| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
DALLAS CONNECTICUT |
|
| 178 | 76 Final 96 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
611 | DALLAS | +220 | 612 | CONNECTICUT | -300 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread. (91-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.5%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (113-68 since 1997.) (62.4%, +45.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (207-124 since 1997.) (62.5%, +38.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (103-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +14.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games. (84-44 since 1997.) (65.6%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (83-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +9.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (123-49 since 1997.) (71.5%, +31.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (159-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.6%, +35.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after being beaten by the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in non-conference games. (48-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (110-34 since 1997.) (76.4%, +21.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (125-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +24.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (40-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.9%, +23.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season against opponent after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (34-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (81%, +5.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (40-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.9%, +23.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (45-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +1.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (185-110 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +23.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games. (37-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.1%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%). (49-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.1%, +23.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (65-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +2.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%). (50-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (82%, +24.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two poor defensive teams (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (50-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.5%, +15 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (211-132 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +12.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - off 2 or more consecutive road losses, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (21-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +16.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a marginal losing team. (90-66 since 1997.) (57.7%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a marginal losing team after 15 or more games. (75-55 since 1997.) (57.7%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a marginal losing team. (61-41 since 1997.) (59.8%, +33.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a marginal losing team after 15 or more games. (51-32 since 1997.) (61.4%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (89-87 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.6%, +14.8 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS | 85 | | 31-68 | 45.6% | 7-21 | 31.0% | 17-21 | 79.2% | 43 | 12 | 15 | CONNECTICUT | 89 | | 34-74 | 46.3% | 8-21 | 37.0% | 13-18 | 74.6% | 44 | 13 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 615 times, while DALLAS won 358 times. Edge against the money line=DALLAS |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
DALLAS is 9-4 against the money line (+6.1 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.9, OPPONENT 78.8 | DALLAS is 11-5 against the money line (+6.1 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.5, OPPONENT 81.9 | CONNECTICUT is 14-12 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 82.0 | CONNECTICUT is 7-13 against the money line (-13.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 83.4 | CONNECTICUT is 1-4 against the money line (-9.2 Units) when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 79.1 | CONNECTICUT is 62-74 against the money line (-38.4 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 78.2 | CONNECTICUT is 7-12 against the money line (-22.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 88.3 | CONNECTICUT is 6-9 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.9, OPPONENT 90.7 | CONNECTICUT is 3-7 against the money line (-15.3 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 84.8 | CONNECTICUT is 6-11 against the money line (-17.2 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 85.2 |
|
DALLAS is 10-14 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.9, OPPONENT 85.4 | DALLAS is 10-21 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.0, OPPONENT 90.3 | DALLAS is 8-13 against the money line (-17.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.0, OPPONENT 90.3 | DALLAS is 6-13 against the money line (-19.0 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.4, OPPONENT 91.4 | DALLAS is 8-10 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season. The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 83.7 | DALLAS is 11-16 against the money line (-15.5 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.2, OPPONENT 86.8 | DALLAS is 6-8 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.6, OPPONENT 84.7 | CONNECTICUT is 79-35 against the money line (+44.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 75.2 | CONNECTICUT is 13-6 against the money line (+16.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 78.4 | CONNECTICUT is 80-49 against the money line (+22.5 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 46-22 against the money line (+22.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.2, OPPONENT 83.3 | CONNECTICUT is 45-12 against the money line (+32.6 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.0, OPPONENT 82.2 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 15-13 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-12 against the money line (-18.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-13 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-8 against the money line (-9.7 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-13 against the money line (-11.7 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-13 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-13 against the money line (-17.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-13 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-12 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 5-8 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.8, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-12 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.6, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 6-9 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.7, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 8-11 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.2, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-10 against the money line (-13.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.8, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-14 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.2, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 6-9 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.9, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-13 against the money line (-13.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.9, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 3-7 against the money line (-11.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 5-11 against the money line (-13.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots this season. The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 8-10 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.2, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-14 against the money line (-12.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.7, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-9 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.2, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-13 against the money line (-13.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.0, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-10 against the money line (-13.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.8, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 10-14 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.8, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 5-8 against the money line (-13.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.1, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 7-10 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.5, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.1, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 10-13 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.2, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 6-19 against the money line (-18.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 91.6 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 12-27 against the money line (-19.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 8-10 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.2, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-14 against the money line (-12.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.7, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.1, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 10-13 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.2, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 8-10 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.2, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-14 against the money line (-12.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.7, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 6-9 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.4, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-13 against the money line (-13.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.6, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 14-27 against the money line (-15.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+13.5 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 78-62 against the money line (+22.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 4-9 against the money line (-22.3 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 8*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-6 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-8 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 43-51 against the money line (-25.6 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-10 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-10 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-13 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-13 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-13 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-13 against the money line (-20.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-11 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.9, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-9 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-7 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-7 against the money line (-16.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-10 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.7, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-8 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 14-17 against the money line (-12.9 Units) in all games this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-9 against the money line (-12.2 Units) against Eastern conference opponents this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.2, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-11 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after a non-conference game this season. The average score was DALLAS 85.8, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 5*) | DALLAS is 3-8 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.5, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 6*) | DALLAS is 1-7 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 8*) | DALLAS is 5-12 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 87.2, OPPONENT 91.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-18 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 1-7 against the money line (-7.5 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season. The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 13-24 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.7, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 8-9 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in non-conference games this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.2, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 4-7 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.8, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 8-24 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 91.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 3-18 against the money line (-15.3 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 91.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 4-11 against the money line (-14.4 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.3, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 4-11 against the money line (-14.4 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.3, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 3-8 against the money line (-12.4 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points this season. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 3-8 against the money line (-11.7 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent this season. The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 2-8 against the money line (-6.9 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent this season. The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 2-8 against the money line (-6.9 Units) revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points this season. The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 3-10 against the money line (-9.4 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 80.9, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-15 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 85.4, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-13 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.3, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 8-11 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.0, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 6-10 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 85.2, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 12-13 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.2, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 8-11 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 5-10 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 3-8 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.0, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 6*) | DALLAS is 1-7 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 8*) | DALLAS is 9-10 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.1, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 3-8 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 6*) | DALLAS is 0-7 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 9*) | DALLAS is 4-7 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after allowing 90 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.3, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 5-7 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.2, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 17-31 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-8 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 9-14 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 7-12 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.2, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 6-10 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.3, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 12-15 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.0, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 11-14 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-14 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.4, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 10-13 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.1, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 9-12 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.9, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 11-15 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.0, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-12 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 6-10 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.1, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 4-10 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 89.1 - (Rating = 5*) | DALLAS is 10-13 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.7, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-12 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 5*) | DALLAS is 3-9 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 7*) | DALLAS is 3-9 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 7*) | DALLAS is 9-12 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.6, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 5-10 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 5-8 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was DALLAS 86.1, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 1-4 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games this season. The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 3-12 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 23-33 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 7*) | DALLAS is 4-16 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 2-13 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after 4 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 2-10 against the money line (-9.0 Units) after 5 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 2-5 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season. The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-18 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 88.6 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 4-7 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after a game forcing opponent to commit 8 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 88.5, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-21 against the money line (+19.0 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-17 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after a division game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in home games after 2 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-21 against the money line (+19.0 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) off a home win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 93.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-21 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 72-48 against the money line (+20.8 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 14-17 | -12.9 | 17-14 | 17-12 | 86.9 | 43.8 | 44.5% | 46.0 | 84.5 | 43.5 | 44.1% | 40.4 | Road Games | 5-10 | -7 | 7-8 | 10-4 | 85.1 | 42.3 | 42.7% | 46.6 | 87.7 | 45.6 | 43.8% | 43.0 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -6.5 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 81.2 | 37.0 | 43.0% | 48.0 | 89.2 | 46.8 | 48.4% | 37.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 86.9 | 43.8 | 31-69 | 44.5% | 7-22 | 30.6% | 19-24 | 78.6% | 46 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.2 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 44.5% | 7-19 | 34.2% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 85.1 | 42.3 | 30-69 | 42.7% | 7-24 | 30.6% | 19-24 | 78.3% | 47 | 10 | 18 | 21 | 6 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.5 | 43.5 | 31-69 | 44.1% | 7-19 | 35.4% | 17-21 | 79.8% | 40 | 9 | 19 | 21 | 8 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 7-19 | 34.7% | 14-18 | 79.7% | 41 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 87.7 | 45.6 | 31-71 | 43.8% | 7-19 | 35.5% | 19-24 | 79.3% | 43 | 10 | 19 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 18-13 | -11.9 | 14-17 | 15-15 | 87.0 | 42.8 | 46.0% | 45.7 | 81.8 | 41.0 | 44.5% | 38.9 | Home Games | 10-4 | -5.9 | 7-7 | 8-6 | 90.1 | 44.8 | 48.9% | 44.3 | 80.9 | 40.6 | 43.8% | 37.4 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -1.5 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 94.0 | 46.6 | 49.1% | 44.8 | 85.8 | 42.4 | 47.7% | 37.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 87.0 | 42.8 | 34-73 | 46.0% | 8-21 | 36.0% | 12-17 | 74.2% | 46 | 12 | 19 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.9 | 41.6 | 31-69 | 44.5% | 7-20 | 34.4% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 90.1 | 44.8 | 35-71 | 48.9% | 7-19 | 39.3% | 13-17 | 75.1% | 44 | 10 | 20 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.8 | 41.0 | 30-67 | 44.5% | 7-19 | 35.3% | 15-19 | 80.4% | 39 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 82.2 | 41.3 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 7-19 | 34.4% | 15-19 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.9 | 40.6 | 29-67 | 43.8% | 7-18 | 38.1% | 15-19 | 82.2% | 37 | 7 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: DALLAS 71.6, CONNECTICUT 70.5 |
| | |
|
|
7/5/2018 | INDIANA | 90-63 | W | -550 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 60 | 18 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 27 | 12 | 7/8/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 97-87 | W | -165 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 53 | 9 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 40 | 6 | 7/10/2018 | PHOENIX | 101-72 | W | -140 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 45 | 14 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 33 | 21 | 7/12/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 92-77 | W | +200 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 44 | 11 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 34 | 13 | 7/14/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 84-91 | L | +170 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 44 | 15 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 50 | 14 | 7/17/2018 | NEW YORK | 104-87 | W | -360 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 41 | 11 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 38 | 16 | 7/19/2018 | WASHINGTON | 90-81 | W | -200 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 54 | 13 | 31-81 | 38.3% | 44 | 9 | 7/20/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 99-114 | L | -300 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 36 | 11 | 42-74 | 56.8% | 46 | 19 | 7/22/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 75-92 | L | -175 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 38 | 12 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 44 | 8 | 7/31/2018 | CHICAGO | 91-92 | L | -850 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 53 | 15 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 33 | 8 | 8/2/2018 | @ INDIANA | 78-84 | L | -250 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 49 | 21 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 34 | 9 | 8/5/2018 | WASHINGTON | 74-76 | L | +145 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 50 | 13 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 35 | 8 | 8/8/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 92-101 | L | +105 | 38-80 | 47.5% | 41 | 13 | 40-71 | 56.3% | 40 | 9 | 8/11/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 82-92 | L | +210 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 48 | 14 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 39 | 10 | 8/12/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-93 | L | +450 | 26-76 | 34.2% | 52 | 12 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 41 | 6 | 8/14/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/17/2018 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/19/2018 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/5/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 77-84 | L | +210 | 28-81 | 34.6% | 45 | 12 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 46 | 17 | 7/7/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 90-94 | L | -200 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 44 | 9 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 45 | 11 | 7/11/2018 | NEW YORK | 76-79 | L | -450 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 51 | 11 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 41 | 13 | 7/13/2018 | PHOENIX | 91-87 | W | -200 | 38-74 | 51.4% | 38 | 7 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 35 | 14 | 7/15/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 83-64 | W | +135 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 51 | 14 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 33 | 15 | 7/17/2018 | ATLANTA | 83-86 | L | -330 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 43 | 12 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 43 | 15 | 7/20/2018 | SEATTLE | 65-78 | L | -155 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 43 | 22 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 34 | 12 | 7/22/2018 | @ DALLAS | 92-75 | W | +155 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 44 | 8 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 38 | 12 | 7/24/2018 | WASHINGTON | 94-68 | W | -220 | 39-68 | 57.4% | 41 | 13 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 35 | 9 | 8/1/2018 | NEW YORK | 92-77 | W | -850 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 46 | 10 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 39 | 15 | 8/5/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 109-88 | W | -400 | 46-77 | 59.7% | 41 | 10 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 31 | 14 | 8/8/2018 | @ DALLAS | 101-92 | W | -125 | 40-71 | 56.3% | 40 | 9 | 38-80 | 47.5% | 41 | 13 | 8/10/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 86-97 | L | -550 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 42 | 13 | 39-72 | 54.2% | 39 | 11 | 8/12/2018 | CHICAGO | 82-75 | W | -850 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 55 | 16 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 39 | 16 | 8/14/2018 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/17/2018 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/19/2018 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 32-32 (-7.9 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 7-1 (+8.9 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
DALLAS is 14-17 (+3.6 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 3-0 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/8/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 101 | -2 | SU ATS | 48 | 40-71 | 56.3% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 40 | 10 | 9 | | DALLAS | 92 | 175 | Over | 32 | 38-80 | 47.5% | 10-29 | 34.5% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 41 | 17 | 13 | 7/22/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 92 | 178 | SU ATS | 44 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 10-20 | 50.0% | 8-13 | 61.5% | 44 | 12 | 8 | | DALLAS | 75 | -4 | Under | 38 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 5-21 | 23.8% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 38 | 5 | 12 | 8/23/2017 | DALLAS | 87 | 180 | ATS | 44 | 34-81 | 42.0% | 10-29 | 34.5% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 45 | 9 | 13 | | CONNECTICUT | 93 | -11.5 | SU | 47 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 19-27 | 70.4% | 50 | 12 | 16 | 8/12/2017 | DALLAS | 88 | 179 | ATS | 48 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 25-26 | 96.2% | 38 | 5 | 11 | | CONNECTICUT | 96 | -9.5 | SU Over | 55 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 4-19 | 21.1% | 22-28 | 78.6% | 55 | 12 | 15 | 6/25/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 82 | -5 | Over | 39 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 35 | 7 | 18 | | DALLAS | 96 | 174 | SU ATS | 49 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 23-28 | 82.1% | 37 | 8 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Williams is 4-1 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in road games vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 17-20 against the money line (-22.8 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 11-18 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 3-8 against the money line (-9.7 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 8-13 against the money line (-11.7 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Williams is 71-98 against the money line (-33.2 Units) in all games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 39-84 against the money line (-36.7 Units) in road games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.0, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 37-83 against the money line (-36.9 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.2, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 28-68 against the money line (-33.5 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 80.0, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 11-30 against the money line (-18.9 Units) in road games in August or September games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 75.8, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 32-46 against the money line (-30.5 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 31-43 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 13-21 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 7-12 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 8-24 against the money line (-22.6 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Williams is 3-10 against the money line (-9.8 Units) when playing their 4th game in 7 days as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 27-52 against the money line (-27.3 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 23-44 against the money line (-23.3 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 18-39 against the money line (-23.8 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 32-46 against the money line (-30.5 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 5-13 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 80.8, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 27-38 against the money line (-22.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 10-25 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 11-35 against the money line (-23.2 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 6-21 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 6-29 against the money line (-21.0 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 35-55 against the money line (-19.3 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 29-55 against the money line (-27.0 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 21-39 against the money line (-19.3 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 24-42 against the money line (-19.0 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 8-16 against the money line (-11.6 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 46-77 against the money line (-42.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 41-66 against the money line (-37.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.2, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 35-59 against the money line (-39.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 30-53 against the money line (-38.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 55-81 against the money line (-38.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 44-67 against the money line (-35.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 35-59 against the money line (-38.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 27-52 against the money line (-41.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Williams is 24-45 against the money line (-32.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 42-67 against the money line (-35.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 29-49 against the money line (-29.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 18-39 against the money line (-32.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Williams is 24-38 against the money line (-22.0 Units) after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 24-46 against the money line (-27.3 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 1-9 against the money line (-9.0 Units) after trailing their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 92.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 10-24 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Williams is 42-60 against the money line (-27.3 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 34-48 against the money line (-23.6 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 25-44 against the money line (-32.0 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 57-70 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 49-61 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 41-57 against the money line (-26.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 36-51 against the money line (-26.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 43-66 against the money line (-35.4 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 50-75 against the money line (-35.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 37-55 against the money line (-29.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 27-41 against the money line (-26.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 27-50 against the money line (-34.2 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.7, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 51-70 against the money line (-30.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 36-53 against the money line (-28.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 28-40 against the money line (-22.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 24-33 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 86.1, OPPONENT 88.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 37-57 against the money line (-27.9 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 24-35 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 22-57 against the money line (-46.8 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 5*) | Williams is 9-32 against the money line (-31.0 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 6*) | Williams is 5-18 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 34-60 against the money line (-34.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 17-38 against the money line (-28.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 9-27 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.2, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 5-21 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after 4 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Williams is 5-15 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after 5 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 3-11 against the money line (-9.2 Units) after 6 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.5, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 2-8 against the money line (-7.2 Units) after 7 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.7, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 27-45 against the money line (-27.2 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 18-35 against the money line (-25.0 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 21-36 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 5-11 against the money line (-9.6 Units) after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.3, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 6-18 against the money line (-14.1 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 18-33 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 33-50 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 16-27 against the money line (-28.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.2, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Williams is 28-42 against the money line (-30.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 19-32 against the money line (-29.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 32-53 against the money line (-33.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 17-33 against the money line (-23.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.2, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 27-52 against the money line (-30.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 11-29 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.9, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Williams is 23-45 against the money line (-21.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 29-54 against the money line (-40.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Williams is 52-81 against the money line (-38.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 25-46 against the money line (-37.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Williams is 44-68 against the money line (-38.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 31-53 against the money line (-36.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 53-82 against the money line (-41.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 17-22 against the money line (-23.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 29-34 against the money line (-23.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 25-41 against the money line (-26.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 44-60 against the money line (-23.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 6-10 against the money line (-14.0 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 87.1, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 10-15 against the money line (-15.0 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 86.9, OPPONENT 89.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 8-28 against the money line (-26.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 5*) | Williams is 18-36 against the money line (-20.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 5-14 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 80.7, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 31-53 against the money line (-38.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 53-78 against the money line (-37.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 22-41 against the money line (-38.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Williams is 39-60 against the money line (-38.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 29-52 against the money line (-37.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 47-78 against the money line (-39.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 19-42 against the money line (-36.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Williams is 33-64 against the money line (-38.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 25-42 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.8, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 12-39 against the money line (-21.4 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.4, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 28-21 against the money line (+19.0 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 28-17 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 9-2 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in home games after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 28-21 against the money line (+19.0 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 16-10 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.6, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 8-1 against the money line (+9.5 Units) off a home win against a division rival as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 94.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 30-24 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 26-20 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 11-7 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 27-21 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 23-9 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.6, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 28-17 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 11-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 9-1 against the money line (+13.5 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 7*) | Miller is 17-11 against the money line (+8.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 44-31 against the money line (+10.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 26-20 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 1 times, while the road underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 0 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/26/2024 3:56:37 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|