| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON
INDIANA |
|
|
157.5
| 87
Final
82 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 673 | WASHINGTON | -175 | | 674 | INDIANA | +155 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss.
(29-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.6%, +30 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss.
(42-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(29-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(40-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (58%, +22.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(49-33 since 1997.) (59.8%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(60-33 since 1997.) (64.5%, +27.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss by 10 points or more.
(33-12 since 1997.) (73.3%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher against opponent after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(27-7 since 1997.) (79.4%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(32-13 since 1997.) (71.1%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(25-9 since 1997.) (73.5%, +18 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(31-15 since 1997.) (67.4%, +17.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, on Sunday games.
(41-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +20.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(61-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(33-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +14.3 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after scoring 55 points or less.
(141-49 since 1997.) (74.2%, +53.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record.
(118-38 since 1997.) (75.6%, +50.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record.
(76-13 since 1997.) (85.4%, +49.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%).
(31-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +33.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(100-64 since 1997.) (61%, +44.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 55 points or less.
(82-30 since 1997.) (73.2%, +44.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(52-7 since 1997.) (88.1%, +37.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games.
(46-22 since 1997.) (67.6%, +33.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(60-22 since 1997.) (73.2%, +32.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(55-40 since 1997.) (57.9%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(69-43 since 1997.) (61.6%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(79-51 since 1997.) (60.8%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record.
(36-5 since 1997.) (87.8%, +29.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(39-28 since 1997.) (58.2%, +29 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(23-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +24 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season.
(107-60 since 1997.) (64.1%, +28.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, vs. division opponents.
(33-3 since 1997.) (91.7%, +27.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(46-18 since 1997.) (71.9%, +26.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a huge blowout loss by 30 or more.
(54-19 since 1997.) (74%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - horrible team - outscored by their opponents by 9+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(34-4 since 1997.) (89.5%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(32-12 since 1997.) (72.7%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 55 points or less.
(32-4 since 1997.) (88.9%, +25.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(28-17 since 1997.) (62.2%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - horrible team - outscored by their opponents by 9+ points/game, after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(37-11 since 1997.) (77.1%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 55 points or less.
(43-21 since 1997.) (67.2%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(36-17 since 1997.) (67.9%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a huge blowout loss by 30 or more.
(44-15 since 1997.) (74.6%, +21.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(32-13 since 1997.) (71.1%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a huge blowout loss by 30 or more.
(24-8 since 1997.) (75%, +20.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 55 points or less.
(22-5 since 1997.) (81.5%, +18.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record.
(22-4 since 1997.) (84.6%, +18.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(25-9 since 1997.) (73.5%, +18 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 24 points in their previous game.
(32-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +22.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season.
(88-63 since 1997.) (58.3%, +15.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(56-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a huge blowout loss by 30 or more.
(29-13 since 1997.) (69%, +13.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, after a game - shooting 37% or lower, allowing 48% or higher.
(21-10 since 1997.) (67.7%, +12.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season.
(46-34 since 1997.) (57.5%, +8.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(23-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +15.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging 2 straight losses versus opponent by 10 points or more, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(21-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +13.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging 2 straight losses versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(34-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.3%, +18 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging 2 straight losses versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(24-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +13.4 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| WASHINGTON | 84 | | 30-69 | 43.2% | 7-22 | 33.5% | 17-20 | 83.2% | 48 | 14 | 13 | | INDIANA | 74 | | 28-67 | 42.0% | 4-15 | 29.6% | 14-17 | 84.8% | 39 | 9 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 724 times, while INDIANA won 246 times.
Edge against the money line=WASHINGTON |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 13-2 against the money line (+15.7 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.9, OPPONENT 78.7 | WASHINGTON is 23-12 against the money line (+16.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 88.4, OPPONENT 81.3 | WASHINGTON is 20-5 against the money line (+21.2 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 91.8, OPPONENT 80.3 | INDIANA is 124-151 against the money line (-71.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 76.8, OPPONENT 77.2 | INDIANA is 2-9 against the money line (-10.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was INDIANA 75.3, OPPONENT 85.4 | INDIANA is 13-30 against the money line (-19.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 78.4, OPPONENT 86.9 | INDIANA is 2-13 against the money line (-11.2 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was INDIANA 75.2, OPPONENT 90.2 | INDIANA is 62-52 against the money line (-40.1 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 83.2, OPPONENT 83.1 |
|
WASHINGTON is 113-177 against the money line (-57.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.1, OPPONENT 78.3 | WASHINGTON is 81-121 against the money line (-53.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 74.5 | WASHINGTON is 72-114 against the money line (-47.3 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 74.8 | WASHINGTON is 49-96 against the money line (-63.4 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 74.4 | WASHINGTON is 16-27 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 83.6 | WASHINGTON is 15-26 against the money line (-15.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.3, OPPONENT 85.9 | INDIANA is 14-9 against the money line (+12.3 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 78.4, OPPONENT 77.0 | INDIANA is 87-57 against the money line (+29.8 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 74.1, OPPONENT 71.7 | INDIANA is 137-101 against the money line (+31.6 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 75.4, OPPONENT 73.5 | INDIANA is 4-1 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in home games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 79.6 | INDIANA is 26-18 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.7, OPPONENT 79.3 |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 19-10 against the money line (+12.0 Units) vs. horrible rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 5+/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 8-16 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.2, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 9-16 against the money line (-10.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 6-14 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 78.4, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 1-7 against the money line (-8.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was INDIANA 73.1, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 6-12 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 78.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 1-8 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was INDIANA 72.9, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 4*) | INDIANA is 6-12 against the money line (-8.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was INDIANA 76.5, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 137-160 against the money line (-66.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-9 against the money line (-10.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 10-17 against the money line (-12.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.8, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 69-111 against the money line (-43.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-13 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 9-17 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-16 against the money line (-11.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 210-313 against the money line (-105.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-13 against the money line (-12.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 22-37 against the money line (-27.8 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 2-7 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 10-18 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-20 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 38-42 against the money line (-30.5 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 77-132 against the money line (-51.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-15 against the money line (-10.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 9-5 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 83.8, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 7-5 against the money line (+10.1 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 78.8, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 76-52 against the money line (+20.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 118-80 against the money line (+23.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 76.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 150-111 against the money line (+26.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 74.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 62-51 against the money line (+19.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 77.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 11-2 against the money line (+9.0 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 6-2 against the money line (+10.1 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.9, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 6-2 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-9 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-6 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 18-15 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-4 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 8-1 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.8, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 6*) | WASHINGTON is 13-5 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 9-5 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 7-14 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 78.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 16-25 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 77.6, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 8-18 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 74.8, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 1-7 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games this season.
The average score was INDIANA 72.1, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 6-13 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.2, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 5-14 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was INDIANA 75.3, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 11-20 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 4-10 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after playing a road game this season.
The average score was INDIANA 74.9, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 275-404 against the money line (-121.3 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 84-140 against the money line (-53.1 Units) in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 13-47 against the money line (-28.2 Units) in road games on Sunday games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 132-194 against the money line (-63.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 16-51 against the money line (-34.3 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 9-32 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 31-53 against the money line (-26.9 Units) after 2 straight games where they were called for 22 or more fouls since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-26 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after a game where they were called for 27 or more fouls since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 13-21 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 103-145 against the money line (-47.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 35-65 against the money line (-28.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 122-203 against the money line (-71.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 73-132 against the money line (-48.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 148-256 against the money line (-94.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 86-161 against the money line (-62.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 37-85 against the money line (-40.3 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 132-218 against the money line (-73.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 66-114 against the money line (-51.3 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 145-241 against the money line (-70.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 83-142 against the money line (-46.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 49-76 against the money line (-31.1 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-13 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-11 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 9-7 against the money line (+10.7 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was INDIANA 79.9, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 5-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season.
The average score was INDIANA 85.4, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 46-42 against the money line (+17.0 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 70.0, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 31-25 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 70.1, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 5-2 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent this season.
The average score was INDIANA 82.9, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 5-2 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points this season.
The average score was INDIANA 82.9, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 15-11 against the money line (+11.4 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 109-79 against the money line (+28.1 Units) off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.6, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 27-11 against the money line (+19.3 Units) off 2 or more consecutive road losses since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.8, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 129-97 against the money line (+33.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 145-122 against the money line (+23.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 74.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 22-9 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 80.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 6-2 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 80.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 10-6 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 78.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 12-5 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 3-0 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more this season.
The average score was INDIANA 86.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 21-12 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 36-27 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 78.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 53-30 against the money line (+23.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.2, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 88-49 against the money line (+30.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 74.0, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 6-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season.
The average score was INDIANA 79.7, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 7-2 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 79.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 164-139 against the money line (+35.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.8, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 10-4 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 77.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 5-2 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 74.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 16-12 | -0.7 | 13-14 | 14-14 | 81.8 | 43.7 | 41.7% | 43.5 | 79.9 | 39.8 | 43.0% | 42.6 | | Road Games | 6-8 | -3 | 6-8 | 6-8 | 80.0 | 44.8 | 41.3% | 42.1 | 79.8 | 40.1 | 42.0% | 44.9 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 80.0 | 40.6 | 43.9% | 42.0 | 84.0 | 42.2 | 49.4% | 37.8 | | Division Games | 11-2 | +9 | 9-3 | 4-9 | 82.6 | 44.4 | 41.2% | 47.6 | 74.3 | 36.6 | 39.5% | 44.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 81.8 | 43.7 | 28-68 | 41.7% | 7-22 | 31.3% | 18-22 | 84.3% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82 | 41.3 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.0 | 44.8 | 28-69 | 41.3% | 7-21 | 30.9% | 16-19 | 86.5% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.9 | 39.8 | 30-69 | 43.0% | 6-17 | 35.2% | 14-18 | 79.8% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 6 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.5 | 40.7 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-17 | 34.0% | 16-20 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.8 | 40.1 | 29-70 | 42.0% | 6-17 | 32.9% | 16-19 | 80.9% | 45 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 9-20 | -3.4 | 12-17 | 13-16 | 76.1 | 35.6 | 43.0% | 34.8 | 85.3 | 44.1 | 48.0% | 42.4 | | Home Games | 6-7 | +3.8 | 6-7 | 7-6 | 80.7 | 37.8 | 44.6% | 36.8 | 83.1 | 41.8 | 46.7% | 40.2 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | +3.3 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 72.4 | 33.4 | 41.4% | 34.8 | 91.0 | 48.2 | 48.8% | 45.2 | | Division Games | 4-9 | -4.4 | 5-8 | 4-9 | 77.2 | 36.3 | 42.3% | 35.5 | 83.3 | 43.9 | 46.3% | 44.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 76.1 | 35.6 | 28-66 | 43.0% | 5-15 | 30.3% | 15-18 | 85.1% | 35 | 7 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.7 | 41 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 16-20 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.7 | 37.8 | 29-66 | 44.6% | 5-14 | 31.7% | 18-21 | 86.1% | 37 | 7 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 85.3 | 44.1 | 31-64 | 48.0% | 6-16 | 38.2% | 17-21 | 82.6% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.7 | 41.9 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 34.2% | 16-20 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 83.1 | 41.8 | 30-64 | 46.7% | 7-18 | 36.6% | 17-20 | 82.7% | 40 | 8 | 17 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 71.1, INDIANA 71.3 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/14/2017 | @ INDIANA | 72-58 | W | -300 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 45 | 14 | 18-66 | 27.3% | 51 | 16 | | 7/16/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 55-85 | L | +210 | 18-65 | 27.7% | 40 | 11 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 55 | 11 | | 7/19/2017 | ATLANTA | 100-96 | W | -165 | 37-89 | 41.6% | 53 | 12 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 43 | 12 | | 7/25/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-76 | W | -300 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 44 | 12 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 47 | 10 | | 7/30/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 77-70 | W | -125 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 58 | 12 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 38 | 6 | | 8/4/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-76 | L | -200 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 43 | 11 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 42 | 10 | | 8/6/2017 | PHOENIX | 85-80 | W | -155 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 55 | 12 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 36 | 9 | | 8/12/2017 | INDIANA | 100-80 | W | -400 | 34-59 | 57.6% | 39 | 11 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 33 | 10 | | 8/16/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 62-95 | L | +200 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 30 | 20 | 40-65 | 61.5% | 38 | 13 | | 8/18/2017 | PHOENIX | 79-89 | L | +155 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 43 | 12 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 40 | 12 | | 8/20/2017 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2017 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/26/2017 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/12/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 72-79 | L | -360 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 34 | 10 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 42 | 13 | | 7/14/2017 | WASHINGTON | 58-72 | L | +220 | 18-66 | 27.3% | 51 | 16 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 45 | 14 | | 7/17/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 62-80 | L | | 23-58 | 39.7% | 27 | 16 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 41 | 12 | | 7/19/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 84-77 | W | +210 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 38 | 13 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 42 | 14 | | 7/20/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 61-85 | L | -210 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 30 | 16 | 33-55 | 60.0% | 39 | 15 | | 7/25/2017 | @ DALLAS | 82-84 | L | +210 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 40 | 17 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 39 | 14 | | 7/28/2017 | NEW YORK | 84-85 | L | +200 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 24 | 10 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 50 | 15 | | 7/30/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | 73-89 | L | | 29-72 | 40.3% | 38 | 17 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 49 | 11 | | 8/4/2017 | CHICAGO | 70-81 | L | -120 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 37 | 14 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 43 | 15 | | 8/6/2017 | MINNESOTA | 84-82 | W | +650 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 38 | 19 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 45 | 19 | | 8/8/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 76-81 | L | +325 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 39 | 13 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 49 | 12 | | 8/12/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-100 | L | +300 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 33 | 10 | 34-59 | 57.6% | 39 | 11 | | 8/18/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 52-111 | L | | 19-62 | 30.6% | 27 | 19 | 42-71 | 59.2% | 50 | 12 | | 8/20/2017 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/23/2017 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/26/2017 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/30/2017 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/2/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| INDIANA is 44-27 (+10.2 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 8-3 (+4.6 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| INDIANA is 22-12 (-2.2 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 3-1 (+2.4 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/12/2017 | INDIANA | 80 | 154.5 | Over | 36 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 33 | 8 | 10 | | | WASHINGTON | 100 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 34-59 | 57.6% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 22-25 | 88.0% | 39 | 7 | 11 | 7/14/2017 | WASHINGTON | 72 | -7 | SU ATS | 50 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 22-28 | 78.6% | 45 | 8 | 14 | | | INDIANA | 58 | 164.5 | Under | 28 | 18-66 | 27.3% | 1-16 | 6.2% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 51 | 10 | 16 | 6/11/2017 | INDIANA | 70 | 164.5 | Under | 35 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 2-12 | 16.7% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 31 | 5 | 8 | | | WASHINGTON | 88 | -8 | SU ATS | 48 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 10-21 | 47.6% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 52 | 13 | 10 | 9/11/2016 | INDIANA | 80 | 162 | SU ATS | 42 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 41 | 8 | 11 | | | WASHINGTON | 73 | -1 | Under | 47 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 33 | 7 | 8 | 8/27/2016 | WASHINGTON | 92 | 156 | SU ATS | 36 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 38 | 8 | 13 | | | INDIANA | 69 | -6 | Over | 39 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 2-14 | 14.3% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 43 | 13 | 14 | 6/22/2016 | INDIANA | 62 | 159 | Under | 35 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 1-9 | 11.1% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 44 | 11 | 18 | | | WASHINGTON | 76 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 34 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 31-37 | 83.8% | 37 | 3 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 56-38 against the money line (+27.8 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 78.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 11-5 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 53-38 against the money line (+21.6 Units) off a home loss in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 7-3 against the money line (+10.2 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 79.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 42-39 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 31-26 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 31-26 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 11-8 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 9-3 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 22-9 against the money line (+22.6 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 5*) | Thibault is 55-48 against the money line (+19.1 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 11-8 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 117-99 against the money line (+20.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 53-42 against the money line (+23.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 78.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 15-11 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 43-39 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 72-44 against the money line (+32.4 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 121-104 against the money line (+21.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 50-42 against the money line (+18.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 39-24 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 78.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 15-4 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 23-5 against the money line (+18.0 Units) versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 73.3, OPPONENT 65.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Thibault is 31-12 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 73.3, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 77-91 against the money line (-37.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 78.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 1-8 against the money line (-8.1 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 72.3, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 57-66 against the money line (-29.8 Units) after one or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 78.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 1-7 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 72.1, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 3-9 against the money line (-10.5 Units) off a road blowout loss by 20 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 76.2, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 21-37 against the money line (-28.9 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 77.0, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 3-9 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after a blowout loss by 20 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 76.2, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 5-15 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 73.7, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 5-14 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 75.3, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 35-46 against the money line (-26.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 79.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 45-59 against the money line (-32.9 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 78.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 4-10 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 74.9, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 40-56 against the money line (-34.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 77.4, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 50-70 against the money line (-33.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 77.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 55-82 against the money line (-43.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 77.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 1-7 against the money line (-8.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 73.1, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 1-8 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 72.9, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 26-25 against the money line (-23.3 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 81.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 7-16 against the money line (-14.1 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 74.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Thibault is 23-37 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 17-27 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 9-22 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.3, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 22-26 against the money line (-15.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 39-57 against the money line (-19.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 20-36 against the money line (-22.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 24-33 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 36-49 against the money line (-23.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 4-7 against the money line (-10.3 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 4-10 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in road games vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 34-49 against the money line (-23.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 20-26 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 11-12 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 19-5 against the money line (+16.1 Units) in home games on Sunday games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 84.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 9-7 against the money line (+10.7 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 79.9, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 44-22 against the money line (+15.7 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 82.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 5-2 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 82.9, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 5-2 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 82.9, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 36-32 against the money line (+16.4 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 78.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 9-5 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in home games triple revenge - 3 straight losses vs. opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 80.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 12-7 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 82.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 9-5 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 82.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 3-0 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 86.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 20-10 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in home games after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 84.6, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 37-25 against the money line (+19.0 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 81.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 23-15 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 80.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 18-9 against the money line (+10.7 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 79.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 38-29 against the money line (+19.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Chatman 79.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 60 times, while the home underdog won straight up 39 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog won the game straight up 6 times, while the road favorite won the game straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 08/18/2017 - Natasha Cloud left last game, "?" Sunday vs. Indiana ( Hip ) | | [F] 08/01/2017 - Elena Delle Donne out indefinitely ( Thumb ) | | [G] 07/16/2017 - Tayler Hill out for season ( Knee ) | |
| [G] 08/17/2017 - Tiffany Mitchell out for season ( ACL ) | | [G] 07/13/2017 - Shenise Johnson out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/26/2024 1:08:24 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|