| | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES First Half Results CONNECTICUT |
|
| 78 | 25 Final 49 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
663 | LOS ANGELES | 78 | 664 | CONNECTICUT | -4 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
- Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - off a upset loss as a favorite, playing with 2 days rest. (88-45 since 1997.) (66.2%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games. (43-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.9%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, playing with 2 days rest. (245-168 since 1997.) (59.3%, +60.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest. (267-164 since 1997.) (61.9%, +86.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest. (171-111 since 1997.) (60.6%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest. (322-225 since 1997.) (58.9%, +74.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss. (103-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +38.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss. (92-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +32.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 66 | | 33 | | 25-61 | 40.6% | 5-17 | 30.6% | 11-14 | 77.9% | 33 | 5 | 16 | CONNECTICUT | 80 | | 40 | Under | 28-64 | 44.2% | 6-18 | 34.8% | 17-21 | 81.5% | 48 | 12 | 17 |
| The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT covered the first half line 602 times, while LOS ANGELES covered the first half line 364 times. Edge against first half line=CONNECTICUT | In 1000 simulated games, 657 games went under first half total, while 310 games went over first half total. Edge against first half total=Under |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 4-14 against the 1rst half line (-11.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 44.7 | LOS ANGELES is 30-52 against the 1rst half line (-27.2 Units) in road games when they score 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.4, OPPONENT 42.8 | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.6, OPPONENT 35.5 | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.1, OPPONENT 34.1 | CONNECTICUT is 85-50 against the 1rst half line (+30.0 Units) when they grab 10+ more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.6, OPPONENT 35.5 | CONNECTICUT is 200-138 against the 1rst half line (+48.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.2, OPPONENT 39.0 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 44.7 | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.7, OPPONENT 39.4 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 173-133 UNDER (+26.7 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they attempt 57 to 63 shots since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.6, OPPONENT 35.2 | LOS ANGELES is 124-80 UNDER (+36.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 35.4 | LOS ANGELES is 262-198 UNDER (+44.2 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 35.7 | LOS ANGELES is 97-67 UNDER (+23.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.4, OPPONENT 36.5 | LOS ANGELES is 97-52 UNDER (+39.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 33.6, OPPONENT 35.2 | CONNECTICUT is 22-11 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.5, OPPONENT 34.1 | CONNECTICUT is 122-82 UNDER (+31.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.8, OPPONENT 36.6 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | | | CONNECTICUT | -5.5 | |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 23-11 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.6, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 113-82 UNDER (+22.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) in road games when playing with 2 days rest over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 42-23 against the 1rst half line (+16.7 Units) versus the first half line in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.1, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-12 against the 1rst half line (+12.8 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.6, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-16 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) after a division game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.1, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-7 against the 1rst half line (+12.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-9 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.8, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.1, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-0 OVER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.0, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-0 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.3, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 476-411 UNDER (+23.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 245-190 UNDER (+36.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.9, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 216-164 UNDER (+35.6 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-8 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 81-54 UNDER (+21.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.7, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 95-68 UNDER (+20.2 Units) the 1rst half total off a upset loss as a favorite since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 83-58 UNDER (+19.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.6, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 200-155 UNDER (+29.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 138-104 UNDER (+23.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.6, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 245-185 UNDER (+41.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 71-46 UNDER (+20.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 74-50 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.8, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 133-102 UNDER (+20.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.9, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 102-74 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.1, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 164-121 UNDER (+30.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.0, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 270-222 UNDER (+25.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 320-269 UNDER (+24.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 127-88 UNDER (+30.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 118-83 UNDER (+26.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road favorite since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 229-180 UNDER (+31.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 243-194 UNDER (+29.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 191-152 UNDER (+23.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.3, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 128-94 UNDER (+24.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.2, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 2-1 | +0.4 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 86.7 | 41.3 | 43.7% | 46.7 | 81.7 | 38.3 | 41.0% | 42.7 | Road Games | 2-1 | +0.4 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 86.7 | 41.3 | 43.7% | 46.7 | 81.7 | 38.3 | 41.0% | 42.7 | Last 5 Games | 2-1 | +0.4 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 86.7 | 41.3 | 43.7% | 46.7 | 81.7 | 38.3 | 41.0% | 42.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 86.7 | 41.3 | 30-69 | 43.7% | 5-16 | 29.2% | 21-25 | 84.2% | 47 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 13 | 16 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 78 | 37.9 | 27-69 | 39.7% | 6-20 | 30.2% | 17-21 | 82.3% | 43 | 8 | 18 | 17 | 10 | 15 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 86.7 | 41.3 | 30-69 | 43.7% | 5-16 | 29.2% | 21-25 | 84.2% | 47 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 13 | 16 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.7 | 38.3 | 30-72 | 41.0% | 10-26 | 38.5% | 12-16 | 77.1% | 43 | 8 | 21 | 21 | 8 | 19 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 79.8 | 37.9 | 29-70 | 41.8% | 9-23 | 37.0% | 13-16 | 78.2% | 46 | 9 | 19 | 20 | 8 | 17 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.7 | 38.3 | 30-72 | 41.0% | 10-26 | 38.5% | 12-16 | 77.1% | 43 | 8 | 21 | 21 | 8 | 19 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 0-1 | -2.2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 79.0 | 30.0 | 42.2% | 45.0 | 81.0 | 38.0 | 47.5% | 36.0 | Home Games | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | Last 5 Games | 0-1 | -2.2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 79.0 | 30.0 | 42.2% | 45.0 | 81.0 | 38.0 | 47.5% | 36.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.0 | 30.0 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 21-28 | 75.0% | 45 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 10 | 15 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 84.7 | 35.7 | 30-71 | 41.8% | 7-20 | 34.4% | 18-23 | 78.6% | 51 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 6 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.0 | 38.0 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 10-25 | 40.0% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 36 | 7 | 17 | 25 | 9 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 72.3 | 32 | 26-66 | 38.7% | 7-22 | 33.8% | 14-17 | 80.4% | 39 | 6 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 64.3, CONNECTICUT 77 |
| | |
|
|
5/6/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 98-91 | 42-39 | 2 | W | 76.5 | O | 32-65 | 49.2% | 41 | 20 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 35 | 25 | 5/8/2022 | @ INDIANA | 87-77 | 43-36 | -3.5 | W | 79 | P | 34-71 | 47.9% | 50 | 19 | 29-78 | 37.2% | 43 | 18 | 5/11/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 75-77 | 39-40 | -2.5 | L | 80 | U | 25-72 | 34.7% | 49 | 8 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 50 | 13 | 5/14/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/17/2022 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/20/2022 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/23/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/25/2022 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/27/2022 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/29/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/7/2022 | @ NEW YORK | 79-81 | 30-38 | -3 | L | 80 | U | 27-64 | 42.2% | 45 | 15 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 36 | 15 | 5/14/2022 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/17/2022 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/20/2022 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/22/2022 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/24/2022 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/26/2022 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/28/2022 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 30-23 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997 | 31 of 52 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 3-3 versus the first half line when playing against LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons | 3 of 6 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 14-11 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997 | 18 of 25 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 2-0 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/9/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 75 | -10 | SU ATS | 45 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 26-29 | 89.7% | 39 | 9 | 19 | | LOS ANGELES | 57 | 142 | Under | 28 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 27 | 5 | 17 | 8/28/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 61 | 144.5 | Under | 37 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 24 | 3 | 14 | | CONNECTICUT | 76 | -10.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 50 | 8 | 18 | 8/26/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 72 | 145.5 | ATS | 39 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 13-14 | 92.9% | 29 | 3 | 15 | | CONNECTICUT | 76 | -11.5 | SU Over | 36 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 41 | 9 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) off an upset loss as a road favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Fisher is 14-24 against the 1rst half line (-12.4 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 14-24 against the 1rst half line (-12.4 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.7, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 10-21 against the 1rst half line (-13.1 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.4, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 38.0, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 8-18 against the 1rst half line (-11.8 Units) in road games after a non-conference game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 36.3, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 35.6, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 10-20 against the 1rst half line (-12.0 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.0, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 9-19 against the 1rst half line (-11.9 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.5, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 119-89 against the 1rst half line (+21.1 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.2, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 71-56 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.7, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 34-21 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.5, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 53-40 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 64-48 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.4, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 53-40 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 64-42 against the 1rst half line (+17.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 76-56 against the 1rst half line (+14.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 54-42 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.7, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 88-74 against the 1rst half line (+6.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.2, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 78-57 against the 1rst half line (+15.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.5, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 45-33 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.7, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 59-46 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.8, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Fisher is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 37.2, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 70-56 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.7, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 44-31 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.4, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3.5 to 7 vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 44.2, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a upset loss as a favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.7, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 67-53 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.1, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Fisher is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 34.3, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 64-51 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.3, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 30-19 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.7, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 55-42 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.7, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 28 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 19 times. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 2 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 0 times. |
|
|
| |
|
Since 1997, 33 games went over the first half total, while 26 games went under the first half total. | Over the last 3 seasons, 3 games went over the first half total, while 3 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 9 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 9 times. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 1 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 0 times. | Since 1997, 11 games went over the first half total, while 7 games went under the first half total. | Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
[C] 05/06/2022 - Olivia Nelson-Ododa is out indefinitely ( Hip ) | [F] 05/06/2022 - Katie Lou Samuelson is out indefinitely ( Suspension ) | [G] 05/06/2022 - Kristi Toliver is out indefinitely ( Suspension ) | [C] 05/06/2022 - Amanda Zahui B is out for season ( Suspension ) | |
[G] 05/07/2022 - Courtney Williams is OUT ( Suspension ) | [F] 05/05/2022 - DeWanna Bonner is out indefinitely ( Personal ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/20/2024 5:47:31 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|