 against the money line (-28.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-15 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-21 against the money line (-22.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 77-81 against the money line (-36.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 112-119 against the money line (-51.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-11.6 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-12 against the money line (-13.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-16 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 29-23 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 164-137 against the money line (-64.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-19 against the money line (-19.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-12 against the money line (-15.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-18 against the money line (-19.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-14 against the money line (-17.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-20 against the money line (-20.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-16 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 28-23 against the money line (-26.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-15 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-20 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-18 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 1-6 against the money line (-5.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 1-6 against the money line (-6.8 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.1, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 43-56 against the money line (-31.1 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-14 against the money line (-17.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 13-17 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-15 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 9-16 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 8-16 against the money line (-19.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 16-21 against the money line (-17.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 10-17 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 1-7 against the money line (-7.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.4, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 5-10 against the money line (-8.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-14 against the money line (-17.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-15 against the money line (-14.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 27-29 against the money line (-30.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 9-16 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 20-23 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.1, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 2-7 against the money line (-6.4 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 10-17 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 8-13 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 2-7 against the money line (-6.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 206-185 against the money line (-67.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-14 against the money line (-16.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 8-13 against the money line (-10.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-2 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-5 against the money line (+7.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 83-30 against the money line (+34.9 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 88-45 against the money line (+22.0 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 23-5 against the money line (+15.0 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 93-48 against the money line (+24.3 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 12-4 against the money line (+8.2 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 15-4 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 143-73 against the money line (+31.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-6 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 10-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 34-26 against the money line (-21.3 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-18 against the money line (-23.9 Units) as a favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-5 against the money line (-11.0 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-9 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-20 against the money line (-26.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-6 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-15 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-4 against the money line (-14.9 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-9 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-13 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-10 against the money line (-18.3 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-5 against the money line (-18.9 Units) in home games after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-21 against the money line (-26.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-19 against the money line (-29.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-18 against the money line (-32.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-17 against the money line (-35.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 7*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-14 against the money line (-24.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-21.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-4 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-15 against the money line (-21.0 Units) in home games after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-10 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-4 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.8, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-5 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-15 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 30-30 against the money line (-20.2 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 220-211 against the money line (-78.7 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 12-14 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 11-20 against the money line (-20.5 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 52-86 against the money line (-37.6 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.3, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-13 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 67-81 against the money line (-42.5 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 53-77 against the money line (-34.3 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 90-105 against the money line (-42.6 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 89-98 against the money line (-49.2 Units) off a road loss since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.9, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 16-19 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 15-18 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 76-85 against the money line (-47.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-22 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 114-163 against the money line (-88.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 58-81 against the money line (-44.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 87-124 against the money line (-74.2 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.9, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 166-171 against the money line (-91.9 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 15-17 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-10 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 149-167 against the money line (-74.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 68-87 against the money line (-35.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-0 against the money line (+9.2 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in home games after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-7 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in home games off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in home games off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a road favorite since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-12 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-1 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in home games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 68.7 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-1 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in home games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 29-10 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-1 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.0, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 13-14 | -3 | 14-12 | 14-13 | 77.2 | 40.3 | 44.6% | 41.0 | 75.9 | 38.1 | 42.9% | 38.9 | Road Games | 6-8 | -2.2 | 6-8 | 8-6 | 75.4 | 40.6 | 44.3% | 38.4 | 77.3 | 39.1 | 43.6% | 42.1 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.6 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 81.8 | 43.4 | 49.8% | 37.2 | 79.8 | 40.6 | 45.0% | 37.6 | Division Games | 4-7 | -5.8 | 4-6 | 5-6 | 75.0 | 39.5 | 44.0% | 39.7 | 76.3 | 37.8 | 44.4% | 36.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.2 | 40.3 | 30-67 | 44.6% | 6-17 | 33.0% | 12-15 | 78.6% | 41 | 9 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.9 | 39.6 | 29-68 | 42.2% | 7-20 | 33.7% | 13-17 | 80.2% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.4 | 40.6 | 29-66 | 44.3% | 5-17 | 31.0% | 12-15 | 78.6% | 38 | 8 | 19 | 16 | 9 | 15 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.9 | 38.1 | 28-66 | 42.9% | 7-21 | 32.9% | 12-15 | 79.7% | 39 | 8 | 17 | 17 | 9 | 16 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 77.7 | 39.4 | 29-68 | 41.8% | 7-21 | 33.5% | 14-17 | 79.9% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 77.3 | 39.1 | 29-66 | 43.6% | 7-21 | 31.9% | 13-16 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 16 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 15-10 | -2.7 | 13-12 | 14-11 | 78.8 | 38.8 | 42.1% | 41.5 | 78.1 | 39.6 | 41.1% | 44.6 | Home Games | 9-2 | +2 | 7-4 | 7-4 | 81.4 | 41.7 | 43.9% | 42.2 | 75.9 | 40.2 | 39.3% | 44.3 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.2 | 2-3 | 5-0 | 82.0 | 42.4 | 46.5% | 37.2 | 81.0 | 40.2 | 43.2% | 41.2 | Division Games | 7-5 | -0.2 | 6-6 | 6-6 | 76.3 | 39.1 | 42.5% | 39.2 | 76.2 | 39.6 | 41.2% | 44.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.8 | 38.8 | 30-71 | 42.1% | 7-21 | 35.0% | 12-14 | 85.1% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.8 | 39.6 | 29-69 | 41.9% | 7-20 | 33.3% | 14-17 | 80.0% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.4 | 41.7 | 31-70 | 43.9% | 8-21 | 36.9% | 12-14 | 85.4% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.1 | 39.6 | 28-68 | 41.1% | 7-20 | 36.0% | 15-18 | 80.6% | 45 | 10 | 17 | 16 | 9 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 77.7 | 39.5 | 29-68 | 41.9% | 7-20 | 33.6% | 14-17 | 80.1% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.9 | 40.2 | 27-69 | 39.3% | 7-21 | 34.2% | 14-17 | 82.0% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 9 | 15 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 71.7, LOS ANGELES 70.8 |
| | |
|
|
7/12/2019 | @ ATLANTA | 53-60 | L | -120 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 42 | 12 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 51 | 12 | 7/14/2019 | PHOENIX | 75-62 | W | -115 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 52 | 18 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 31 | 13 | 7/17/2019 | SEATTLE | 79-90 | L | -220 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 36 | 13 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 39 | 19 | 7/21/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 74-79 | L | +200 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 40 | 18 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 39 | 18 | 7/24/2019 | WASHINGTON | 71-79 | L | +180 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 43 | 18 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 37 | 14 | 8/3/2019 | @ INDIANA | 75-86 | L | -155 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 34 | 21 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 37 | 14 | 8/6/2019 | @ ATLANTA | 85-69 | W | -210 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 51 | 10 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 45 | 18 | 8/9/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 89-57 | W | +135 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 48 | 19 | 21-68 | 30.9% | 42 | 20 | 8/11/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | 78-101 | L | +280 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 29 | 17 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 38 | 16 | 8/13/2019 | @ NEW YORK | 89-73 | W | -220 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 40 | 14 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 43 | 17 | 8/16/2019 | WASHINGTON | 79-86 | L | +200 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 40 | 19 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 33 | 12 | 8/18/2019 | @ SEATTLE | 74-82 | L | +145 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 29 | 17 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 32 | 16 | 8/20/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/22/2019 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2019 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2019 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2019 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/12/2019 | @ INDIANA | 90-84 | W | -140 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 47 | 12 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 40 | 20 | 7/14/2019 | @ ATLANTA | 76-71 | W | -155 | 30-87 | 34.5% | 52 | 5 | 25-76 | 32.9% | 63 | 11 | 7/18/2019 | DALLAS | 69-64 | W | -330 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 36 | 11 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 45 | 15 | 7/20/2019 | @ NEW YORK | 78-83 | L | -125 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 39 | 11 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 42 | 15 | 7/23/2019 | @ ATLANTA | 78-66 | W | -115 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 44 | 13 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 37 | 12 | 8/1/2019 | LAS VEGAS | 76-68 | W | -120 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 42 | 12 | 25-71 | 35.2% | 49 | 14 | 8/4/2019 | SEATTLE | 83-75 | W | -200 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 37 | 16 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 34 | 19 | 8/8/2019 | PHOENIX | 84-74 | W | -250 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 35 | 13 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 44 | 14 | 8/11/2019 | CHICAGO | 84-81 | W | -300 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 39 | 23 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 44 | 24 | 8/14/2019 | @ DALLAS | 78-84 | L | -300 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 38 | 15 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 40 | 18 | 8/16/2019 | @ CHICAGO | 81-91 | L | -120 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 37 | 13 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 44 | 18 | 8/20/2019 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/22/2019 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2019 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/29/2019 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/31/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2019 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/5/2019 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 56-38 (+19.1 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 9-5 (+7.3 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 33-13 (+11.6 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 5-1 (+3.5 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/8/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 89 | 149 | SU ATS | 44 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 9-25 | 36.0% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 37 | 12 | 16 | | MINNESOTA | 85 | -4.5 | Over | 39 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 50 | 13 | 21 | 8/21/2018 | MINNESOTA | 68 | 150.5 | Under | 37 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 44 | 10 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 75 | -6 | SU ATS | 40 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 32 | 5 | 10 | 8/2/2018 | MINNESOTA | 57 | 155.5 | Under | 29 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 1-10 | 10.0% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 40 | 7 | 14 | | LOS ANGELES | 79 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 8-16 | 50.0% | 7-11 | 63.6% | 37 | 6 | 9 | 7/5/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 72 | 153.5 | Over | 35 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 30 | 8 | 9 | | MINNESOTA | 83 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 29-56 | 51.8% | 8-13 | 61.5% | 17-18 | 94.4% | 39 | 5 | 14 | 6/3/2018 | MINNESOTA | 69 | 158.5 | Under | 38 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 12-20 | 60.0% | 38 | 5 | 18 | | LOS ANGELES | 77 | -6 | SU ATS | 40 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 31 | 4 | 11 | 5/20/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 155.5 | SU ATS | 32 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 31 | 5 | 6 | | MINNESOTA | 76 | -7.5 | Under | 38 | 27-55 | 49.1% | 3-7 | 42.9% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 47 | 6 | 24 |
|
| | |
|
Reeve is 50-15 against the money line (+24.9 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 139-68 against the money line (+28.1 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 47-22 against the money line (+13.4 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 101-36 against the money line (+32.2 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 77-23 against the money line (+36.3 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 59-15 against the money line (+34.8 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 75-23 against the money line (+31.9 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 40-11 against the money line (+20.0 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 22-5 against the money line (+14.0 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 79-22 against the money line (+35.2 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 36-15 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 21-5 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 111-47 against the money line (+24.7 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 50-20 against the money line (+16.9 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 29-17 against the money line (+11.2 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 77-45 against the money line (+13.5 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 36-20 against the money line (+13.0 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 60-29 against the money line (+23.9 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 56-25 against the money line (+21.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 29-14 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 40-14 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 168-80 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 122-52 against the money line (+27.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 104-40 against the money line (+25.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 47-10 against the money line (+32.0 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 5*) | Reeve is 132-56 against the money line (+26.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 41-10 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 1-4 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Fisher is 0-4 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.8, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Reeve is 39-38 against the money line (-18.3 Units) in road games in August or September games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 58-49 against the money line (-21.6 Units) in road games after a division game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 47-39 against the money line (-27.1 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 7-10 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.2, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 30-30 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 30-30 against the money line (-22.2 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 14-18 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in road games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 31-28 against the money line (-19.2 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.2, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 35-35 against the money line (-18.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 10-15 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 37-27 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 18-19 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 40-47 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 22-34 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.3, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 41-35 against the money line (-22.4 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 27-28 against the money line (-26.9 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 38-40 against the money line (-16.7 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 55-48 against the money line (-24.3 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 45-42 against the money line (-19.2 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 21-27 against the money line (-22.8 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 34-33 against the money line (-17.2 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 96-64 against the money line (-26.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 127-85 against the money line (-35.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 57-48 against the money line (-22.8 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 49-42 against the money line (-24.0 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 57-46 against the money line (-21.0 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 118-73 against the money line (-30.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 35-38 against the money line (-22.6 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 8-0 against the money line (+9.2 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 7-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 10-2 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 8-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 13-5 against the money line (+7.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 210 times, while the road underdog won straight up 86 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 20 times, while the road underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[F] 08/11/2019 - Kelsey Griffin is out indefinitely ( Foot ) | [G] 08/09/2019 - Karima Christmas-Kelly is out for season ( Knee ) | [F] 06/10/2019 - Jessica Shepard is out for season ( Knee ) | [F] 02/07/2019 - Maya Moore is out for season ( Personal ) | |
[G] 07/21/2019 - Karlie Samuelson is out indefinitely ( Knee ) | [G] 07/16/2019 - Riquna Williams is OUT 10 games ( Suspension ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/8/2024 6:40:15 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|