| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
154
| 70
Final
79 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 603 | LOS ANGELES | +650 | | 604 | CONNECTICUT | -1050 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(136-36 since 1997.) (79.1%, +57.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good free throw shooting teams (76-80%), after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(104-60 since 1997.) (63.4%, +45.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%), after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(76-48 since 1997.) (61.3%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against a poor team (-3 to -7 PPG differential), after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(28-1 since 1997.) (96.6%, +26 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against a poor team (-3 to -7 PPG differential), after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(28-1 since 1997.) (96.6%, +26 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(94-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.6%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(89-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.9%, +44.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(75-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.5%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(80-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.8%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better against opponent after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better.
(39-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.7%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(79-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in June games.
(25-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.1%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(66-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.8%, +51.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, playing with 2 days rest.
(52-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.1%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(50-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (45.9%, +48.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(73-69 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.4%, +52 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(58-72 over the last 5 seasons.) (44.6%, +52.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(54-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.9%, +42.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(24-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor pressure defensive team - forcing <=14 turnovers/game, in June games.
(64-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.7%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in June games.
(56-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.9%, +34.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, playing with 2 days rest.
(45-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.6%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(88-85 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.9%, +58.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(29-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(78-72 over the last 5 seasons.) (52%, +52.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in June games.
(27-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.1%, +19.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(78-74 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.3%, +48.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(83-77 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.9%, +53.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(56-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +20.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(80-74 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.9%, +52.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(20-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +29.4 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(92-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.1%, +42.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(82-93 over the last 5 seasons.) (46.9%, +47.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(62-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (43.1%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(53-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.2%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(168-168 over the last 5 seasons.) (50%, +43.3 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | 73 | | 26-63 | 41.6% | 6-20 | 31.7% | 14-17 | 79.8% | 40 | 7 | 16 | | CONNECTICUT | 84 | | 31-68 | 46.2% | 7-19 | 36.1% | 14-19 | 76.6% | 43 | 9 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 791 times, while LOS ANGELES won 189 times.
Edge against the money line=LOS ANGELES |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 15-14 against the money line (-29.6 Units) in home games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 79.0 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 5-16 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 83.9 | LOS ANGELES is 69-103 against the money line (-98.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 80.7 | LOS ANGELES is 3-14 against the money line (-17.6 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 79.9 | LOS ANGELES is 79-83 against the money line (-56.9 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 78.0 | LOS ANGELES is 18-43 against the money line (-23.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 88.5 | LOS ANGELES is 11-34 against the money line (-22.3 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 91.4 | LOS ANGELES is 83-109 against the money line (-93.4 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 76.4 | LOS ANGELES is 254-230 against the money line (-118.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.9, OPPONENT 82.6 | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-8.9 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.4, OPPONENT 77.8 | LOS ANGELES is 13-28 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 84.3 | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 70.2 | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 76.9 | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 77.1 | CONNECTICUT is 100-59 against the money line (+46.3 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 123-61 against the money line (+41.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 75.5 | CONNECTICUT is 133-93 against the money line (+23.4 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 75.2 | CONNECTICUT is 98-58 against the money line (+33.8 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 75.8 | CONNECTICUT is 16-1 against the money line (+13.9 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 73.9 | CONNECTICUT is 36-9 against the money line (+21.7 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 76.6 | CONNECTICUT is 18-4 against the money line (+12.9 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 74.2 | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 77.4 | CONNECTICUT is 296-105 against the money line (+174.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 79.3 | CONNECTICUT is 218-57 against the money line (+151.5 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.2, OPPONENT 80.0 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 28-19 against the money line (-27.4 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-19 against the money line (-27.4 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-11 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-11 against the money line (-20.8 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-17 against the money line (-32.6 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-11 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-7 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 194-198 against the money line (-115.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 248-234 against the money line (-100.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 159-191 against the money line (-77.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 126-137 against the money line (-52.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 295-274 against the money line (-100.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 275-246 against the money line (-78.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-15 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-11 against the money line (-9.6 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 30-49 against the money line (-27.1 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 42-85 against the money line (-40.6 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 275-278 against the money line (-104.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 195-203 against the money line (-77.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 65.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 65.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 65.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 65.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 65.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 58-13 against the money line (+25.3 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 65.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 11-10 against the money line (-20.0 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-9 against the money line (-14.8 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-8 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-15.5 Units) in home games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-12 against the money line (-25.7 Units) in home games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-5 against the money line (-18.0 Units) in home games after having won 4 of their last 5 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-6 against the money line (-18.8 Units) in home games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-17 against the money line (-22.9 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-4 against the money line (-12.5 Units) off 2 or more consecutive road wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-10 against the money line (-22.2 Units) in home games after a win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-9 against the money line (-19.7 Units) in home games after a blowout win by 15 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-9 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-8 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-9 against the money line (-18.8 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-8 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-11 against the money line (-24.2 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-10 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-7 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-7 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-10 against the money line (-25.0 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 9*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-4 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-11 against the money line (-26.2 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 5*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 191-235 against the money line (-72.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 103-142 against the money line (-60.9 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 51-77 against the money line (-47.9 Units) in road games in June games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-17 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in road games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-28 against the money line (-17.3 Units) in road games after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 102-118 against the money line (-41.5 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-43 against the money line (-31.5 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 268-230 against the money line (-83.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-22 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 82-116 against the money line (-47.1 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-41 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-21 against the money line (-14.9 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-16 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-22 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-37 against the money line (-24.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-29 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 48-64 against the money line (-36.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-14 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-10 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-27 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-12 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-7 against the money line (-8.0 Units) in road games after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-20 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-16 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-18 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 141-101 against the money line (-58.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 101-81 against the money line (-45.6 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-22 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 145-174 against the money line (-58.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-29 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-1 against the money line (+18.6 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 8*) | CONNECTICUT is 190-118 against the money line (+39.0 Units) against Western conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 190-118 against the money line (+39.0 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 41-18 against the money line (+17.7 Units) after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-7 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 42-27 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 4-10 | -1.3 | 5-9 | 6-7 | 77.6 | 37.4 | 41.6% | 44.4 | 84.0 | 42.4 | 43.9% | 41.1 | | Road Games | 1-6 | -3.2 | 3-4 | 3-3 | 77.1 | 35.6 | 42.3% | 42.0 | 86.3 | 42.0 | 43.7% | 42.6 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +2.6 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 81.2 | 41.4 | 42.9% | 42.6 | 85.4 | 44.0 | 44.7% | 41.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.6 | 37.4 | 27-65 | 41.6% | 7-23 | 32.0% | 16-21 | 77.6% | 44 | 7 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.9 | 41.4 | 30-69 | 43.2% | 8-23 | 33.8% | 15-19 | 80.3% | 44 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.1 | 35.6 | 27-63 | 42.3% | 7-21 | 34.9% | 17-22 | 77.0% | 42 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 17 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.0 | 42.4 | 30-69 | 43.9% | 8-22 | 35.4% | 15-19 | 80.2% | 41 | 9 | 21 | 19 | 9 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.6 | 40.9 | 30-69 | 42.9% | 8-23 | 34.1% | 15-18 | 80.7% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 86.3 | 42.0 | 31-70 | 43.7% | 9-24 | 37.9% | 16-20 | 80.6% | 43 | 10 | 22 | 20 | 11 | 13 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 12-1 | +11 | 7-6 | 7-6 | 81.1 | 40.8 | 44.0% | 43.8 | 70.8 | 36.0 | 42.1% | 38.1 | | Home Games | 7-1 | +6 | 4-4 | 4-4 | 80.4 | 40.7 | 43.9% | 42.6 | 70.2 | 34.5 | 42.7% | 39.2 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 81.6 | 41.8 | 44.7% | 44.2 | 71.0 | 35.6 | 41.6% | 35.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 81.1 | 40.8 | 29-66 | 44.0% | 5-17 | 30.0% | 18-23 | 77.0% | 44 | 9 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83.3 | 41.6 | 30-69 | 43.7% | 8-23 | 33.4% | 16-20 | 79.4% | 44 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.4 | 40.7 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 5-17 | 30.6% | 17-23 | 74.7% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.8 | 36.0 | 26-62 | 42.1% | 6-20 | 28.6% | 13-16 | 78.3% | 38 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.2 | 40.5 | 29-68 | 42.9% | 8-22 | 33.5% | 14-18 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 20 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 70.2 | 34.5 | 26-61 | 42.7% | 6-23 | 28.3% | 12-16 | 74.6% | 39 | 7 | 19 | 19 | 6 | 17 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 70.6, CONNECTICUT 69.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/15/2024 | ATLANTA | 81-92 | L | +145 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 51 | 11 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 38 | 13 | | 5/18/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | 82-89 | L | | 34-66 | 51.5% | 43 | 17 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 39 | 12 | | 5/21/2024 | WASHINGTON | 70-68 | W | -140 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 44 | 24 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 32 | 18 | | 5/24/2024 | INDIANA | 73-78 | L | +100 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 42 | 18 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 39 | 10 | | 5/26/2024 | DALLAS | 83-84 | L | -165 | 30-76 | 39.5% | 46 | 8 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 54 | 6 | | 5/28/2024 | @ INDIANA | 88-82 | W | +180 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 45 | 19 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 39 | 14 | | 5/30/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 73-83 | L | +170 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 45 | 18 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 46 | 14 | | 6/2/2024 | @ PHOENIX | 68-87 | L | +155 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 41 | 18 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 40 | 14 | | 6/5/2024 | MINNESOTA | 62-86 | L | +220 | 20-77 | 26.0% | 51 | 16 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 14 | | 6/7/2024 | DALLAS | 81-72 | W | +155 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 45 | 14 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 42 | 14 | | 6/9/2024 | LAS VEGAS | 96-92 | W | +400 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 48 | 15 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 30 | 6 | | 6/11/2024 | @ SEATTLE | 79-95 | L | +500 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 40 | 11 | 37-79 | 46.8% | 54 | 9 | | 6/14/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-81 | L | +600 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 42 | 21 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 31 | 17 | | 6/16/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 74-87 | L | +175 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 38 | 12 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 49 | 10 | | 6/18/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/20/2024 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/22/2024 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2024 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2024 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/14/2024 | INDIANA | 92-71 | W | -270 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 39 | 15 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 31 | 25 | | 5/17/2024 | WASHINGTON | 84-77 | W | -360 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 37 | 10 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 36 | 20 | | 5/20/2024 | @ INDIANA | 88-84 | W | -200 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 8 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 44 | 17 | | 5/23/2024 | MINNESOTA | 83-82 | W | -250 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 40 | 16 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 43 | 17 | | 5/25/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 86-82 | W | -200 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 47 | 17 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 28 | 11 | | 5/28/2024 | PHOENIX | 70-47 | W | -360 | 27-77 | 35.1% | 52 | 9 | 15-63 | 23.8% | 59 | 20 | | 5/31/2024 | DALLAS | 74-72 | W | -400 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 36 | 10 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 37 | 14 | | 6/2/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 69-50 | W | -140 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 54 | 15 | 19-67 | 28.4% | 41 | 12 | | 6/4/2024 | WASHINGTON | 76-59 | W | -1050 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 45 | 12 | 20-64 | 31.2% | 42 | 16 | | 6/8/2024 | NEW YORK | 75-82 | L | +120 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 44 | 13 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 33 | 11 | | 6/10/2024 | INDIANA | 89-72 | W | -550 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 48 | 10 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 33 | 11 | | 6/12/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 83-75 | W | -330 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 38 | 14 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 32 | 17 | | 6/15/2024 | @ DALLAS | 85-67 | W | -270 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 46 | 7 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 36 | 11 | | 6/18/2024 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/21/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/23/2024 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2024 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2024 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/4/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 31-26 (+4.5 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 6-0 (+6.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 18-10 (+2.5 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 3-0 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
09/05/2023 | LOS ANGELES | 76 | 152.5 | Over | 36 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 32 | 8 | 13 | | | CONNECTICUT | 90 | -10 | SU ATS | 49 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 41 | 8 | 15 | 08/27/2023 | LOS ANGELES | 68 | 156.5 | Under | 38 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 10-15 | 66.7% | 31 | 1 | 14 | | | CONNECTICUT | 83 | -6 | SU ATS | 43 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 8-26 | 30.8% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 48 | 7 | 19 | 06/18/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 83 | -4 | SU ATS | 39 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 33 | 2 | 12 | | | LOS ANGELES | 74 | 157 | | 44 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 4-19 | 21.1% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 40 | 10 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 37-18 against the money line (+24.5 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Miller 81.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 23-8 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Miller 81.5, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 87-54 against the money line (+31.0 Units) in non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Miller 82.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-18 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Miller 82.1, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-15 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Miller 81.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 42-31 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Miller 84.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 138-95 against the money line (+24.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Miller 83.0, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 24-17 against the money line (+14.6 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Miller 82.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 11-10 against the money line (-20.0 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 6-9 against the money line (-14.8 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 8-8 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 11-11 against the money line (-22.5 Units) in home games after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 83.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 2-5 against the money line (-15.5 Units) in home games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 4*) | White is 17-13 against the money line (-21.6 Units) in home games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 82.1, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 2-6 against the money line (-17.2 Units) in home games after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.5, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 5*) | White is 3-5 against the money line (-18.0 Units) in home games after having won 4 of their last 5 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 4*) | White is 3-6 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 6-6 against the money line (-18.8 Units) in home games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 2-5 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 3-6 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in home games off a road win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 5-5 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in home games off an road win where they scored 85 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.6, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 2-4 against the money line (-12.5 Units) off 2 or more consecutive road wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 10-11 against the money line (-20.2 Units) in home games after a win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.0, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 11-9 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 9-8 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 13-10 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 10-9 against the money line (-18.8 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 8-8 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 18-16 against the money line (-21.8 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 81.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 22-22 against the money line (-23.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.7, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 9-10 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 4-7 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 8-7 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 4-10 against the money line (-25.0 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 9*) | White is 0-4 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 10-8 against the money line (-18.0 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 15-12 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 17-13 against the money line (-27.4 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 83.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 21-19 against the money line (-22.6 Units) in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 82.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 14-11 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 10-11 against the money line (-20.8 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 28-23 against the money line (-25.9 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 82.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 22-19 against the money line (-29.1 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 82.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 14-11 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 8-7 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Miller is 5-17 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 7-13 against the money line (-13.1 Units) off 2 or more consecutive road losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Miller 78.5, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 1-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-22 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-20 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 7-16 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 3-9 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 3-15 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 4*) | White is 20-11 against the money line (+11.4 Units) on Tuesday in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 19-1 against the money line (+18.6 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 8*) | White is 16-7 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 37 times, while the road underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 5 times, while the road underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 6/29/2024 2:40:46 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|