| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
DALLAS CONNECTICUT |
|
| 180 | 87 Final 93 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
609 | DALLAS | +500 | 610 | CONNECTICUT | -750 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (148-72 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +59.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (55-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.3%, +35.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (55-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (103-74 since 1997.) (58.2%, +33.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (45-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.4%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (120-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +46.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season. (108-60 since 1997.) (64.3%, +29.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game. (56-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game. (66-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.5%, +28.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (46-25 since 1997.) (64.8%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a home no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (34-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +18.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (39-17 since 1997.) (69.6%, +21.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots. (37-21 since 1997.) (63.8%, +19.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (54-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.1%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (84-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +26.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (100-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.7%, +25.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after scoring 90 points or more. (34-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.5%, +23.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after scoring 90 points or more. (34-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (85%, +21.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in non-conference games, playing with 3 or more days rest. (65-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.7%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (33-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +16.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a blowout win by 15 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (40-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +10.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (44-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +12.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (42-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.8%, +19.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (51-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +19.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (57-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +18.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite. (24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +18.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (34-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.9%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (120-67 since 1997.) (64.2%, +53.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (122-85 since 1997.) (58.9%, +49.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, on Wednesday nights. (27-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season against opponent after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots. (21-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS | 82 | | 28-70 | 39.3% | 7-21 | 34.3% | 19-23 | 83.4% | 40 | 12 | 13 | CONNECTICUT | 99 | | 37-74 | 50.3% | 7-18 | 39.4% | 17-23 | 74.1% | 50 | 14 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 876 times, while DALLAS won 112 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 56-68 against the money line (-32.6 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 78.0 | CONNECTICUT is 28-45 against the money line (-27.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 79.5 | CONNECTICUT is 61-150 against the money line (-123.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 86.6 |
|
DALLAS is 20-34 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 89.7 | DALLAS is 5-24 against the money line (-26.9 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 93.2 | DALLAS is 6-12 against the money line (-9.1 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 92.1 | DALLAS is 5-13 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 90.9 | DALLAS is 19-38 against the money line (-22.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 90.6 | DALLAS is 9-35 against the money line (-32.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 93.7 | DALLAS is 6-19 against the money line (-16.7 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 90.5 | DALLAS is 4-12 against the money line (-13.2 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.8, OPPONENT 90.6 | CONNECTICUT is 17-9 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 81.0 | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 93.5, OPPONENT 81.0 | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.9, OPPONENT 75.7 | CONNECTICUT is 8-5 against the money line (+12.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 78.1 | CONNECTICUT is 76-43 against the money line (+26.5 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 74.8 | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 79.1 | CONNECTICUT is 118-99 against the money line (+31.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.6, OPPONENT 74.1 | CONNECTICUT is 15-8 against the money line (+8.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 82.5 | CONNECTICUT is 17-5 against the money line (+14.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.0, OPPONENT 80.8 | CONNECTICUT is 17-0 against the money line (+20.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.8, OPPONENT 78.8 | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.1, OPPONENT 79.7 |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 4-10 against the money line (-11.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 11-19 against the money line (-12.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.7, OPPONENT 90.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-13 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 90.7 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 12-22 against the money line (-11.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 90.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 1-12 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 76.9, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 1-9 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 75.2, OPPONENT 91.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 7-19 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 90.5 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 18-32 against the money line (-16.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-14 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 90.9 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 11-22 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 8-17 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 17-30 against the money line (-18.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 3-12 against the money line (-15.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 93.4 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 8-19 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 91.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-20 against the money line (-17.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 20-31 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 8-18 against the money line (-17.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 19-28 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 8-20 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 17-34 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-20 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 90.9 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 14-32 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 6-17 against the money line (-13.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-9 against the money line (+15.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-1 against the money line (+19.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 10*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+7.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.9, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-6 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-11 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-12 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the money line (+9.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.0, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-10 against the money line (+18.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the money line (+9.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 against the money line (+17.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-10 against the money line (+15.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-8 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-3 against the money line (+8.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.7, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-12 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-10 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-19 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.5, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-12 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-12 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-6 against the money line (+7.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-11 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-17 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 9-4 against the money line (+7.3 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.2, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 10-22 against the money line (-18.7 Units) against Eastern conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 7-19 against the money line (-17.9 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 91.4 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 11-25 against the money line (-16.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 6-13 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 91.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-22 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 21-33 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 19-31 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 16-30 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.3, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 16-27 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.3, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 22-35 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 21-31 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 19-28 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 16-26 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.7, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 18-30 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 3-7 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after a win by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 93.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 17-28 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 18-30 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 3-7 against the money line (-9.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 79.9, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 8-15 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 90.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 21-32 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.2, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-19 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 80.8, OPPONENT 90.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 9-21 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.2, OPPONENT 91.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 11-25 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-10 against the money line (+6.3 Units) in all games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in home games in August or September games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-10 against the money line (+16.9 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-12 against the money line (+18.4 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.9, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-12 against the money line (+18.4 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-11 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 59-26 against the money line (+23.0 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.6, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-0 against the money line (+7.4 Units) off a home blowout win by 20 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+8.3 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.0, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+9.3 Units) off a home win this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-6 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after a blowout win by 20 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-7 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-8 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-6 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 52-38 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-22 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after playing a home game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.9, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-27 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.6, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 14-16 | +3.8 | 14-16 | 19-11 | 86.0 | 43.3 | 40.3% | 43.8 | 89.0 | 45.2 | 48.3% | 42.4 | Road Games | 4-10 | -2 | 6-8 | 10-4 | 81.9 | 41.6 | 39.0% | 41.9 | 90.6 | 46.9 | 49.9% | 43.1 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.6 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 91.2 | 49.6 | 40.6% | 50.0 | 88.4 | 45.8 | 45.4% | 42.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 86.0 | 43.3 | 28-71 | 40.3% | 7-21 | 32.0% | 22-27 | 83.0% | 44 | 11 | 15 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.8 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 16-19 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.9 | 41.6 | 27-69 | 39.0% | 7-22 | 30.9% | 21-25 | 83.0% | 42 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 89.0 | 45.2 | 33-68 | 48.3% | 6-16 | 34.9% | 18-22 | 80.4% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 81.2 | 41 | 30-67 | 44.6% | 6-17 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 79.8% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 90.6 | 46.9 | 34-67 | 49.9% | 6-16 | 35.9% | 17-22 | 79.0% | 43 | 8 | 22 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 19-10 | +6.3 | 19-10 | 15-14 | 87.1 | 42.5 | 45.6% | 45.3 | 81.0 | 40.1 | 43.5% | 41.4 | Home Games | 11-4 | +2.2 | 8-7 | 7-8 | 88.1 | 42.2 | 45.5% | 46.5 | 79.8 | 41.3 | 43.2% | 41.3 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.3 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 88.0 | 44.4 | 44.9% | 49.8 | 76.4 | 42.4 | 37.0% | 47.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 87.1 | 42.5 | 33-72 | 45.6% | 7-18 | 37.3% | 15-20 | 74.4% | 45 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.4 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 16-20 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 88.1 | 42.2 | 33-72 | 45.5% | 6-18 | 32.2% | 17-22 | 75.7% | 46 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 11 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.0 | 40.1 | 30-68 | 43.5% | 6-18 | 35.5% | 16-20 | 79.6% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 80.8 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 6-17 | 33.6% | 16-20 | 80.2% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 79.8 | 41.3 | 30-69 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 14-18 | 78.2% | 41 | 7 | 15 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: DALLAS 72.3, CONNECTICUT 70.8 |
| | |
|
|
7/16/2017 | CHICAGO | 112-106 | W | -210 | 35-97 | 36.1% | 64 | 12 | 37-84 | 44.0% | 55 | 21 | 7/19/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 74-100 | L | | 26-75 | 34.7% | 36 | 13 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 52 | 17 | 7/25/2017 | INDIANA | 84-82 | W | -270 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 39 | 14 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 40 | 17 | 7/28/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 93-109 | L | +200 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 38 | 15 | 40-65 | 61.5% | 31 | 12 | 7/30/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 74-95 | L | +550 | 19-66 | 28.8% | 32 | 12 | 40-71 | 56.3% | 50 | 15 | 8/4/2017 | SEATTLE | 93-80 | W | -110 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 50 | 14 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 32 | 9 | 8/6/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 85-79 | W | +210 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 54 | 15 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 36 | 15 | 8/10/2017 | PHOENIX | 100-101 | L | -155 | 33-80 | 41.2% | 54 | 15 | 38-74 | 51.4% | 40 | 15 | 8/12/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | 88-96 | L | +350 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 38 | 11 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 55 | 15 | 8/19/2017 | ATLANTA | 90-86 | W | -210 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 54 | 8 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 48 | 13 | 8/23/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/26/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/30/2017 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2017 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/16/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 89-75 | W | | 36-72 | 50.0% | 45 | 9 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 40 | 14 | 7/19/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 80-96 | L | -125 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 27 | 4 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 56 | 14 | 7/25/2017 | CHICAGO | 93-72 | W | -300 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 52 | 11 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 36 | 18 | 7/30/2017 | INDIANA | 89-73 | W | | 32-72 | 44.4% | 49 | 11 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 38 | 17 | 8/4/2017 | PHOENIX | 93-92 | W | -360 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 35 | 11 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 40 | 16 | 8/8/2017 | SEATTLE | 84-71 | W | -220 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 50 | 10 | 27-75 | 36.0% | 45 | 12 | 8/12/2017 | DALLAS | 96-88 | W | -500 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 55 | 15 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 38 | 11 | 8/15/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 96-75 | W | -210 | 35-74 | 47.3% | 43 | 11 | 30-82 | 36.6% | 56 | 12 | 8/18/2017 | NEW YORK | 70-82 | L | -270 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 48 | 8 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 59 | 12 | 8/20/2017 | PHOENIX | 94-66 | W | -210 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 53 | 12 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 39 | 12 | 8/23/2017 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2017 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2017 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
DALLAS is 32-29 (+1.2 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 5-2 (+5.4 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
DALLAS is 14-16 (+4.6 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 3-0 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/12/2017 | DALLAS | 88 | 179 | ATS | 48 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 25-26 | 96.2% | 38 | 5 | 11 | | CONNECTICUT | 96 | -9.5 | SU Over | 55 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 4-19 | 21.1% | 22-28 | 78.6% | 55 | 12 | 15 | 6/25/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 82 | -5 | Over | 39 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 35 | 7 | 18 | | DALLAS | 96 | 174 | SU ATS | 49 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 23-28 | 82.1% | 37 | 8 | 14 | 9/16/2016 | DALLAS | 74 | 173 | Over | 41 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 8-27 | 29.6% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 31 | 8 | 11 | | CONNECTICUT | 107 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 54 | 43-68 | 63.2% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 14-23 | 60.9% | 50 | 11 | 14 | 7/20/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 89 | 169.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 46 | 11 | 12 | | DALLAS | 78 | -7 | Under | 33 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 38 | 8 | 9 | 7/2/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 86 | 174 | SU ATS | 41 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 8-12 | 66.7% | 41 | 12 | 15 | | DALLAS | 83 | -9 | Under | 38 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 2-13 | 15.4% | 23-27 | 85.2% | 39 | 11 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Williams is 26-19 against the money line (+13.1 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 37-26 against the money line (+15.3 Units) off a home win in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 79.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 55-39 against the money line (+15.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 79.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Williams is 32-72 against the money line (-30.8 Units) in road games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 76.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 30-71 against the money line (-31.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 76.9, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 21-56 against the money line (-27.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.7, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 20-30 against the money line (-18.1 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.3, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 22-34 against the money line (-18.4 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 16-28 against the money line (-17.4 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 28-46 against the money line (-18.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 25-44 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 22-34 against the money line (-18.4 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 13-30 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 34-59 against the money line (-26.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 30-50 against the money line (-22.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 25-45 against the money line (-24.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 22-40 against the money line (-22.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 41-65 against the money line (-27.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 34-53 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 28-46 against the money line (-22.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 22-41 against the money line (-24.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 21-35 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 32-54 against the money line (-22.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 17-31 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 17-31 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 14-39 against the money line (-22.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.0, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 10-35 against the money line (-26.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.1, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 8-27 against the money line (-18.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 76.7, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 32-51 against the money line (-21.3 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 37-57 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 26-40 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 12-20 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.1, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 6-13 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 21-37 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.2, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 13-30 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 22-42 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 17-48 against the money line (-32.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.9, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 5-14 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 76.8, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 5-24 against the money line (-18.6 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 74.6, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 8-15 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 18-28 against the money line (-15.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 10-19 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.9, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 21-36 against the money line (-17.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 17-38 against the money line (-18.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 19-41 against the money line (-27.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.6, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 38-64 against the money line (-26.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 17-35 against the money line (-23.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.3, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 33-53 against the money line (-24.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.6, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 22-40 against the money line (-23.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.8, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 41-65 against the money line (-26.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 24-44 against the money line (-31.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 43-62 against the money line (-27.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 79.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 5-21 against the money line (-23.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.2, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 6*) | Williams is 14-28 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 21-40 against the money line (-26.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.4, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 39-61 against the money line (-25.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 13-29 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Williams is 27-45 against the money line (-24.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 19-39 against the money line (-25.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 33-61 against the money line (-27.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 11-30 against the money line (-24.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.9, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Williams is 22-48 against the money line (-25.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 17-32 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.7, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 7-32 against the money line (-19.6 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.9, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 31-29 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 9-2 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in home games in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-12 against the money line (+18.4 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 26-21 against the money line (+15.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 9-3 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 19-12 against the money line (+18.4 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 15-11 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 14-7 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 4-0 against the money line (+7.4 Units) off a home blowout win by 20 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-4 against the money line (+9.2 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 11-6 against the money line (+8.2 Units) off a home win as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 28-24 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 27-21 against the money line (+16.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 25-19 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 23-18 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 25-23 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 20-17 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 26-15 against the money line (+20.5 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 24-22 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-8 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 13-3 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 9-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.6, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 13-4 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 18-12 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 11-4 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 18-12 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-5 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 20-9 against the money line (+15.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 14-1 against the money line (+19.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 10*) | Miller is 8-3 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 7-1 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 13-5 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-9 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 13-6 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-11 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-12 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 27-19 against the money line (+20.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 20-10 against the money line (+18.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 28-17 against the money line (+23.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 14-5 against the money line (+17.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 17-10 against the money line (+15.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 10-3 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 13-8 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 6-1 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 7-3 against the money line (+8.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 16-13 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 20-12 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 29-21 against the money line (+18.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.7, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 18-10 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 26-19 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 11-4 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.5, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-12 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 27-21 against the money line (+18.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 18-12 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 24-21 against the money line (+15.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 16-11 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 22-17 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 63 times, while the road underdog won straight up 7 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 12 times, while the road underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[F] 05/13/2017 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Achilles ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/26/2024 8:47:39 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|