| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT INDIANA |
|
| 139.5 | 60 Final 69 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
651 | CONNECTICUT | +500 | 652 | INDIANA | -750 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent. (695-301 since 1997.) (69.8%, +135.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent. (649-285 since 1997.) (69.5%, +124.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG). (262-93 since 1997.) (73.8%, +83.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - playing on back-to-back days. (249-93 since 1997.) (72.8%, +81.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game. (232-66 since 1997.) (77.9%, +78.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, playing on back-to-back days. (279-101 since 1997.) (73.4%, +75.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game. (161-28 since 1997.) (85.2%, +75.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG). (244-98 since 1997.) (71.3%, +75.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after playing a road game, playing on back-to-back days. (171-57 since 1997.) (75%, +72.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, playing on back-to-back days. (174-58 since 1997.) (75%, +70 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (269-100 since 1997.) (72.9%, +69.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game. (268-125 since 1997.) (68.2%, +69.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG). (215-71 since 1997.) (75.2%, +67.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - playing on back-to-back days. (204-95 since 1997.) (68.2%, +66.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - playing on back-to-back days. (172-52 since 1997.) (76.8%, +65.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after playing a road game, playing on back-to-back days. (156-69 since 1997.) (69.3%, +65.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (287-111 since 1997.) (72.1%, +64.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after playing a road game, playing on back-to-back days. (130-36 since 1997.) (78.3%, +61.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (332-207 since 1997.) (61.6%, +61.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (149-55 since 1997.) (73%, +56.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games. (134-45 since 1997.) (74.9%, +52.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG). (135-48 since 1997.) (73.8%, +52.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, playing on back-to-back days. (150-52 since 1997.) (74.3%, +52.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, playing on back-to-back days. (118-34 since 1997.) (77.6%, +51.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, playing on back-to-back days. (83-22 since 1997.) (79%, +50.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a win against a division rival, playing on back-to-back days. (106-30 since 1997.) (77.9%, +49.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, playing on back-to-back days. (115-41 since 1997.) (73.7%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a win against a division rival, playing on back-to-back days. (93-33 since 1997.) (73.8%, +45.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, playing on back-to-back days. (104-33 since 1997.) (75.9%, +44.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after a game where they covered the spread, playing on back-to-back days. (116-52 since 1997.) (69%, +44.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, playing on back-to-back days. (73-13 since 1997.) (84.9%, +44.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a road win, playing on back-to-back days. (82-27 since 1997.) (75.2%, +43.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (72-17 since 1997.) (80.9%, +41.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, playing on back-to-back days. (101-27 since 1997.) (78.9%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, playing on back-to-back days. (109-59 since 1997.) (64.9%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (89-30 since 1997.) (74.8%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, playing on back-to-back days. (85-26 since 1997.) (76.6%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (63-14 since 1997.) (81.8%, +38.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (62-14 since 1997.) (81.6%, +36.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - playing on back-to-back days, in August or September games. (78-31 since 1997.) (71.6%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (64-17 since 1997.) (79%, +35.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - vs. division opponents, playing on back-to-back days. (133-68 since 1997.) (66.2%, +35.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - playing on back-to-back days, in August or September games. (68-20 since 1997.) (77.3%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (78-35 since 1997.) (69%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more. (63-25 since 1997.) (71.6%, +33.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - playing on back-to-back days, in August or September games. (83-30 since 1997.) (73.5%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (INDIANA) - playing on back-to-back days, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (59-16 since 1997.) (78.7%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (56-14 since 1997.) (80%, +33.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (127-73 since 1997.) (63.5%, +31.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (92-47 since 1997.) (66.2%, +30.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (58-24 since 1997.) (70.7%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off an upset win as a road underdog, playing on back-to-back days. (50-18 since 1997.) (73.5%, +29.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (52-21 since 1997.) (71.2%, +27.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off an upset win as an underdog, playing on back-to-back days. (51-21 since 1997.) (70.8%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - playing on back-to-back days, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (38-11 since 1997.) (77.6%, +24.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (47-24 since 1997.) (66.2%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (46-21 since 1997.) (68.7%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games. (26-6 since 1997.) (81.2%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%). (25-4 since 1997.) (86.2%, +21 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%). (62-32 since 1997.) (66%, +20.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (35-14 since 1997.) (71.4%, +19.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games. (22-4 since 1997.) (84.6%, +19.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%). (26-7 since 1997.) (78.8%, +19 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset win over a division rival as a home underdog. (31-11 since 1997.) (73.8%, +16 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games. (21-6 since 1997.) (77.8%, +16 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%). (22-7 since 1997.) (75.9%, +15.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games. (43-21 since 1997.) (67.2%, +15 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off an upset win as a road underdog. (36-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games. (27-10 since 1997.) (73%, +12.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off an upset win as an underdog, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%). (23-12 since 1997.) (65.7%, +6.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off an upset win as a road underdog. (42-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win, with a losing record. (75-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +27.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off an upset win as an underdog. (50-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off an upset win as an underdog. (57-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.6%, +21.5 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (38-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (25-9 since 1997.) (73.5%, +13.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (34-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +31.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (50-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT | 65 | | 25-63 | 39.7% | 4-12 | 30.2% | 11-14 | 75.4% | 42 | 9 | 15 | INDIANA | 76 | | 27-67 | 40.5% | 6-17 | 35.5% | 15-20 | 78.5% | 46 | 12 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, INDIANA won the game straight up 775 times, while CONNECTICUT won 207 times. Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 15-8 against the money line (+9.6 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 74.1 | INDIANA is 82-103 against the money line (-66.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 76.3 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 4-10 against the money line (-8.3 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.0, OPPONENT 79.1 | CONNECTICUT is 8-13 against the money line (-13.4 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.9, OPPONENT 77.2 | CONNECTICUT is 3-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 69.4, OPPONENT 76.4 | CONNECTICUT is 2-7 against the money line (-7.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 69.9, OPPONENT 77.4 | CONNECTICUT is 16-30 against the money line (-24.2 Units) when they score 60 to 65 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 63.1, OPPONENT 67.4 | INDIANA is 16-7 against the money line (+10.9 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 72.0 | INDIANA is 23-14 against the money line (+9.2 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.1, OPPONENT 73.1 | INDIANA is 27-15 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 71.5 | INDIANA is 76-34 against the money line (+43.8 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.5, OPPONENT 68.1 | INDIANA is 9-1 against the money line (+8.9 Units) when they allow 60 to 65 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 62.8 | INDIANA is 95-56 against the money line (+24.3 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.3, OPPONENT 68.6 | INDIANA is 10-1 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.7, OPPONENT 67.5 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.5, OPPONENT 66.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-9 against the money line (+14.5 Units) versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 10-18 against the money line (-16.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 13-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.0, OPPONENT 66.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 26-16 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 35-24 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.7, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 22-13 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.0, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 44-25 against the money line (+16.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 28-17 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.5, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 36-25 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.2, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 14-7 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.7, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 17-10 against the money line (+9.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.6, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 18-12 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 25-17 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.7, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 25-15 against the money line (+15.7 Units) when playing on back-to-back days since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 3-8 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was INDIANA 69.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 3-8 against the money line (-13.6 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog of 6 or more since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 65.8, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 31-35 against the money line (-24.0 Units) off a road win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.0, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 86-92 against the money line (-41.7 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.0, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 1-5 against the money line (-7.2 Units) off a road win this season. The average score was INDIANA 72.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 132-132 against the money line (-51.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.1, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 8-21 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in all games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-11 against the money line (-7.5 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-13 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 68.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-12 against the money line (-9.0 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-14 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-9 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.6, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-13 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-11 against the money line (-8.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.4, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-15 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 17-6 against the money line (+9.6 Units) on Saturday games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.0, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 9-3 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season. The average score was INDIANA 70.8, OPPONENT 65.7 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 24-12 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 16-9 against the money line (+10.3 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 80-53 against the money line (+22.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 74.4, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 96-74 against the money line (+18.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.5, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 13-2 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.3, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 20-9 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 9-3 against the money line (+6.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.8, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 18-8 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 40-21 against the money line (+24.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 70.1, OPPONENT 67.2 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 18-4 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 81.5, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 8-22 | -16 | 12-18 | 10-19 | 71.3 | 33.5 | 39.9% | 42.6 | 76.8 | 38.7 | 43.6% | 45.1 | Road Games | 2-13 | -9.2 | 5-10 | 5-10 | 68.5 | 31.5 | 38.5% | 42.5 | 76.9 | 37.4 | 43.7% | 46.7 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -1.6 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 70.8 | 33.2 | 39.9% | 36.8 | 77.8 | 40.2 | 46.1% | 44.4 | Division Games | 6-12 | -5.8 | 8-10 | 5-12 | 71.4 | 33.1 | 40.7% | 43.4 | 75.6 | 38.1 | 42.4% | 44.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.3 | 33.5 | 28-70 | 39.9% | 4-14 | 31.0% | 12-16 | 74.7% | 43 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.4 | 37.4 | 28-67 | 42.0% | 5-14 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 68.5 | 31.5 | 27-70 | 38.5% | 4-14 | 29.0% | 11-15 | 72.4% | 42 | 11 | 13 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.8 | 38.7 | 29-67 | 43.6% | 4-11 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 77.9% | 45 | 11 | 15 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 75.9 | 37.9 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-14 | 32.3% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.9 | 37.4 | 29-66 | 43.7% | 4-11 | 32.0% | 16-21 | 75.2% | 47 | 12 | 16 | 15 | 9 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 14-16 | -4.4 | 15-15 | 11-18 | 70.9 | 36.1 | 39.4% | 39.4 | 70.7 | 34.2 | 43.9% | 40.6 | Home Games | 7-7 | -4.6 | 7-7 | 5-8 | 72.1 | 37.6 | 39.0% | 39.3 | 70.5 | 34.4 | 45.0% | 40.4 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.1 | 4-1 | 5-0 | 78.4 | 38.2 | 41.2% | 38.8 | 76.0 | 33.8 | 43.0% | 44.8 | Division Games | 9-9 | -1.7 | 9-9 | 6-11 | 70.8 | 36.8 | 38.5% | 40.9 | 69.3 | 32.4 | 42.1% | 42.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.9 | 36.1 | 25-64 | 39.4% | 6-16 | 35.2% | 15-19 | 78.3% | 39 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 10 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.1 | 37.8 | 28-67 | 42.0% | 5-14 | 32.6% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 72.1 | 37.6 | 25-64 | 39.0% | 6-16 | 37.6% | 16-20 | 79.4% | 39 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.7 | 34.2 | 26-59 | 43.9% | 4-12 | 32.6% | 15-18 | 79.7% | 41 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 76 | 37.6 | 28-67 | 42.4% | 4-14 | 31.8% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 70.5 | 34.4 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 4-12 | 30.9% | 13-16 | 79.8% | 40 | 8 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 6 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.2, INDIANA 69.8 |
| | |
|
|
8/1/2013 | INDIANA | 70-64 | W | -200 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 36 | 8 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 48 | 13 | 8/3/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 88-66 | W | +170 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 44 | 14 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 34 | 16 | 8/6/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 72-74 | L | +145 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 36 | 13 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 44 | 14 | 8/9/2013 | CHICAGO | 61-77 | L | +170 | 25-78 | 32.1% | 47 | 9 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 53 | 12 | 8/11/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 63-74 | L | +170 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 41 | 14 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 45 | 14 | 8/14/2013 | ATLANTA | 88-86 | W | +145 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 38 | 13 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 48 | 10 | 8/16/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 57-88 | L | +325 | 22-69 | 31.9% | 47 | 21 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 38 | 17 | 8/18/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 78-89 | L | +300 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 34 | 18 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 46 | 16 | 8/22/2013 | MINNESOTA | 77-91 | L | +350 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 39 | 15 | 38-66 | 57.6% | 27 | 9 | 8/25/2013 | NEW YORK | 66-74 | L | -140 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 38 | 6 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 45 | 13 | 8/27/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 78-91 | L | | 29-69 | 42.0% | 38 | 18 | 37-65 | 56.9% | 42 | 13 | 8/29/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 65-78 | L | +250 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 34 | 12 | 23-47 | 48.9% | 39 | 18 | 8/31/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 68-76 | L | +600 | 29-82 | 35.4% | 40 | 9 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 54 | 17 | 9/6/2013 | WASHINGTON | 77-70 | W | +180 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 34 | 18 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 42 | 18 | 9/7/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/15/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/1/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 64-70 | L | +170 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 48 | 13 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 36 | 8 | 8/3/2013 | CHICAGO | 79-58 | W | -155 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 50 | 10 | 20-61 | 32.8% | 39 | 14 | 8/6/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 64-58 | W | +200 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 35 | 9 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 52 | 15 | 8/8/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 64-74 | L | -140 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 42 | 10 | 30-55 | 54.5% | 37 | 16 | 8/10/2013 | ATLANTA | 80-66 | W | -140 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 38 | 13 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 29 | 14 | 8/14/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 58-75 | L | +175 | 21-67 | 31.3% | 34 | 12 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 45 | 19 | 8/16/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 72-94 | L | +250 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 30 | 12 | 36-57 | 63.2% | 34 | 12 | 8/17/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 70-77 | L | +100 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 43 | 5 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 28 | 11 | 8/21/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 80-63 | W | -360 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 35 | 12 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 38 | 19 | 8/24/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 77-84 | L | +350 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 31 | 13 | 37-64 | 57.8% | 35 | 13 | 8/30/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 73-67 | W | -200 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 37 | 7 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 48 | 13 | 9/4/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 80-89 | L | +170 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 44 | 15 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 59 | 16 | 9/6/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 82-77 | W | +210 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 47 | 8 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 44 | 8 | 9/7/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/10/2013 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2013 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/15/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 35-24 (+6.3 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 8-7 (+0.1 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CONNECTICUT is 15-15 (+6.4 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 5-2 (+1.3 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/1/2013 | INDIANA | 64 | 140 | Under | 34 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 48 | 12 | 13 | | CONNECTICUT | 70 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 25 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 36 | 10 | 8 | 7/6/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 66 | 145 | Under | 23 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 42 | 9 | 21 | | INDIANA | 78 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 34 | 6 | 8 | 6/12/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 73 | 147 | SU ATS | 38 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 47 | 9 | 17 | | INDIANA | 61 | -3.5 | Under | 35 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 37 | 12 | 11 | 10/11/2012 | INDIANA | 87 | 146 | SU ATS | 43 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 10-16 | 62.5% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 36 | 7 | 11 | | CONNECTICUT | 71 | -4.5 | Over | 24 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 39 | 10 | 9 | 10/8/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 76 | 146.5 | ATS | 43 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 43 | 14 | 14 | | INDIANA | 78 | -5 | SU Over | 46 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 36 | 14 | 7 | 10/5/2012 | INDIANA | 64 | 150.5 | Under | 30 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 36 | 10 | 8 | | CONNECTICUT | 76 | -4 | SU ATS | 30 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 19-20 | 95.0% | 39 | 10 | 12 | 9/19/2012 | INDIANA | 67 | 154 | Under | 27 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 36 | 16 | 10 | | CONNECTICUT | 73 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 6/21/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 61 | 159.5 | Under | 30 | 20-61 | 32.8% | 2-17 | 11.8% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 35 | 9 | 14 | | INDIANA | 95 | -6 | SU ATS | 57 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 15-24 | 62.5% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 39 | 5 | 11 | 6/19/2012 | INDIANA | 85 | 162 | ATS | 39 | 35-79 | 44.3% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 40 | 9 | 11 | | CONNECTICUT | 88 | -4.5 | SU Over | 45 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 45 | 9 | 15 | 6/8/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 89 | 162.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 45 | 12 | 15 | | INDIANA | 81 | -5 | Over | 47 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 9-22 | 40.9% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 36 | 10 | 17 |
|
| | |
|
Anne is 74-55 against the money line (+18.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 74.0, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 23-24 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 21-39 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lin 69.7, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 31-49 against the money line (-24.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lin 70.2, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Anne is 8-21 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 2-13 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 68.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 5*) | Anne is 5-12 against the money line (-9.0 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 5-14 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 3-9 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.6, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 7-26 against the money line (-19.2 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 73.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 5-20 against the money line (-14.9 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 73.8, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 21-56 against the money line (-31.7 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 70.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 5-15 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 32-41 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 76.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 11-5 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when playing on back-to-back days as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 74.8, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 92-57 against the money line (+18.5 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.7, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 7-1 against the money line (+8.6 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 4 days as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 81.6, OPPONENT 67.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Lin is 32-20 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 6-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) after 5 or more consecutive overs as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 82.3, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 53-38 against the money line (+11.4 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.8, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 40-26 against the money line (+14.1 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 22-11 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 56-30 against the money line (+20.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.0, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 61-40 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 33-16 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 33-19 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 40-13 against the money line (+18.0 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 51-24 against the money line (+30.4 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Lin is 16-6 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 48-22 against the money line (+28.1 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Lin is 13-3 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 80.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Lin is 68-41 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 34-12 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.5, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 77-57 against the money line (+7.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 110-78 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 48-32 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.4, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 68-45 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.4, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 75-52 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 106-74 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 26-16 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 35-22 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 28-17 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.4, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 35-27 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 74.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 105-74 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 45 times, while the road underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 11 times, while the road underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[C] 09/06/2013 - Tina Charles out for season ( Knee ) | [G] 08/26/2013 - Kara Lawson out for season ( Knee ) | [G] 08/21/2013 - Kelly Faris out for season ( Foot ) | [F] 08/21/2013 - Allison Hightower out for season ( Knee ) | [G] 06/16/2013 - Danielle McCray out for season ( Achilles ) | [F] 05/25/2013 - Asjha Jones out for season ( Personal ) | |
[G] 06/21/2013 - Katie Douglas out indefinitely ( Back ) | [C] 06/21/2013 - Jessica Davenport out for season ( Tibia ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 3:32:34 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|