| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES CONNECTICUT |
|
| 160.5 | 86 Final 89 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
601 | LOS ANGELES | +175 | 602 | CONNECTICUT | -210 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (369-149 since 1997.) (71.2%, +87.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (227-157 since 1997.) (59.1%, +72.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (178-113 since 1997.) (61.2%, +71.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (211-73 since 1997.) (74.3%, +67.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning record on the season. (58-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +21.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (181-60 since 1997.) (75.1%, +57.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread. (94-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.1%, +38.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (210-103 since 1997.) (67.1%, +50.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, in August or September games. (110-54 since 1997.) (67.1%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team. (27-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.1%, +10.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, on Sunday games. (55-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +22.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (38-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +27.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after one or more consecutive overs, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game. (48-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.7%, +29.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after one or more consecutive overs, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game. (48-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.4%, +26.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (55-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +39.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (27-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +21.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (43-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.6%, +26.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (43-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.6%, +26.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (52-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (60-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +25.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games. (40-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.1%, +27.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%). (52-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.9%, +26.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (63-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +23 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%). (53-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.8%, +27.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (24-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +16.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (57-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +35.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two poor defensive teams (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (55-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +20 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a close loss by 3 points or less. (69-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +41.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (46-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +28.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games. (43-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning record on the season, on Sunday games. (72-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.2%, +21.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins, with a winning record on the season. (30-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +22.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 3 or more consecutive home wins, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (26-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.8%, +20.2 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (171-131 since 1997.) (56.6%, +54.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (177-135 since 1997.) (56.7%, +47.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (64-37 since 1997.) (63.4%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 2 straight games making 50% of their shots or better. (43-18 since 1997.) (70.5%, +25.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (89-93 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.9%, +5.3 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 79 | | 31-68 | 45.7% | 7-18 | 35.9% | 10-13 | 80.6% | 38 | 8 | 12 | CONNECTICUT | 84 | | 33-69 | 47.1% | 7-20 | 33.9% | 11-15 | 76.1% | 45 | 12 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 603 times, while LOS ANGELES won 377 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 20-6 against the money line (+12.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.6, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 44-29 against the money line (+14.6 Units) in road games when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 74.2 | LOS ANGELES is 19-5 against the money line (+11.6 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 75.1 | LOS ANGELES is 58-10 against the money line (+30.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.8, OPPONENT 77.5 | CONNECTICUT is 15-12 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.1, OPPONENT 81.8 | CONNECTICUT is 7-13 against the money line (-13.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 83.4 | CONNECTICUT is 3-8 against the money line (-18.1 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 86.7 | CONNECTICUT is 4-6 against the money line (-15.1 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 84.5 | CONNECTICUT is 62-83 against the money line (-33.3 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.7, OPPONENT 74.4 | CONNECTICUT is 4-10 against the money line (-14.4 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 79.9 | CONNECTICUT is 8-12 against the money line (-21.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.7, OPPONENT 87.8 | CONNECTICUT is 16-15 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.8 | CONNECTICUT is 4-7 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 84.1 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 11-12 against the money line (-20.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 77.7 | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-16.1 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 80.5 | LOS ANGELES is 4-12 against the money line (-27.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 86.0 | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-15.2 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 89.8 | LOS ANGELES is 1-8 against the money line (-16.0 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.8, OPPONENT 83.7 | LOS ANGELES is 76-82 against the money line (-49.2 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 76.1 | LOS ANGELES is 11-12 against the money line (-20.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 81.7 | CONNECTICUT is 79-35 against the money line (+44.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 75.2 | CONNECTICUT is 11-1 against the money line (+12.9 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.4, OPPONENT 77.5 | CONNECTICUT is 171-126 against the money line (+28.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 74.8 | CONNECTICUT is 71-41 against the money line (+18.9 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 75.8 | CONNECTICUT is 48-22 against the money line (+24.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.3, OPPONENT 83.1 | CONNECTICUT is 47-12 against the money line (+34.6 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.1, OPPONENT 82.0 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 82-62 against the money line (+19.9 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 60-42 against the money line (+19.0 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-12 against the money line (-17.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-7 against the money line (-8.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-12 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-7 against the money line (-13.2 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 6-11 against the money line (-15.6 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-8 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-9 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 7*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-11 against the money line (-21.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-12 against the money line (-20.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 72-77 against the money line (-36.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 102-112 against the money line (-49.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-10.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-8 against the money line (-13.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-11 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-13 against the money line (-21.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-7 against the money line (-17.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-8 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-9 against the money line (-19.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-10 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-4 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-5 against the money line (-14.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-18.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-11 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-6 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-5 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-5 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in road games versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-24 against the money line (-18.2 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-23 against the money line (-20.9 Units) in road games vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.6, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-11 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-13 against the money line (-21.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-13 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-10.8 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 7*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-44 against the money line (-23.6 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-11 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-13 against the money line (-21.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-12.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-9 against the money line (-22.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 7*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-10 against the money line (-20.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-11 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 46-31 against the money line (+12.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-9 against the money line (+16.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-7 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-5 against the money line (+23.5 Units) versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.8, OPPONENT 66.1 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-13 against the money line (+18.2 Units) versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.0, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-20 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 18-6 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) on Sunday games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.5, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after a game where opponent was called for 10 or less fouls since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-7 against the money line (+11.1 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+9.5 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-8 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after a non-conference game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 10*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-10 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-13 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-13 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-13 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-13 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-7 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-8 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-7 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 18-14 against the money line (-17.6 Units) in all games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 154-131 against the money line (-65.2 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-22.8 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-5 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 104-87 against the money line (-55.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-7 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.7, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-8 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-6 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-8 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-7 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-11 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-11 against the money line (-21.5 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-11 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 96-40 against the money line (+24.0 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+5.9 Units) on Sunday games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.0, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-21 against the money line (+21.0 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-5 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-21 against the money line (+21.0 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 62-26 against the money line (+26.0 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.7, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in home games after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-24 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-20 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-9 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-7 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-6 against the money line (+13.1 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-7 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.7, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after 2 straight blowout wins by 15 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-21 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-9 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+5.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 96.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-7 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.9, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+5.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 96.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-12 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 19-14 | -17.5 | 14-18 | 13-19 | 78.7 | 40.2 | 45.5% | 36.5 | 76.6 | 38.2 | 44.9% | 41.7 | Road Games | 8-8 | -2 | 7-8 | 10-6 | 81.2 | 39.5 | 44.8% | 35.4 | 81.8 | 39.6 | 47.4% | 42.1 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.8 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 74.8 | 37.2 | 40.2% | 39.8 | 76.2 | 40.4 | 46.0% | 43.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.7 | 40.2 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 6-17 | 34.9% | 12-15 | 80.8% | 37 | 7 | 19 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 83.1 | 41.8 | 31-69 | 44.4% | 7-20 | 34.7% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.2 | 39.5 | 31-69 | 44.8% | 7-18 | 39.1% | 12-15 | 83.7% | 35 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 10 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.6 | 38.2 | 29-64 | 44.9% | 5-17 | 30.5% | 14-17 | 78.8% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 82.8 | 41.6 | 30-69 | 44.3% | 7-20 | 34.3% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.8 | 39.6 | 30-64 | 47.4% | 6-17 | 35.7% | 15-18 | 81.8% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 16 | 6 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 20-13 | -9.9 | 16-17 | 16-16 | 87.6 | 43.1 | 46.5% | 45.5 | 81.5 | 41.1 | 44.5% | 38.7 | Home Games | 12-4 | -3.9 | 9-7 | 9-7 | 90.9 | 45.0 | 49.4% | 44.0 | 80.5 | 40.8 | 43.8% | 37.1 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -1.5 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 92.2 | 42.8 | 48.9% | 44.2 | 83.8 | 41.6 | 46.3% | 37.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 87.6 | 43.1 | 34-73 | 46.5% | 7-21 | 36.2% | 13-17 | 74.4% | 45 | 11 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.9 | 41.7 | 31-69 | 44.4% | 7-20 | 34.4% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 90.9 | 45.0 | 35-71 | 49.4% | 7-19 | 39.4% | 14-18 | 75.3% | 44 | 10 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.5 | 41.1 | 30-67 | 44.5% | 7-19 | 34.5% | 15-19 | 80.7% | 39 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 82.4 | 41.5 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 7-20 | 34.2% | 15-19 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.5 | 40.8 | 29-67 | 43.8% | 7-19 | 36.0% | 15-18 | 82.7% | 37 | 7 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 70.6, CONNECTICUT 70.8 |
| | |
|
|
7/10/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 77-75 | W | +120 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 39 | 12 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 47 | 21 | 7/12/2018 | DALLAS | 77-92 | L | -250 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 34 | 13 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 44 | 11 | 7/15/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 99-78 | W | -210 | 37-76 | 48.7% | 39 | 7 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 50 | 13 | 7/20/2018 | INDIANA | 76-78 | L | -1050 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 42 | 11 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 43 | 8 | 7/22/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 93-76 | W | -155 | 38-73 | 52.1% | 38 | 9 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 13 | 7/24/2018 | ATLANTA | 71-81 | L | -140 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 32 | 12 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 47 | 11 | 8/2/2018 | MINNESOTA | 79-57 | W | -140 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 37 | 9 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 40 | 14 | 8/5/2018 | PHOENIX | 78-75 | W | -300 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 45 | 7 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 33 | 4 | 8/8/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 82-81 | W | -450 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 37 | 10 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 44 | 13 | 8/9/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 73-79 | L | -120 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 37 | 12 | 29-56 | 51.8% | 41 | 19 | 8/12/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 78-86 | L | -155 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 34 | 9 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 41 | 15 | 8/14/2018 | NEW YORK | 74-66 | W | -1050 | 29-79 | 36.7% | 46 | 5 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 48 | 18 | 8/17/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 67-69 | L | +155 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 45 | 10 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 42 | 8 | 8/19/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/11/2018 | NEW YORK | 76-79 | L | -450 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 51 | 11 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 41 | 13 | 7/13/2018 | PHOENIX | 91-87 | W | -200 | 38-74 | 51.4% | 38 | 7 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 35 | 14 | 7/15/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 83-64 | W | +135 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 51 | 14 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 33 | 15 | 7/17/2018 | ATLANTA | 83-86 | L | -330 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 43 | 12 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 43 | 15 | 7/20/2018 | SEATTLE | 65-78 | L | -155 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 43 | 22 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 34 | 12 | 7/22/2018 | @ DALLAS | 92-75 | W | +155 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 44 | 8 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 38 | 12 | 7/24/2018 | WASHINGTON | 94-68 | W | -220 | 39-68 | 57.4% | 41 | 13 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 35 | 9 | 8/1/2018 | NEW YORK | 92-77 | W | -850 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 46 | 10 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 39 | 15 | 8/5/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 109-88 | W | -400 | 46-77 | 59.7% | 41 | 10 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 31 | 14 | 8/8/2018 | @ DALLAS | 101-92 | W | -125 | 40-71 | 56.3% | 40 | 9 | 38-80 | 47.5% | 41 | 13 | 8/10/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 86-97 | L | -550 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 42 | 13 | 39-72 | 54.2% | 39 | 11 | 8/12/2018 | CHICAGO | 82-75 | W | -850 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 55 | 16 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 39 | 16 | 8/14/2018 | DALLAS | 96-76 | W | -300 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 46 | 9 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 38 | 13 | 8/17/2018 | MINNESOTA | 96-79 | W | -220 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 38 | 10 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 31 | 13 | 8/19/2018 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 22-16 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 2-5 (-0.5 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 10-9 (+3.2 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 3-1 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 73 | 162 | SU ATS | 41 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 41 | 6 | 17 | | LOS ANGELES | 72 | -9.5 | Under | 25 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 30 | 6 | 13 | 5/24/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 94 | 162.5 | Over | 47 | 35-64 | 54.7% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 18 | 5 | 11 | | CONNECTICUT | 102 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 40-64 | 62.5% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 40 | 9 | 20 | 9/3/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 70 | 161.5 | Under | 27 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 39 | 7 | 17 | | LOS ANGELES | 81 | -8 | SU ATS | 38 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 1-6 | 16.7% | 6-6 | 100.0% | 37 | 5 | 13 | 7/13/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 77 | 167.5 | Under | 45 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 10-16 | 62.5% | 45 | 9 | 18 | | LOS ANGELES | 87 | -7 | SU ATS | 46 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 44 | 9 | 15 | 6/27/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 87 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 39 | 8 | 9 | | CONNECTICUT | 79 | 168.5 | Under | 39 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 51 | 16 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 66-41 against the money line (+28.6 Units) on Sunday games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.3, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 45-40 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 70.8, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 8-1 against the money line (+9.5 Units) revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 22-27 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 8-15 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 12-12 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Agler is 91-58 against the money line (-27.2 Units) in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 20-22 against the money line (-20.4 Units) in road games after a non-conference game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.4, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 35-51 against the money line (-26.6 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 71.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 17-23 against the money line (-26.9 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 18-16 against the money line (-16.2 Units) off a road loss as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 7-9 against the money line (-14.1 Units) off a close road loss of 3 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 69.1, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 9-12 against the money line (-23.7 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 12-19 against the money line (-23.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 10-15 against the money line (-21.3 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 28-25 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 5-9 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 40-30 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 31-24 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 22-21 against the money line (-24.0 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 29-19 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 34-24 against the money line (-31.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 48-32 against the money line (-29.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 35-26 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 26-23 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 33-25 against the money line (-31.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 47-35 against the money line (-30.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 18-13 against the money line (-26.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 27-16 against the money line (-26.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 46-28 against the money line (-30.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 61-35 against the money line (-28.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 9-9 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 2-5 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in road games versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 55-33 against the money line (-29.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 45-27 against the money line (-25.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 25-22 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 53-37 against the money line (-25.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 29-31 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 19-22 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 48-33 against the money line (-25.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 30-21 against the money line (+21.0 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 16-5 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 30-21 against the money line (+21.0 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 21-14 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 18-10 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 14-8 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 12-4 against the money line (+7.7 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.7, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 32-24 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 28-20 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-9 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-19 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 10-5 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 17-9 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 29-21 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 25-9 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-2 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 94.0, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 30-17 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.7, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-6 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.0, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 18-12 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-11 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 25-18 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 33-20 against the money line (+10.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 46-31 against the money line (+12.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-9 against the money line (+16.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 14-5 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 18-7 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 28-20 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 174 times, while the road underdog won straight up 99 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 23 times, while the road underdog won straight up 7 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[F] 08/18/2018 - Chiney Ogwumike is "?" Sunday vs LA Sparks ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/18/2024 3:51:23 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|