| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
DALLAS
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
161.5
| 72
Final
74 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 615 | DALLAS | +300 | | 616 | CONNECTICUT | -400 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(190-68 since 1997.) (73.6%, +68.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - off an upset win as a road underdog, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(86-54 since 1997.) (61.4%, +34.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(59-35 since 1997.) (62.8%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team from last season - allowed 72 or more points/game, after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(46-28 since 1997.) (62.2%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 125 points or less.
(26-4 since 1997.) (86.7%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May games.
(24-3 since 1997.) (88.9%, +20.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - horrible defensive team from last season - allowed 75 or more points/game, after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(41-26 since 1997.) (61.2%, +20.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - excellent offensive team from last season - scored 75 or more points/game, after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(40-26 since 1997.) (60.6%, +19.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 125 points or less.
(23-5 since 1997.) (82.1%, +17.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in May games.
(26-10 since 1997.) (72.2%, +15.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - off an upset win as a road underdog, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(26-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +20.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 50 points or less.
(19-6 since 1997.) (76%, +17.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, playing with 2 days rest.
(51-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(51-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.5%, +43.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(29-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +21.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, playing with 2 days rest.
(44-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.7%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after 1 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(43-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.1%, +39.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(79-89 over the last 5 seasons.) (47%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(59-72 over the last 5 seasons.) (45%, +49.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(50-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (51%, +38.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(162-158 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.6%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| DALLAS | 84 | | 31-70 | 45.0% | 6-19 | 34.2% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 45 | 12 | 15 | | CONNECTICUT | 86 | | 32-71 | 45.0% | 8-21 | 38.4% | 15-19 | 77.4% | 42 | 10 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 542 times, while DALLAS won 434 times.
Edge against the money line=DALLAS |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
DALLAS is 22-18 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.9, OPPONENT 83.6 | DALLAS is 16-7 against the money line (+13.7 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.3, OPPONENT 83.4 | DALLAS is 40-25 against the money line (+13.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 90.1, OPPONENT 85.5 | DALLAS is 17-9 against the money line (+18.7 Units) in road games when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 93.0, OPPONENT 87.5 | CONNECTICUT is 60-81 against the money line (-70.4 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 80.6 | CONNECTICUT is 13-13 against the money line (-30.6 Units) in home games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 79.4 | CONNECTICUT is 10-16 against the money line (-27.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 87.0 | CONNECTICUT is 4-14 against the money line (-28.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 90.0 | CONNECTICUT is 12-10 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.3 |
|
DALLAS is 28-57 against the money line (-34.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 85.5 | DALLAS is 7-11 against the money line (-12.8 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 90.1, OPPONENT 89.2 | DALLAS is 14-20 against the money line (-21.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 88.6, OPPONENT 90.1 | DALLAS is 8-18 against the money line (-27.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 90.5, OPPONENT 93.3 | CONNECTICUT is 113-53 against the money line (+51.8 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 75.9 | CONNECTICUT is 99-59 against the money line (+45.3 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 75.5 | CONNECTICUT is 123-61 against the money line (+41.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 75.5 | CONNECTICUT is 131-93 against the money line (+21.4 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 75.3 | CONNECTICUT is 98-58 against the money line (+33.8 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 75.8 | CONNECTICUT is 33-9 against the money line (+18.7 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 77.1 | CONNECTICUT is 293-105 against the money line (+171.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 79.3 | CONNECTICUT is 215-57 against the money line (+148.5 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.2, OPPONENT 80.1 |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 11-6 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 91.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-10 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-10 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-10 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-10 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-9 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-10 against the money line (-18.8 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-10 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-16 against the money line (-19.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 49-66 against the money line (-33.0 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-10 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-9 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-10 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-10 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-7 against the money line (-21.0 Units) in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 84-111 against the money line (-39.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 85-121 against the money line (-43.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 19-19 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.6, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 93-129 against the money line (-50.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-14 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.2, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 5*) | DALLAS is 98-132 against the money line (-46.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 93-136 against the money line (-52.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 81-125 against the money line (-51.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-18 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.8, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 24-21 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 9-1 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 96.3, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 13-9 against the money line (+13.9 Units) in road games against Eastern conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 13-9 against the money line (+13.9 Units) in road games in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 20-15 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 26-17 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-4 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.2, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 88.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 88.6, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 16-9 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 17-13 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in road games after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 11-5 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 16-12 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 15-9 against the money line (+13.4 Units) in road games after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.6, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-9 against the money line (-20.0 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-20 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-6 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in home games off a home win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-8 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in home games off a home win over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-16 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-8 against the money line (-20.7 Units) in home games after a blowout win by 15 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-9 against the money line (-19.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-8 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-6 against the money line (-18.1 Units) in home games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-6 against the money line (-20.0 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-7 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-11 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-6 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 35-59 against the money line (-30.9 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 58-89 against the money line (-33.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 7-14 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 12-17 against the money line (-17.6 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 22-46 against the money line (-28.8 Units) after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 2-5 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after a game with 16 or more offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 6-10 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 88-123 against the money line (-45.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 78-106 against the money line (-40.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 65-97 against the money line (-47.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 11-13 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 79-104 against the money line (-38.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 49-73 against the money line (-40.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 40-60 against the money line (-31.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 73-99 against the money line (-39.2 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 58-81 against the money line (-42.7 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 46-66 against the money line (-40.3 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.3, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 86-115 against the money line (-46.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 75-98 against the money line (-45.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 68-84 against the money line (-38.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.7, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 61-74 against the money line (-37.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 85-118 against the money line (-55.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 66-90 against the money line (-46.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 52-68 against the money line (-41.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-14 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 15-18 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 86-116 against the money line (-48.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 64-93 against the money line (-40.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 49-73 against the money line (-38.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 43-58 against the money line (-25.8 Units) after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.7, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 63-88 against the money line (-39.2 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 45-71 against the money line (-41.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in May games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-1 against the money line (+16.6 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 188-118 against the money line (+37.0 Units) against Western conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 188-118 against the money line (+37.0 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-1 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 3-2 | +1.2 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 86.0 | 46.2 | 43.6% | 48.6 | 84.0 | 38.0 | 40.3% | 46.6 | | Road Games | 2-1 | +2 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 89.7 | 49.7 | 45.7% | 48.7 | 86.0 | 39.0 | 40.8% | 43.0 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.2 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 86.0 | 46.2 | 43.6% | 48.6 | 84.0 | 38.0 | 40.3% | 46.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 86.0 | 46.2 | 32-74 | 43.6% | 5-16 | 32.1% | 16-20 | 83.7% | 49 | 14 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 7 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.7 | 40.9 | 29-69 | 42.3% | 7-22 | 32.6% | 16-20 | 79.3% | 44 | 10 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 89.7 | 49.7 | 34-74 | 45.7% | 5-16 | 29.2% | 18-22 | 81.5% | 49 | 14 | 21 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.0 | 38.0 | 30-75 | 40.3% | 7-23 | 31.0% | 16-21 | 74.8% | 47 | 13 | 21 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.7 | 40.6 | 29-69 | 42.4% | 7-22 | 34.0% | 15-20 | 74.2% | 44 | 10 | 20 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 86.0 | 39.0 | 30-74 | 40.8% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 16-20 | 81.7% | 43 | 10 | 21 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 6-0 | +6 | 2-4 | 4-2 | 83.8 | 40.5 | 43.1% | 43.0 | 73.8 | 38.2 | 43.3% | 40.2 | | Home Games | 4-0 | +4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 82.2 | 40.0 | 42.4% | 42.0 | 69.2 | 33.7 | 41.8% | 42.2 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 82.2 | 38.8 | 42.1% | 43.8 | 74.4 | 38.0 | 42.5% | 42.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 83.8 | 40.5 | 30-69 | 43.1% | 5-19 | 27.7% | 19-23 | 80.9% | 43 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 9 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 84.9 | 42.3 | 30-69 | 44.1% | 8-23 | 33.4% | 17-20 | 81.6% | 44 | 9 | 20 | 17 | 9 | 15 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 82.2 | 40.0 | 29-69 | 42.4% | 5-19 | 27.6% | 18-22 | 80.0% | 42 | 7 | 19 | 19 | 12 | 12 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.8 | 38.2 | 27-62 | 43.3% | 6-21 | 28.3% | 14-18 | 77.3% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 18 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 79.7 | 39.3 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 8-25 | 34.0% | 13-17 | 78.5% | 42 | 9 | 20 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 69.2 | 33.7 | 25-60 | 41.8% | 5-22 | 24.4% | 14-19 | 73.3% | 42 | 6 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 20 | 6 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: DALLAS 70.6, CONNECTICUT 68.8 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/15/2024 | CHICAGO | 87-79 | W | -330 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 49 | 15 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 54 | 12 | | 5/18/2024 | CHICAGO | 74-83 | L | -175 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 48 | 25 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 50 | 17 | | 5/21/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 78-83 | L | +210 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 45 | 14 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 47 | 12 | | 5/25/2024 | @ PHOENIX | 107-92 | W | +155 | 39-75 | 52.0% | 47 | 18 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 36 | 19 | | 5/26/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | 84-83 | W | +145 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 54 | 6 | 30-76 | 39.5% | 46 | 8 | | 5/31/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/2/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/5/2024 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/7/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/9/2024 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/13/2024 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/15/2024 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/14/2024 | INDIANA | 92-71 | W | -270 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 39 | 15 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 31 | 25 | | 5/17/2024 | WASHINGTON | 84-77 | W | -360 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 37 | 10 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 36 | 20 | | 5/20/2024 | @ INDIANA | 88-84 | W | -200 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 8 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 44 | 17 | | 5/23/2024 | MINNESOTA | 83-82 | W | -250 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 40 | 16 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 43 | 17 | | 5/25/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 86-82 | W | -200 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 47 | 17 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 28 | 11 | | 5/28/2024 | PHOENIX | 70-47 | W | -360 | 27-77 | 35.1% | 52 | 9 | 15-63 | 23.8% | 59 | 20 | | 5/31/2024 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/2/2024 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/4/2024 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/8/2024 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/10/2024 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/12/2024 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/15/2024 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 45-38 (-15.1 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
| DALLAS is 5-5 (+6.5 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| DALLAS is 17-24 (+6.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| DALLAS is 3-3 (+6.5 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
08/18/2023 | DALLAS | 95 | 169 | SU ATS | 46 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 15-23 | 65.2% | 49 | 16 | 12 | | | CONNECTICUT | 75 | -4.5 | Over | 40 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 46 | 16 | 12 | 08/12/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 81 | 168.5 | Over | 43 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 41 | 9 | 12 | | | DALLAS | 91 | -3 | SU ATS | 52 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 25-27 | 92.6% | 42 | 7 | 12 | 07/25/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 88 | 168 | SU ATS | 40 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 7-24 | 29.2% | 23-26 | 88.5% | 39 | 8 | 7 | | | DALLAS | 83 | -4 | Over | 42 | 31-76 | 40.8% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 52 | 18 | 9 | 06/04/2023 | DALLAS | 74 | 165.5 | ATS | 30 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 17-19 | 89.5% | 36 | 11 | 17 | | | CONNECTICUT | 80 | -6.5 | SU Under | 44 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 19-23 | 82.6% | 45 | 6 | 17 |
|
| | |
|
Trammell is 9-1 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 96.3, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Trammell is 7-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 88.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 11-5 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 11-6 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 91.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 10-9 against the money line (-20.0 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 8-10 against the money line (-21.2 Units) in home games after a win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 9-9 against the money line (-19.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 8-8 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 6-6 against the money line (-20.0 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 8-7 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 11-11 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 4-6 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 12-10 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 12-10 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 12-10 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 12-10 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 7-9 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 11-10 against the money line (-18.8 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 12-10 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 19-16 against the money line (-19.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 12-10 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 11-9 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 12-10 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 12-10 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 6-7 against the money line (-21.0 Units) in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
Trammell is 7-14 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 2-5 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after a game with 16 or more offensive rebounds as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 6-10 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 11-13 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 10-14 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 87.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 19-19 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 87.6, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 5-14 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 87.2, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 5*) | Trammell is 12-18 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.8, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 10-1 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in May games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 4*) | White is 17-1 against the money line (+16.6 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 7*) | White is 12-1 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 34-27 against the money line (+15.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 19-10 against the money line (+13.7 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 44 times, while the road underdog won straight up 12 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 5 times, while the road underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 9/7/2024 8:37:25 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|