| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
First Half Results
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
81.5
| 38
Final
36 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 655 | CONNECTICUT | 81 | | 656 | LOS ANGELES | -9 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game, on Sunday games.
(43-17 since 1997.) (71.7%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points.
(251-178 since 1997.) (58.5%, +55.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - in non-conference games, off an road win where they scored 85 or more points.
(44-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(80-44 since 1997.) (64.5%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - in non-conference games, off an road win where they scored 85 or more points.
(27-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.1%, +18.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points.
(116-75 since 1997.) (60.7%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points.
(134-90 since 1997.) (59.8%, +35 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(77-51 since 1997.) (60.2%, +20.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(76-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in June games.
(44-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +18.7 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (LOS ANGELES) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in June games.
(38-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +16 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning record on the season, in June games.
(41-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +22.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(805-624 since 1997.) (56.3%, +118.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in May, June, or July games.
(501-371 since 1997.) (57.5%, +92.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after a non-conference game.
(658-505 since 1997.) (56.6%, +102.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(123-77 since 1997.) (61.5%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win, in May, June, or July games.
(238-164 since 1997.) (59.2%, +57.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games.
(63-34 since 1997.) (64.9%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game.
(401-298 since 1997.) (57.4%, +73.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 consecutive division games against opponent after a non-conference game.
(256-183 since 1997.) (58.3%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(490-364 since 1997.) (57.4%, +89.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 72 | | 36 | | 28-68 | 40.8% | 5-18 | 26.6% | 11-16 | 71.1% | 39 | 11 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 92 | | 46 | | 35-66 | 52.4% | 7-16 | 41.5% | 16-22 | 75.8% | 44 | 10 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES covered the first half line 554 times, while CONNECTICUT covered the first half line 413 times.
Edge against first half line=LOS ANGELES | In 1000 simulated games, 534 games went over first half total, while 432 games went under first half total.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in road games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.6, OPPONENT 35.0 | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.8, OPPONENT 35.5 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 17-5 against the 1rst half line (+11.5 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.5, OPPONENT 35.3 | LOS ANGELES is 20-8 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.0, OPPONENT 36.9 | LOS ANGELES is 57-37 against the 1rst half line (+16.3 Units) in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.9, OPPONENT 33.7 | LOS ANGELES is 53-27 against the 1rst half line (+23.3 Units) in home games when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.9, OPPONENT 34.1 | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 45.8, OPPONENT 33.6 | LOS ANGELES is 7-0 against the 1rst half line (+7.0 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 47.4, OPPONENT 33.6 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.7, OPPONENT 45.7 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 71-46 UNDER (+20.4 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 33.6 | LOS ANGELES is 78-55 UNDER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 33.8 | LOS ANGELES is 91-66 UNDER (+18.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.1, OPPONENT 35.3 | LOS ANGELES is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.0, OPPONENT 35.5 |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | | | | LOS ANGELES | -11 |  |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.2, OPPONENT 45.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-10 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.5, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 50-31 against the 1rst half line (+15.9 Units) in home games versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.9, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.5, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.6, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 75-49 UNDER (+21.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.1, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.4, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-8 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-14 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.2, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 295-246 UNDER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.2, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.7, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 180-134 UNDER (+32.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 7-0 against the 1rst half line (+7.0 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.1, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.7, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.1, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-7 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.5, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 54-79 against the 1rst half line (-32.9 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.2, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) off an road win where they scored 85 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.8, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) in June games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-37 against the 1rst half line (-19.7 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.9, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.8, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.3, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.9, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.2, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.8, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.8, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.0, OPPONENT 47.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-11 against the 1rst half line (-11.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.6, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 49-80 against the 1rst half line (-39.0 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.3, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.8, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-17 against the 1rst half line (-10.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.4, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.8, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 55-82 against the 1rst half line (-35.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.8, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 60-89 against the 1rst half line (-37.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.2, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 74-105 against the 1rst half line (-41.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.9, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-50 against the 1rst half line (-24.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.4, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 166-131 against the 1rst half line (+21.9 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.7, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-0 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) in home games on Sunday games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.1, OPPONENT 32.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-10 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 98-66 against the 1rst half line (+25.4 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.6, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.8, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-5 against the 1rst half line (+7.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 30-18 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.8, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-9 OVER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.4, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total on Sunday games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.3, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.3, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-7 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.8, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-8 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-10 OVER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.6, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 44-27 OVER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.1, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-15 OVER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.3, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-5 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.2, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-10 OVER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.3, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.4, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.3, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 7.5 to 10 points vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.2, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-7 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 7.5 or more points vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 41.7, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 31-19 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 254-206 UNDER (+27.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.7, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-9 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 161-123 UNDER (+25.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 187-137 UNDER (+36.3 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.5, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 90-59 UNDER (+25.1 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.6, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 142-104 UNDER (+27.6 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.2, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 78-54 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 of their last 5 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.2, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 119-82 UNDER (+28.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 103-61 UNDER (+35.9 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.3, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 76-49 UNDER (+22.1 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.0, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 64-41 UNDER (+18.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.0, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 97-70 UNDER (+20.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.1, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 179-130 UNDER (+36.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 118-83 UNDER (+26.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.9, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 144-106 UNDER (+27.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.1, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 187-137 UNDER (+36.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 3-11 | -9.2 | 6-7 | 8-6 | 80.8 | 37.9 | 42.4% | 43.8 | 87.9 | 42.4 | 47.9% | 42.7 | | Road Games | 1-5 | -4 | 3-3 | 4-2 | 80.2 | 37.5 | 42.3% | 42.0 | 90.7 | 43.7 | 49.1% | 43.7 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3 | 1-3 | 4-1 | 87.8 | 40.2 | 45.1% | 43.4 | 94.0 | 46.4 | 50.8% | 40.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.8 | 37.9 | 30-72 | 42.4% | 5-19 | 29.0% | 14-21 | 70.5% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.7 | 40.9 | 30-69 | 43.6% | 5-16 | 32.8% | 18-22 | 79.2% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.2 | 37.5 | 30-72 | 42.3% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 13-20 | 67.8% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 25 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 87.9 | 42.4 | 31-65 | 47.9% | 6-16 | 36.3% | 20-25 | 79.3% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.4 | 40.1 | 29-66 | 43.8% | 5-16 | 32.3% | 18-23 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 90.7 | 43.7 | 32-65 | 49.1% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 22-27 | 81.6% | 44 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 12-1 | +10.2 | 9-4 | 7-6 | 86.1 | 42.6 | 49.2% | 38.0 | 71.8 | 34.1 | 41.7% | 42.4 | | Home Games | 5-1 | +2.4 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 84.7 | 43.7 | 50.0% | 35.3 | 72.0 | 34.3 | 42.2% | 41.7 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.2 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 87.0 | 42.6 | 50.8% | 35.6 | 75.4 | 35.8 | 43.1% | 40.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 86.1 | 42.6 | 32-66 | 49.2% | 7-17 | 39.5% | 15-19 | 77.3% | 38 | 7 | 21 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.1 | 40.9 | 29-68 | 43.2% | 5-17 | 32.1% | 18-23 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 84.7 | 43.7 | 32-65 | 50.0% | 6-16 | 37.1% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 35 | 7 | 20 | 18 | 9 | 11 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.8 | 34.1 | 27-64 | 41.7% | 4-15 | 25.6% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 42 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.4 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 5-15 | 33.1% | 17-22 | 79.6% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.0 | 34.3 | 26-62 | 42.2% | 3-15 | 22.5% | 16-20 | 81.4% | 42 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.7, LOS ANGELES 71.5 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/19/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 72-68 | 39-36 | -2 | W | 74.5 | O | 28-67 | 41.8% | 41 | 11 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 44 | 15 | | 5/21/2016 | WASHINGTON | 76-84 | 37-32 | -3 | W | 76.5 | U | 27-78 | 34.6% | 53 | 16 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 48 | 20 | | 5/26/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 72-77 | 43-41 | 6.5 | W | 78 | O | 26-70 | 37.1% | 44 | 12 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 44 | 17 | | 5/28/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 81-93 | 37-39 | 3 | W | 75 | O | 30-69 | 43.5% | 31 | 13 | 32-57 | 56.1% | 44 | 18 | | 5/31/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 90-99 | 46-40 | 7 | W | 81.5 | O | 34-67 | 50.7% | 48 | 19 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 35 | 4 | | 6/3/2016 | ATLANTA | 77-83 | 39-43 | 4 | T | 82.5 | U | 29-73 | 39.7% | 50 | 18 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 47 | 16 | | 6/5/2016 | INDIANA | 77-88 | 35-47 | 3 | L | 81.5 | O | 32-66 | 48.5% | 40 | 16 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 38 | 13 | | 6/10/2016 | SEATTLE | 77-76 | 28-38 | 1.5 | L | 80 | U | 27-69 | 39.1% | 46 | 12 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 40 | 12 | | 6/12/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 87-93 | 41-46 | 4.5 | L | 83 | O | 34-71 | 47.9% | 43 | 11 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 46 | 13 | | 6/14/2016 | WASHINGTON | 106-109 | 42-44 | 1.5 | L | 80.5 | O | 39-86 | 45.3% | 55 | 19 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 18 | | 6/16/2016 | NEW YORK | 72-80 | 36-41 | 4 | L | 80 | U | 28-60 | 46.7% | 30 | 16 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 45 | 17 | | 6/19/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 93-90 | 45-45 | -2.5 | L | 75.5 | O | 36-73 | 49.3% | 43 | 10 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 32 | 13 | | 6/24/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 81-98 | 37-56 | 4.5 | L | 82 | O | 32-85 | 37.6% | 46 | 12 | 35-57 | 61.4% | 38 | 15 | | 6/26/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2016 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2016 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2016 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/20/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 97-67 | 43-31 | -4 | W | 78 | U | 37-66 | 56.1% | 36 | 11 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 41 | 21 | | 5/21/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 79-72 | 34-34 | -1 | L | 78 | U | 31-88 | 35.2% | 57 | 11 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 61 | 15 | | 5/24/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 93-80 | 53-35 | -1.5 | W | 82 | O | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 8 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 40 | 15 | | 5/26/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 77-72 | 41-43 | -6.5 | L | 78 | O | 29-57 | 50.9% | 44 | 17 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 44 | 12 | | 6/2/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 68-61 | 35-31 | -9.5 | L | 74.5 | U | 23-53 | 43.4% | 39 | 15 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 43 | 13 | | 6/4/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-61 | 33-26 | -6 | W | 72.5 | U | 27-58 | 46.6% | 36 | 8 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 43 | 8 | | 6/7/2016 | NEW YORK | 100-77 | 51-38 | -4 | W | 74.5 | O | 41-74 | 55.4% | 41 | 9 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 37 | 17 | | 6/11/2016 | @ DALLAS | 97-73 | 50-32 | -5 | W | 81 | O | 38-65 | 58.5% | 35 | 19 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 34 | 21 | | 6/14/2016 | CHICAGO | 98-85 | 46-37 | -4.5 | W | 83.5 | U | 39-67 | 58.2% | 31 | 6 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 36 | 9 | | 6/17/2016 | PHOENIX | 77-71 | 40-36 | -6 | L | 83.5 | U | 31-68 | 45.6% | 36 | 8 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 44 | 15 | | 6/21/2016 | MINNESOTA | 69-72 | 39-38 | -1.5 | L | 80.5 | U | 24-60 | 40.0% | 39 | 17 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 51 | 14 | | 6/24/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 94-76 | 38-36 | 3 | W | 77.5 | U | 34-67 | 50.7% | 37 | 14 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 38 | 18 | | 6/26/2016 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2016 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2016 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 21-12 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997 | | 21 of 32 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 3-2 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 12-5 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997 | | 10 of 16 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 1-1 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
5/26/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | -11 | SU Under | 41 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 15-23 | 65.2% | 44 | 5 | 17 | | | CONNECTICUT | 72 | 157.5 | ATS | 43 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 4-19 | 21.1% | 16-24 | 66.7% | 44 | 9 | 12 | 6/26/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 76 | 142 | ATS | 32 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 44 | 8 | 19 | | | CONNECTICUT | 80 | -7 | SU Over | 26 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 3-16 | 18.7% | 25-32 | 78.1% | 50 | 15 | 12 | 6/21/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 76 | -4 | SU ATS | 30 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 40 | 5 | 8 | | | LOS ANGELES | 68 | 135.5 | Over | 40 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 37 | 7 | 16 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 25-42 against the 1rst half line (-21.2 Units) off an upset win as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 32.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 17-35 against the 1rst half line (-21.5 Units) off an upset win as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 32.1, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Miller is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) in June games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.3, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.2, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.7, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.2, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.2, OPPONENT 45.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 8-0 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) in home games on Sunday games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 43.1, OPPONENT 32.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 20-10 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) after a division game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 40.8, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 36-20 against the 1rst half line (+14.0 Units) in home games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 38.2, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 17-6 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) in home games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 41.0, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 64-43 against the 1rst half line (+16.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.0, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 13-5 against the 1rst half line (+7.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 79-54 against the 1rst half line (+19.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 56-33 against the 1rst half line (+19.7 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 38.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 78-55 against the 1rst half line (+17.5 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 38.4, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 20-10 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.5, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Agler is 31-19 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 132-78 UNDER (+46.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.5, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 101-61 UNDER (+33.9 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.8, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 128-78 UNDER (+42.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.1, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 95-58 UNDER (+31.2 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 37.6, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 82-37 UNDER (+41.3 Units) the 1rst half total in June games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.6, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 172-91 UNDER (+71.9 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.1, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 50-31 UNDER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total on Sunday games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.2, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 95-50 UNDER (+40.0 Units) the 1rst half total against Eastern conference opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.6, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 21-9 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 110-60 UNDER (+44.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.1, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 65-42 UNDER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.4, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 129-85 UNDER (+35.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 137-86 UNDER (+42.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.1, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 41-21 UNDER (+17.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 115-63 UNDER (+45.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.5, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 95-50 UNDER (+40.0 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.6, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 43-26 UNDER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.4, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 122-53 UNDER (+63.7 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.6, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 85-50 UNDER (+30.0 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.6, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 59-34 UNDER (+21.6 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.5, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 63-28 UNDER (+32.2 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 76-40 UNDER (+32.0 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 36-19 UNDER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 of their last 5 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.2, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 52-25 UNDER (+24.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.1, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 22-10 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.1, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 53-26 UNDER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 33.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 99-51 UNDER (+42.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.5, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 35-16 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a blowout win by 15 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.8, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 102-61 UNDER (+34.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.0, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 67-40 UNDER (+23.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 74-36 UNDER (+34.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.0, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 119-66 UNDER (+46.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 33.2, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 95-49 UNDER (+41.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 33.1, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 130-62 UNDER (+61.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.0, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 123-72 UNDER (+43.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.5, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 130-84 UNDER (+37.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 50-19 UNDER (+29.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.0, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 28-14 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.9, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 121-60 UNDER (+55.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.0, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 105-68 UNDER (+30.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 24-14 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.2, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 29-15 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total vs. poor free throw shooting teams - making <=71% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 33.0, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 136-82 UNDER (+45.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.2, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 204-111 UNDER (+81.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.4, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 67-39 UNDER (+24.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.8, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 57-26 UNDER (+28.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 34.6, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 99-65 UNDER (+27.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.0, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 39.2, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.7, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 64-26 UNDER (+35.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.0, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 150-93 UNDER (+47.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 35.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 104-67 UNDER (+30.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 36.6, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
| |
|
| Since 1997, 8 games went over the first half total, while 8 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 3 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 1 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 0 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 0 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 0 times. | | Since 1997, 1 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 0 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/2/2024 4:28:49 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|