| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO LOS ANGELES |
|
| 169 | 84 Final 99 |
|
|
| | |
|
WNBA Playoffs - Semifinals - Best of 5 - Game 2 - LA lead 1-0 | | | | |
657 | CHICAGO | +500 | 658 | LOS ANGELES | -750 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (212-63 since 1997.) (77.1%, +98.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (188-40 since 1997.) (82.5%, +91.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (275-96 since 1997.) (74.1%, +83.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (331-134 since 1997.) (71.2%, +82.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (244-66 since 1997.) (78.7%, +74.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (333-127 since 1997.) (72.4%, +69.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (187-63 since 1997.) (74.8%, +68 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (228-80 since 1997.) (74%, +67.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more. (153-43 since 1997.) (78.1%, +64.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (166-41 since 1997.) (80.2%, +63.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (161-57 since 1997.) (73.9%, +60.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games. (155-41 since 1997.) (79.1%, +58.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning record on the season. (48-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more. (104-27 since 1997.) (79.4%, +50.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more. (104-22 since 1997.) (82.5%, +50.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (133-56 since 1997.) (70.4%, +50 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (102-37 since 1997.) (73.4%, +50 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (128-47 since 1997.) (73.1%, +49.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (112-46 since 1997.) (70.9%, +45.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (91-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.2%, +34.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (83-21 since 1997.) (79.8%, +43.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (75-16 since 1997.) (82.4%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (59-10 since 1997.) (85.5%, +34.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (70-33 since 1997.) (68%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (76-37 since 1997.) (67.3%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (100-71 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.5%, +44 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (43-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +13.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (48-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a blowout win by 15 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games. (43-16 since 1997.) (72.9%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (36-9 since 1997.) (80%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (58-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.8%, +40.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (28-5 since 1997.) (84.8%, +24.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (31-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game. (55-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +28.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - triple revenge - 3 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (32-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (78%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (82-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +41.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game. (67-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (42-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +20.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 90 points or more. (53-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.9%, +18.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (44-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.6%, +30.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (126-69 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +43.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (98-101 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.2%, +24.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (85-84 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.3%, +22.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (52-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.5%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (50-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (50-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (50-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season. (83-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +26.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (106-66 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.6%, +30.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (55-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +14.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (89-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +16.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (89-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +16.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (89-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +16.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (25-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (25-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (25-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (87-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.4%, +22.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (87-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.4%, +22.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (87-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.4%, +22.9 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO | 82 | | 33-73 | 45.2% | 4-11 | 35.9% | 12-15 | 82.3% | 42 | 12 | 11 | LOS ANGELES | 87 | | 33-66 | 49.8% | 6-16 | 38.7% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 40 | 9 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 621 times, while CHICAGO won 350 times. Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 57-36 against the money line (+19.1 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 78.6 | CHICAGO is 9-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 89.1, OPPONENT 86.2 | CHICAGO is 9-4 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 80.5 | CHICAGO is 47-24 against the money line (+20.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 88.7, OPPONENT 84.0 | LOS ANGELES is 27-25 against the money line (-23.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 79.6 | LOS ANGELES is 45-71 against the money line (-76.3 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 79.6 | LOS ANGELES is 61-57 against the money line (-38.4 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 75.8 | LOS ANGELES is 131-111 against the money line (-55.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 74.6 | LOS ANGELES is 35-57 against the money line (-49.7 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 14-16 against the money line (-23.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.4, OPPONENT 84.6 | LOS ANGELES is 20-21 against the money line (-22.5 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 76.6 | LOS ANGELES is 105-105 against the money line (-60.2 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 74.8 | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-15.1 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 76.4 | LOS ANGELES is 168-149 against the money line (-81.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 82.2 |
|
CHICAGO is 13-20 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 85.4 | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-8.7 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 93.5 | CHICAGO is 32-59 against the money line (-36.8 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 72.9, OPPONENT 75.6 | CHICAGO is 25-55 against the money line (-39.7 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 78.6 | CHICAGO is 27-46 against the money line (-29.3 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 80.0 | CHICAGO is 11-16 against the money line (-11.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 87.0, OPPONENT 90.7 | CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-9.3 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 87.7, OPPONENT 92.6 | CHICAGO is 6-11 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 89.1 | CHICAGO is 1-8 against the money line (-10.3 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 87.9 | LOS ANGELES is 18-2 against the money line (+15.1 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.4, OPPONENT 76.5 | LOS ANGELES is 82-50 against the money line (+20.4 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 74.5 | LOS ANGELES is 100-35 against the money line (+41.7 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 71.2 | LOS ANGELES is 11-2 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in home games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.3, OPPONENT 75.6 | LOS ANGELES is 30-5 against the money line (+23.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.8, OPPONENT 78.4 | LOS ANGELES is 17-0 against the money line (+17.8 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 93.4, OPPONENT 78.8 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 12-5 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 89.1, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-9 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-12 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-11 against the money line (-10.9 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-14 against the money line (-10.8 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 181-167 against the money line (-61.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-21 against the money line (-24.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-27 against the money line (-28.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 32-33 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 42-42 against the money line (-24.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 28-26 against the money line (-24.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 36-33 against the money line (-25.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 119-97 against the money line (-55.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 171-141 against the money line (-74.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 117-121 against the money line (-50.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 37-41 against the money line (-25.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 29-27 against the money line (-23.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 40-38 against the money line (-26.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 53-84 against the money line (-40.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 78-126 against the money line (-64.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-8.5 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-55 against the money line (-38.3 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 52-85 against the money line (-44.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 74-119 against the money line (-65.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 76-119 against the money line (-54.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 131-170 against the money line (-57.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-15 against the money line (-10.3 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 106-150 against the money line (-49.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 48-66 against the money line (-32.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-4 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-2 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+7.1 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 11-5 against the money line (+6.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs this season. The average score was CHICAGO 88.2, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 55-50 against the money line (-30.0 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 131-117 against the money line (-55.9 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-5 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-13 against the money line (-26.0 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 29-28 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-21 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 17-28 against the money line (-15.2 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-10 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in road games after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 108-133 against the money line (-48.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-11.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season. The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-33 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-28 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 81-109 against the money line (-51.8 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-15 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after 2 straight games being called for 5+ more fouls than opponent since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-6.7 Units) in road games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 95.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-13 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-13 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 89-133 against the money line (-61.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 68-101 against the money line (-46.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 96-130 against the money line (-51.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 27-33 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.2, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-8.0 Units) in road games after allowing 90 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 90.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 24-49 against the money line (-29.2 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-10 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-9.0 Units) in road games after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 58-76 against the money line (-36.9 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 36-51 against the money line (-27.3 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-11 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.5, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-10 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-10 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-32 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-19 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 7-15 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.0, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 5-11 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 26-28 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-13 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-13 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.0, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 20-25 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-22 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-31 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.8, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-9.0 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 69-19 against the money line (+34.1 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-4 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-3 against the money line (+13.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-2 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after 2 straight games where they were called for 15 or less fouls over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+5.9 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.8, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-2 against the money line (+9.4 Units) off a home win this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-4 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+5.9 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-2 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+6.5 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after playing a home game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-2 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 123-51 against the money line (+29.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 19-17 | -4.8 | 17-18 | 25-11 | 86.5 | 44.3 | 46.3% | 43.6 | 86.2 | 42.6 | 43.9% | 41.9 | Road Games | 7-11 | -7.8 | 9-8 | 12-6 | 83.9 | 44.3 | 45.3% | 42.8 | 87.7 | 42.8 | 44.5% | 42.6 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.8 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 89.6 | 43.2 | 48.8% | 42.4 | 89.2 | 43.4 | 44.7% | 44.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 86.5 | 44.3 | 33-72 | 46.3% | 4-11 | 36.8% | 16-19 | 82.9% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.8 | 40.6 | 30-67 | 44.3% | 5-16 | 33.4% | 17-21 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 83.9 | 44.3 | 32-71 | 45.3% | 4-11 | 38.3% | 15-18 | 84.0% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 86.2 | 42.6 | 30-69 | 43.9% | 7-19 | 35.1% | 19-23 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81.8 | 40.4 | 30-67 | 44.1% | 6-17 | 33.6% | 17-22 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 87.7 | 42.8 | 31-70 | 44.5% | 8-21 | 36.5% | 18-23 | 79.2% | 43 | 10 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 27-8 | +3.5 | 16-19 | 19-16 | 83.3 | 40.4 | 48.8% | 38.5 | 75.9 | 37.7 | 43.2% | 39.8 | Home Games | 15-3 | +5.8 | 7-11 | 10-8 | 84.7 | 41.2 | 49.9% | 36.9 | 76.1 | 37.4 | 44.0% | 39.5 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -2.9 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 79.4 | 38.0 | 46.8% | 36.4 | 77.8 | 39.2 | 43.6% | 40.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 83.3 | 40.4 | 31-64 | 48.8% | 6-16 | 37.4% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 38 | 7 | 20 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.8 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 5-16 | 34.1% | 17-22 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 84.7 | 41.2 | 32-64 | 49.9% | 5-15 | 35.7% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 37 | 7 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.9 | 37.7 | 29-67 | 43.2% | 5-16 | 30.4% | 13-17 | 78.0% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 40.7 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 5-16 | 33.3% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.1 | 37.4 | 29-66 | 44.0% | 5-15 | 30.9% | 14-17 | 81.0% | 39 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 71.1, LOS ANGELES 71.3 |
| | |
|
|
8/26/2016 | ATLANTA | 90-82 | W | -210 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 50 | 7 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 41 | 12 | 8/28/2016 | @ DALLAS | 92-85 | W | +105 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 42 | 9 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 44 | 12 | 9/2/2016 | SEATTLE | 92-88 | W | -330 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 45 | 5 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 45 | 8 | 9/4/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 97-73 | W | -750 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 46 | 9 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 32 | 8 | 9/7/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 81-118 | L | -165 | 32-84 | 38.1% | 40 | 9 | 45-74 | 60.8% | 47 | 9 | 9/9/2016 | @ INDIANA | 88-95 | L | +220 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 40 | 11 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 45 | 17 | 9/11/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 96-86 | W | +145 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 46 | 12 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 47 | 12 | 9/13/2016 | MINNESOTA | 98-97 | W | +180 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 41 | 17 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 44 | 15 | 9/16/2016 | NEW YORK | 92-68 | W | -200 | 39-83 | 47.0% | 51 | 8 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 45 | 18 | 9/18/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 75-88 | L | +200 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 36 | 16 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 43 | 12 | 9/25/2016 | ATLANTA | 108-98 | W | -125 | 44-80 | 55.0% | 47 | 11 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 47 | 12 | 9/28/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 75-95 | L | +450 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 37 | 15 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 45 | 17 | 9/30/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/2/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/26/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 72-79 | L | -450 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 41 | 17 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 40 | 12 | 8/28/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 66-70 | L | -165 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 43 | 21 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 40 | 16 | 9/1/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 70-61 | W | | 25-57 | 43.9% | 39 | 14 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 36 | 12 | 9/2/2016 | @ DALLAS | 87-79 | W | -270 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 42 | 10 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 45 | 11 | 9/4/2016 | INDIANA | 88-81 | W | -400 | 31-54 | 57.4% | 38 | 9 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 30 | 8 | 9/6/2016 | MINNESOTA | 74-77 | L | -110 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 37 | 8 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 42 | 11 | 9/8/2016 | ATLANTA | 81-86 | L | -450 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 36 | 9 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 47 | 12 | 9/11/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 60-78 | L | -140 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 27 | 13 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 47 | 16 | 9/13/2016 | PHOENIX | 90-85 | W | -155 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 38 | 4 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 43 | 11 | 9/16/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 71-65 | W | -650 | 27-54 | 50.0% | 36 | 22 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 27 | 14 | 9/28/2016 | CHICAGO | 95-75 | W | -650 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 45 | 17 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 37 | 15 | 9/30/2016 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/2/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 17-6 (+9.8 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 7-1 (+5.5 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 9-2 (+5.5 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 3-1 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/28/2016 | CHICAGO | 75 | 167.5 | Over | 35 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 0-2 | 0.0% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 37 | 11 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 95 | -11 | SU ATS | 52 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 45 | 10 | 17 | 7/13/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | -5 | SU ATS | 44 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 44 | 2 | 12 | | CHICAGO | 67 | 169 | Under | 35 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 4-6 | 66.7% | 32 | 10 | 5 | 6/14/2016 | CHICAGO | 85 | 168.5 | Over | 37 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 36 | 11 | 9 | | LOS ANGELES | 98 | -8 | SU ATS | 46 | 39-67 | 58.2% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 31 | 7 | 6 | 5/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 93 | -3 | SU ATS | 53 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 26-32 | 81.2% | 37 | 6 | 8 | | CHICAGO | 80 | 165.5 | Over | 35 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 1-8 | 12.5% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 40 | 7 | 15 | 8/16/2015 | CHICAGO | 64 | 162 | Under | 35 | 23-71 | 32.4% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 49 | 14 | 9 | | LOS ANGELES | 76 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 41 | 4 | 11 | 7/31/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 88 | 163 | SU ATS | 39 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 21-25 | 84.0% | 42 | 7 | 6 | | CHICAGO | 77 | -5 | Over | 39 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 37 | 8 | 9 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 47-51 against the money line (-36.4 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 73.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 7-9 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 11-12 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Chatman is 110-107 against the money line (-27.1 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 33-46 against the money line (-26.2 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 36-43 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 69-76 against the money line (-36.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 62-63 against the money line (-20.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 23-39 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 33-46 against the money line (-26.2 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 55-56 against the money line (-23.3 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 3-10 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after 2 straight games being called for 5+ more fouls than opponent as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 43-44 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 33-38 against the money line (-25.6 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 49-59 against the money line (-21.7 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 40-52 against the money line (-21.8 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 14-21 against the money line (-14.4 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 29-32 against the money line (-15.6 Units) off a road loss as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 2-8 against the money line (-9.0 Units) in road games off a road loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 60-67 against the money line (-30.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 44-53 against the money line (-25.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 64-67 against the money line (-30.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 45-51 against the money line (-26.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 10-15 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 20-26 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 15-29 against the money line (-26.8 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Chatman is 5-15 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in road games after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Chatman is 2-12 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 72.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 5*) | Chatman is 23-41 against the money line (-23.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 16-32 against the money line (-20.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 11-27 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 10-21 against the money line (-12.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 27-43 against the money line (-19.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 18-30 against the money line (-19.4 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 10-21 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 54-61 against the money line (-27.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 30-36 against the money line (-20.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 2-7 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in road games after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 31-34 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 38-47 against the money line (-30.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 32-35 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 49-52 against the money line (-23.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 29-46 against the money line (-28.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 45-64 against the money line (-35.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 5-19 against the money line (-17.3 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 73.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Chatman is 10-28 against the money line (-23.4 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Chatman is 31-42 against the money line (-23.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 44-58 against the money line (-37.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 15-33 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 87-89 against the money line (-27.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 39-48 against the money line (-18.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 50-69 against the money line (-40.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 64-64 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 56-64 against the money line (-20.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 83-91 against the money line (-35.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 16-28 against the money line (-15.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 67-77 against the money line (-22.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 43-63 against the money line (-23.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 33-42 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 44-55 against the money line (-26.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 109-53 against the money line (+27.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.0, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 48-14 against the money line (+28.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 81.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 88-65 against the money line (+21.6 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 73.4, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 14-4 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 11-3 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 43-26 against the money line (+18.2 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.6, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 15-5 against the money line (+13.1 Units) off a home blowout win by 20 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.1, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 28-10 against the money line (+19.2 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 79.1, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 29-18 against the money line (+14.3 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.0, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 70-36 against the money line (+29.0 Units) after a win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.3, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 19-8 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after a blowout win by 20 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.1, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 40-12 against the money line (+19.2 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 80.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 10-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 14-4 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 12-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 13-1 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in home games after scoring 90 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 81.9, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 11-2 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 19-6 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 14-4 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 15-4 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in home games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 83.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 19-10 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 6-1 against the money line (+6.5 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as a home favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 68-24 against the money line (+24.6 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.5, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 16-5 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 21-7 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 28-4 against the money line (+20.4 Units) in home games after 3 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 80.7, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 10-1 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 14-4 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 31-15 against the money line (+14.1 Units) in home games vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 38-23 against the money line (+15.7 Units) in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.6, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 70-31 against the money line (+27.5 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.2, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 158-126 against the money line (+30.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.7, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 9-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.0, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 14-7 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.9, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 160-114 against the money line (+23.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.9, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 46-12 against the money line (+25.7 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 79.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 109-56 against the money line (+41.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 65-34 against the money line (+20.2 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.8, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 90-44 against the money line (+31.6 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.8, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 51-24 against the money line (+19.7 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 107-87 against the money line (+23.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 7-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 8-2 against the money line (+7.1 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 58 times, while the road underdog won straight up 7 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 8 times, while the road underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 09/14/2016 - Elena Delle Donne out indefinitely ( Thumb ) | [G] 06/08/2016 - Betnijah Laney out for season ( Knee ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/5/2024 10:05:44 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|