| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON
INDIANA |
|
|
167
| 81
Final
88 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 607 | WASHINGTON | +175 | | 608 | INDIANA | -210 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in June games.
(57-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.3%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record.
(30-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.2%, +21.4 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(161-137 over the last 5 seasons.) (54%, +58.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(118-79 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.9%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(128-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(129-85 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(96-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(82-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - playing with 2 days rest, with a losing record.
(59-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - horrible team - outscored by their opponents by 9+ points/game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(91-33 since 1997.) (73.4%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points.
(93-103 over the last 5 seasons.) (47.4%, +55.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(64-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(102-63 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(115-84 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.8%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(47-29 since 1997.) (61.8%, +31 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots.
(91-74 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.2%, +42.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots.
(94-77 over the last 5 seasons.) (55%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less, off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals.
(42-15 since 1997.) (73.7%, +28.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots.
(93-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.4%, +43.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in June games.
(25-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.1%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(60-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(94-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.6%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games.
(25-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +13.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a division rival.
(23-11 since 1997.) (67.6%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots.
(104-86 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.7%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - horrible team - outscored by their opponents by 9+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(28-8 since 1997.) (77.8%, +19.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(145-119 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.9%, +38.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(113-112 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.2%, +51.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(71-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after a game where they covered the spread, playing with 2 days rest.
(52-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.1%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a losing record.
(27-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(80-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.8%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots.
(21-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +24.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(161-128 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.7%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a division rival.
(21-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(54-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.9%, +42.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(120-112 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.7%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread against opponent after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(42-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.2%, +35.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(114-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.4%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(24-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(95-66 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +41.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in June games.
(57-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.3%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, playing with 2 days rest.
(45-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.6%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(143-138 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.9%, +56.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(102-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(45-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.7%, +39.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(56-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +20.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(92-76 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.8%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals.
(26-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +24.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(39-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.1%, +21.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(82-93 over the last 5 seasons.) (46.9%, +47.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(63-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (43.4%, +47.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, after 2 consecutive division games.
(84-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.5%, +41.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(126-105 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +53.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(124-102 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.9%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(168-169 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.9%, +41.1 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| WASHINGTON | 81 | | 30-70 | 43.2% | 10-27 | 36.6% | 12-15 | 78.7% | 42 | 9 | 13 | | INDIANA | 82 | | 29-66 | 44.3% | 8-22 | 35.6% | 15-20 | 77.9% | 44 | 9 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, INDIANA won the game straight up 495 times, while WASHINGTON won 471 times.
Edge against the money line=WASHINGTON |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 93-89 against the money line (+21.2 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 77.6 | WASHINGTON is 33-21 against the money line (+14.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.3, OPPONENT 81.4 | INDIANA is 166-260 against the money line (-123.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 77.7, OPPONENT 80.6 | INDIANA is 105-124 against the money line (-42.2 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 74.6, OPPONENT 76.7 | INDIANA is 70-98 against the money line (-43.4 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 75.5, OPPONENT 77.6 | INDIANA is 8-26 against the money line (-16.4 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.2, OPPONENT 88.4 | INDIANA is 38-70 against the money line (-54.4 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 75.3, OPPONENT 80.1 | INDIANA is 8-28 against the money line (-20.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 81.7, OPPONENT 90.5 | INDIANA is 153-224 against the money line (-87.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 82.1, OPPONENT 84.7 | INDIANA is 4-14 against the money line (-11.8 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.9, OPPONENT 85.8 | INDIANA is 9-21 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 81.2, OPPONENT 87.6 |
|
WASHINGTON is 31-42 against the money line (-23.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 79.9 | WASHINGTON is 10-15 against the money line (-12.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 78.5 | WASHINGTON is 58-111 against the money line (-66.2 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 76.5 | WASHINGTON is 4-14 against the money line (-14.2 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.4, OPPONENT 83.6 | WASHINGTON is 4-13 against the money line (-11.0 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.8, OPPONENT 85.3 | WASHINGTON is 4-15 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.8, OPPONENT 83.5 | WASHINGTON is 4-11 against the money line (-17.5 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 80.4 | WASHINGTON is 6-28 against the money line (-26.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 88.1 | WASHINGTON is 12-19 against the money line (-15.5 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 81.3 | WASHINGTON is 109-157 against the money line (-59.9 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 76.7 | WASHINGTON is 11-25 against the money line (-17.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.6, OPPONENT 86.1 | INDIANA is 127-98 against the money line (+33.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 74.3, OPPONENT 73.0 | INDIANA is 108-67 against the money line (+52.6 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 73.4 | INDIANA is 218-117 against the money line (+134.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 85.0, OPPONENT 80.5 |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus horrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 9+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.5, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 19-15 against the money line (-24.9 Units) in home games when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 76.5, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 7-23 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 78.4, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 18-41 against the money line (-20.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.8, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 119-204 against the money line (-77.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 149-179 against the money line (-67.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 78.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 127-123 against the money line (-49.3 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 77.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 26-22 against the money line (-20.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 32-56 against the money line (-28.2 Units) in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 122-197 against the money line (-65.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 30-38 against the money line (-20.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 153-218 against the money line (-77.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 230-301 against the money line (-96.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 198-283 against the money line (-97.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 304-407 against the money line (-127.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 38-49 against the money line (-32.1 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-12 against the money line (-20.3 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 148-193 against the money line (-65.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 95-151 against the money line (-63.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 147-204 against the money line (-67.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 71-60 against the money line (+21.1 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 23-52 against the money line (-23.8 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.5, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 3-9 against the money line (-9.8 Units) as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 3-9 against the money line (-9.8 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 158-151 against the money line (-57.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 78.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 77-111 against the money line (-61.9 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 79.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 11-23 against the money line (-12.9 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 80.2, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 41-61 against the money line (-34.0 Units) on Wednesday since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 73.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 4-11 against the money line (-9.4 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.1, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 47-55 against the money line (-31.6 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 73.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 2-9 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 82.8, OPPONENT 91.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 87-99 against the money line (-40.9 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 73.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 104-116 against the money line (-53.2 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.9, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 118-135 against the money line (-52.4 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 73.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 18-43 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.7, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 6-16 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 154-209 against the money line (-68.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 179-222 against the money line (-72.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 75.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 84-130 against the money line (-71.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 108-144 against the money line (-57.0 Units) after scoring 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 37-52 against the money line (-24.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 77.0, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 42-67 against the money line (-33.8 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 49-67 against the money line (-33.3 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 76.1, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 139-190 against the money line (-60.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 63-102 against the money line (-37.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 29-67 against the money line (-34.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 3-14 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 75.2, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 174-193 against the money line (-60.6 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 73.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 182-220 against the money line (-81.3 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 73.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 82-112 against the money line (-52.7 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 73.7, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 179-205 against the money line (-78.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 73.7, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 79-100 against the money line (-48.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 5-18 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 7-15 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.9, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 42-49 against the money line (-22.3 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 14-24 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 42-59 against the money line (-27.0 Units) on Wednesday since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 226-305 against the money line (-109.3 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 139-202 against the money line (-72.8 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 89-138 against the money line (-60.4 Units) after 3 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-11 against the money line (-15.2 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 12-25 against the money line (-19.8 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 17-21 against the money line (-24.8 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 91-132 against the money line (-71.4 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 35-61 against the money line (-56.8 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 45-80 against the money line (-62.1 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.3, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 32-58 against the money line (-38.5 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 6-20 against the money line (-18.7 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as a home underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 61-94 against the money line (-45.6 Units) off an upset win as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-16 against the money line (-13.6 Units) off 2 or more consecutive upset wins as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 112-127 against the money line (-49.6 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 15-33 against the money line (-22.5 Units) off an upset win as a home underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 9-15 against the money line (-12.8 Units) off a home win over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 24-32 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 25-39 against the money line (-22.0 Units) after a close win by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-5 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after a win by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.8, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 32-36 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 29-31 against the money line (-21.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 26-25 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 21-24 against the money line (-23.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-27 against the money line (-24.8 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 13-24 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-27 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 3-13 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-13 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.6, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-23 against the money line (-23.0 Units) in road games after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 18-27 against the money line (-26.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 56-66 against the money line (-32.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 26-34 against the money line (-23.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.6, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-12 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.9, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-17 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 21-31 against the money line (-22.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 189-311 against the money line (-110.9 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 109-189 against the money line (-67.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 25-68 against the money line (-33.6 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 48-100 against the money line (-41.9 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-13 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.2, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-14 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.2, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-7 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 18-25 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-13 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-5 against the money line (-7.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 2-12 | -7.6 | 9-5 | 7-7 | 76.1 | 39.7 | 41.5% | 39.5 | 82.3 | 39.3 | 44.7% | 43.5 | | Road Games | 1-7 | -3.9 | 6-2 | 4-4 | 75.9 | 39.2 | 42.1% | 37.1 | 83.1 | 40.0 | 46.1% | 41.6 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +1.5 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 82.4 | 42.8 | 45.2% | 41.6 | 81.2 | 38.2 | 42.2% | 42.8 | | Division Games | 2-8 | -3.6 | 7-3 | 6-4 | 77.4 | 40.5 | 42.6% | 40.8 | 81.4 | 38.6 | 43.4% | 43.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 76.1 | 39.7 | 28-67 | 41.5% | 9-27 | 34.4% | 12-15 | 76.5% | 39 | 8 | 21 | 20 | 7 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 79.2 | 40.4 | 29-68 | 42.4% | 7-23 | 32.8% | 14-18 | 80.1% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.9 | 39.2 | 27-65 | 42.1% | 10-26 | 37.8% | 11-14 | 79.3% | 37 | 7 | 20 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.3 | 39.3 | 29-64 | 44.7% | 8-23 | 33.6% | 17-22 | 77.6% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.3 | 40.8 | 29-68 | 43.0% | 7-22 | 32.4% | 16-20 | 79.7% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 83.1 | 40.0 | 28-62 | 46.1% | 9-24 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 78.2% | 42 | 7 | 20 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 5-10 | -3.8 | 7-8 | 11-4 | 79.3 | 39.4 | 42.8% | 40.1 | 88.9 | 45.6 | 45.8% | 43.5 | | Home Games | 3-4 | -1.8 | 4-3 | 5-2 | 81.9 | 41.3 | 43.4% | 42.1 | 88.3 | 41.9 | 44.7% | 43.1 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.4 | 2-3 | 5-0 | 81.4 | 44.0 | 44.4% | 39.6 | 88.6 | 47.4 | 45.6% | 43.0 | | Division Games | 4-6 | -0.6 | 5-5 | 7-3 | 77.9 | 40.6 | 43.4% | 39.3 | 88.6 | 46.5 | 45.2% | 44.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.3 | 39.4 | 29-67 | 42.8% | 8-25 | 34.1% | 13-17 | 78.9% | 40 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.5 | 39.7 | 29-67 | 42.5% | 7-22 | 32.7% | 14-18 | 79.7% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.9 | 41.3 | 29-67 | 43.4% | 8-23 | 33.1% | 16-19 | 81.6% | 42 | 10 | 19 | 20 | 5 | 14 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 88.9 | 45.6 | 32-70 | 45.8% | 9-23 | 37.8% | 17-20 | 81.3% | 44 | 9 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.4 | 41 | 29-68 | 43.1% | 7-22 | 32.3% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 44 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 88.3 | 41.9 | 32-71 | 44.7% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 18-22 | 80.0% | 43 | 10 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 72.3, INDIANA 73.3 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/14/2024 | NEW YORK | 80-85 | L | +450 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 43 | 12 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 45 | 18 | | 5/17/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | 77-84 | L | +280 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 36 | 20 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 37 | 10 | | 5/19/2024 | SEATTLE | 75-84 | L | +170 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 38 | 16 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 52 | 20 | | 5/21/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | 68-70 | L | +120 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 32 | 18 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 44 | 24 | | 5/23/2024 | @ PHOENIX | 80-83 | L | +220 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 42 | 17 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 41 | 16 | | 5/25/2024 | @ SEATTLE | 69-101 | L | +300 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 33 | 14 | 37-60 | 61.7% | 40 | 16 | | 5/29/2024 | ATLANTA | 67-73 | L | +120 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 38 | 13 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 51 | 17 | | 5/31/2024 | @ NEW YORK | 79-90 | L | +650 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 41 | 14 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 40 | 14 | | 6/4/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | 59-76 | L | +650 | 20-64 | 31.2% | 42 | 16 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 45 | 12 | | 6/6/2024 | CHICAGO | 71-79 | L | +135 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 48 | 24 | 30-79 | 38.0% | 49 | 13 | | 6/7/2024 | INDIANA | 83-85 | L | +155 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 47 | 15 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 37 | 15 | | 6/9/2024 | @ NEW YORK | 88-93 | L | | 33-67 | 49.3% | 26 | 12 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 45 | 21 | | 6/11/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 87-68 | W | +210 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 45 | 11 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 41 | 8 | | 6/14/2024 | CHICAGO | 83-81 | W | +135 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 42 | 18 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 42 | 14 | | 6/19/2024 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/22/2024 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/23/2024 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2024 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2024 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/4/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/14/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | 71-92 | L | +210 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 31 | 25 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 39 | 15 | | 5/16/2024 | NEW YORK | 66-102 | L | +300 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 39 | 13 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 47 | 10 | | 5/18/2024 | @ NEW YORK | 80-91 | L | +650 | 33-80 | 41.2% | 41 | 15 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 42 | 20 | | 5/20/2024 | CONNECTICUT | 84-88 | L | +170 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 44 | 17 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 8 | | 5/22/2024 | @ SEATTLE | 83-85 | L | +180 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 47 | 11 | 34-82 | 41.5% | 47 | 8 | | 5/24/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | 78-73 | W | -120 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 39 | 10 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 42 | 18 | | 5/25/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | 80-99 | L | | 30-70 | 42.9% | 41 | 12 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 42 | 8 | | 5/28/2024 | LOS ANGELES | 82-88 | L | -220 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 39 | 14 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 45 | 19 | | 5/30/2024 | SEATTLE | 88-103 | L | +180 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 42 | 13 | 42-75 | 56.0% | 37 | 7 | | 6/1/2024 | CHICAGO | 71-70 | W | -105 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 40 | 11 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 54 | 15 | | 6/2/2024 | @ NEW YORK | 68-104 | L | | 27-73 | 37.0% | 37 | 12 | 38-66 | 57.6% | 44 | 13 | | 6/7/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | 85-83 | W | -175 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 37 | 15 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 47 | 15 | | 6/10/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | 72-89 | L | +375 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 33 | 11 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 48 | 10 | | 6/13/2024 | ATLANTA | 91-84 | W | +135 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 45 | 14 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 39 | 11 | | 6/16/2024 | CHICAGO | 91-83 | W | -140 | 35-62 | 56.5% | 46 | 15 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 37 | 5 | | 6/19/2024 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/21/2024 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/23/2024 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2024 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2024 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| INDIANA is 49-40 (+3.7 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 5-3 (+0.6 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| WASHINGTON is 19-24 (+1.3 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 2-1 (+0.0 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
08/18/2023 | WASHINGTON | 83 | -5.5 | SU | 42 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 12-25 | 48.0% | 19-25 | 76.0% | 32 | 3 | 9 | | | INDIANA | 79 | 162 | ATS | 42 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 45 | 7 | 17 | 07/19/2023 | INDIANA | 82 | 158 | SU ATS | 39 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 39 | 6 | 14 | | | WASHINGTON | 76 | -2.5 | | 36 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 40 | 6 | 15 | 07/07/2023 | INDIANA | 88 | 155.5 | Over | 40 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 32 | 5 | 13 | | | WASHINGTON | 96 | -1 | SU ATS | 55 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 31-37 | 83.8% | 41 | 10 | 7 | 06/13/2023 | WASHINGTON | 66 | -4.5 | Under | 38 | 22-66 | 33.3% | 7-25 | 28.0% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 36 | 6 | 12 | | | INDIANA | 87 | 157.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 53 | 14 | 12 | 06/07/2024 | INDIANA | 85 | -4 | SU Over | 42 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 16-35 | 45.7% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 37 | 5 | 15 | | | WASHINGTON | 83 | 160.5 | ATS | 40 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 13-34 | 38.2% | 8-13 | 61.5% | 47 | 9 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Sides is 11-23 against the money line (-12.9 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 80.2, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Sides is 4-11 against the money line (-9.4 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 79.1, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Sides is 6-16 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Thibault is 14-24 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 1-5 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after a win by 6 points or less as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.8, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 13-24 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 3-13 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 5-12 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.9, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 3-13 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.2, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 7-13 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 1-5 against the money line (-7.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 276 times, while the road underdog won straight up 129 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 15 times, while the road underdog won straight up 11 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 6/29/2024 3:12:13 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|