| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
LAS VEGAS |
|
|
160.5
| 75
Final
83 |
|
|
| | |
|
| WNBA Playoffs - Semifinals - Best of 5 - Bradenton, FL | | |  | |
| 617 | CONNECTICUT | +180 | | 618 | LAS VEGAS | -220 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games.
(189-53 since 1997.) (78.1%, +65.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(202-81 since 1997.) (71.4%, +63.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(134-47 since 1997.) (74%, +51.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(62-11 since 1997.) (84.9%, +45.2 units. Rating = 5*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in the conference finals.
(89-29 since 1997.) (75.4%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - as a # 1 seed in the playoffs, in the conference finals.
(53-9 since 1997.) (85.5%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(73-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.8%, +27.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a double digit win as a underdog of 6 points or more.
(29-9 since 1997.) (76.3%, +25.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(20-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +16.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(32-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +19 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(25-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(71-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +35.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(32-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +19 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(118-67 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.8%, +44.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(84-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(110-45 since 1997.) (71%, +50.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - being called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents on the season, in August or September games.
(53-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (51%, +20.9 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 78 | | 28-68 | 42.0% | 6-20 | 31.4% | 15-18 | 79.7% | 43 | 9 | 14 | | LAS VEGAS | 83 | | 32-70 | 44.9% | 5-17 | 30.3% | 15-19 | 78.5% | 45 | 10 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LAS VEGAS won the game straight up 640 times, while CONNECTICUT won 340 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 13-8 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 76.6 | CONNECTICUT is 93-53 against the money line (+29.1 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 23-8 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 77.6 | CONNECTICUT is 83-48 against the money line (+32.2 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 22-10 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 76.3 | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 70.7 | CONNECTICUT is 62-40 against the money line (+22.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 78.0 | CONNECTICUT is 32-10 against the money line (+25.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 79.3 | LAS VEGAS is 16-15 against the money line (-20.1 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.1, OPPONENT 82.6 | LAS VEGAS is 5-7 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 81.9, OPPONENT 81.6 | LAS VEGAS is 4-9 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in road games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.6, OPPONENT 87.0 | LAS VEGAS is 5-6 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.9, OPPONENT 80.7 | LAS VEGAS is 17-18 against the money line (-26.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.3, OPPONENT 87.3 | LAS VEGAS is 95-142 against the money line (-53.2 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 74.8, OPPONENT 77.7 | LAS VEGAS is 3-5 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 81.7, OPPONENT 82.9 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 9-16 against the money line (-25.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 83.4 | CONNECTICUT is 44-68 against the money line (-55.9 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 80.8 | CONNECTICUT is 17-18 against the money line (-19.5 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 80.6 | CONNECTICUT is 2-11 against the money line (-9.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 88.6 | CONNECTICUT is 5-17 against the money line (-14.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 93.3 | CONNECTICUT is 4-15 against the money line (-14.9 Units) in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 86.7 | CONNECTICUT is 10-18 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 86.0 | CONNECTICUT is 2-8 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 82.9 | LAS VEGAS is 13-4 against the money line (+14.1 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.6, OPPONENT 81.1 | LAS VEGAS is 21-8 against the money line (+13.6 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.2, OPPONENT 80.8 | LAS VEGAS is 32-31 against the money line (+21.7 Units) in road games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.4, OPPONENT 78.8 | LAS VEGAS is 46-22 against the money line (+25.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.9, OPPONENT 82.7 | LAS VEGAS is 28-9 against the money line (+13.2 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 90.9, OPPONENT 81.8 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 14-8 against the money line (+9.1 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-10 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-11 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-30 against the money line (+19.9 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-11 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-10 against the money line (+14.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-6 against the money line (+9.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-8 against the money line (+11.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-11 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-9 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+6.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-11 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-9 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-6 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-11 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-9 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-7 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-6 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 131-104 against the money line (+25.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 9-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 9-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 51-100 against the money line (-52.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 9-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 9-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 72-100 against the money line (-41.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 106-143 against the money line (-46.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 9-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 7-11 against the money line (-12.0 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.4, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LAS VEGAS is 38-25 against the money line (+15.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.7, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 42-23 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 44-28 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 41-30 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.4, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 11-2 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 13-9 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in August or September games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) on Tuesday over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 217-162 against the money line (+24.7 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-9 against the money line (+6.7 Units) after 3 consecutive division games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in the 2nd game of a playoff series since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.1, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+12.0 Units) off 2 or more consecutive upset wins as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 51-24 against the money line (+18.3 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.7, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-8 against the money line (+6.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-6 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-6 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-6 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-6 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 45-49 against the money line (+20.5 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 100-64 against the money line (+35.4 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 55-30 against the money line (+19.7 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-14 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 257-346 against the money line (-92.3 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 138-88 against the money line (-55.4 Units) as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 91-135 against the money line (-60.4 Units) in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 151-216 against the money line (-72.1 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 7-11 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.3, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 9-11 against the money line (-21.2 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.2, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LAS VEGAS is 134-199 against the money line (-80.6 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 74.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 43-75 against the money line (-30.5 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 74.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 3-8 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in the 2nd game of a playoff series since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.2, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 8-13 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 5-17 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 69.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 1-11 against the money line (-12.0 Units) in road games off an upset loss by 15 points or more as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 65.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 4*) | LAS VEGAS is 13-35 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after a blowout loss by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 71.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 6-12 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-7 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LAS VEGAS is 24-9 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.2, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 27-13 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 18-6 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 11-4 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.2, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 13-5 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games after having won 4 of their last 5 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 6-1 against the money line (+8.7 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 22-13 against the money line (+13.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.2, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 21-12 against the money line (+13.1 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.6, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 12-5 against the money line (+13.7 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LAS VEGAS is 12-3 against the money line (+11.1 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite of 6 or more since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 13-7 against the money line (+10.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.3, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 34-23 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.7, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 12-1 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 27-15 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 27-16 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 25-15 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.1, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 13-12 | +3.3 | 13-12 | 10-14 | 80.9 | 39.4 | 42.8% | 44.2 | 78.4 | 37.1 | 43.7% | 39.8 | | Road Games | 13-12 | +3.3 | 13-12 | 10-14 | 80.9 | 39.4 | 42.8% | 44.2 | 78.4 | 37.1 | 43.7% | 39.8 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.6 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 84.8 | 36.6 | 42.3% | 48.2 | 76.8 | 34.6 | 40.1% | 40.8 | | Division Games | 13-12 | +3.3 | 13-12 | 10-14 | 80.9 | 39.4 | 42.8% | 44.2 | 78.4 | 37.1 | 43.7% | 39.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.9 | 39.4 | 30-70 | 42.8% | 6-19 | 32.1% | 15-20 | 77.2% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 19 | 9 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83.2 | 41.7 | 31-69 | 44.6% | 7-21 | 34.9% | 15-18 | 80.5% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.9 | 39.4 | 30-70 | 42.8% | 6-19 | 32.1% | 15-20 | 77.2% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 19 | 9 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.4 | 37.1 | 28-65 | 43.7% | 6-20 | 31.8% | 15-19 | 82.4% | 40 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 83.4 | 41.8 | 31-68 | 45.1% | 7-21 | 35.0% | 15-18 | 81.2% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.4 | 37.1 | 28-65 | 43.7% | 6-20 | 31.8% | 15-19 | 82.4% | 40 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 18-5 | +4.2 | 12-9 | 11-12 | 87.6 | 45.4 | 47.1% | 44.6 | 80.4 | 41.2 | 43.4% | 39.1 | | Road Games | 18-5 | +4.2 | 12-9 | 11-12 | 87.6 | 45.4 | 47.1% | 44.6 | 80.4 | 41.2 | 43.4% | 39.1 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +0.5 | 2-2 | 3-2 | 85.6 | 45.6 | 44.9% | 46.4 | 83.2 | 42.0 | 44.5% | 37.6 | | Division Games | 18-5 | +4.2 | 12-9 | 11-12 | 87.6 | 45.4 | 47.1% | 44.6 | 80.4 | 41.2 | 43.4% | 39.1 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 87.6 | 45.4 | 32-69 | 47.1% | 4-12 | 36.0% | 19-23 | 81.6% | 45 | 8 | 20 | 15 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83 | 41.3 | 30-68 | 44.7% | 7-21 | 34.9% | 15-19 | 81.1% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 87.6 | 45.4 | 32-69 | 47.1% | 4-12 | 36.0% | 19-23 | 81.6% | 45 | 8 | 20 | 15 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.4 | 41.2 | 31-71 | 43.4% | 8-24 | 31.5% | 11-14 | 78.4% | 39 | 8 | 19 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.4 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 8-22 | 34.5% | 15-18 | 80.6% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.4 | 41.2 | 31-71 | 43.4% | 8-24 | 31.5% | 11-14 | 78.4% | 39 | 8 | 19 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 71.4, LAS VEGAS 71.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/14/2020 | *CHICAGO | 77-74 | W | +200 | 29-76 | 38.2% | 53 | 8 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 40 | 15 | | 8/16/2020 | *SEATTLE | 72-95 | L | +375 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 49 | 11 | 37-65 | 56.9% | 36 | 11 | | 8/18/2020 | *INDIANA | 84-62 | W | -210 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 45 | 11 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 39 | 15 | | 8/20/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 78-99 | L | +220 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 30 | 16 | 36-64 | 56.2% | 43 | 15 | | 8/22/2020 | *NEW YORK | 82-65 | W | -850 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 42 | 9 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 39 | 18 | | 8/28/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | 76-80 | L | +175 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 35 | 23 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 32 | 17 | | 8/30/2020 | *WASHINGTON | 76-63 | W | -200 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 44 | 13 | 19-59 | 32.2% | 39 | 16 | | 9/1/2020 | *NEW YORK | 70-65 | W | -750 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 48 | 12 | 19-55 | 34.5% | 44 | 18 | | 9/3/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 78-93 | L | +200 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 47 | 21 | 38-73 | 52.1% | 29 | 10 | | 9/5/2020 | *INDIANA | 96-77 | W | -270 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 37 | 6 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 34 | 19 | | 9/7/2020 | *PHOENIX | 85-70 | W | +135 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 45 | 9 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 41 | 16 | | 9/9/2020 | *PHOENIX | 95-100 | L | +120 | 31-84 | 36.9% | 62 | 16 | 35-82 | 42.7% | 47 | 11 | | 9/11/2020 | *ATLANTA | 75-82 | L | -115 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 42 | 13 | 31-77 | 40.3% | 51 | 8 | | 9/15/2020 | *CHICAGO | 94-81 | W | +105 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 49 | 12 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 25 | 12 | | 9/17/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | 73-59 | W | +170 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 45 | 8 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 40 | 14 | | 9/20/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 87-62 | W | +200 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 43 | 12 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 41 | 14 | | 9/22/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/24/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/13/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 87-77 | W | -210 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 40 | 11 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 42 | 19 | | 8/15/2020 | *WASHINGTON | 88-73 | W | -450 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 33 | 10 | 29-76 | 38.2% | 48 | 18 | | 8/18/2020 | *CHICAGO | 82-84 | L | -200 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 44 | 8 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 42 | 14 | | 8/20/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | 99-78 | W | -300 | 36-64 | 56.2% | 43 | 15 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 30 | 16 | | 8/22/2020 | *SEATTLE | 82-74 | W | +175 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 51 | 16 | 28-75 | 37.3% | 42 | 13 | | 8/25/2020 | *DALLAS | 96-92 | W | -450 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 42 | 8 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 43 | 11 | | 8/29/2020 | *NEW YORK | 80-63 | W | | 30-79 | 38.0% | 49 | 8 | 22-66 | 33.3% | 48 | 17 | | 9/1/2020 | *PHOENIX | 85-92 | L | -400 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 48 | 12 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 40 | 8 | | 9/3/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | 93-78 | W | -250 | 38-73 | 52.1% | 29 | 10 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 47 | 21 | | 9/5/2020 | *ATLANTA | 89-79 | W | -600 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 44 | 16 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 37 | 9 | | 9/8/2020 | *INDIANA | 92-86 | W | | 32-70 | 45.7% | 48 | 9 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 32 | 13 | | 9/10/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 104-89 | W | -210 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 46 | 6 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 35 | 12 | | 9/12/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | 84-70 | W | -175 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 47 | 15 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 32 | 12 | | 9/13/2020 | @ SEATTLE | 86-84 | W | -125 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 50 | 9 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 46 | 11 | | 9/20/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | 62-87 | L | -250 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 41 | 14 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 43 | 12 | | 9/22/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/24/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 27-17 (+10.2 Units) against the money line versus LAS VEGAS since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 4-4 (+0.8 Units) against the money line versus LAS VEGAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
9/20/2020 | CONNECTICUT | 87 | 162.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 43 | 7 | 12 | | N | LAS VEGAS | 62 | -6 | Under | 25 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 1-14 | 7.1% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 41 | 5 | 14 | 9/3/2020 | LAS VEGAS | 93 | -6 | SU ATS | 43 | 38-73 | 52.1% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 12-12 | 100.0% | 29 | 6 | 10 | | N | CONNECTICUT | 78 | 161.5 | Over | 36 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 4-20 | 20.0% | 24-29 | 82.8% | 47 | 17 | 21 | 8/20/2020 | CONNECTICUT | 78 | 163 | Over | 42 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 30 | 6 | 16 | | N | LAS VEGAS | 99 | -7 | SU ATS | 53 | 36-64 | 56.2% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 23-27 | 85.2% | 43 | 7 | 15 | 8/23/2019 | LAS VEGAS | 85 | 163.5 | Over | 56 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 2-13 | 15.4% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 42 | 4 | 10 | | | CONNECTICUT | 89 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 42 | 7 | 10 | 8/11/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 81 | 159 | Over | 42 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 9-27 | 33.3% | 8-8 | 100.0% | 39 | 11 | 9 | | | LAS VEGAS | 89 | -3 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 51 | 11 | 16 | 6/2/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 80 | 167.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 26-77 | 33.8% | 8-26 | 30.8% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 46 | 11 | 9 | | | LAS VEGAS | 74 | -5.5 | Under | 43 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 49 | 6 | 21 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 19-9 against the money line (+10.5 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 54-36 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 33-21 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 22-12 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 30-24 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 23-9 against the money line (+14.7 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 29-21 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-6 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 21-12 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 30-20 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-12 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 27-19 against the money line (+7.9 Units) off a win against a division rival as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 80-58 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 75-52 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 26-16 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 14-6 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 57-36 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 28-16 against the money line (+15.1 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 20-10 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 28-22 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 35-26 against the money line (+8.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 44-29 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 55-41 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 27-19 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 57-35 against the money line (+18.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 82-57 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 57-31 against the money line (+24.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 80-50 against the money line (+22.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 37-18 against the money line (+27.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 48-30 against the money line (+23.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 49-30 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-9 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 58-35 against the money line (+19.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 14-14 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 54-35 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 78-57 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 47-33 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 43-27 against the money line (+22.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 58-44 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 7-11 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.3, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 23-22 against the money line (-17.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.7, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 11-13 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.7, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 5-8 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.5, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 7-11 against the money line (-12.0 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.4, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Miller is 47-45 against the money line (-21.6 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 12-18 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 8-13 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Lambeer is 185-130 against the money line (+24.8 Units) vs. division opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 24-9 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.2, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 41-27 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in road games after 3 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 158-109 against the money line (+28.7 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.7, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 27-13 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 22-14 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 21-7 against the money line (+15.1 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Lambeer is 26-12 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 13-5 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games after having won 4 of their last 5 games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 65-42 against the money line (+30.6 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 53-33 against the money line (+23.1 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 77.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 35-23 against the money line (+13.6 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.3, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 51-47 against the money line (+19.2 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.2, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 6-1 against the money line (+8.7 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 22-13 against the money line (+13.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.2, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 21-12 against the money line (+13.1 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.6, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 17-11 against the money line (+8.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 12-5 against the money line (+13.7 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Lambeer is 10-6 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in road games revenging a blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.8, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 15-11 against the money line (+9.5 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.7, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 13-7 against the money line (+10.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.3, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 38-21 against the money line (+26.9 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Lambeer is 22-15 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in road games off a upset loss as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 77.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 135-90 against the money line (+43.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 79.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 34-23 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.7, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 69-48 against the money line (+20.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 81.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 36-24 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.9, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 27-15 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 27-16 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 72-38 against the money line (+50.3 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.4, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Lambeer is 36-18 against the money line (+27.1 Units) after a blowout loss by 15 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 78.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Lambeer is 20-11 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after a blowout loss by 20 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 78.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 34-21 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 78.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 22-14 against the money line (+12.9 Units) in road games after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 79.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 25-15 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.1, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 19-14 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.7, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 142-120 against the money line (+32.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.3, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 89-75 against the money line (+26.7 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 42-26 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 44-31 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.2, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 66-50 against the money line (+23.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 79.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 33-26 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.7, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 44-31 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.2, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 38-25 against the money line (+15.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.7, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 152-93 against the money line (+40.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 74.6, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 42-23 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 44-28 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 43-31 against the money line (+8.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.5, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 41-30 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.4, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 32-26 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.2, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 16-13 against the money line (+16.2 Units) in road games versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 74.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 11-3 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 71-62 against the money line (+27.1 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | | Line Movement Analysis not posted for neutral court games. |
|
| | |
| [G] 09/12/2020 - Bria Holmes is out for season ( Knee ) | | [F] 06/22/2020 - Jonquel Jones is out for season ( Personal ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/20/2024 3:39:21 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|