| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO
DALLAS |
|
|
171.5
| 92
Final
87 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 603 | CHICAGO | -110 | | 604 | DALLAS | -110 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(106-69 since 1997.) (60.6%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, average team from last season that won between 45-55% of their games.
(46-10 since 1997.) (82.1%, +32.9 units. Rating = 4*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - marginal winning team from last season who won between 51% and 60% of their games, in non-conference games.
(37-12 since 1997.) (75.5%, +24.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher against opponent after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ less free throws than opponent.
(21-9 since 1997.) (70%, +20.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going over the total by more than 24 points in their previous game.
(19-6 since 1997.) (76%, +14.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(45-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(30-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(42-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - horrible defensive team from last season - allowed 75 or more points/game, after scoring 75 points or more.
(39-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(70-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(23-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +16.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in non-conference games, off a home loss.
(303-212 since 1997.) (58.8%, +85.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(279-270 since 1997.) (50.8%, +84.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more.
(272-112 since 1997.) (70.8%, +78.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more.
(273-114 since 1997.) (70.5%, +75.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(254-100 since 1997.) (71.8%, +73.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more.
(266-243 since 1997.) (52.3%, +72.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(182-175 since 1997.) (51%, +67.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(163-56 since 1997.) (74.4%, +59.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(135-44 since 1997.) (75.4%, +57.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(157-57 since 1997.) (73.4%, +55.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws.
(162-65 since 1997.) (71.4%, +55.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more.
(145-47 since 1997.) (75.5%, +54.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(137-48 since 1997.) (74.1%, +54.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(130-47 since 1997.) (73.4%, +51.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(66-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (55%, +36 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(57-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.2%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(89-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +44.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(142-99 since 1997.) (58.9%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(37-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +38 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(86-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +45.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(82-26 since 1997.) (75.9%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(76-21 since 1997.) (78.4%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(62-13 since 1997.) (82.7%, +36.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(52-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +36 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(22-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +32.8 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(28-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +18.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(47-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(62-36 since 1997.) (63.3%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(54-30 since 1997.) (64.3%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(46-14 since 1997.) (76.7%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(49-25 since 1997.) (66.2%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(27-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.1%, +20.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(42-20 since 1997.) (67.7%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(32-12 since 1997.) (72.7%, +21.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(35-15 since 1997.) (70%, +21.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(43-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(30-13 since 1997.) (69.8%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(30-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +34.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games.
(35-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(26-10 since 1997.) (72.2%, +17.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +20.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(52-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +36.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(24-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +25 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(23-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(58-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.6%, +36.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(32-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +32.2 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(33-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +27.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(26-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +27.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| CHICAGO | 82 | | 32-70 | 45.9% | 4-11 | 36.9% | 14-17 | 79.7% | 45 | 11 | 12 | | DALLAS | 82 | | 27-68 | 40.2% | 5-19 | 28.5% | 22-27 | 80.1% | 44 | 12 | 10 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, DALLAS won the game straight up 489 times, while CHICAGO won 483 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 52-31 against the money line (+21.9 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 77.8 | CHICAGO is 31-14 against the money line (+16.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.3, OPPONENT 82.1 |
|
CHICAGO is 9-20 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 82.1 | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 82.0 | CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-11.4 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 80.7 | CHICAGO is 2-10 against the money line (-12.4 Units) when they attempt 10+ less free throws than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 86.4 | CHICAGO is 23-43 against the money line (-29.7 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 79.2 | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-7.8 Units) in road games when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.6, OPPONENT 79.9 | CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 88.7 | CHICAGO is 50-82 against the money line (-53.3 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 77.9 | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-8.4 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 84.9 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 51-87 against the money line (-60.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 63-111 against the money line (-68.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 64-110 against the money line (-56.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 33-43 against the money line (-33.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 56-71 against the money line (-31.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 90-137 against the money line (-50.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 47-95 against the money line (-37.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 34-55 against the money line (-32.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 14-3 against the money line (+10.1 Units) as a road favorite of -155 or less since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 153-197 against the money line (-59.2 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-22 against the money line (-19.7 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 0-6 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in road games after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.0, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 96-122 against the money line (-46.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-22 against the money line (-19.7 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 10-13 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 31-43 against the money line (-25.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 73-123 against the money line (-64.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 52-93 against the money line (-52.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 22-29 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 47-77 against the money line (-37.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 29-47 against the money line (-28.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 44-66 against the money line (-38.4 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-43 against the money line (-30.2 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 13-25 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 46-63 against the money line (-33.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 29-45 against the money line (-28.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-29 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-11 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-17 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 7-11 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-9.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-16 against the money line (-19.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 5-9 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-23 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 65-87 against the money line (-39.5 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-24 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 78-109 against the money line (-39.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 20-39 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 22-15 | -1.5 | 16-20 | 22-15 | 82.9 | 42.4 | 44.8% | 43.9 | 79.5 | 39.8 | 42.9% | 42.1 | | Road Games | 8-10 | -3.2 | 8-10 | 9-9 | 79.6 | 41.8 | 43.7% | 42.9 | 80.6 | 39.8 | 43.0% | 44.1 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.8 | 1-3 | 4-1 | 83.0 | 44.6 | 46.4% | 41.2 | 83.6 | 44.0 | 44.7% | 42.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.9 | 42.4 | 32-71 | 44.8% | 4-13 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 82.8% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 74.9 | 37.9 | 28-65 | 42.7% | 5-14 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 80.1% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.6 | 41.8 | 30-70 | 43.7% | 4-12 | 31.2% | 15-18 | 81.0% | 43 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.5 | 39.8 | 30-69 | 42.9% | 5-15 | 34.0% | 15-20 | 76.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.8 | 37.7 | 28-65 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 33.4% | 15-18 | 78.9% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.6 | 39.8 | 30-69 | 43.0% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 16-21 | 77.7% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 18-18 | +2.1 | 18-15 | 18-18 | 76.8 | 39.5 | 38.7% | 43.8 | 77.7 | 38.3 | 45.0% | 41.4 | | Home Games | 12-6 | +4 | 9-7 | 7-11 | 79.0 | 39.5 | 39.7% | 44.1 | 74.8 | 35.7 | 43.2% | 39.7 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 1-3 | 3-2 | 71.6 | 33.6 | 36.6% | 41.6 | 84.4 | 45.4 | 48.6% | 44.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 76.8 | 39.5 | 26-68 | 38.7% | 6-19 | 31.5% | 18-23 | 79.1% | 44 | 12 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 74.5 | 37.4 | 28-66 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 32.2% | 14-18 | 79.3% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.0 | 39.5 | 26-67 | 39.7% | 6-19 | 31.7% | 20-24 | 81.6% | 44 | 11 | 14 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.7 | 38.3 | 29-64 | 45.0% | 5-14 | 34.6% | 16-20 | 79.3% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.2 | 37.2 | 28-64 | 43.1% | 5-14 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 79.9% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 74.8 | 35.7 | 27-63 | 43.2% | 5-15 | 33.5% | 16-19 | 82.4% | 40 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 6 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 70.7, DALLAS 71.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/14/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 93-70 | W | -550 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 55 | 16 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 43 | 17 | | 5/18/2016 | MINNESOTA | 80-97 | L | +145 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 12 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 41 | 9 | | 5/22/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 81-87 | L | -200 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 60 | 13 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 44 | 5 | | 5/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 80-93 | L | +135 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 40 | 15 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 8 | | 5/27/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 78-79 | L | -330 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 50 | 15 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 33 | 11 | | 5/29/2016 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/1/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/3/2016 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/10/2016 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/12/2016 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/14/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/14/2016 | @ INDIANA | 90-79 | W | +155 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 42 | 13 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 40 | 19 | | 5/15/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 71-79 | L | +210 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 42 | 11 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 46 | 16 | | 5/18/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 87-77 | W | +135 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 42 | 12 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 49 | 15 | | 5/21/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 82-77 | W | -950 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 53 | 13 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 42 | 11 | | 5/27/2016 | ATLANTA | 93-102 | L | -200 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 48 | 19 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 44 | 12 | | 5/29/2016 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/4/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/8/2016 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/11/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/14/2016 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| DALLAS is 16-8 (+7.0 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
| DALLAS is 3-1 (+2.2 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| DALLAS is 9-2 (+7.1 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
| DALLAS is 2-0 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/11/2015 | TULSA | 71 | 159 | Over | 47 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 17-23 | 73.9% | 46 | 13 | 15 | | | CHICAGO | 92 | -6 | SU ATS | 51 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 42 | 10 | 7 | 6/6/2015 | CHICAGO | 93 | 166.5 | Over | 43 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 20-22 | 90.9% | 33 | 8 | 15 | | | TULSA | 101 | -2 | SU ATS | 62 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 23-27 | 85.2% | 41 | 12 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Chatman is 12-2 against the money line (+9.5 Units) as a road favorite of -155 or less as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 18-12 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 12-22 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 78.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 7-17 against the money line (-16.0 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 74.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 2-11 against the money line (-13.0 Units) off an upset loss as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 77.1, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 1-13 against the money line (-12.4 Units) off a home loss as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 77.9, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 4-14 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 77.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 6-16 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.5, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 13-24 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 78.5, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 7-24 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 78.4, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 26-48 against the money line (-34.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 77.6, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 12-30 against the money line (-17.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 75.7, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 7-16 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 74.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 28-43 against the money line (-25.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 75.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 16-26 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 76.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 35-50 against the money line (-33.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 78.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 8-17 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 27-49 against the money line (-25.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 77.7, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Chatman is 93-94 against the money line (-28.5 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 51-52 against the money line (-19.4 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 24-40 against the money line (-30.7 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 27-36 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 57-65 against the money line (-34.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 24-40 against the money line (-30.7 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 41-49 against the money line (-30.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 44-57 against the money line (-33.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 28-45 against the money line (-32.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 10-20 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 48-57 against the money line (-34.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 27-35 against the money line (-21.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 13-22 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 17-32 against the money line (-20.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 11-23 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 6-18 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 70.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 29-34 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 50-53 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 12-23 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 5-15 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 38-49 against the money line (-28.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 15-25 against the money line (-22.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 2-7 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 1-6 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where they had 5 or less steals as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 47-48 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 3-9 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in road games after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 42-47 against the money line (-23.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 6-14 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 26-31 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 25-40 against the money line (-40.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Chatman is 33-50 against the money line (-39.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 70-76 against the money line (-28.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 38-60 against the money line (-42.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 18-27 against the money line (-24.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 65-68 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 29-35 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 51-64 against the money line (-22.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 27-50 against the money line (-23.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 30-44 against the money line (-27.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 16-11 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 79.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 15-6 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 31-12 against the money line (+16.2 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 80.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 7-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) in home games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 79.1, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog won the game straight up 2 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 1 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 0 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 05/27/2016 - Courtney Vandersloot "?" Sunday vs Dallas Wings ( Ankle ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/27/2024 6:45:38 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|