| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
161
| 79
Final
96 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 307 | MINNESOTA | +220 | | 308 | CONNECTICUT | -300 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(368-149 since 1997.) (71.2%, +86.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(210-73 since 1997.) (74.2%, +66.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning record on the season.
(56-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +19.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(180-60 since 1997.) (75%, +56.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive home losses.
(90-36 since 1997.) (71.4%, +52.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(209-103 since 1997.) (67%, +49.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in non-conference games, off a close home loss by 3 points or less.
(72-41 since 1997.) (63.7%, +43.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive home losses.
(58-10 since 1997.) (85.3%, +41 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive home losses.
(65-13 since 1997.) (83.3%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team.
(26-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +9.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good FT shooting team (76-80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(51-29 since 1997.) (63.8%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging 2 straight losses versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(47-8 since 1997.) (85.5%, +31.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(37-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(160-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.8%, +36.5 units. Rating = 1*) |  - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(54-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +38.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +20.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(45-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +21.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(126-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +25.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(42-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.4%, +25.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(42-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.4%, +25.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(51-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(187-110 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +25.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games.
(39-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.8%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%).
(51-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.6%, +25.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%).
(52-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.5%, +26.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(56-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +34.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(45-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.8%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games.
(39-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +13.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(68-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +40.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(45-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two poor defensive teams (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(52-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.2%, +17 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(213-132 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.7%, +14.9 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(89-90 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.7%, +8.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(31-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +28.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(66-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +20.7 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| MINNESOTA | 79 | | 31-69 | 44.8% | 6-16 | 34.9% | 11-15 | 78.2% | 42 | 10 | 14 | | CONNECTICUT | 84 | | 33-72 | 46.2% | 8-20 | 37.5% | 11-14 | 75.5% | 43 | 11 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 642 times, while MINNESOTA won 336 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 102-31 against the money line (+77.5 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 73.3 | MINNESOTA is 13-3 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 76.7 | MINNESOTA is 233-71 against the money line (+113.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.2, OPPONENT 78.4 | CONNECTICUT is 15-12 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.1, OPPONENT 81.8 | CONNECTICUT is 7-13 against the money line (-13.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 83.4 | CONNECTICUT is 62-83 against the money line (-33.3 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.7, OPPONENT 74.4 | CONNECTICUT is 3-10 against the money line (-15.4 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 80.0 | CONNECTICUT is 7-12 against the money line (-22.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 88.3 | CONNECTICUT is 4-7 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 84.1 | CONNECTICUT is 6-11 against the money line (-17.2 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 85.2 |
|
MINNESOTA is 86-98 against the money line (-41.9 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.7, OPPONENT 76.5 | MINNESOTA is 2-6 against the money line (-9.7 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 81.0 | MINNESOTA is 75-83 against the money line (-39.5 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 74.7 | MINNESOTA is 33-38 against the money line (-24.2 Units) in road games when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 78.6 | MINNESOTA is 2-8 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 80.7 | MINNESOTA is 4-10 against the money line (-18.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 84.9 | MINNESOTA is 1-8 against the money line (-19.0 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.7, OPPONENT 87.4 | MINNESOTA is 28-14 against the money line (-26.5 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 76.5 | MINNESOTA is 8-9 against the money line (-12.9 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.3, OPPONENT 78.7 | CONNECTICUT is 79-35 against the money line (+44.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 75.2 | CONNECTICUT is 13-6 against the money line (+16.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 78.4 | CONNECTICUT is 80-49 against the money line (+22.5 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 11-1 against the money line (+12.9 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.4, OPPONENT 77.5 | CONNECTICUT is 171-126 against the money line (+28.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 74.8 | CONNECTICUT is 47-22 against the money line (+23.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.2, OPPONENT 83.2 | CONNECTICUT is 46-12 against the money line (+33.6 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.0, OPPONENT 82.1 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 14-16 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-13 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-12 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-13 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-13 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-13 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 4-7 against the money line (-12.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 8-9 against the money line (-13.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 4-7 against the money line (-10.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 5-7 against the money line (-9.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 5-8 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 9-10 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-8 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 12-13 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 17-16 against the money line (-26.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 5-7 against the money line (-9.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 47-25 against the money line (-30.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-7 against the money line (-22.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 6-6 against the money line (-12.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 31-16 against the money line (-26.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 137-118 against the money line (-58.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.8, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 29-37 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 50-63 against the money line (-41.1 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-18 against the money line (-17.2 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 71.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 2-4 against the money line (-13.1 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-8 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 5-8 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 10-11 against the money line (-16.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 78-101 against the money line (-37.2 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-8 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 198-173 against the money line (-63.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 5-8 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-11 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 45-31 against the money line (+11.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-20 against the money line (+10.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 8-2 against the money line (+6.2 Units) in road games on Friday over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-2 against the money line (+6.2 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 12-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 135-65 against the money line (+30.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 20-6 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-8 against the money line (-15.3 Units) on Friday over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-8 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after a non-conference game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-12 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-8 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-10 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-10 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-13 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-13 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-13 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-13 against the money line (-19.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-11 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-7 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-7 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-10 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-8 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-7 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 16-14 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 12-12 against the money line (-19.6 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 79-68 against the money line (-41.2 Units) when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 33-15 against the money line (-29.9 Units) against Eastern conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 199-171 against the money line (-82.4 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.6, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 33-15 against the money line (-29.9 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 5-17 against the money line (-17.3 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home losses since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 71.1, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 72-79 against the money line (-44.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 3-7 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 7-20 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 70-103 against the money line (-38.6 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 3-6 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 142-159 against the money line (-72.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 2-4 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 7-10 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-21 against the money line (+20.0 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-21 against the money line (+20.0 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-10 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.9, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in home games after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-6 against the money line (+14.7 Units) off a home blowout win by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-24 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-7 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after a blowout win by 20 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.6, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-21 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 93.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-17 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 93.3, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 17-15 | -16.2 | 12-20 | 10-22 | 78.7 | 40.9 | 44.6% | 43.3 | 77.6 | 38.1 | 44.0% | 38.4 | | Road Games | 9-7 | -3 | 8-8 | 2-14 | 77.8 | 39.6 | 45.2% | 43.3 | 76.2 | 37.5 | 43.7% | 37.0 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -5.7 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 80.0 | 38.0 | 45.6% | 41.6 | 79.0 | 39.6 | 44.1% | 40.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.7 | 40.9 | 30-67 | 44.6% | 5-16 | 34.9% | 13-17 | 77.3% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.7 | 41.7 | 31-69 | 44.5% | 7-19 | 34.2% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.8 | 39.6 | 30-67 | 45.2% | 5-16 | 33.6% | 12-15 | 78.8% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.6 | 38.1 | 29-67 | 44.0% | 7-20 | 34.3% | 12-15 | 79.0% | 38 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.4 | 41.3 | 30-69 | 44.4% | 7-20 | 34.2% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.2 | 37.5 | 29-66 | 43.7% | 7-19 | 34.7% | 12-15 | 78.9% | 37 | 6 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 19-13 | -10.9 | 15-17 | 15-16 | 87.3 | 43.1 | 46.2% | 45.7 | 81.6 | 40.9 | 44.3% | 38.9 | | Home Games | 11-4 | -4.9 | 8-7 | 8-7 | 90.5 | 45.1 | 49.1% | 44.4 | 80.6 | 40.5 | 43.4% | 37.5 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -1.5 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 94.8 | 47.0 | 50.0% | 44.8 | 85.6 | 42.2 | 46.6% | 37.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 87.3 | 43.1 | 34-73 | 46.2% | 7-21 | 35.9% | 13-17 | 74.3% | 46 | 11 | 19 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.8 | 41.7 | 31-69 | 44.4% | 7-20 | 34.3% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 90.5 | 45.1 | 35-71 | 49.1% | 7-19 | 39.1% | 13-18 | 75.1% | 44 | 10 | 20 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.6 | 40.9 | 30-67 | 44.3% | 7-19 | 34.9% | 15-19 | 80.5% | 39 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.3 | 41.4 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 7-20 | 34.2% | 15-19 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.6 | 40.5 | 29-67 | 43.4% | 7-19 | 37.1% | 16-19 | 82.3% | 37 | 7 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 70.6, CONNECTICUT 70.5 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/11/2018 | @ INDIANA | 87-65 | W | -550 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 43 | 11 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 30 | 10 | | 7/13/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 77-85 | L | -400 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 41 | 9 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 44 | 12 | | 7/15/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 64-83 | L | -155 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 33 | 15 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 51 | 14 | | 7/18/2018 | INDIANA | 89-65 | W | | 33-63 | 52.4% | 44 | 9 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 31 | 11 | | 7/21/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 80-75 | W | +135 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 46 | 14 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 35 | 11 | | 7/24/2018 | NEW YORK | 85-82 | W | -950 | 31-76 | 40.8% | 52 | 7 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 47 | 14 | | 8/2/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 57-79 | L | +120 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 40 | 14 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 37 | 9 | | 8/3/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 75-85 | L | +180 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 43 | 18 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 38 | 10 | | 8/5/2018 | ATLANTA | 66-86 | L | -220 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 39 | 11 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 47 | 13 | | 8/7/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 85-64 | W | -175 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 43 | 20 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 37 | 20 | | 8/9/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 89-73 | W | +100 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 46 | 10 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 36 | 11 | | 8/12/2018 | SEATTLE | 72-81 | L | +135 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 36 | 9 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 47 | 14 | | 8/14/2018 | CHICAGO | 88-91 | L | -450 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 44 | 16 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 34 | 14 | | 8/17/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/19/2018 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/11/2018 | NEW YORK | 76-79 | L | -450 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 51 | 11 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 41 | 13 | | 7/13/2018 | PHOENIX | 91-87 | W | -200 | 38-74 | 51.4% | 38 | 7 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 35 | 14 | | 7/15/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 83-64 | W | +135 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 51 | 14 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 33 | 15 | | 7/17/2018 | ATLANTA | 83-86 | L | -330 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 43 | 12 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 43 | 15 | | 7/20/2018 | SEATTLE | 65-78 | L | -155 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 43 | 22 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 34 | 12 | | 7/22/2018 | @ DALLAS | 92-75 | W | +155 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 44 | 8 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 38 | 12 | | 7/24/2018 | WASHINGTON | 94-68 | W | -220 | 39-68 | 57.4% | 41 | 13 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 35 | 9 | | 8/1/2018 | NEW YORK | 92-77 | W | -850 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 46 | 10 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 39 | 15 | | 8/5/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 109-88 | W | -400 | 46-77 | 59.7% | 41 | 10 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 31 | 14 | | 8/8/2018 | @ DALLAS | 101-92 | W | -125 | 40-71 | 56.3% | 40 | 9 | 38-80 | 47.5% | 41 | 13 | | 8/10/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 86-97 | L | -550 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 42 | 13 | 39-72 | 54.2% | 39 | 11 | | 8/12/2018 | CHICAGO | 82-75 | W | -850 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 55 | 16 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 39 | 16 | | 8/14/2018 | DALLAS | 96-76 | W | -300 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 46 | 9 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 38 | 13 | | 8/17/2018 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/19/2018 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 20-19 (+12.0 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 5-3 (+10.4 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 12-8 (+8.1 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 3-1 (+7.5 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/15/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 83 | 164.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 12-25 | 48.0% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 51 | 13 | 14 | | | MINNESOTA | 64 | -3 | Under | 33 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 33 | 7 | 15 | 6/9/2018 | MINNESOTA | 75 | 168.5 | Under | 38 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 43 | 9 | 12 | | | CONNECTICUT | 89 | -6 | SU ATS | 44 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 17-23 | 73.9% | 48 | 12 | 10 | 6/17/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 98 | 162.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 41-74 | 55.4% | 10-22 | 45.5% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 46 | 9 | 17 | | | MINNESOTA | 93 | -9.5 | Over | 47 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 30 | 3 | 13 | 5/26/2017 | MINNESOTA | 82 | -6 | SU ATS | 42 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 22-25 | 88.0% | 51 | 12 | 15 | | | CONNECTICUT | 68 | 158 | Under | 26 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 34 | 7 | 12 | 5/23/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 78 | 163 | ATS | 37 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 10-20 | 50.0% | 4-6 | 66.7% | 43 | 9 | 12 | | | MINNESOTA | 80 | -12 | SU Under | 35 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 7-12 | 58.3% | 15-22 | 68.2% | 42 | 8 | 20 |
|
| | |
|
Reeve is 20-11 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 103-39 against the money line (+23.7 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 46-18 against the money line (+14.9 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 25-13 against the money line (+9.4 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 71-36 against the money line (+16.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 60-31 against the money line (+12.4 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 34-15 against the money line (+15.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 56-22 against the money line (+26.3 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 53-19 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 114-44 against the money line (+26.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 166-72 against the money line (+22.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 132-53 against the money line (+26.6 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 124-49 against the money line (+25.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 72-26 against the money line (+18.0 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 37-11 against the money line (+15.2 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 114-41 against the money line (+26.4 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 117-46 against the money line (+21.6 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 34-14 against the money line (+12.9 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-27 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 11-12 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-18 against the money line (-19.9 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Reeve is 85-43 against the money line (-32.5 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 85-43 against the money line (-32.5 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 15-14 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 39-38 against the money line (-29.3 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 117-72 against the money line (-31.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 31-27 against the money line (-23.2 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 44-33 against the money line (-20.5 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 4-8 against the money line (-15.9 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 71.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 5-10 against the money line (-18.9 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 5*) | Reeve is 33-31 against the money line (-18.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 49-44 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 46-41 against the money line (-25.5 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 34-34 against the money line (-19.6 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.0, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 29-21 against the money line (+20.0 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 15-5 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 29-21 against the money line (+20.0 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 17-10 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.9, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 6-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in home games after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 31-24 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 27-20 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 16-9 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 12-7 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after a blowout win by 20 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.6, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 28-21 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 24-9 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 14-2 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 93.9, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 29-17 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-6 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.8, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 18-11 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 32-20 against the money line (+9.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 45-31 against the money line (+11.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-7 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 27-20 against the money line (+10.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 233 times, while the road underdog won straight up 68 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 16 times, while the road underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 08/15/2018 - Rebekkah Brunson is "?" Friday vs Connecticut Sun ( Concussion ) | | [G] 08/13/2018 - Danielle Robinson is out indefinitely ( Ankle ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/26/2024 8:16:17 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|