| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO
First Half Results
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
83
| 35
Final
52 |
|
|
| | |
|
| WNBA Playoffs - Semifinals - Best of 5 - Game 1 | | |  | |
| 653 | CHICAGO | 82.5 | | 654 | LOS ANGELES | -6 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off 2 or more consecutive home wins.
(144-91 since 1997.) (61.3%, +43.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(123-62 since 1997.) (66.5%, +54.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(127-78 since 1997.) (62%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(98-48 since 1997.) (67.1%, +45.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(86-45 since 1997.) (65.6%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(69-33 since 1997.) (67.6%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team.
(67-33 since 1997.) (67%, +30.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(99-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, playing with 2 days rest.
(158-98 since 1997.) (61.7%, +50.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, playing with 2 days rest.
(124-76 since 1997.) (62%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a home win against a division rival.
(65-32 since 1997.) (67%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(41-17 since 1997.) (70.7%, +22.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, playing with 2 days rest.
(142-86 since 1997.) (62.3%, +47.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 6 or more points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, playing with 2 days rest.
(34-11 since 1997.) (75.6%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 6 or more points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, playing with 2 days rest.
(28-7 since 1997.) (80%, +20.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(63-29 since 1997.) (68.5%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(54-21 since 1997.) (72%, +30.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, playing with 2 days rest.
(248-169 since 1997.) (59.5%, +62.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a home win, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team.
(67-31 since 1997.) (68.4%, +32.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a win by 10 points or more.
(445-328 since 1997.) (57.6%, +84.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(856-651 since 1997.) (56.8%, +139.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(155-102 since 1997.) (60.3%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(425-303 since 1997.) (58.4%, +91.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(288-197 since 1997.) (59.4%, +71.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(165-104 since 1997.) (61.3%, +50.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(150-89 since 1997.) (62.8%, +52.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(116-65 since 1997.) (64.1%, +44.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team.
(91-48 since 1997.) (65.5%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(219-153 since 1997.) (58.9%, +50.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(88-48 since 1997.) (64.7%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(70-34 since 1997.) (67.3%, +32.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(456-346 since 1997.) (56.9%, +75.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(133-83 since 1997.) (61.6%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(295-202 since 1997.) (59.4%, +72.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(278-191 since 1997.) (59.3%, +67.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(60-27 since 1997.) (69%, +30.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(446-330 since 1997.) (57.5%, +83 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(114-66 since 1997.) (63.3%, +41.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(527-391 since 1997.) (57.4%, +96.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(400-283 since 1997.) (58.6%, +88.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a home win against a division rival, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(77-35 since 1997.) (68.8%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a home win against a division rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team.
(49-21 since 1997.) (70%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(50-19 since 1997.) (72.5%, +29.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a win against a division rival, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(109-53 since 1997.) (67.3%, +50.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a win against a division rival, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(84-41 since 1997.) (67.2%, +38.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a win against a division rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team.
(69-31 since 1997.) (69%, +34.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a win against a division rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games.
(56-25 since 1997.) (69.1%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a home win, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(111-63 since 1997.) (63.8%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games.
(76-33 since 1997.) (69.7%, +39.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(890-683 since 1997.) (56.6%, +138.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(509-380 since 1997.) (57.3%, +91 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(162-99 since 1997.) (62.1%, +53.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(122-73 since 1997.) (62.6%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team.
(95-50 since 1997.) (65.5%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games.
(77-36 since 1997.) (68.1%, +37.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(527-391 since 1997.) (57.4%, +96.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(400-283 since 1997.) (58.6%, +88.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(331-236 since 1997.) (58.4%, +71.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CHICAGO | 83 | | 42 | | 33-73 | 45.7% | 4-12 | 36.8% | 12-15 | 82.8% | 42 | 12 | 11 | | LOS ANGELES | 88 | | 44 | | 33-66 | 49.9% | 6-16 | 37.6% | 16-20 | 80.5% | 40 | 8 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO covered the first half line 609 times, while LOS ANGELES covered the first half line 352 times.
Edge against first half line=CHICAGO | In 1000 simulated games, 623 games went over first half total, while 377 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 28-14 against the 1rst half line (+12.6 Units) in road games when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 38.8 | CHICAGO is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 46.4, OPPONENT 40.0 | CHICAGO is 39-23 against the 1rst half line (+13.7 Units) in road games when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 38.6 | CHICAGO is 112-61 against the 1rst half line (+44.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.9, OPPONENT 39.2 | CHICAGO is 75-37 against the 1rst half line (+34.3 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.4, OPPONENT 39.7 |
|
CHICAGO is 12-31 against the 1rst half line (-22.1 Units) in road games when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 47.3 | LOS ANGELES is 119-53 against the 1rst half line (+60.7 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.2, OPPONENT 36.2 | LOS ANGELES is 190-103 against the 1rst half line (+76.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 42.2, OPPONENT 37.0 | LOS ANGELES is 132-51 against the 1rst half line (+75.9 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 44.3, OPPONENT 37.7 |
|
CHICAGO is 21-13 OVER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.8, OPPONENT 42.3 | CHICAGO is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.7, OPPONENT 47.4 | CHICAGO is 25-15 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.7, OPPONENT 42.0 | CHICAGO is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.8, OPPONENT 44.7 | CHICAGO is 15-7 OVER (+7.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.1, OPPONENT 45.4 | CHICAGO is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 48.0, OPPONENT 45.8 | CHICAGO is 20-11 OVER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.8, OPPONENT 43.3 | CHICAGO is 21-11 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.3, OPPONENT 42.7 | CHICAGO is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 47.2, OPPONENT 42.7 | CHICAGO is 16-4 OVER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.4, OPPONENT 44.6 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.0, OPPONENT 36.2 |
|
| | |
|
| CHICAGO | |  | | LOS ANGELES | -2.5 | |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.3, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.6, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.6, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.6, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-15 against the 1rst half line (-9.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.4, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.9, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-16 against the 1rst half line (-9.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.0, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.9, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-16 against the 1rst half line (-9.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.0, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-13 against the 1rst half line (-11.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.4, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-15 against the 1rst half line (-8.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.5, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 57-81 against the 1rst half line (-32.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.6, OPPONENT 47.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 35-19 OVER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-13 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.0, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-7 OVER (+6.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.9, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 19-11 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.3, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 37-23 OVER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 55-35 OVER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-7 OVER (+7.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 46.0, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-7 OVER (+6.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.9, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.6, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 33-18 OVER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.1, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-10 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.4, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.8, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-10 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.4, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 31-19 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.8, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 126-92 UNDER (+24.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.5, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 39-22 UNDER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 138-99 UNDER (+29.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 135-104 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 217-169 UNDER (+31.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.0, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 99-67 UNDER (+25.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 130-95 UNDER (+25.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 141-93 UNDER (+38.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 188-145 UNDER (+28.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.8, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in August or September games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.6, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.1, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) off a no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.4, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-16 against the 1rst half line (-10.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.9, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-14 against the 1rst half line (-11.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.6, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 56-81 against the 1rst half line (-33.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 40-61 against the 1rst half line (-27.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-19 against the 1rst half line (-11.9 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 51-25 against the 1rst half line (+23.5 Units) in home games when playing with 3 or more days rest since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.6, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 60-31 against the 1rst half line (+25.9 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 98-69 against the 1rst half line (+22.1 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.6, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 106-76 against the 1rst half line (+22.4 Units) in home games after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.6, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 44-28 OVER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.5, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 36-22 OVER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 36-22 OVER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 32-19 OVER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 46.1, OPPONENT 44.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.1, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-8 OVER (+6.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.5, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 27-11 OVER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-6 OVER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 46.0, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 48.4, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 49.4, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.0, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 35-20 OVER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 31-17 OVER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 20-9 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.8, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.9, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.3, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.5, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-8 OVER (+6.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.7, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-4 OVER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.3, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.7, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.8, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.7, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 33-19 OVER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.4, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.8, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.4, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.6, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.6, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-11 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.7, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.6, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-6 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.7, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 15-5 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 46.3, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.4, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-6 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 45.7, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 21-11 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.7, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.8, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.6, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-8 OVER (+6.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 165 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.0, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.7, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 OVER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.2, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 33-20 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.7, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 25-15 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.6, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 387-322 UNDER (+32.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 264-216 UNDER (+26.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.7, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-4 UNDER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.0, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.5, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 166-129 UNDER (+24.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-12 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-9 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 259-209 UNDER (+29.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 121-88 UNDER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 202-156 UNDER (+30.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 19-16 | -3.8 | 17-17 | 24-11 | 86.8 | 44.6 | 46.5% | 43.8 | 85.9 | 42.3 | 43.6% | 41.9 | | Road Games | 7-10 | -6.8 | 9-7 | 11-6 | 84.4 | 44.9 | 45.5% | 43.1 | 87.3 | 42.3 | 44.0% | 42.5 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +4.2 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 93.8 | 44.8 | 50.4% | 44.2 | 87.4 | 42.4 | 42.3% | 45.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 86.8 | 44.6 | 34-72 | 46.5% | 4-11 | 37.0% | 16-19 | 82.9% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 11 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.8 | 40.7 | 30-67 | 44.3% | 5-16 | 33.4% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 84.4 | 44.9 | 33-71 | 45.5% | 5-12 | 38.7% | 15-18 | 84.0% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 85.9 | 42.3 | 30-69 | 43.6% | 7-19 | 35.2% | 19-24 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.7 | 40.4 | 29-67 | 43.9% | 6-17 | 33.4% | 17-22 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 87.3 | 42.3 | 31-70 | 44.0% | 8-21 | 36.6% | 18-23 | 79.2% | 42 | 10 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 26-8 | +2.5 | 15-19 | 18-16 | 83.0 | 40.0 | 48.7% | 38.3 | 75.9 | 37.8 | 43.3% | 39.9 | | Home Games | 14-3 | +4.8 | 6-11 | 9-8 | 84.1 | 40.6 | 49.7% | 36.4 | 76.2 | 37.6 | 44.1% | 39.6 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -5 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 75.2 | 35.0 | 44.3% | 34.8 | 78.2 | 40.6 | 45.1% | 41.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 83.0 | 40.0 | 31-64 | 48.7% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 38 | 7 | 20 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.6 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 5-16 | 33.9% | 17-22 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 84.1 | 40.6 | 32-64 | 49.7% | 5-15 | 35.9% | 15-19 | 77.9% | 36 | 7 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.9 | 37.8 | 29-66 | 43.3% | 5-17 | 30.5% | 13-17 | 77.9% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.7 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 43.7% | 5-16 | 33.2% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.2 | 37.6 | 29-65 | 44.1% | 5-16 | 31.1% | 14-17 | 80.8% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 71.1, LOS ANGELES 71.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/26/2016 | ATLANTA | 90-82 | 44-44 | -2.5 | L | 82.5 | O | 32-79 | 40.5% | 50 | 7 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 41 | 12 | | 8/28/2016 | @ DALLAS | 92-85 | 50-37 | 1 | W | 85 | O | 36-73 | 49.3% | 42 | 9 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 44 | 12 | | 9/2/2016 | SEATTLE | 92-88 | 55-43 | -4 | W | 81.5 | O | 37-78 | 47.4% | 45 | 5 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 45 | 8 | | 9/4/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 97-73 | 51-47 | -6.5 | L | 79 | O | 34-65 | 52.3% | 46 | 9 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 32 | 8 | | 9/7/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 81-118 | 39-56 | -2 | L | 83.5 | O | 32-84 | 38.1% | 40 | 9 | 45-74 | 60.8% | 47 | 9 | | 9/9/2016 | @ INDIANA | 88-95 | 44-52 | 3.5 | L | 82.5 | O | 31-73 | 42.5% | 40 | 11 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 45 | 17 | | 9/11/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 96-86 | 43-47 | 2 | L | 85 | O | 33-66 | 50.0% | 46 | 12 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 47 | 12 | | 9/13/2016 | MINNESOTA | 98-97 | 41-39 | 3 | W | 84 | U | 35-68 | 51.5% | 41 | 17 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 44 | 15 | | 9/16/2016 | NEW YORK | 92-68 | 50-37 | -2.5 | W | 85 | O | 39-83 | 47.0% | 51 | 8 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 45 | 18 | | 9/18/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 75-88 | 34-39 | 3 | L | 84 | U | 33-68 | 48.5% | 36 | 16 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 43 | 12 | | 9/25/2016 | ATLANTA | 108-98 | 56-50 | -1 | W | 85 | O | 44-80 | 55.0% | 47 | 11 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 47 | 12 | | 9/28/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/26/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 72-79 | 28-31 | -5 | L | 80 | U | 30-66 | 45.5% | 41 | 17 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 40 | 12 | | 8/28/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 66-70 | 30-32 | -2 | L | 82 | U | 28-57 | 49.1% | 43 | 21 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 40 | 16 | | 9/1/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 70-61 | 34-36 | -8 | L | 75 | U | 25-57 | 43.9% | 39 | 14 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 36 | 12 | | 9/2/2016 | @ DALLAS | 87-79 | 43-41 | -3.5 | L | 81.5 | O | 30-63 | 47.6% | 42 | 10 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 45 | 11 | | 9/4/2016 | INDIANA | 88-81 | 46-41 | -5 | T | 79 | O | 31-54 | 57.4% | 38 | 9 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 30 | 8 | | 9/6/2016 | MINNESOTA | 74-77 | 37-42 | 0 | L | 78.5 | O | 25-61 | 41.0% | 37 | 8 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 42 | 11 | | 9/8/2016 | ATLANTA | 81-86 | 36-41 | -5 | L | 80.5 | U | 32-71 | 45.1% | 36 | 9 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 47 | 12 | | 9/11/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 60-78 | 27-49 | -1.5 | L | 79 | U | 23-61 | 37.7% | 27 | 13 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 47 | 16 | | 9/13/2016 | PHOENIX | 90-85 | 39-47 | -1.5 | L | 80 | O | 34-71 | 47.9% | 38 | 4 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 43 | 11 | | 9/16/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 71-65 | 36-24 | -6.5 | W | 75 | U | 27-54 | 50.0% | 36 | 22 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 27 | 14 | | 9/28/2016 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2016 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 15-8 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997 | | 13 of 22 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 6-1 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 4 of 7 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 7-4 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997 | | 7 of 11 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 2-1 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 3 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/13/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | -5 | SU ATS | 44 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 44 | 2 | 12 | | | CHICAGO | 67 | 169 | Under | 35 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 4-6 | 66.7% | 32 | 10 | 5 | 6/14/2016 | CHICAGO | 85 | 168.5 | Over | 37 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 36 | 11 | 9 | | | LOS ANGELES | 98 | -8 | SU ATS | 46 | 39-67 | 58.2% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 31 | 7 | 6 | 5/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 93 | -3 | SU ATS | 53 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 26-32 | 81.2% | 37 | 6 | 8 | | | CHICAGO | 80 | 165.5 | Over | 35 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 1-8 | 12.5% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 40 | 7 | 15 | 8/16/2015 | CHICAGO | 64 | 162 | Under | 35 | 23-71 | 32.4% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 49 | 14 | 9 | | | LOS ANGELES | 76 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 41 | 4 | 11 | 7/31/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 88 | 163 | SU ATS | 39 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 21-25 | 84.0% | 42 | 7 | 6 | | | CHICAGO | 77 | -5 | Over | 39 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 37 | 8 | 9 |
|
| | |
|
Chatman is 47-35 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 15-31 against the 1rst half line (-19.1 Units) off a no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.0, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 11-27 against the 1rst half line (-18.7 Units) off a home no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.6, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 26-50 against the 1rst half line (-29.0 Units) after a win by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.1, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 12-25 against the 1rst half line (-15.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.6, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Chatman is 97-118 against the 1rst half line (-32.8 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 35-58 against the 1rst half line (-28.8 Units) in August or September games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 55-76 against the 1rst half line (-28.6 Units) after a division game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 31-45 against the 1rst half line (-18.5 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 63-79 against the 1rst half line (-23.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 10-24 against the 1rst half line (-16.4 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 23-36 against the 1rst half line (-16.6 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 26-43 against the 1rst half line (-21.3 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 45-64 against the 1rst half line (-25.4 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 40-54 against the 1rst half line (-19.4 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 33-45 against the 1rst half line (-16.5 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 53-72 against the 1rst half line (-26.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 56-76 against the 1rst half line (-27.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 33-52 against the 1rst half line (-24.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 21-34 against the 1rst half line (-16.4 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 34-47 against the 1rst half line (-17.7 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.7, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 53-70 against the 1rst half line (-24.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 37-60 against the 1rst half line (-29.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 29-46 against the 1rst half line (-21.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.7, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 56-73 against the 1rst half line (-24.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 36-48 against the 1rst half line (-16.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 23-34 against the 1rst half line (-14.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.2, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 43-55 against the 1rst half line (-17.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 51-65 against the 1rst half line (-20.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 44-57 against the 1rst half line (-18.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 39-55 against the 1rst half line (-21.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 24-35 against the 1rst half line (-14.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 30-42 against the 1rst half line (-16.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 47-60 against the 1rst half line (-19.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 28-41 against the 1rst half line (-17.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 47-68 against the 1rst half line (-27.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 77-96 against the 1rst half line (-28.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 34-54 against the 1rst half line (-25.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 52-75 against the 1rst half line (-30.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 47-70 against the 1rst half line (-30.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 74-98 against the 1rst half line (-33.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 15-27 against the 1rst half line (-14.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.5, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 22-35 against the 1rst half line (-16.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.0, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 42-54 against the 1rst half line (-17.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 29-42 against the 1rst half line (-17.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 51-32 against the 1rst half line (+15.8 Units) in home games in August or September games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 37.8, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 45-23 against the 1rst half line (+19.7 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 38.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 49-30 against the 1rst half line (+16.0 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 37.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Chatman is 123-94 OVER (+19.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 66-44 OVER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 66-44 OVER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 49-29 OVER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 55-39 OVER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 85-59 OVER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 70-55 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 68-45 OVER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 48-29 OVER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 37-23 OVER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 44-27 OVER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 26-14 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 of their last 5 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.5, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games revenging a home loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 61-48 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 55-38 OVER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 43-31 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 23-12 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 25-15 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total off an home win scoring 85 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 42-23 OVER (+16.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 74-52 OVER (+16.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 74-58 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 24-13 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.9, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 57-40 OVER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 51-31 OVER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.7, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 76-48 OVER (+23.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 63-35 OVER (+24.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 51-26 OVER (+22.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.7, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 40-20 OVER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.7, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 51-38 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 77-55 OVER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 54-32 OVER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 38-20 OVER (+16.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.2, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 28-12 OVER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 23-8 OVER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.9, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 60-38 OVER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 27-11 OVER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.1, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 72-44 OVER (+23.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 42-25 OVER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.2, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 27-14 OVER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.0, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 72-52 OVER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 51-35 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 60-44 OVER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 58-44 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 66-43 OVER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 57-40 OVER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 43-31 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 64-44 OVER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 25-15 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 58-44 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 66-51 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 98-77 OVER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 66-53 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 73-55 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 67-52 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 99-75 OVER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 53-38 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 62-48 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 88-72 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 55-43 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 83-60 OVER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 60-45 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.9, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 57-42 OVER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games off a home no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 39.9, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Agler is 274-158 UNDER (+100.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.7, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 142-88 UNDER (+45.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.7, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 106-67 UNDER (+32.3 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 37.0, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 133-84 UNDER (+40.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.2, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 100-64 UNDER (+29.6 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 37.7, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 97-60 UNDER (+31.0 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.3, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 25-12 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total on Wednesday in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 32.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 65-30 UNDER (+32.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing with 3 or more days rest in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 100-57 UNDER (+37.3 Units) the 1rst half total against Eastern conference opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.1, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 27-12 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 113-62 UNDER (+44.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.2, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 66-44 UNDER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.6, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 19-7 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 134-91 UNDER (+33.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.2, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 42-22 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 45-26 UNDER (+16.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.5, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 35-11 UNDER (+22.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 33.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 19-6 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 32.5, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 13-2 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 30.9, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 120-69 UNDER (+44.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.7, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 58-32 UNDER (+22.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.2, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 100-57 UNDER (+37.3 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.1, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 22-12 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 20-9 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 63-38 UNDER (+21.2 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.3, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 65-43 UNDER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.8, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 87-53 UNDER (+28.7 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 82-58 UNDER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 88-60 UNDER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 145-84 UNDER (+52.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 80-52 UNDER (+22.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 37.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 49-30 UNDER (+16.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 37.3, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 107-64 UNDER (+36.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.4, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 50-18 UNDER (+30.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.2, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 131-81 UNDER (+41.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.0, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 71-33 UNDER (+34.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive home games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 139-77 UNDER (+54.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.7, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 136-92 UNDER (+34.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.1, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 121-70 UNDER (+44.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 66-43 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 38-21 UNDER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.6, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 125-83 UNDER (+33.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.7, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 93-62 UNDER (+24.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.2, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 113-82 UNDER (+22.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.4, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 169-116 UNDER (+41.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 125-83 UNDER (+33.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 38-22 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 56-32 UNDER (+20.8 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 37.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 93-59 UNDER (+28.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.8, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 142-86 UNDER (+47.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.3, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 137-83 UNDER (+45.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 211-118 UNDER (+81.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.6, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 88-63 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 70-47 UNDER (+18.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.4, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 103-73 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.4, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 110-81 UNDER (+20.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.4, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 167-107 UNDER (+49.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 99-69 UNDER (+23.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 37.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 109-76 UNDER (+25.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.9, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 158-104 UNDER (+43.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 112-78 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 91-60 UNDER (+25.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.9, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 36 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 34 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 8 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 6 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 6 games went under the first half total, while 4 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 3 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 2 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 2 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 2 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 0 times. | | Since 1997, 3 games went under the first half total, while 1 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [G] 09/14/2016 - Elena Delle Donne out indefinitely ( Thumb ) | | [G] 06/08/2016 - Betnijah Laney out for season ( Knee ) | |
| [F] 09/23/2016 - Candace Parker injured last game, probable Wednesday vs. Chicago Sky ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/5/2024 6:15:13 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|