| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LAS VEGAS CONNECTICUT |
|
| 163.5 | 85 Final 89 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
603 | LAS VEGAS | +105 | 604 | CONNECTICUT | -125 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, in August or September games. (75-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.4%, +42.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (182-145 since 1997.) (55.7%, +51.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (119-50 since 1997.) (70.4%, +44.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - being called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents on the season, in August or September games. (31-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.5%, +31 units. Rating = 5*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more. (99-37 since 1997.) (72.8%, +41 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in August or September games. (55-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.3%, +32.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (44-9 since 1997.) (83%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - being called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents on the season, in August or September games. (51-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (182-145 since 1997.) (55.7%, +51.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an good defensive team (38-40.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (103-51 since 1997.) (66.9%, +42.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (85-49 since 1997.) (63.4%, +39.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (114-78 since 1997.) (59.4%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (119-83 since 1997.) (58.9%, +37.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (79-46 since 1997.) (63.2%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (69-37 since 1997.) (65.1%, +33.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (87-56 since 1997.) (60.8%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (64-34 since 1997.) (65.3%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (67-37 since 1997.) (64.4%, +31.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (69-41 since 1997.) (62.7%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (32-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (49-22 since 1997.) (69%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots. (52-27 since 1997.) (65.8%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, on Friday nights. (63-37 since 1997.) (63%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games. (48-24 since 1997.) (66.7%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games. (61-36 since 1997.) (62.9%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (37-14 since 1997.) (72.5%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games. (57-34 since 1997.) (62.6%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (56-32 since 1997.) (63.6%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (67-47 since 1997.) (58.8%, +23.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season. (47-26 since 1997.) (64.4%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (38-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.1%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games. (35-17 since 1997.) (67.3%, +20.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (23-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.3%, +17.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (23-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.3%, +17.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (23-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.3%, +17.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games. (45-27 since 1997.) (62.5%, +19.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (20-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +15.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (30-13 since 1997.) (69.8%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (22-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +16.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games. (38-21 since 1997.) (64.4%, +18.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games against opponent after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games. (23-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +25.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games. (31-15 since 1997.) (67.4%, +17.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, on Friday nights. (20-5 since 1997.) (80%, +15.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +16.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - good defensive team - shooting pct defense of <=40% on the season, good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game. (29-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +23.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games against opponent after going over the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games. (29-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +24.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (27-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
LAS VEGAS | 79 | | 29-67 | 43.8% | 5-15 | 35.1% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 48 | 10 | 16 | CONNECTICUT | 77 | | 29-74 | 38.8% | 7-22 | 33.2% | 12-18 | 70.3% | 45 | 12 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LAS VEGAS won the game straight up 529 times, while CONNECTICUT won 448 times. Edge against the money line=LAS VEGAS |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LAS VEGAS is 8-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.4, OPPONENT 76.9 | LAS VEGAS is 26-29 against the money line (+17.3 Units) in road games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.3, OPPONENT 78.6 | LAS VEGAS is 18-8 against the money line (+15.4 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.5, OPPONENT 82.2 | LAS VEGAS is 8-3 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.9, OPPONENT 74.6 | LAS VEGAS is 23-13 against the money line (+11.6 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.4, OPPONENT 81.1 | LAS VEGAS is 51-39 against the money line (+16.8 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 79.7, OPPONENT 78.2 | LAS VEGAS is 27-14 against the money line (+18.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.5, OPPONENT 82.5 | CONNECTICUT is 37-63 against the money line (-41.6 Units) when they make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.2, OPPONENT 75.1 | CONNECTICUT is 10-12 against the money line (-21.5 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 80.4 | CONNECTICUT is 7-11 against the money line (-13.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 79.7 | CONNECTICUT is 13-18 against the money line (-26.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 87.8 | CONNECTICUT is 10-10 against the money line (-13.7 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 82.1 | CONNECTICUT is 2-7 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.9, OPPONENT 79.3 |
|
LAS VEGAS is 46-115 against the money line (-87.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 74.0, OPPONENT 78.7 | LAS VEGAS is 43-78 against the money line (-32.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 74.4, OPPONENT 77.7 | LAS VEGAS is 81-117 against the money line (-51.9 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 74.9, OPPONENT 77.5 | LAS VEGAS is 6-19 against the money line (-17.6 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.7, OPPONENT 82.3 | LAS VEGAS is 39-90 against the money line (-47.4 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 73.0, OPPONENT 79.1 | LAS VEGAS is 103-162 against the money line (-57.9 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 72.6, OPPONENT 76.6 | CONNECTICUT is 108-77 against the money line (+24.4 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 75.0 | CONNECTICUT is 90-52 against the money line (+25.6 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 19-3 against the money line (+15.6 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 76.4 |
|
| | |
|
LAS VEGAS is 9-6 against the money line (+10.6 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 15-8 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 26-16 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.6, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 17-11 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.0, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 28-21 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 17-11 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.0, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 28-21 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 17-8 against the money line (+12.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 27-14 against the money line (+20.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LAS VEGAS is 17-10 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 28-18 against the money line (+20.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LAS VEGAS is 15-8 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 81.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 17-11 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.0, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 27-21 against the money line (+16.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.5, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 25-21 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.9, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 18-15 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-48 against the money line (-23.2 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-35 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-55 against the money line (-36.0 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
LAS VEGAS is 92-136 against the money line (-48.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 74.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 130-187 against the money line (-62.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 74.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 42-93 against the money line (-49.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 70-127 against the money line (-44.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.6, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 10-20 against the money line (-16.1 Units) vs. poor free throw shooting teams - making <=71% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 71.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 18-35 against the money line (-20.3 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 31-55 against the money line (-27.3 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in home games vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-28 against the money line (+17.8 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
LAS VEGAS is 11-6 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.9, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 14-11 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.0, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 17-8 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 16-8 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 10-5 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 20-18 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 18-14 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 14-13 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.9, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 20-16 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.9, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 16-8 against the money line (+16.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LAS VEGAS is 11-5 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 15-13 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.2, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 11-4 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in road games after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 11-7 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in road games after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.9, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 16-12 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 5-2 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after 2 straight games where they had 5 or less steals over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 17-10 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 7-5 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.3, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 14-11 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.2, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 10-7 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.9, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 5-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after a game forcing opponent to commit 8 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.7, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-17 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-10 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LAS VEGAS is 238-334 against the money line (-85.1 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 74.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 73-125 against the money line (-55.4 Units) in August or September games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 49-75 against the money line (-30.8 Units) on Friday since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 135-209 against the money line (-66.8 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 74.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 119-193 against the money line (-78.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 73.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 125-192 against the money line (-77.6 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 73.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 6-10 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 51-86 against the money line (-48.0 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 71-96 against the money line (-45.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 54-67 against the money line (-33.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was LAS VEGAS 79.3, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-12 against the money line (+14.3 Units) as a home favorite of -155 or less since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.5, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 100-41 against the money line (+26.3 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 135-98 against the money line (+27.1 Units) against Western conference opponents since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-7 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in home games after 3 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 135-98 against the money line (+27.1 Units) in non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 106-85 against the money line (+20.1 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 59-42 against the money line (+25.7 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 72-33 against the money line (+23.9 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 34-11 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 19-8 | -1.2 | 11-16 | 12-14 | 82.5 | 42.5 | 42.8% | 49.3 | 76.1 | 39.1 | 38.1% | 42.2 | Road Games | 7-5 | -4.3 | 5-7 | 4-7 | 80.5 | 40.6 | 41.6% | 49.2 | 76.2 | 38.6 | 37.9% | 42.5 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1 | 2-3 | 5-0 | 90.2 | 42.4 | 42.6% | 54.6 | 84.4 | 43.6 | 39.1% | 42.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 82.5 | 42.5 | 30-70 | 42.8% | 6-15 | 38.1% | 17-21 | 77.9% | 49 | 9 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 78.1 | 39.6 | 29-68 | 42.4% | 7-20 | 33.9% | 14-17 | 79.9% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.5 | 40.6 | 29-70 | 41.6% | 6-15 | 38.4% | 16-21 | 77.8% | 49 | 10 | 18 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.1 | 39.1 | 28-72 | 38.1% | 8-24 | 31.9% | 13-16 | 82.6% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 6 | vs opponents averaging | 77.4 | 39.1 | 29-68 | 41.9% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 13-16 | 80.5% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.2 | 38.6 | 27-72 | 37.9% | 8-23 | 33.0% | 14-16 | 84.3% | 42 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 9 | 12 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 19-8 | +2 | 11-15 | 11-16 | 78.6 | 39.6 | 41.3% | 45.8 | 75.6 | 39.6 | 42.9% | 41.4 | Home Games | 13-1 | +9.4 | 8-6 | 6-8 | 82.4 | 40.1 | 44.0% | 46.1 | 72.4 | 37.4 | 42.0% | 38.1 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.5 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 74.6 | 37.4 | 40.1% | 42.6 | 79.0 | 42.2 | 45.6% | 44.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.6 | 39.6 | 29-71 | 41.3% | 7-21 | 34.6% | 12-18 | 70.2% | 46 | 11 | 19 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 78 | 39.3 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 7-20 | 34.0% | 13-17 | 79.7% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 82.4 | 40.1 | 31-71 | 44.0% | 8-21 | 37.2% | 12-16 | 73.8% | 46 | 11 | 20 | 16 | 9 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.6 | 39.6 | 28-66 | 42.9% | 6-20 | 28.6% | 13-16 | 81.0% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 77.6 | 39.4 | 29-68 | 42.0% | 7-20 | 33.2% | 14-17 | 81.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.4 | 37.4 | 27-65 | 42.0% | 6-21 | 27.2% | 12-15 | 77.9% | 38 | 7 | 19 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LAS VEGAS 71, CONNECTICUT 70.9 |
| | |
|
|
7/19/2019 | @ SEATTLE | 66-69 | L | -120 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 42 | 21 | 20-72 | 27.8% | 51 | 14 | 7/21/2019 | MINNESOTA | 79-74 | W | -250 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 39 | 18 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 40 | 18 | 7/23/2019 | SEATTLE | 79-62 | W | -210 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 46 | 10 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 45 | 18 | 7/30/2019 | DALLAS | 86-54 | W | -750 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 46 | 10 | 18-63 | 28.6% | 46 | 18 | 8/1/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | 68-76 | L | +100 | 25-71 | 35.2% | 49 | 14 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 42 | 12 | 8/3/2019 | @ DALLAS | 75-70 | W | -200 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 55 | 17 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 35 | 13 | 8/9/2019 | CHICAGO | 84-87 | L | -300 | 31-84 | 36.9% | 55 | 15 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 41 | 14 | 8/11/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 89-81 | W | -155 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 51 | 16 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 39 | 9 | 8/13/2019 | ATLANTA | 94-90 | W | -1050 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 50 | 12 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 41 | 10 | 8/18/2019 | @ CHICAGO | 100-85 | W | -125 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 52 | 12 | 26-76 | 34.2% | 44 | 7 | 8/20/2019 | PHOENIX | 84-79 | W | -360 | 31-84 | 36.9% | 65 | 12 | 31-83 | 37.3% | 46 | 7 | 8/23/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2019 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2019 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/31/2019 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/5/2019 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2019 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/14/2019 | @ INDIANA | 76-63 | W | -175 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 38 | 13 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 45 | 14 | 7/19/2019 | ATLANTA | 98-69 | W | -500 | 38-78 | 48.7% | 46 | 8 | 22-58 | 37.9% | 40 | 14 | 7/24/2019 | NEW YORK | 70-63 | W | -550 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 55 | 11 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 49 | 16 | 7/30/2019 | CHICAGO | 100-94 | W | -300 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 45 | 16 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 42 | 14 | 8/1/2019 | PHOENIX | 68-62 | W | -300 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 51 | 16 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 37 | 18 | 8/4/2019 | @ NEW YORK | 94-79 | W | -250 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 41 | 9 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 44 | 17 | 8/9/2019 | @ MINNESOTA | 57-89 | L | -155 | 21-68 | 30.9% | 42 | 20 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 48 | 19 | 8/11/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 81-89 | L | +135 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 39 | 9 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 51 | 16 | 8/14/2019 | @ PHOENIX | 78-71 | W | -300 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 50 | 15 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 40 | 19 | 8/16/2019 | SEATTLE | 79-78 | W | -270 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 39 | 15 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 46 | 27 | 8/18/2019 | DALLAS | 78-68 | W | -500 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 43 | 15 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 37 | 9 | 8/23/2019 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2019 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/30/2019 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2019 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2019 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2019 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 25-15 (+9.2 Units) against the money line versus LAS VEGAS since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 4-2 (+1.8 Units) against the money line versus LAS VEGAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CONNECTICUT is 13-5 (+4.1 Units) against the money line versus LAS VEGAS since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 1-0 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus LAS VEGAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/11/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 81 | 159 | Over | 42 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 9-27 | 33.3% | 8-8 | 100.0% | 39 | 11 | 9 | | LAS VEGAS | 89 | -3 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 51 | 11 | 16 | 6/2/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 80 | 167.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 26-77 | 33.8% | 8-26 | 30.8% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 46 | 11 | 9 | | LAS VEGAS | 74 | -5.5 | Under | 43 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 49 | 6 | 21 | 8/5/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 88 | 173.5 | Over | 49 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 7-12 | 58.3% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 31 | 2 | 14 | | CONNECTICUT | 109 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 64 | 46-77 | 59.7% | 9-22 | 40.9% | 8-12 | 66.7% | 41 | 6 | 10 | 7/7/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 90 | -4.5 | Over | 40 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 9-29 | 31.0% | 7-10 | 70.0% | 44 | 11 | 9 | | LAS VEGAS | 94 | 168.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 45 | 9 | 11 | 5/20/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 65 | 154 | Over | 37 | 18-68 | 26.5% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 28-34 | 82.4% | 53 | 12 | 19 | | CONNECTICUT | 101 | -19 | SU ATS | 49 | 37-79 | 46.8% | 11-21 | 52.4% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 51 | 11 | 8 |
|
| | |
|
Lambeer is 120-121 against the money line (+27.1 Units) in road games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 97-94 against the money line (+24.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 75.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 65-41 against the money line (+17.5 Units) when playing with 2 days rest in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 76.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 43-34 against the money line (+18.3 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 149-102 against the money line (+31.7 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 75.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 11-6 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.9, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 14-11 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.0, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 71-40 against the money line (+24.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 75.7, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 17-8 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 16-8 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 39-27 against the money line (+20.6 Units) in road games after having won 4 of their last 5 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 75.1, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 54-38 against the money line (+27.9 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.6, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 43-29 against the money line (+21.8 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 75.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 18-9 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after 5 straight games with 45 or more rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 85.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 14-3 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after 3 straight games with 50 or more rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 82.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Lambeer is 10-5 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 20-18 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 18-14 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 14-13 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.9, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 37-29 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 81.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 20-16 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.9, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 16-8 against the money line (+16.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Lambeer is 11-5 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 26-15 against the money line (+19.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 80.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 73-50 against the money line (+25.1 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 79.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 138-90 against the money line (+29.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 77.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 101-62 against the money line (+26.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 78.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 76-45 against the money line (+24.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 79.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 56-35 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 79.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 15-13 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.2, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 54-34 against the money line (+26.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 81.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 38-27 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 75.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 31-17 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 78.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 61-47 against the money line (+24.4 Units) in road games after playing a game as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 75.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 16-12 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 13-11 against the money line (+16.7 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where they had 5 or less steals in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 17-10 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 48-35 against the money line (+17.7 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 30-21 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in road games after 3 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 73.2, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 7-5 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.3, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 20-13 against the money line (+15.7 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 78.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 14-11 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.2, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 10-7 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.9, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 5-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after a game forcing opponent to commit 8 or less turnovers as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.7, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 130-114 against the money line (+29.0 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 83-70 against the money line (+28.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 9-6 against the money line (+10.6 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 43-30 against the money line (+25.9 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 75.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 47-51 against the money line (+21.5 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 73.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 15-8 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 26-16 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.6, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 17-11 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.0, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 28-21 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 57-43 against the money line (+26.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 77.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 84-65 against the money line (+35.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 78.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 17-11 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.0, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 28-21 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 21-6 against the money line (+15.0 Units) vs. poor free throw shooting teams - making <=71% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.7, OPPONENT 67.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Lambeer is 17-8 against the money line (+12.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 27-14 against the money line (+20.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Lambeer is 17-10 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 28-18 against the money line (+20.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Lambeer is 45-32 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 73.8, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 15-8 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 81.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 68-41 against the money line (+22.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 78.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 17-11 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.0, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 27-21 against the money line (+16.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.5, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 107-79 against the money line (+23.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 77.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 25-21 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.9, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 25-25 against the money line (+19.6 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 78.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 89-79 against the money line (+20.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 79.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 99-67 against the money line (+33.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 18-15 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS. The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 5-11 against the money line (-13.7 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 7-14 against the money line (-12.2 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 11-15 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Lambeer is 20-22 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after a game with 55 or more rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 77.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 40-27 against the money line (+17.9 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 31-11 against the money line (+16.9 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 40-27 against the money line (+17.9 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 18-6 against the money line (+10.0 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 31-12 against the money line (+12.6 Units) off a home win as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 36-13 against the money line (+15.2 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-5 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 41-21 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 23-9 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.4, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 30-8 against the money line (+14.5 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 42-26 against the money line (+9.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 42-23 against the money line (+15.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 59-38 against the money line (+10.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 43-26 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 10 times, while the road underdog won straight up 9 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 1 times, while the road underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 08/22/2019 - Rachel Banham is "?" Friday vs Las Vegas Aces ( Ankle ) | [G] 06/26/2019 - Layshia Clarendon is OUT 3-4 months ( Ankle ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/25/2024 2:17:32 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|