| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA INDIANA |
|
| 146 | 69 Final 75 |
|
|
| | |
|
WNBA Finals - Best of 5 - Game 4 - MIN leads 2-1 | | | | |
607 | MINNESOTA | +105 | 608 | INDIANA | -125 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (342-129 since 1997.) (72.6%, +93.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (321-130 since 1997.) (71.2%, +88.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (305-110 since 1997.) (73.5%, +87.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (392-244 since 1997.) (61.6%, +86.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (327-122 since 1997.) (72.8%, +84.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (310-121 since 1997.) (71.9%, +77.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (262-106 since 1997.) (71.2%, +65.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more. (94-29 since 1997.) (76.4%, +50.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more. (93-29 since 1997.) (76.2%, +49.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (146-54 since 1997.) (73%, +47.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more. (72-20 since 1997.) (78.3%, +42.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more. (71-20 since 1997.) (78%, +41.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (59-14 since 1997.) (80.8%, +39.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more. (63-18 since 1997.) (77.8%, +38 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more. (63-18 since 1997.) (77.8%, +38 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (57-14 since 1997.) (80.3%, +37.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (INDIANA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (108-63 since 1997.) (63.2%, +36 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential). (76-27 since 1997.) (73.8%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (59-24 since 1997.) (71.1%, +34.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games. (59-16 since 1997.) (78.7%, +34.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (46-9 since 1997.) (83.6%, +34 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more. (83-49 since 1997.) (62.9%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (49-11 since 1997.) (81.7%, +32.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games. (57-16 since 1997.) (78.1%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (44-9 since 1997.) (83%, +32 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after scoring 80 points or more. (47-11 since 1997.) (81%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after scoring 80 points or more. (47-11 since 1997.) (81%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (47-11 since 1997.) (81%, +30.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (38-7 since 1997.) (84.4%, +28.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (90-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +42.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (36-7 since 1997.) (83.7%, +26.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (49-27 since 1997.) (64.5%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (25-1 since 1997.) (96.2%, +23.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (34-8 since 1997.) (81%, +22.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - off an upset win as a road underdog, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (35-13 since 1997.) (72.9%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (28-5 since 1997.) (84.8%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (69-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (69-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (69-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (22-5 since 1997.) (81.5%, +16.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +15.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (30-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (25-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after one or more consecutive overs, an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG). (82-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.8%, +28.1 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in non-conference games, off a home loss. (296-209 since 1997.) (58.6%, +80 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws. (297-292 since 1997.) (50.4%, +70.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (77-63 over the last 5 seasons.) (55%, +44.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (65-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.6%, +40.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (96-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.9%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in non-conference games, off a close home loss by 3 points or less. (61-34 since 1997.) (64.2%, +34.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (70-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +42.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (100-76 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.8%, +42.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (38-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.8%, +36.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less. (76-50 since 1997.) (60.3%, +28 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (48-22 since 1997.) (68.6%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (62-37 since 1997.) (62.6%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less. (35-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +20.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in non-conference games, off a close home loss by 3 points or less. (33-23 since 1997.) (58.9%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (25-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +17.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (96-91 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.3%, +26.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (53-31 since 1997.) (63.1%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (38-17 since 1997.) (69.1%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (117-102 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.4%, +35.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (56-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.1%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (27-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +14.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (122-94 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.5%, +43.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less. (24-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.5%, +14.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (INDIANA) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (30-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.8%, +12.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (36-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (50%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA | 72 | | 28-65 | 43.9% | 4-12 | 29.7% | 11-14 | 79.2% | 41 | 10 | 14 | INDIANA | 78 | | 29-67 | 43.2% | 5-15 | 35.9% | 14-17 | 85.2% | 42 | 11 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, INDIANA won the game straight up 649 times, while MINNESOTA won 321 times. Edge against the money line=INDIANA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 39-14 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 74.8 | INDIANA is 47-72 against the money line (-39.0 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.3, OPPONENT 74.5 | INDIANA is 93-102 against the money line (-46.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 81.7, OPPONENT 82.2 |
|
MINNESOTA is 3-9 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.7, OPPONENT 80.0 | MINNESOTA is 58-75 against the money line (-44.2 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.6, OPPONENT 74.1 | MINNESOTA is 3-6 against the money line (-12.5 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.0, OPPONENT 78.0 | MINNESOTA is 4-7 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.5, OPPONENT 79.8 | MINNESOTA is 4-10 against the money line (-19.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 81.2 | MINNESOTA is 13-12 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.5, OPPONENT 73.2 | INDIANA is 13-10 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was INDIANA 78.3, OPPONENT 76.5 | INDIANA is 16-8 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.7, OPPONENT 69.8 | INDIANA is 106-69 against the money line (+37.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.7, OPPONENT 70.4 | INDIANA is 79-52 against the money line (+27.5 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.8, OPPONENT 71.0 | INDIANA is 11-5 against the money line (+7.7 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season. The average score was INDIANA 80.1, OPPONENT 72.6 | INDIANA is 24-13 against the money line (+15.8 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 75.0 | INDIANA is 10-5 against the money line (+9.2 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.9, OPPONENT 72.6 | INDIANA is 12-4 against the money line (+11.2 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.9, OPPONENT 75.3 | INDIANA is 15-4 against the money line (+11.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was INDIANA 85.4, OPPONENT 77.6 | INDIANA is 12-5 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season. The average score was INDIANA 78.1, OPPONENT 72.8 |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 27-10 against the money line (+15.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 51-20 against the money line (+17.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 47-16 against the money line (+22.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 61-24 against the money line (+23.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 2-7 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 72.8, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 4-10 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 72.6, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 9-16 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 4-12 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 6-12 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 16-10 against the money line (+10.7 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 12-7 against the money line (+8.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games this season. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 13-7 against the money line (+10.0 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) this season. The average score was INDIANA 76.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 10-6 against the money line (+7.2 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games this season. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 16-11 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 22-14 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 19-14 against the money line (+7.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 20-12 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 17-11 against the money line (+7.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 24-14 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 32-23 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.8, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 17-12 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 75.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 16-12 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 12-8 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 15-10 against the money line (+5.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was INDIANA 78.1, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 18-11 against the money line (+9.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 78.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 17-13 against the money line (+7.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 54-20 against the money line (+24.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 62-36 against the money line (+18.3 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.8, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 26-9 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 38-25 against the money line (+15.2 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 6-10 against the money line (-13.6 Units) in home games after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 26-34 against the money line (-27.6 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.0, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 1-7 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in home games off a home loss over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 6-11 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 0-5 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in home games after a close loss by 3 points or less over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 71.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 2-9 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in home games after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 5*) | INDIANA is 6-14 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 118-131 against the money line (-46.8 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.5, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 8-13 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 45-59 against the money line (-28.9 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.1, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 23-45 against the money line (-24.2 Units) in a road game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 69.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 4-7 against the money line (-11.0 Units) on Sunday games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 70.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 154-152 against the money line (-67.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 68-63 against the money line (-36.6 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 32-53 against the money line (-34.4 Units) off an upset win as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 23-40 against the money line (-35.5 Units) off an upset win as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 69.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 4-6 against the money line (-9.8 Units) off a road win this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 102-150 against the money line (-80.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.7, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 76-117 against the money line (-76.0 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 9-9 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.3, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 7-8 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 25-18 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in all games this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 19-8 against the money line (+14.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was INDIANA 78.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 4*) | INDIANA is 17-11 against the money line (+6.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season. The average score was INDIANA 76.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 14-10 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was INDIANA 78.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 9-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) when trailing in a playoff series since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 79.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 9-4 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season. The average score was INDIANA 78.2, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 8-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread this season. The average score was INDIANA 79.3, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 16-12 against the money line (+10.4 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 14-7 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was INDIANA 79.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 122-95 against the money line (+24.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 74.2, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 10-5 against the money line (+6.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 18-12 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was INDIANA 79.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 16-10 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was INDIANA 79.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 28-14 | -5.1 | 19-23 | 17-25 | 75.2 | 37.2 | 43.9% | 41.8 | 71.9 | 37.0 | 41.7% | 39.0 | Road Games | 11-9 | -2.9 | 8-12 | 8-12 | 73.7 | 36.2 | 44.0% | 40.2 | 74.9 | 39.8 | 43.1% | 39.6 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.7 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 73.0 | 36.4 | 43.5% | 43.2 | 70.8 | 38.2 | 41.7% | 36.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.2 | 37.2 | 29-65 | 43.9% | 4-12 | 32.7% | 14-17 | 81.1% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.2 | 37.7 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 32.3% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 73.7 | 36.2 | 28-64 | 44.0% | 4-13 | 32.8% | 13-16 | 81.6% | 40 | 8 | 17 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.9 | 37.0 | 27-66 | 41.7% | 5-16 | 32.7% | 12-15 | 82.3% | 39 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 74.5 | 37.6 | 27-64 | 42.7% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 15-18 | 79.8% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 74.9 | 39.8 | 28-66 | 43.1% | 5-17 | 32.4% | 13-16 | 78.7% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 25-18 | +10.5 | 21-20 | 24-19 | 77.4 | 39.4 | 43.1% | 39.8 | 75.6 | 39.0 | 44.2% | 40.6 | Home Games | 13-7 | +3 | 8-11 | 15-5 | 80.5 | 40.5 | 44.8% | 40.1 | 75.6 | 39.1 | 42.6% | 40.5 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 71.8 | 36.0 | 44.3% | 36.2 | 68.2 | 34.4 | 41.4% | 40.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.4 | 39.4 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 5-15 | 36.1% | 16-20 | 80.5% | 40 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 9 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 75 | 37.9 | 28-66 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 33.6% | 15-18 | 79.9% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.5 | 40.5 | 29-64 | 44.8% | 5-15 | 33.1% | 18-23 | 80.3% | 40 | 9 | 14 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.6 | 39.0 | 28-64 | 44.2% | 5-14 | 31.1% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 75.8 | 38.3 | 28-66 | 42.8% | 5-14 | 32.9% | 14-18 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.6 | 39.1 | 27-64 | 42.6% | 5-15 | 30.7% | 16-21 | 79.7% | 40 | 9 | 14 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 71.1, INDIANA 70.2 |
| | |
|
|
9/4/2015 | INDIANA | 81-65 | W | -175 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 40 | 17 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 34 | 10 | 9/6/2015 | NEW YORK | 71-75 | L | -155 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 33 | 13 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 41 | 12 | 9/8/2015 | SEATTLE | 73-67 | W | -750 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 41 | 12 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 34 | 18 | 9/11/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 64-78 | L | -165 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 46 | 10 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 39 | 9 | 9/18/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 67-65 | W | -220 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 36 | 11 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 38 | 14 | 9/20/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 71-81 | L | +135 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 35 | 16 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 46 | 10 | 9/22/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 91-80 | W | -200 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 49 | 10 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 33 | 13 | 9/24/2015 | PHOENIX | 67-60 | W | -210 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 49 | 12 | 19-58 | 32.8% | 37 | 12 | 9/27/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 72-71 | W | +105 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 44 | 11 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 32 | 6 | 10/4/2015 | INDIANA | 69-75 | L | -270 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 50 | 14 | 27-75 | 36.0% | 42 | 10 | 10/6/2015 | INDIANA | 77-71 | W | -270 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 42 | 13 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 35 | 16 | 10/9/2015 | @ INDIANA | 80-77 | W | +135 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 31 | 8 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 34 | 14 | 10/11/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
9/1/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 81-51 | W | -550 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 46 | 15 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 33 | 16 | 9/4/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 65-81 | L | +155 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 34 | 10 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 40 | 17 | 9/8/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 72-76 | L | +105 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 39 | 18 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 52 | 22 | 9/11/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 75-67 | W | +180 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 43 | 19 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 46 | 18 | 9/13/2015 | NEW YORK | 81-76 | W | -220 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 40 | 14 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 47 | 15 | 9/17/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 72-77 | L | +175 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 44 | 12 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 51 | 12 | 9/19/2015 | CHICAGO | 89-82 | W | -165 | 36-77 | 46.8% | 48 | 12 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 37 | 13 | 9/21/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 100-89 | W | +170 | 37-64 | 57.8% | 28 | 6 | 36-63 | 57.1% | 30 | 8 | 9/23/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 67-84 | L | +105 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 32 | 14 | 35-62 | 56.5% | 31 | 13 | 9/27/2015 | NEW YORK | 70-64 | W | -165 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 36 | 10 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 39 | 11 | 9/29/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 66-51 | W | +145 | 26-53 | 49.1% | 34 | 14 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 41 | 21 | 10/4/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 75-69 | W | +210 | 27-75 | 36.0% | 42 | 10 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 50 | 14 | 10/6/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 71-77 | L | +210 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 35 | 16 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 42 | 13 | 10/9/2015 | MINNESOTA | 77-80 | L | -155 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 34 | 14 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 31 | 8 | 10/11/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
MINNESOTA is 21-16 (+0.7 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 8-1 (+5.7 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
MINNESOTA is 10-8 (+7.5 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 4-0 (+4.4 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
10/9/2015 | MINNESOTA | 80 | 146 | SU ATS | 38 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 31 | 8 | 8 | | INDIANA | 77 | -3 | Over | 42 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 34 | 7 | 14 | 10/6/2015 | INDIANA | 71 | 147 | ATS | 41 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 35 | 11 | 16 | | MINNESOTA | 77 | -6.5 | SU Over | 39 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 0-8 | 0.0% | 17-18 | 94.4% | 42 | 15 | 13 | 10/4/2015 | INDIANA | 75 | 147 | SU ATS | 35 | 27-75 | 36.0% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 16-16 | 100.0% | 42 | 12 | 10 | | MINNESOTA | 69 | -6.5 | Under | 29 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 15-23 | 65.2% | 50 | 11 | 14 | 9/4/2015 | INDIANA | 65 | 149 | Under | 32 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 34 | 12 | 10 | | MINNESOTA | 81 | -4 | SU ATS | 41 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 5-6 | 83.3% | 40 | 10 | 17 | 6/6/2015 | MINNESOTA | 78 | -8 | SU ATS | 36 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 26-31 | 83.9% | 49 | 13 | 14 | | INDIANA | 69 | 154 | Under | 27 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 9-17 | 52.9% | 40 | 7 | 12 | 8/5/2014 | MINNESOTA | 66 | -4.5 | SU Under | 38 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 1-11 | 9.1% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 52 | 13 | 10 | | INDIANA | 64 | 153 | ATS | 44 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 36 | 9 | 9 | 6/22/2014 | INDIANA | 77 | 152 | ATS | 41 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 37 | 11 | 16 | | MINNESOTA | 83 | -9.5 | SU Over | 35 | 31-54 | 57.4% | 2-6 | 33.3% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 34 | 1 | 19 |
|
| | |
|
Cheryl is 147-71 against the money line (+24.6 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 51-20 against the money line (+22.1 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 93-44 against the money line (+22.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 48-10 against the money line (+29.2 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Cheryl is 13-7 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.7, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 66-27 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 24-7 against the money line (+11.6 Units) as a # 1 seed in the playoffs as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 43-20 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 56-25 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 54-20 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 103-49 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 80-37 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 78-33 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 103-45 against the money line (+21.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 25-9 against the money line (+11.6 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 63-30 against the money line (+15.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 82-40 against the money line (+19.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 105-57 against the money line (+16.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 93-42 against the money line (+23.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 120-60 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 30-8 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 40-11 against the money line (+22.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 85-36 against the money line (+31.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 108-53 against the money line (+25.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 54-28 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Cheryl is 10-15 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in road games off a road win as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 23-31 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Stephanie is 25-18 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in all games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Stephanie is 19-8 against the money line (+14.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Stephanie is 8-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.3, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Stephanie is 14-7 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Stephanie is 16-10 against the money line (+10.7 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Stephanie is 12-7 against the money line (+8.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Stephanie is 13-7 against the money line (+10.0 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Stephanie is 22-14 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Stephanie is 20-12 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Stephanie is 24-14 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Stephanie is 17-12 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Stephanie is 18-11 against the money line (+9.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 164 times, while the road underdog won straight up 117 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 15 times, while the road underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 2:45:20 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|