| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON INDIANA |
|
| 142.5 | 69 Final 67 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
653 | WASHINGTON | +200 | 654 | INDIANA | -250 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, after 3 consecutive division games. (518-205 since 1997.) (71.6%, +99.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record. (170-51 since 1997.) (76.9%, +67.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss by 10 points or more. (213-80 since 1997.) (72.7%, +65 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record. (117-31 since 1997.) (79.1%, +54.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss against a division rival, with a losing record. (225-80 since 1997.) (73.8%, +54.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games. (135-45 since 1997.) (75%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record. (111-26 since 1997.) (81%, +52.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss, on Tuesday nights. (144-97 since 1997.) (59.8%, +48 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (INDIANA) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season, in August or September games. (88-18 since 1997.) (83%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off a home loss by 10 points or more. (153-57 since 1997.) (72.9%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a home loss by 10 points or more. (122-37 since 1997.) (76.7%, +40.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (90-30 since 1997.) (75%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a home loss by 10 points or more. (93-24 since 1997.) (79.5%, +36.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, in August or September games. (75-23 since 1997.) (76.5%, +34.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (128-73 since 1997.) (63.7%, +32.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (93-47 since 1997.) (66.4%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (73-20 since 1997.) (78.5%, +28.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two good free throw shooting teams (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (46-11 since 1997.) (80.7%, +26 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (46-11 since 1997.) (80.7%, +26 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two good free throw shooting teams (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (46-11 since 1997.) (80.7%, +26 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (46-11 since 1997.) (80.7%, +26 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (46-11 since 1997.) (80.7%, +26 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (46-11 since 1997.) (80.7%, +26 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (47-21 since 1997.) (69.1%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (36-14 since 1997.) (72%, +20.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (114-62 since 1997.) (64.8%, +42.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, off a loss against a division rival. (67-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.6%, +35 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (128-73 since 1997.) (63.7%, +32.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (93-47 since 1997.) (66.4%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (48-24 since 1997.) (66.7%, +24.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON | 69 | | 26-62 | 41.3% | 4-13 | 32.3% | 14-17 | 79.5% | 43 | 10 | 16 | INDIANA | 76 | | 27-67 | 40.1% | 6-17 | 34.8% | 16-20 | 79.4% | 43 | 12 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, INDIANA won the game straight up 678 times, while WASHINGTON won 294 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 6-2 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in games where they attempt 77 to 83 shots this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.3, OPPONENT 73.6 | INDIANA is 82-103 against the money line (-66.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 76.3 |
|
WASHINGTON is 63-93 against the money line (-40.5 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 73.1 | WASHINGTON is 50-93 against the money line (-52.4 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 74.9 | WASHINGTON is 5-15 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 78.8 | WASHINGTON is 9-24 against the money line (-14.4 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 78.9 | WASHINGTON is 2-13 against the money line (-12.2 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.2, OPPONENT 75.5 | WASHINGTON is 6-24 against the money line (-18.2 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 79.4 | WASHINGTON is 40-97 against the money line (-59.7 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 76.1 | WASHINGTON is 4-21 against the money line (-15.8 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 80.8 | WASHINGTON is 4-23 against the money line (-17.5 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.8, OPPONENT 77.7 | INDIANA is 16-7 against the money line (+10.9 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 72.0 | INDIANA is 23-14 against the money line (+9.2 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.1, OPPONENT 73.1 | INDIANA is 27-15 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 71.5 | INDIANA is 17-8 against the money line (+9.3 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.1, OPPONENT 68.7 | INDIANA is 95-56 against the money line (+24.3 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.3, OPPONENT 68.6 | INDIANA is 33-19 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.1, OPPONENT 70.2 |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 102-126 against the money line (-53.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 50-71 against the money line (-43.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 30-54 against the money line (-28.3 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.4, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 18-39 against the money line (-28.1 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.8, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 6-29 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-40 against the money line (-23.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 51-83 against the money line (-32.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 21-30 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus poor passing teams, averaging <14 assists/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 65.7, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-23 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-36 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 45-81 against the money line (-37.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-18 against the money line (-12.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-28 against the money line (-16.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 12-26 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-23 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-38 against the money line (-23.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 16-46 against the money line (-29.9 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 30-73 against the money line (-41.9 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 3-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 1-8 against the money line (-7.8 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.0, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 14-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 66.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 37-21 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 27-16 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 36-24 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.6, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 20-13 against the money line (+12.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.1, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 28-20 against the money line (+13.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 23-13 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.8, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 45-25 against the money line (+17.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.5, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 29-17 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.4, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 37-25 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.1, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 15-7 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.5, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 18-10 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.5, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 26-17 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.5, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 19-14 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 28-21 against the money line (+8.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.7, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 87-92 against the money line (-40.7 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.0, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 137-141 against the money line (-51.1 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.8, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 133-132 against the money line (-50.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.1, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 24-71 against the money line (-36.5 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 99-248 against the money line (-75.4 Units) as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-38 against the money line (-23.9 Units) in road games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-21 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in a road game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-37 against the money line (-22.9 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-20 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-30 against the money line (-18.0 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 127-201 against the money line (-85.4 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 78-136 against the money line (-64.4 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-14 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after 3 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-30 against the money line (-20.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 64-110 against the money line (-51.3 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-21 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-28 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-29 against the money line (-22.3 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 6-27 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 4-23 against the money line (-19.0 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 17-51 against the money line (-25.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 52-109 against the money line (-41.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 11-37 against the money line (-22.1 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 69-129 against the money line (-58.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 26-56 against the money line (-31.1 Units) off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 33-65 against the money line (-29.9 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 2-11 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 17-38 against the money line (-20.7 Units) off a home loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 13-42 against the money line (-23.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-20 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-13 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 9-33 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-25 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 7-30 against the money line (-22.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 1-10 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 53-105 against the money line (-46.0 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-8 against the money line (-9.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 65.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-12 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 6-13 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-16 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-17 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 19-56 against the money line (-28.2 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 26-77 against the money line (-48.2 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 3-21 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in road games after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 12-39 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 51-98 against the money line (-53.9 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 10-31 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-38 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 13-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 38-10 against the money line (+21.7 Units) in home games when playing with 2 days rest since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 74.8, OPPONENT 67.6 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 25-12 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.7, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 14-17 | +1.4 | 16-15 | 14-16 | 75.6 | 36.8 | 41.5% | 43.3 | 77.0 | 37.6 | 41.9% | 43.4 | Road Games | 6-10 | -2.2 | 9-7 | 9-6 | 77.2 | 38.1 | 42.7% | 42.7 | 80.3 | 40.4 | 43.9% | 41.6 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.9 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 76.2 | 36.4 | 38.5% | 43.6 | 78.6 | 36.8 | 42.4% | 45.4 | Division Games | 7-12 | -5.5 | 8-11 | 8-10 | 72.6 | 34.1 | 40.0% | 41.9 | 76.1 | 36.7 | 41.5% | 45.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.6 | 36.8 | 27-66 | 41.5% | 4-13 | 33.1% | 17-21 | 79.4% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.3 | 37.5 | 28-66 | 42.2% | 5-14 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.2 | 38.1 | 28-66 | 42.7% | 4-13 | 32.1% | 16-20 | 80.9% | 43 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.0 | 37.6 | 28-68 | 41.9% | 5-15 | 32.3% | 15-20 | 78.0% | 43 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 75.9 | 37.8 | 28-67 | 42.2% | 5-14 | 32.1% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.3 | 40.4 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 5-14 | 34.5% | 16-20 | 78.9% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 15-16 | -3.4 | 15-16 | 11-19 | 70.8 | 35.9 | 39.5% | 39.5 | 70.4 | 34.0 | 43.7% | 40.6 | Home Games | 8-7 | -3.6 | 7-8 | 5-9 | 71.9 | 37.2 | 39.3% | 39.3 | 69.8 | 33.9 | 44.5% | 40.5 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.1 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 76.2 | 36.2 | 41.2% | 39.8 | 75.4 | 34.4 | 42.3% | 45.6 | Division Games | 10-9 | -0.7 | 9-10 | 6-12 | 70.7 | 36.5 | 38.7% | 40.8 | 68.8 | 32.2 | 41.8% | 42.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.8 | 35.9 | 25-64 | 39.5% | 6-16 | 34.7% | 15-19 | 78.3% | 39 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 10 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.1 | 37.9 | 28-67 | 42.1% | 5-14 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 71.9 | 37.2 | 25-64 | 39.3% | 6-16 | 36.4% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 39 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.4 | 34.0 | 26-60 | 43.7% | 4-12 | 31.7% | 15-18 | 79.5% | 41 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 75.8 | 37.5 | 28-67 | 42.3% | 4-14 | 32.0% | 15-19 | 77.9% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 69.8 | 33.9 | 27-60 | 44.5% | 4-12 | 29.3% | 13-16 | 79.3% | 40 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 71.9, INDIANA 70 |
| | |
|
|
8/2/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 78-85 | L | +210 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 41 | 19 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 41 | 10 | 8/4/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 57-75 | L | -105 | 25-73 | 34.2% | 42 | 16 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 48 | 13 | 8/6/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 88-93 | L | +135 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 39 | 7 | 35-64 | 54.7% | 41 | 10 | 8/8/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 79-75 | W | | 31-68 | 45.6% | 48 | 16 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 31 | 11 | 8/11/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 74-63 | W | -200 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 45 | 14 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 41 | 14 | 8/16/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 66-57 | W | +120 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 40 | 10 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 46 | 15 | 8/18/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 58-76 | L | +220 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 45 | 17 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 50 | 17 | 8/20/2013 | CHICAGO | 73-79 | L | +120 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 51 | 14 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 49 | 11 | 8/23/2013 | ATLANTA | 74-64 | W | +120 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 42 | 9 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 50 | 14 | 8/28/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 85-80 | W | +210 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 44 | 16 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 51 | 16 | 9/6/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 70-77 | L | -220 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 42 | 18 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 34 | 18 | 9/8/2013 | CHICAGO | 79-93 | L | +135 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 39 | 9 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 43 | 11 | 9/10/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/15/2013 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/1/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 64-70 | L | +170 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 48 | 13 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 36 | 8 | 8/3/2013 | CHICAGO | 79-58 | W | -155 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 50 | 10 | 20-61 | 32.8% | 39 | 14 | 8/6/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 64-58 | W | +200 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 35 | 9 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 52 | 15 | 8/8/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 64-74 | L | -140 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 42 | 10 | 30-55 | 54.5% | 37 | 16 | 8/10/2013 | ATLANTA | 80-66 | W | -140 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 38 | 13 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 29 | 14 | 8/14/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 58-75 | L | +175 | 21-67 | 31.3% | 34 | 12 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 45 | 19 | 8/16/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 72-94 | L | +250 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 30 | 12 | 36-57 | 63.2% | 34 | 12 | 8/17/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 70-77 | L | +100 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 43 | 5 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 28 | 11 | 8/21/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 80-63 | W | -360 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 35 | 12 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 38 | 19 | 8/24/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 77-84 | L | +350 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 31 | 13 | 37-64 | 57.8% | 35 | 13 | 8/30/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 73-67 | W | -200 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 37 | 7 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 48 | 13 | 9/4/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 80-89 | L | +170 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 44 | 15 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 59 | 16 | 9/6/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 82-77 | W | +210 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 47 | 8 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 44 | 8 | 9/7/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 69-60 | W | -750 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 40 | 15 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 42 | 17 | 9/10/2013 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2013 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/15/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
INDIANA is 37-16 (+16.6 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 10-2 (+7.2 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
INDIANA is 20-6 (+6.3 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 6-0 (+6.0 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/21/2013 | INDIANA | 65 | 144.5 | SU ATS | 30 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 44 | 11 | 12 | | WASHINGTON | 52 | -4.5 | Under | 16 | 17-55 | 30.9% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 40 | 4 | 15 | 7/19/2013 | WASHINGTON | 70 | 147 | | 31 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 17-19 | 89.5% | 38 | 8 | 21 | | INDIANA | 77 | -5 | SU ATS | 32 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 22-23 | 95.7% | 41 | 16 | 13 | 6/16/2013 | INDIANA | 60 | 143 | Under | 31 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 39 | 8 | 10 | | WASHINGTON | 64 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 31 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 44 | 6 | 16 | 9/21/2012 | INDIANA | 66 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 28 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 53 | 10 | 16 | | WASHINGTON | 53 | 142.5 | Under | 26 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 4-21 | 19.0% | 5-7 | 71.4% | 38 | 6 | 15 | 8/28/2012 | WASHINGTON | 68 | 149.5 | Over | 37 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 3-7 | 42.9% | 30 | 7 | 15 | | INDIANA | 83 | -13 | SU ATS | 43 | 30-56 | 53.6% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 34 | 7 | 14 | 8/16/2012 | WASHINGTON | 66 | 147 | Over | 38 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 39 | 11 | 16 | | INDIANA | 84 | -11 | SU ATS | 40 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 9-25 | 36.0% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 47 | 15 | 14 | 6/15/2012 | INDIANA | 66 | -6 | Under | 31 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 17-26 | 65.4% | 44 | 10 | 14 | | WASHINGTON | 67 | 149.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 3-16 | 18.7% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 45 | 12 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Mike is 99-69 against the money line (+25.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.3, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 41-29 against the money line (+19.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 71-50 against the money line (+17.5 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 26-16 against the money line (+11.9 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 75.0, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 37-22 against the money line (+14.7 Units) off a home loss in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 85-63 against the money line (+22.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 57-28 against the money line (+29.8 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 21-14 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 78.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 76-70 against the money line (-25.5 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Mike is 5-13 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 1-8 against the money line (-7.8 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.0, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 133-97 against the money line (+4.7 Units) in all games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 48-14 against the money line (+15.9 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.1, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 19-3 against the money line (+13.1 Units) in home games when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 82.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 93-57 against the money line (+19.5 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.6, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 28-24 against the money line (+16.7 Units) when playing their 4th game in 7 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lin 69.2, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 20-11 against the money line (+8.6 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 78-57 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 111-78 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 49-32 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.3, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 69-45 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.3, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 76-52 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 107-74 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 27-16 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 36-22 against the money line (+16.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.9, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 106-74 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.8, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 96-72 against the money line (+6.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 174 times, while the road underdog won straight up 71 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 23 times, while the road underdog won straight up 11 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 09/08/2013 - Erin Phillips "?" Tuesday vs. Wash Mystics ( Eye ) | [G] 06/21/2013 - Katie Douglas out indefinitely ( Back ) | [C] 06/21/2013 - Jessica Davenport out for season ( Tibia ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/28/2024 12:32:06 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|