| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES CONNECTICUT |
|
| 163 | 68 Final 94 |
|
|
| | |
|
WNBA Playoffs - Semifinals - Best of 5 - Game 2 | | | | |
615 | LOS ANGELES | +100 | 616 | CONNECTICUT | -120 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, in August or September games. (95-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.8%, +42.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in August or September games. (125-72 since 1997.) (63.5%, +50.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in August or September games. (96-25 since 1997.) (79.3%, +48.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in August or September games. (62-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.5%, +44 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (56-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +37.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more. (101-37 since 1997.) (73.2%, +43 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, in August or September games. (80-42 since 1997.) (65.6%, +41.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in the conference finals. (85-26 since 1997.) (76.6%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (86-80 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.8%, +39 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (47-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +43.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor free throw shooting team - making <=71% of their free throws, on Thursday nights. (58-17 since 1997.) (77.3%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots. (54-29 since 1997.) (65.1%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (63-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +49.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (30-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (48-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +27.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (25-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games. (72-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (33-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.2%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (94-49 since 1997.) (65.7%, +47.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (108-62 since 1997.) (63.5%, +46.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (114-70 since 1997.) (62%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (128-85 since 1997.) (60.1%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (114-71 since 1997.) (61.6%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (131-89 since 1997.) (59.5%, +44.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more. (119-76 since 1997.) (61%, +42.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more. (95-54 since 1997.) (63.8%, +42.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (102-63 since 1997.) (61.8%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (119-79 since 1997.) (60.1%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (84-46 since 1997.) (64.6%, +38.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (77-41 since 1997.) (65.3%, +37.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (85-51 since 1997.) (62.5%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (111-72 since 1997.) (60.7%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (115-80 since 1997.) (59%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (120-85 since 1997.) (58.5%, +36.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (86-50 since 1997.) (63.2%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (109-73 since 1997.) (59.9%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (83-49 since 1997.) (62.9%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (62-30 since 1997.) (67.4%, +32.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (70-39 since 1997.) (64.2%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (88-58 since 1997.) (60.3%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%). (23-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +18.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (61-30 since 1997.) (67%, +31 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (94-62 since 1997.) (60.3%, +30.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (77-46 since 1997.) (62.6%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (68-40 since 1997.) (63%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (72-43 since 1997.) (62.6%, +29 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (35-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (50-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, on Thursday nights. (37-14 since 1997.) (72.5%, +26 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (50-24 since 1997.) (67.6%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (32-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.4%, +22.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (37-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +15.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (29-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +15.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (56-34 since 1997.) (62.2%, +21.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (33-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (24-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +15.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - when trailing in a playoff series, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (35-16 since 1997.) (68.6%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - when trailing in a playoff series, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (35-16 since 1997.) (68.6%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (46-26 since 1997.) (63.9%, +19.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record. (26-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (32-14 since 1997.) (69.6%, +18.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (27-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.4%, +20.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (39-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (27-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73%, +17.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (22-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.9%, +15 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (33-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 82 | | 32-68 | 47.0% | 7-21 | 33.7% | 11-13 | 83.8% | 41 | 9 | 15 | CONNECTICUT | 80 | | 30-71 | 42.3% | 8-21 | 35.7% | 12-18 | 69.1% | 45 | 14 | 15 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 539 times, while CONNECTICUT won 431 times. Edge against the money line=LOS ANGELES |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 8-3 against the money line (+5.7 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 78.2 | LOS ANGELES is 286-76 against the money line (+160.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.4, OPPONENT 77.8 | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-8.2 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 83.1 | CONNECTICUT is 38-66 against the money line (-62.4 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 80.7 | CONNECTICUT is 67-79 against the money line (-42.7 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 78.2 | CONNECTICUT is 7-11 against the money line (-13.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 79.7 | CONNECTICUT is 15-21 against the money line (-29.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 88.5 | CONNECTICUT is 12-12 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 83.3 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 30-25 against the money line (-22.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 78.2 | LOS ANGELES is 49-63 against the money line (-31.2 Units) in road games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 75.5 | LOS ANGELES is 72-62 against the money line (-41.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 76.3 | LOS ANGELES is 17-17 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 78.8 | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-12.0 Units) in road games when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 81.6 | LOS ANGELES is 16-14 against the money line (-16.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 77.8 | LOS ANGELES is 4-6 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 80.3 | LOS ANGELES is 5-11 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 86.0 | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in road games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 83.6 | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-8.4 Units) in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.1, OPPONENT 82.6 | LOS ANGELES is 83-84 against the money line (-43.9 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 76.0 | LOS ANGELES is 23-20 against the money line (-23.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 81.6 | CONNECTICUT is 71-46 against the money line (+28.3 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 75.0 | CONNECTICUT is 91-52 against the money line (+26.6 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 83-36 against the money line (+36.8 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 73.5 | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 71.1 | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+5.8 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 73.0 | CONNECTICUT is 19-2 against the money line (+16.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.7, OPPONENT 77.5 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 13-6 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 87-66 against the money line (+21.3 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 63-46 against the money line (+18.0 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-4 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-4 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-5 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-5 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-4 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-5 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-3 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-7 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-5 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-4 against the money line (+7.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-49 against the money line (-23.2 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-22 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-19 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 1-9 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 30-22 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 203-166 against the money line (-75.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-12 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 117-121 against the money line (-48.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-17 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-28 against the money line (-20.7 Units) in road games versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 36-25 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-17 against the money line (-22.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-22 against the money line (-27.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 228-207 against the money line (-78.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-12 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-13 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-13 against the money line (-19.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-17 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 141-100 against the money line (+23.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.9, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 87-65 against the money line (+26.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) on Thursday this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.9, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-3 against the money line (+6.7 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.2 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) off a road loss this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-11 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-11 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-18 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-20 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-19 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-14 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-12 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-10 against the money line (-20.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 5*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 87-104 against the money line (-42.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-9 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games in August or September games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-18 against the money line (-15.6 Units) in road games after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-11 against the money line (-13.2 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-12 against the money line (-14.1 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 36-42 against the money line (-30.1 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-21 against the money line (-18.6 Units) in road games red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 163-117 against the money line (-84.9 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 134-87 against the money line (-54.4 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-11 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-8 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 32-22 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-20 against the money line (-24.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-19 against the money line (-28.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-18 against the money line (-32.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-15 against the money line (-20.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-10 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 34-41 against the money line (-27.0 Units) in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-12 against the money line (+15.3 Units) as a home favorite of -155 or less since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.9, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 101-42 against the money line (+24.8 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 138-99 against the money line (+29.4 Units) against Western conference opponents since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 138-99 against the money line (+29.4 Units) in non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-5 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 23-12 | +3.3 | 19-15 | 19-16 | 80.4 | 39.5 | 43.3% | 41.9 | 77.0 | 39.0 | 40.8% | 43.9 | Road Games | 7-10 | -5.8 | 6-11 | 9-8 | 77.4 | 36.8 | 40.7% | 40.4 | 81.6 | 40.1 | 43.0% | 45.7 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 3-1 | 3-2 | 85.4 | 41.4 | 47.1% | 44.2 | 71.4 | 35.2 | 37.8% | 42.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 80.4 | 39.5 | 31-70 | 43.3% | 7-21 | 34.3% | 12-15 | 83.7% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 78.9 | 40.1 | 29-69 | 42.6% | 7-20 | 33.7% | 14-17 | 79.8% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.4 | 36.8 | 29-71 | 40.7% | 7-21 | 33.8% | 12-14 | 83.7% | 40 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.0 | 39.0 | 28-68 | 40.8% | 7-21 | 34.4% | 15-18 | 79.4% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 78.7 | 40.2 | 29-68 | 42.4% | 7-20 | 33.8% | 14-18 | 79.3% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.6 | 40.1 | 29-67 | 43.0% | 7-19 | 37.2% | 17-21 | 79.8% | 46 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 23-11 | +1.2 | 14-19 | 17-17 | 80.8 | 40.8 | 42.3% | 45.7 | 77.9 | 40.3 | 43.9% | 40.8 | Home Games | 15-2 | +8.9 | 10-7 | 9-8 | 85.2 | 41.7 | 44.8% | 46.2 | 75.2 | 38.6 | 43.0% | 38.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.8 | 2-3 | 5-0 | 93.0 | 46.8 | 46.9% | 46.8 | 87.8 | 40.6 | 47.9% | 38.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 80.8 | 40.8 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 7-21 | 35.6% | 13-18 | 70.4% | 46 | 11 | 19 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 78.9 | 40 | 29-69 | 42.3% | 7-20 | 34.0% | 14-17 | 79.5% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.2 | 41.7 | 32-72 | 44.8% | 8-21 | 38.2% | 13-17 | 73.6% | 46 | 11 | 21 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.9 | 40.3 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 6-21 | 30.8% | 13-17 | 80.2% | 41 | 7 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 78.4 | 39.9 | 29-68 | 42.3% | 7-20 | 33.5% | 14-17 | 80.4% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.2 | 38.6 | 28-66 | 43.0% | 6-21 | 26.9% | 13-16 | 79.9% | 38 | 7 | 19 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 71.2, CONNECTICUT 70.7 |
| | |
|
|
8/11/2019 | CHICAGO | 84-81 | W | -300 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 39 | 23 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 44 | 24 | 8/14/2019 | @ DALLAS | 78-84 | L | -300 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 38 | 15 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 40 | 18 | 8/16/2019 | @ CHICAGO | 81-91 | L | -120 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 37 | 13 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 44 | 18 | 8/20/2019 | MINNESOTA | 81-71 | W | -250 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 40 | 16 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 38 | 17 | 8/22/2019 | INDIANA | 98-65 | W | -450 | 38-76 | 50.0% | 51 | 13 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 37 | 18 | 8/25/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 84-72 | W | -210 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 35 | 14 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 43 | 15 | 8/27/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | 66-95 | L | +250 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 44 | 15 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 41 | 9 | 8/29/2019 | @ INDIANA | 87-83 | W | -210 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 36 | 11 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 49 | 13 | 8/31/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 86-92 | L | +145 | 31-77 | 40.3% | 33 | 4 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 59 | 16 | 9/3/2019 | ATLANTA | 70-60 | W | -550 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 56 | 18 | 23-74 | 31.1% | 41 | 11 | 9/5/2019 | SEATTLE | 102-68 | W | -270 | 41-75 | 54.7% | 52 | 8 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 32 | 13 | 9/8/2019 | MINNESOTA | 77-68 | W | -165 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 35 | 14 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 45 | 16 | 9/15/2019 | SEATTLE | 92-69 | W | -300 | 37-76 | 48.7% | 45 | 8 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 37 | 15 | 9/19/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2019 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/11/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 81-89 | L | +135 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 39 | 9 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 51 | 16 | 8/14/2019 | @ PHOENIX | 78-71 | W | -300 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 50 | 15 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 40 | 19 | 8/16/2019 | SEATTLE | 79-78 | W | -270 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 39 | 15 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 46 | 27 | 8/18/2019 | DALLAS | 78-68 | W | -500 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 43 | 15 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 37 | 9 | 8/23/2019 | LAS VEGAS | 89-85 | W | -120 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 42 | 10 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 42 | 10 | 8/25/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | 72-84 | L | +175 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 43 | 15 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 35 | 14 | 8/27/2019 | @ SEATTLE | 89-70 | W | +135 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 50 | 8 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 38 | 17 | 8/30/2019 | @ NEW YORK | 94-84 | W | -600 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 45 | 9 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 39 | 13 | 9/4/2019 | DALLAS | 102-72 | W | -600 | 36-63 | 57.1% | 48 | 16 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 23 | 9 | 9/6/2019 | CHICAGO | 104-109 | L | -250 | 38-89 | 42.7% | 49 | 17 | 41-77 | 53.2% | 47 | 20 | 9/8/2019 | @ INDIANA | 76-104 | L | -165 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 42 | 14 | 38-65 | 58.5% | 47 | 15 | 9/19/2019 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 24-18 (+2.3 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 4-5 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 10-11 (+1.2 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 3-1 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/25/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 72 | 157.5 | Under | 39 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 8-13 | 61.5% | 43 | 10 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 84 | -5 | SU ATS | 42 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 13-13 | 100.0% | 35 | 3 | 14 | 6/6/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 158 | Over | 32 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 25 | 7 | 21 | | CONNECTICUT | 89 | -8 | SU ATS | 43 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 38 | 14 | 17 | 5/31/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 70 | -3 | Under | 31 | 24-78 | 30.8% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 63 | 18 | 14 | | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 164 | SU ATS | 38 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 46 | 9 | 10 | 8/19/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 86 | 160.5 | ATS | 41 | 30-76 | 39.5% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 44 | 10 | 11 | | CONNECTICUT | 89 | -5 | SU Over | 52 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 11-20 | 55.0% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 38 | 3 | 16 | 7/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 73 | 162 | SU ATS | 41 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 41 | 6 | 17 | | LOS ANGELES | 72 | -9.5 | Under | 25 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 30 | 6 | 13 | 5/24/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 94 | 162.5 | Over | 47 | 35-64 | 54.7% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 18 | 5 | 11 | | CONNECTICUT | 102 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 40-64 | 62.5% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 40 | 9 | 20 |
|
| | |
|
Fisher is 7-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) on Thursday as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.9, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 8-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Fisher is 8-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) off a road loss as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 13-6 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 12-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Fisher is 17-4 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Fisher is 16-3 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Fisher is 21-7 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 12-4 against the money line (+7.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 25-22 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 17-23 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 20-23 against the money line (-22.7 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Miller is 43-28 against the money line (+20.2 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 18-8 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 33-12 against the money line (+16.4 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 43-28 against the money line (+20.2 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 18-10 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 32-24 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 42-24 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 32-9 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 46-26 against the money line (+14.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 27-13 against the money line (+19.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 34-24 against the money line (+11.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 47-29 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 35-23 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road underdog won the game straight up 94 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 85 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 7 times, while the road underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 07/21/2019 - Karlie Samuelson is out indefinitely ( Knee ) | |
[G] 06/26/2019 - Layshia Clarendon is OUT 3-4 months ( Ankle ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/25/2024 10:09:12 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|