| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
DALLAS CONNECTICUT |
|
| 179 | 88 Final 96 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
615 | DALLAS | +375 | 616 | CONNECTICUT | -550 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in non-conference games, off a home loss. (333-242 since 1997.) (57.9%, +54.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in non-conference games, off a home loss against a division rival. (192-136 since 1997.) (58.5%, +53.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss. (25-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +24.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss. (37-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.7%, +23 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (114-66 since 1997.) (63.3%, +47.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (86-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +41.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (143-70 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +58.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days, on Saturday games. (107-30 since 1997.) (78.1%, +42.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season. (48-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite. (57-24 since 1997.) (70.4%, +38.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in non-conference games, off a close home loss by 3 points or less. (65-38 since 1997.) (63.1%, +37.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (102-72 since 1997.) (58.6%, +35.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (116-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +46.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (44-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite. (71-44 since 1997.) (61.7%, +29 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss against a division rival. (45-20 since 1997.) (69.2%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (32-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.4%, +24.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season. (105-59 since 1997.) (64%, +27.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (75-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite. (33-14 since 1997.) (70.2%, +25.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (51-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.9%, +34.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite. (25-4 since 1997.) (86.2%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (38-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +30.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (38-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +30.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (38-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +30.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a win by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (83-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.6%, +27.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (96-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +26.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (45-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (91-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +23.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, playing with 3 or more days rest. (45-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (30-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season, on Saturday games. (36-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +27.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (30-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.2%, +17.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after playing 3 consecutive home games. (41-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.5%, +31.1 units. Rating = 4*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (189-130 since 1997.) (59.2%, +64.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (120-83 since 1997.) (59.1%, +50.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent. (66-45 since 1997.) (59.5%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (48-25 since 1997.) (65.8%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (119-86 over the last 5 seasons.) (58%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a loss against a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (44-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (47.8%, +40.7 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS | 81 | | 28-69 | 39.9% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 19-23 | 82.7% | 41 | 11 | 14 | CONNECTICUT | 97 | | 37-74 | 49.8% | 8-18 | 42.1% | 16-21 | 74.9% | 49 | 13 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 864 times, while DALLAS won 123 times. Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 56-68 against the money line (-32.6 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 78.0 | CONNECTICUT is 28-44 against the money line (-24.5 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.1, OPPONENT 79.5 | CONNECTICUT is 60-149 against the money line (-122.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 86.7 |
|
DALLAS is 19-33 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 89.7 | DALLAS is 5-24 against the money line (-26.9 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 93.2 | DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-5.8 Units) when they attempt 23 to 27 free throws in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 79.6, OPPONENT 93.0 | DALLAS is 5-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 90.6 | DALLAS is 18-37 against the money line (-22.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 90.6 | DALLAS is 8-34 against the money line (-32.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 93.8 | DALLAS is 6-19 against the money line (-16.7 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 90.5 | DALLAS is 4-11 against the money line (-12.2 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.7, OPPONENT 90.3 | DALLAS is 1-9 against the money line (-11.2 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 77.5, OPPONENT 90.1 | CONNECTICUT is 14-8 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 81.5 | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 93.4, OPPONENT 82.5 | CONNECTICUT is 16-10 against the money line (+14.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 77.9 | CONNECTICUT is 7-5 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 79.0 | CONNECTICUT is 13-8 against the money line (+10.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.9 | CONNECTICUT is 13-8 against the money line (+10.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 83.9 | CONNECTICUT is 13-7 against the money line (+14.6 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.6, OPPONENT 75.0 | CONNECTICUT is 116-99 against the money line (+29.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 74.2 | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+8.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 77.6 | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 against the money line (+11.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 81.4 | CONNECTICUT is 14-0 against the money line (+17.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.3, OPPONENT 79.3 | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 80.6 |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 7-4 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 87.2, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 4-9 against the money line (-10.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 11-18 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 5-12 against the money line (-13.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 1-11 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 76.1, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 6-18 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 17-31 against the money line (-16.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-13 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 11-21 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-16 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 16-29 against the money line (-18.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 2-11 against the money line (-15.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 93.7 - (Rating = 5*) | DALLAS is 7-18 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 91.0 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 8-19 against the money line (-17.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.2, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 19-30 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 7-17 against the money line (-17.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 18-27 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.4, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 7-19 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 90.5 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 16-33 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 90.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 6-19 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 90.8 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 13-31 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 5-16 against the money line (-13.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 79.7, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-9 against the money line (+13.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-1 against the money line (+17.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 9*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+10.5 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.4, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-10 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-11 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+9.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-9 against the money line (+18.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+9.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+16.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-10 against the money line (+14.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-8 against the money line (+9.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+8.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.6, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-11 against the money line (+16.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+7.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-9 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-11 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-11 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+6.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.9, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-10 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-16 against the money line (+16.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 3-9 against the money line (-9.4 Units) on Saturday games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 79.8, OPPONENT 90.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 9-21 against the money line (-18.7 Units) against Eastern conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 10-24 against the money line (-16.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 5-12 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 91.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-22 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-11 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 80.7, OPPONENT 91.4 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 9-21 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 20-32 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.2, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 18-30 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.2, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 15-29 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 15-26 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 21-34 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 89.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 20-30 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 18-27 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 15-25 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 17-29 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-21 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 16-27 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 17-29 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.3, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-14 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 20-31 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-18 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 90.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 9-20 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 91.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 2-10 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.3, OPPONENT 90.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 11-24 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-9 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in all games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in home games in August or September games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-12 against the money line (+16.4 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 51-37 against the money line (+25.8 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-11 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+9.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.7, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-12 against the money line (+16.4 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-11 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 58-25 against the money line (+24.7 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 91-75 against the money line (+22.1 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 51-35 against the money line (+27.6 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 57-48 against the money line (+22.6 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 91-80 against the money line (+21.5 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 40-28 against the money line (+14.9 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) off a home win this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-7 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-6 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-6 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-7 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.6, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-5 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in home games after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.7, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-21 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-13 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-8 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+6.5 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.6, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+8.5 Units) after playing a home game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-4 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.2, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-1 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.6, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 5*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 13-15 | +3.8 | 13-15 | 17-11 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 40.5% | 43.6 | 88.9 | 44.9 | 48.5% | 41.7 | Road Games | 4-9 | -1 | 5-8 | 9-4 | 81.5 | 41.2 | 39.0% | 42.2 | 90.2 | 46.3 | 50.3% | 42.2 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.4 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 89.0 | 47.4 | 40.6% | 45.6 | 92.8 | 48.0 | 51.0% | 37.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 85.7 | 42.9 | 29-71 | 40.5% | 6-20 | 31.2% | 22-27 | 83.3% | 44 | 11 | 15 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.6 | 40.5 | 29-68 | 43.6% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 16-20 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.5 | 41.2 | 27-69 | 39.0% | 7-22 | 30.9% | 21-25 | 81.9% | 42 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 88.9 | 44.9 | 33-67 | 48.5% | 6-16 | 35.5% | 18-22 | 80.5% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 81.1 | 41 | 30-67 | 44.6% | 6-17 | 33.6% | 16-20 | 80.3% | 41 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 90.2 | 46.3 | 33-67 | 50.3% | 6-16 | 37.3% | 17-22 | 79.1% | 42 | 8 | 22 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 16-9 | +6 | 17-8 | 13-12 | 86.8 | 41.6 | 45.7% | 44.6 | 81.5 | 39.7 | 44.5% | 40.4 | Home Games | 9-3 | +2.9 | 7-5 | 6-6 | 88.4 | 40.9 | 45.7% | 45.1 | 80.1 | 40.1 | 44.6% | 40.2 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.8 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 87.8 | 42.0 | 44.5% | 42.6 | 80.8 | 37.6 | 43.7% | 43.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 86.8 | 41.6 | 33-72 | 45.7% | 7-17 | 39.1% | 14-19 | 74.6% | 45 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.2 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.7% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 16-20 | 80.2% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 88.4 | 40.9 | 33-72 | 45.7% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 17-22 | 77.2% | 45 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.5 | 39.7 | 30-67 | 44.5% | 7-18 | 36.7% | 15-19 | 80.3% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 80.7 | 40.7 | 30-67 | 44.1% | 6-17 | 33.3% | 16-20 | 80.4% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.1 | 40.1 | 31-68 | 44.6% | 6-18 | 34.9% | 13-16 | 78.5% | 40 | 7 | 16 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: DALLAS 72.3, CONNECTICUT 71.2 |
| | |
|
|
7/5/2017 | ATLANTA | 94-84 | W | -200 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 48 | 20 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 44 | 20 | 7/9/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 78-98 | L | +135 | 25-77 | 32.5% | 64 | 17 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 42 | 5 | 7/12/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 84-90 | L | -155 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 35 | 12 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 49 | 21 | 7/16/2017 | CHICAGO | 112-106 | W | -210 | 35-97 | 36.1% | 64 | 12 | 37-84 | 44.0% | 55 | 21 | 7/19/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 74-100 | L | | 26-75 | 34.7% | 36 | 13 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 52 | 17 | 7/25/2017 | INDIANA | 84-82 | W | -270 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 39 | 14 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 40 | 17 | 7/28/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 93-109 | L | +200 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 38 | 15 | 40-65 | 61.5% | 31 | 12 | 7/30/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 74-95 | L | +550 | 19-66 | 28.8% | 32 | 12 | 40-71 | 56.3% | 50 | 15 | 8/4/2017 | SEATTLE | 93-80 | W | -110 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 50 | 14 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 32 | 9 | 8/6/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 85-79 | W | +210 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 54 | 15 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 36 | 15 | 8/10/2017 | PHOENIX | 100-101 | L | -155 | 33-80 | 41.2% | 54 | 15 | 38-74 | 51.4% | 40 | 15 | 8/12/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/19/2017 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/23/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/26/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/5/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 89-56 | W | -360 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 48 | 13 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 38 | 18 | 7/8/2017 | WASHINGTON | 96-92 | W | -155 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 40 | 7 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 40 | 13 | 7/12/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 83-79 | W | -155 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 44 | 12 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 33 | 15 | 7/13/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 77-87 | L | +220 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 45 | 18 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 44 | 15 | 7/16/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 89-75 | W | | 36-72 | 50.0% | 45 | 9 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 40 | 14 | 7/19/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 80-96 | L | -125 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 27 | 4 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 56 | 14 | 7/25/2017 | CHICAGO | 93-72 | W | -300 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 52 | 11 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 36 | 18 | 7/30/2017 | INDIANA | 89-73 | W | | 32-72 | 44.4% | 49 | 11 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 38 | 17 | 8/4/2017 | PHOENIX | 93-92 | W | -360 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 35 | 11 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 40 | 16 | 8/8/2017 | SEATTLE | 84-71 | W | -220 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 50 | 10 | 27-75 | 36.0% | 45 | 12 | 8/12/2017 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/15/2017 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2017 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/20/2017 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/23/2017 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2017 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
DALLAS is 32-28 (+2.2 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 4-2 (+4.4 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
DALLAS is 14-15 (+5.6 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 2-0 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/25/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 82 | -5 | Over | 39 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 35 | 7 | 18 | | DALLAS | 96 | 174 | SU ATS | 49 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 23-28 | 82.1% | 37 | 8 | 14 | 9/16/2016 | DALLAS | 74 | 173 | Over | 41 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 8-27 | 29.6% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 31 | 8 | 11 | | CONNECTICUT | 107 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 54 | 43-68 | 63.2% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 14-23 | 60.9% | 50 | 11 | 14 | 7/20/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 89 | 169.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 46 | 11 | 12 | | DALLAS | 78 | -7 | Under | 33 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 38 | 8 | 9 | 7/2/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 86 | 174 | SU ATS | 41 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 8-12 | 66.7% | 41 | 12 | 15 | | DALLAS | 83 | -9 | Under | 38 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 2-13 | 15.4% | 23-27 | 85.2% | 39 | 11 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Williams is 5-2 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in road games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Williams is 21-55 against the money line (-26.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.6, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 6-17 against the money line (-14.1 Units) on Saturday games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.2, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 21-33 against the money line (-18.4 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 29-46 against the money line (-23.0 Units) after a division game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 15-25 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 27-45 against the money line (-18.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.9, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 13-28 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 21-33 against the money line (-18.4 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 11-29 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 4-18 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 76.5, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 8-23 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.4, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 3-11 against the money line (-11.0 Units) off a home loss against a division rival as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 13-29 against the money line (-20.3 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 11-22 against the money line (-17.0 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 5-16 against the money line (-15.0 Units) off an upset loss as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 79.2, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 7-23 against the money line (-16.1 Units) off a home loss as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.9, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 13-29 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 33-58 against the money line (-26.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 29-49 against the money line (-22.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 24-44 against the money line (-24.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 21-39 against the money line (-22.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 40-64 against the money line (-27.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 33-52 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 27-45 against the money line (-22.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 21-40 against the money line (-24.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 20-34 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 31-53 against the money line (-22.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 17-36 against the money line (-24.2 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 13-30 against the money line (-21.0 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.9, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 16-30 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 14-38 against the money line (-21.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.8, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 10-34 against the money line (-25.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 76.9, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 8-26 against the money line (-17.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 76.3, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 31-50 against the money line (-21.3 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 36-56 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 25-39 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 20-36 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 12-29 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.5, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 22-41 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.9, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 17-47 against the money line (-31.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.8, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 24-50 against the money line (-26.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 5-23 against the money line (-17.6 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 74.1, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 8-14 against the money line (-12.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 18-27 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 10-18 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 21-35 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.2, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 16-37 against the money line (-18.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.5, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 18-40 against the money line (-27.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.3, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 37-63 against the money line (-26.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 17-34 against the money line (-22.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.1, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 33-52 against the money line (-23.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 21-39 against the money line (-23.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.5, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 40-64 against the money line (-26.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.4, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 24-43 against the money line (-30.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 43-61 against the money line (-26.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 79.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 4-20 against the money line (-23.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 90.1 - (Rating = 6*) | Williams is 13-27 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 20-39 against the money line (-26.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 38-60 against the money line (-25.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 12-28 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Williams is 26-44 against the money line (-24.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 18-38 against the money line (-25.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 32-60 against the money line (-27.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.2, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 10-29 against the money line (-24.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Williams is 21-47 against the money line (-25.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 16-31 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.3, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 7-31 against the money line (-18.6 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.6, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 28-28 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 7-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in home games in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 12-4 against the money line (+14.6 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 17-12 against the money line (+16.4 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 13-11 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 23-20 against the money line (+15.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-12 against the money line (+16.4 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 13-11 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 23-20 against the money line (+14.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 22-16 against the money line (+16.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 21-13 against the money line (+18.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 18-11 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.7, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 22-19 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 20-15 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 18-12 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 25-23 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 24-20 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 22-18 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 20-17 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 23-22 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-16 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-12 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-9 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 14-8 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-16 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 23-14 against the money line (+20.2 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 22-21 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-13 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 15-8 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 14-7 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-2 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 6-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 10-4 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 9-4 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-18 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 16-11 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-5 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 11-5 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 10-2 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.6, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 6*) | Miller is 7-1 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 18-9 against the money line (+13.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 12-1 against the money line (+17.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 9*) | Miller is 7-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 6-1 against the money line (+10.5 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 11-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 17-8 against the money line (+15.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 11-5 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 16-10 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 16-11 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 24-18 against the money line (+19.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 17-9 against the money line (+18.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 25-16 against the money line (+23.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 13-5 against the money line (+16.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 16-10 against the money line (+14.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 9-3 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 12-8 against the money line (+9.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 5-1 against the money line (+8.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 14-12 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 17-11 against the money line (+16.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 26-20 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 15-9 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 23-18 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-4 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 16-11 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 24-20 against the money line (+18.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 15-11 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 21-20 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 13-10 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-16 against the money line (+16.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 96 times, while the road underdog won straight up 17 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 8 times, while the road underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 08/11/2017 - Jasmine Thomas "?" Saturday vs. Dallas Wings ( Ankle ) | [F] 05/13/2017 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Achilles ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/20/2024 6:38:15 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|