| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA DALLAS |
|
| 165 | 77 Final 95 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
605 | MINNESOTA | +135 | 606 | DALLAS | -155 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (308-113 since 1997.) (73.2%, +87.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (208-81 since 1997.) (72%, +69.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (191-76 since 1997.) (71.5%, +63.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (139-47 since 1997.) (74.7%, +56.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (157-60 since 1997.) (72.4%, +56.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.), after a loss by 10 points or more. (143-49 since 1997.) (74.5%, +55.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (150-58 since 1997.) (72.1%, +54.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.), after a loss by 10 points or more. (135-45 since 1997.) (75%, +54.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (119-42 since 1997.) (73.9%, +49.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (66-11 since 1997.) (85.7%, +49.2 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (125-44 since 1997.) (74%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (57-11 since 1997.) (83.8%, +40.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog, on Saturday games. (61-41 since 1997.) (59.8%, +39 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, off a upset loss as a favorite. (74-41 since 1997.) (64.3%, +37.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, off an upset loss as a home favorite. (57-31 since 1997.) (64.8%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, off a upset loss as a favorite. (61-15 since 1997.) (80.3%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite. (55-16 since 1997.) (77.5%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite, with a losing record. (54-31 since 1997.) (63.5%, +28 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, off an upset loss as a home favorite. (45-11 since 1997.) (80.4%, +27.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite. (24-8 since 1997.) (75%, +27 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two excellent free throw shooting teams (>=80%), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (53-29 since 1997.) (64.6%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite. (44-20 since 1997.) (68.8%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival. (38-17 since 1997.) (69.1%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite. (27-14 since 1997.) (65.9%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (33-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival. (29-12 since 1997.) (70.7%, +20.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win against a division rival. (21-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +17.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win against a division rival. (37-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +13 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (84-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win against a division rival. (43-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.6%, +37.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in June games. (36-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +19.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in June games. (29-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +17 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win against a division rival. (35-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +33.7 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, on Saturday games. (127-90 since 1997.) (58.5%, +50.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (121-77 since 1997.) (61.1%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (113-69 since 1997.) (62.1%, +44.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (137-96 since 1997.) (58.8%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, on Saturday games. (96-65 since 1997.) (59.6%, +41.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (132-93 since 1997.) (58.7%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (117-78 since 1997.) (60%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more. (124-83 since 1997.) (59.9%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more. (99-61 since 1997.) (61.9%, +39 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (105-68 since 1997.) (60.7%, +38.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, on Saturday games. (110-70 since 1997.) (61.1%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 80 points or more. (102-68 since 1997.) (60%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more. (78-44 since 1997.) (63.9%, +36 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (73-41 since 1997.) (64%, +33.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (108-76 since 1997.) (58.7%, +33.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (90-57 since 1997.) (61.2%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (109-74 since 1997.) (59.6%, +32.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in June games. (101-71 since 1997.) (58.7%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (89-60 since 1997.) (59.7%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, with a losing record. (67-41 since 1997.) (62%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (88-57 since 1997.) (60.7%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (44-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.5%, +33.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (32-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (72-44 since 1997.) (62.1%, +29.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (65-36 since 1997.) (64.4%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (93-65 since 1997.) (58.9%, +28.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (27-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +24.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (74-49 since 1997.) (60.2%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games. (51-27 since 1997.) (65.4%, +26.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (52-26 since 1997.) (66.7%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after going under the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games, on Saturday games. (35-16 since 1997.) (68.6%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (65-39 since 1997.) (62.5%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games. (46-24 since 1997.) (65.7%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (45-24 since 1997.) (65.2%, +23 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (38-17 since 1997.) (69.1%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (39-19 since 1997.) (67.2%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +14.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (28-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +19.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (23-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +14.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (21-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +15.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (23-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +14.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (24-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +10.2 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA | 84 | | 30-67 | 45.1% | 8-23 | 34.0% | 15-18 | 85.0% | 43 | 9 | 15 | DALLAS | 88 | | 32-73 | 44.3% | 9-25 | 36.6% | 15-18 | 81.4% | 43 | 11 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, DALLAS won the game straight up 616 times, while MINNESOTA won 361 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 111-39 against the money line (+81.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 74.4 | MINNESOTA is 14-5 against the money line (+10.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.4, OPPONENT 78.2 | MINNESOTA is 30-16 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.9, OPPONENT 80.9 | MINNESOTA is 14-5 against the money line (+8.7 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 89.6, OPPONENT 83.3 | DALLAS is 51-89 against the money line (-41.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 86.0 | DALLAS is 2-9 against the money line (-9.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 85.4 | DALLAS is 1-7 against the money line (-7.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.0, OPPONENT 91.8 | DALLAS is 3-18 against the money line (-15.3 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.3, OPPONENT 92.9 | DALLAS is 32-58 against the money line (-26.3 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 86.3 |
|
MINNESOTA is 104-118 against the money line (-50.2 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 79.0 | MINNESOTA is 86-96 against the money line (-41.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.3, OPPONENT 75.3 | MINNESOTA is 38-45 against the money line (-30.0 Units) in road games when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 83.5 | MINNESOTA is 132-118 against the money line (-51.9 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.3, OPPONENT 75.0 | MINNESOTA is 11-16 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 86.7 | MINNESOTA is 4-14 against the money line (-14.9 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 90.3 | MINNESOTA is 69-82 against the money line (-45.4 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 76.3 |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 41-74 against the money line (-31.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 40-69 against the money line (-32.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 49-82 against the money line (-33.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 49-87 against the money line (-35.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 39-78 against the money line (-39.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 179-127 against the money line (-63.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.2, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 109-134 against the money line (-45.4 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 226-223 against the money line (-92.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 318-293 against the money line (-93.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 161-132 against the money line (-55.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 72-71 against the money line (-40.8 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 226-201 against the money line (-70.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 93-50 against the money line (+21.8 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 160-86 against the money line (+29.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 132-69 against the money line (+25.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 107-51 against the money line (+24.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 85-39 against the money line (+23.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 4-11 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in home games on Saturday games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 80.4, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 11-32 against the money line (-25.2 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 8-13 against the money line (-15.5 Units) in home games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 24-46 against the money line (-27.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 1-8 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 77.3, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 5-15 against the money line (-19.3 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 84.2, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 3-13 against the money line (-11.8 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 90.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 3-10 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in home games revenging a home loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 27-65 against the money line (-33.6 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 11-20 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-14 against the money line (-13.3 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 2-6 against the money line (-12.3 Units) off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 5-11 against the money line (-11.5 Units) off an upset loss as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 1-5 against the money line (-11.5 Units) off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 11-24 against the money line (-17.9 Units) off a home loss since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 2-7 against the money line (-11.3 Units) off a home loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 47-81 against the money line (-41.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 43-69 against the money line (-37.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 42-66 against the money line (-32.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 27-47 against the money line (-32.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 39-63 against the money line (-33.5 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 45-71 against the money line (-32.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 37-60 against the money line (-31.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 84.3, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 32-51 against the money line (-26.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 46-73 against the money line (-40.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 35-57 against the money line (-35.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 18-32 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-23 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 21-46 against the money line (-32.7 Units) after playing a home game since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 10-17 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 4-19 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 79.8, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 23-43 against the money line (-28.7 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 15-33 against the money line (-25.7 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 89.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 11-25 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 250-223 against the money line (-78.1 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 238-228 against the money line (-84.7 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 4-7 against the money line (-10.4 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.4, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 11-16 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 194-187 against the money line (-77.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.0, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 23-42 against the money line (-38.9 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 42-63 against the money line (-40.3 Units) off an upset win as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 44-48 against the money line (-41.7 Units) off a road win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.6, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 27-45 against the money line (-37.9 Units) off an upset win as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 70.5, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 82-75 against the money line (-39.7 Units) off a road win since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.0, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-9 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 126-173 against the money line (-92.2 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 89-127 against the money line (-75.0 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 169-175 against the money line (-92.7 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 5-6 | -2.6 | 4-7 | 6-5 | 81.8 | 41.6 | 43.6% | 44.0 | 81.8 | 41.2 | 43.1% | 40.6 | Road Games | 1-3 | -3 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 78.2 | 40.5 | 41.0% | 43.0 | 81.5 | 44.2 | 42.6% | 42.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.5 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 87.0 | 46.2 | 46.0% | 45.0 | 81.4 | 41.4 | 42.1% | 37.2 | Division Games | 2-3 | -0.6 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 78.0 | 40.0 | 42.6% | 45.8 | 77.2 | 38.4 | 41.1% | 41.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.8 | 41.6 | 29-67 | 43.6% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 16-20 | 81.2% | 44 | 7 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.7 | 41 | 29-69 | 42.8% | 7-21 | 34.1% | 16-20 | 79.8% | 44 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 78.2 | 40.5 | 28-68 | 41.0% | 5-23 | 24.2% | 17-19 | 87.0% | 43 | 7 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.8 | 41.2 | 30-70 | 43.1% | 9-23 | 36.7% | 13-17 | 78.9% | 41 | 7 | 20 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 82.4 | 41.4 | 30-70 | 42.6% | 8-23 | 35.5% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.5 | 44.2 | 30-70 | 42.6% | 7-21 | 34.5% | 14-16 | 89.1% | 42 | 6 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 5-7 | +0.3 | 8-4 | 5-5 | 84.5 | 40.7 | 41.1% | 46.9 | 83.3 | 41.1 | 43.2% | 44.1 | Home Games | 1-3 | -2.8 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 83.5 | 38.2 | 39.2% | 46.2 | 85.7 | 39.7 | 44.9% | 43.7 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.6 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 76.2 | 36.8 | 37.4% | 47.4 | 75.4 | 37.4 | 41.4% | 43.8 | Division Games | 5-5 | +2.6 | 8-2 | 4-5 | 83.8 | 40.2 | 40.7% | 48.6 | 81.1 | 40.1 | 42.4% | 43.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 84.5 | 40.7 | 30-74 | 41.1% | 8-24 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 81.8% | 47 | 11 | 18 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.9 | 40.5 | 30-71 | 41.9% | 7-21 | 32.4% | 15-18 | 81.0% | 45 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.5 | 38.2 | 29-75 | 39.2% | 9-25 | 35.3% | 15-18 | 83.8% | 46 | 11 | 18 | 21 | 6 | 11 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.3 | 41.1 | 29-68 | 43.2% | 7-23 | 30.7% | 17-22 | 77.4% | 44 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 6 | vs opponents averaging | 82.4 | 41.4 | 30-68 | 43.6% | 8-22 | 35.0% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 43 | 7 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 85.7 | 39.7 | 31-68 | 44.9% | 8-24 | 32.7% | 16-20 | 82.3% | 44 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 5 | 11 | 7 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 71, DALLAS 73.8 |
| | |
|
|
5/14/2021 | PHOENIX | 75-77 | L | -115 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 49 | 14 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 48 | 11 | 5/18/2021 | @ NEW YORK | 75-86 | L | -210 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 41 | 10 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 48 | 16 | 5/20/2021 | SEATTLE | 78-90 | L | +170 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 43 | 17 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 39 | 17 | 5/28/2021 | @ SEATTLE | 72-82 | L | +200 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 38 | 12 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 43 | 12 | 5/30/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 79-74 | W | +120 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 51 | 14 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 39 | 11 | 6/4/2021 | ATLANTA | 86-84 | W | -270 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 37 | 20 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 44 | 18 | 6/6/2021 | ATLANTA | 100-80 | W | -200 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 37 | 10 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 42 | 18 | 6/8/2021 | @ WASHINGTON | 81-85 | L | -140 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 46 | 21 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 34 | 12 | 6/12/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 80-64 | W | -450 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 52 | 22 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 32 | 12 | 6/15/2021 | CHICAGO | 89-105 | L | -165 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 43 | 20 | 40-70 | 57.1% | 35 | 13 | 6/17/2021 | @ DALLAS | 85-73 | W | +155 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 47 | 14 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 43 | 10 | 6/19/2021 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/23/2021 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/25/2021 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2021 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2021 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/14/2021 | @ LOS ANGELES | 94-71 | W | +200 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 52 | 26 | 28-78 | 35.9% | 38 | 15 | 5/22/2021 | SEATTLE | 97-100 | L | +250 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 52 | 16 | 35-80 | 43.7% | 45 | 9 | 5/24/2021 | @ NEW YORK | 81-88 | L | -110 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 42 | 12 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 42 | 14 | 5/27/2021 | @ ATLANTA | 95-101 | L | -115 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 35 | 10 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 55 | 11 | 5/29/2021 | PHOENIX | 85-89 | L | -105 | 29-78 | 37.2% | 40 | 4 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 51 | 10 | 6/1/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 79-69 | W | +100 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 50 | 16 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 32 | 12 | 6/4/2021 | @ SEATTLE | 102-105 | L | +350 | 43-96 | 44.8% | 55 | 13 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 47 | 16 | 6/6/2021 | @ SEATTLE | 68-67 | W | +325 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 46 | 13 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 45 | 11 | 6/8/2021 | @ PHOENIX | 85-81 | W | +105 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 49 | 9 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 42 | 7 | 6/11/2021 | @ PHOENIX | 77-59 | W | +105 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 53 | 13 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 36 | 13 | 6/13/2021 | @ LAS VEGAS | 78-85 | L | +300 | 25-77 | 32.5% | 46 | 10 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 49 | 16 | 6/17/2021 | MINNESOTA | 73-85 | L | -175 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 43 | 10 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 47 | 14 | 6/19/2021 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/22/2021 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/24/2021 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/26/2021 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2021 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2021 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2021 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
MINNESOTA is 40-13 (+25.3 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 5-1 (+3.9 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
MINNESOTA is 20-9 (+13.6 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 2-1 (+0.9 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/17/2021 | MINNESOTA | 85 | 167.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 47 | 7 | 14 | | DALLAS | 73 | -4 | Under | 33 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 43 | 10 | 10 | 9/4/2020 | MINNESOTA | 88 | -4 | SU ATS | 41 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 10-21 | 47.6% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 51 | 13 | 12 | N | DALLAS | 75 | 165 | Under | 49 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 5-26 | 19.2% | 16-16 | 100.0% | 30 | 3 | 10 | 8/19/2020 | DALLAS | 84 | 156.5 | Over | 43 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 23-27 | 85.2% | 40 | 10 | 10 | N | MINNESOTA | 91 | -6 | SU ATS | 39 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 14-23 | 60.9% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 37 | 8 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Reeve is 159-85 against the money line (+26.5 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 110-45 against the money line (+25.4 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 80-28 against the money line (+31.7 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 189-95 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 139-65 against the money line (+25.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 120-51 against the money line (+28.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 197-98 against the money line (+20.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 153-68 against the money line (+22.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 119-52 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 98-39 against the money line (+26.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 80-30 against the money line (+26.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 69-23 against the money line (+21.8 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 153-70 against the money line (+24.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 93-34 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 150-69 against the money line (+25.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 177-84 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 47-12 against the money line (+18.8 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Reeve is 72-64 against the money line (-29.4 Units) in road games after a division game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 118-71 against the money line (-30.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 3-8 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.7, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 19-21 against the money line (-13.8 Units) off an upset win as an underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 34-27 against the money line (-20.5 Units) off a road win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 21-24 against the money line (-13.9 Units) in road games off a road win as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 47-45 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 135-91 against the money line (-31.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 41-43 against the money line (-22.6 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 144-98 against the money line (-37.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 93-78 against the money line (-26.1 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 59-46 against the money line (-25.8 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 124 times, while the road underdog won straight up 84 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 13 times, while the road underdog won straight up 2 times. Edge against the money line=DALLAS |
|
| | |
[F] 06/14/2021 - Natalie Achonwa is out indefinitely ( Knee ) | [F] 06/14/2021 - Aerial Powers is out indefinitely ( Thumb ) | [F] 06/11/2021 - Jessica Shepard is out indefinitely ( Groin ) | [G] 05/12/2021 - Rennia Davis is out for season ( Foot ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/19/2024 1:43:36 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|