| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO CONNECTICUT |
|
| 174.5 | 72 Final 93 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
605 | CHICAGO | +220 | 606 | CONNECTICUT | -300 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (269-100 since 1997.) (72.9%, +79 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, off a road loss by 10 points or more. (267-96 since 1997.) (73.6%, +76.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (145-34 since 1997.) (81%, +61.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents. (49-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +22.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road loss against a division rival against opponent off an upset win as a road underdog. (97-66 since 1997.) (59.5%, +52 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset win as an underdog against opponent off a road loss against a division rival. (144-97 since 1997.) (59.8%, +50.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (108-65 since 1997.) (62.4%, +42.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (81-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.4%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (99-68 since 1997.) (59.3%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (135-67 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.8%, +52.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (42-19 since 1997.) (68.9%, +36.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (150-80 since 1997.) (65.2%, +36 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents. (36-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (33-9 since 1997.) (78.6%, +32 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (33-9 since 1997.) (78.6%, +32 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (33-9 since 1997.) (78.6%, +32 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (48-21 since 1997.) (69.6%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents. (49-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.8%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents. (65-31 since 1997.) (67.7%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (63-33 since 1997.) (65.6%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (109-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.5%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good FT shooting team (76-80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (45-28 since 1997.) (61.6%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (34-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents. (39-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.9%, +30.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (50-29 since 1997.) (63.3%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a close win by 3 points or less against opponent after a loss by 10 points or more. (47-24 since 1997.) (66.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (33-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.8%, +25.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (71-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (52-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +27.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (26-2 since 1997.) (92.9%, +21.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (44-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (58-36 since 1997.) (61.7%, +19.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record. (35-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +7.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by more than 12 points in two consecutive games, vs. division opponents. (31-16 since 1997.) (66%, +16 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (60-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.2%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (50-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +31.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (36-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.8%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (20-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +4.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (91-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +24.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (35-13 since 1997.) (72.9%, +11.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (27-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.1%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (82-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (44-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (83%, +22.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (113-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.9%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (71-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.7%, +21.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (29-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.3%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (63-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more. (26-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.7%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (89-63 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.6%, +25.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (55-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.4%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (78-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (157-113 since 1997.) (58.1%, +50 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (50-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +28 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (66-42 since 1997.) (61.1%, +35.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (50-27 since 1997.) (64.9%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (50-29 since 1997.) (63.3%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a close win by 3 points or less. (38-17 since 1997.) (69.1%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (52-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +30.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss by 15 points or more as a favorite, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (20-5 since 1997.) (80%, +15.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO | 77 | | 31-69 | 44.3% | 5-15 | 35.7% | 11-14 | 77.3% | 42 | 10 | 15 | CONNECTICUT | 90 | | 34-75 | 45.8% | 7-18 | 40.3% | 14-19 | 72.3% | 47 | 14 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 791 times, while CHICAGO won 185 times. Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 6-4 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was CHICAGO 80.9, OPPONENT 81.5 | CHICAGO is 10-2 against the money line (+14.1 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 89.4, OPPONENT 84.9 | CHICAGO is 18-13 against the money line (+10.9 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 81.6 | CHICAGO is 17-6 against the money line (+12.6 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 79.7 | CONNECTICUT is 4-13 against the money line (-10.7 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 83.9 | CONNECTICUT is 55-68 against the money line (-33.6 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 78.0 |
|
CHICAGO is 48-67 against the money line (-27.9 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 77.7 | CHICAGO is 23-52 against the money line (-39.2 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 81.8 | CHICAGO is 28-58 against the money line (-37.7 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 79.2 | CHICAGO is 27-51 against the money line (-34.3 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 80.5 | CHICAGO is 16-30 against the money line (-14.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 90.0 | CHICAGO is 11-25 against the money line (-17.6 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 92.8 | CHICAGO is 69-100 against the money line (-46.8 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.7 | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-9.2 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 93.8 | CHICAGO is 31-48 against the money line (-25.5 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 76.7 | CHICAGO is 7-18 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 86.9 | CONNECTICUT is 25-26 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 83.7 | CONNECTICUT is 73-33 against the money line (+42.2 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 74.9 | CONNECTICUT is 16-10 against the money line (+14.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 78.0 | CONNECTICUT is 7-5 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 79.5 | CONNECTICUT is 12-8 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 85.0 | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.8, OPPONENT 81.1 | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+10.0 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 74.9 | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.9 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.6, OPPONENT 78.3 | CONNECTICUT is 61-36 against the money line (+19.1 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 75.0 | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+8.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.2, OPPONENT 82.4 | CONNECTICUT is 11-0 against the money line (+14.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 93.2, OPPONENT 80.1 | CONNECTICUT is 16-10 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 81.3 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 11-8 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.5, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 90.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 15-11 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 90.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-6 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 90.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 3-0 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 5-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 16-8 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 88.0, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 31-22 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 91.8, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 15-7 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 89.5, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 90.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 24-21 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 90.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 22-16 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 90.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 90.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 17-11 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 81-130 against the money line (-58.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 25-58 against the money line (-31.0 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 79-126 against the money line (-58.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 46-53 against the money line (-27.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-16 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-9 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.7, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+15.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 8*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-5 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-9 against the money line (+12.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-8 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-10 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-9 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-9 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-5 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-8 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-18 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-9 against the money line (+15.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-16 against the money line (+20.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-4 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-7 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-0 against the money line (+8.7 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.5, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-11 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-20 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+7.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.2, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-11 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-20 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+5.7 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.2, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 6-4 against the money line (+10.3 Units) as a road underdog this season. The average score was CHICAGO 80.9, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in July games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 91.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-6 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots this season. The average score was CHICAGO 90.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 3-0 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was CHICAGO 90.3, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season. The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 3-0 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 6-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-3 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-3 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 5-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-3 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-13 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-10 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.8, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-3 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 81.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-0 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 5-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-13 against the money line (+16.9 Units) in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 9-20 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-11 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-33 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-16 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 39-54 against the money line (-32.6 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-7.4 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 91.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-12 against the money line (-12.3 Units) off a road win by 3 points or less since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 96-144 against the money line (-56.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 73-112 against the money line (-49.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 29-56 against the money line (-27.1 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-16 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 45-64 against the money line (-28.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 40-47 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-5 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-4 against the money line (+11.6 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-10 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-20 against the money line (+12.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-15 against the money line (+13.5 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-8 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in home games off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-20 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-16 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-4 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.0, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-13 against the money line (+15.8 Units) in home games after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in home games after a blowout loss by 15 points or more since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-19 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-15 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-12 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-20 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-18 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-4 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.6, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-9 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-5 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in home games after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-4 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-13 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-12 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+6.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 65-44 against the money line (+22.8 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-5 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 8-13 | +2.9 | 11-10 | 11-9 | 80.9 | 39.3 | 45.2% | 44.2 | 85.0 | 43.4 | 42.4% | 44.5 | Road Games | 6-6 | +9 | 9-3 | 5-6 | 81.0 | 37.2 | 45.2% | 43.7 | 82.1 | 41.3 | 41.1% | 46.6 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +10 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 90.0 | 40.8 | 47.5% | 43.4 | 85.4 | 42.0 | 40.8% | 45.8 | Division Games | 3-7 | -1.9 | 3-7 | 4-6 | 76.0 | 37.7 | 41.7% | 45.9 | 84.5 | 42.2 | 42.3% | 47.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 80.9 | 39.3 | 32-70 | 45.2% | 6-16 | 35.2% | 12-16 | 77.1% | 44 | 9 | 20 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.2 | 40.5 | 30-67 | 44.0% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 16-20 | 80.5% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.0 | 37.2 | 32-70 | 45.2% | 5-15 | 34.4% | 13-16 | 78.6% | 44 | 8 | 19 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 85.0 | 43.4 | 31-73 | 42.4% | 5-18 | 30.2% | 18-23 | 77.9% | 45 | 10 | 19 | 16 | 9 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81.7 | 41.3 | 29-67 | 43.5% | 6-18 | 32.7% | 17-21 | 80.8% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 82.1 | 41.3 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 4-16 | 26.9% | 18-24 | 75.3% | 47 | 11 | 18 | 16 | 9 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 12-9 | +3 | 14-7 | 12-9 | 86.2 | 41.5 | 45.7% | 44.2 | 82.3 | 40.5 | 44.9% | 40.5 | Home Games | 5-3 | -0.1 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 87.7 | 40.2 | 45.8% | 44.4 | 81.6 | 42.2 | 45.6% | 40.5 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.2 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 85.0 | 41.6 | 45.2% | 40.2 | 85.8 | 47.4 | 48.1% | 42.6 | Division Games | 6-4 | +1.5 | 8-2 | 7-3 | 88.7 | 43.4 | 45.1% | 44.6 | 82.8 | 40.1 | 43.2% | 42.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 86.2 | 41.5 | 33-72 | 45.7% | 7-17 | 41.3% | 13-18 | 72.6% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.8 | 40.4 | 29-67 | 43.6% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 16-20 | 80.3% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 87.7 | 40.2 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 7-18 | 36.8% | 15-21 | 74.1% | 44 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 10 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.3 | 40.5 | 30-66 | 44.9% | 6-17 | 36.5% | 17-21 | 80.3% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81 | 40.8 | 30-67 | 44.1% | 6-17 | 33.1% | 16-20 | 80.6% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 81.6 | 42.2 | 30-67 | 45.6% | 5-16 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 40 | 8 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 71.4, CONNECTICUT 71 |
| | |
|
|
6/16/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 78-86 | L | +350 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 49 | 15 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 41 | 9 | 6/18/2017 | INDIANA | 79-91 | L | -105 | 31-57 | 54.4% | 40 | 18 | 37-80 | 46.2% | 33 | 4 | 6/23/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 82-78 | W | +135 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 48 | 10 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 47 | 6 | 6/25/2017 | WASHINGTON | 63-97 | L | +180 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 44 | 21 | 39-83 | 47.0% | 45 | 9 | 6/28/2017 | INDIANA | 75-82 | L | +145 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 56 | 17 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 31 | 8 | 6/30/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 82-89 | L | -125 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 24 | 13 | 39-73 | 53.4% | 41 | 13 | 7/8/2017 | MINNESOTA | 100-76 | W | | 43-72 | 59.7% | 42 | 19 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 31 | 20 | 7/12/2017 | DALLAS | 90-84 | W | +135 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 49 | 21 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 35 | 12 | 7/14/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 78-68 | W | +220 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 39 | 7 | 27-77 | 35.1% | 58 | 10 | 7/16/2017 | @ DALLAS | 106-112 | L | +175 | 37-84 | 44.0% | 55 | 21 | 35-97 | 36.1% | 64 | 12 | 7/18/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 94-83 | W | +200 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 36 | 9 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 37 | 18 | 7/20/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 82-80 | W | +550 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 38 | 12 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 35 | 11 | 7/25/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/28/2017 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/30/2017 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2017 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2017 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/17/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 98-93 | W | +350 | 41-74 | 55.4% | 46 | 17 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 30 | 13 | 6/23/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 94-89 | W | +170 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 38 | 8 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 39 | 14 | 6/25/2017 | @ DALLAS | 82-96 | L | -210 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 35 | 18 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 37 | 14 | 6/27/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 79-87 | L | +120 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 51 | 14 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 39 | 9 | 6/29/2017 | SEATTLE | 96-89 | W | -270 | 39-69 | 56.5% | 44 | 9 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 32 | 9 | 7/1/2017 | @ INDIANA | 91-85 | W | -165 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 43 | 16 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 39 | 9 | 7/5/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 89-56 | W | -360 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 48 | 13 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 38 | 18 | 7/8/2017 | WASHINGTON | 96-92 | W | -155 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 40 | 7 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 40 | 13 | 7/12/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 83-79 | W | -155 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 44 | 12 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 33 | 15 | 7/13/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 77-87 | L | +220 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 45 | 18 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 44 | 15 | 7/16/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 89-75 | W | | 36-72 | 50.0% | 45 | 9 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 40 | 14 | 7/19/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 80-96 | L | -125 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 27 | 4 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 56 | 14 | 7/25/2017 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/28/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/30/2017 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2017 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 23-20 (-1.8 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 5-4 (+4.8 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CHICAGO is 8-11 (+1.5 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 2-2 (+0.6 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
5/28/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 97 | 162 | SU ATS | 49 | 33-84 | 39.3% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 28-39 | 71.8% | 69 | 15 | 7 | | CHICAGO | 79 | -2.5 | Over | 37 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 19-31 | 61.3% | 48 | 8 | 11 | 9/11/2016 | CHICAGO | 96 | 172 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 24-31 | 77.4% | 46 | 10 | 12 | | CONNECTICUT | 86 | -3.5 | Over | 47 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 17-23 | 73.9% | 47 | 16 | 12 | 7/22/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 94 | 167 | SU ATS | 38 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 26-32 | 81.2% | 39 | 8 | 7 | | CHICAGO | 89 | -5 | Over | 38 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 37 | 6 | 15 | 5/14/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 70 | 165 | Under | 25 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 9-27 | 33.3% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 43 | 10 | 17 | | CHICAGO | 93 | -10 | SU ATS | 45 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 0-6 | 0.0% | 31-37 | 83.8% | 55 | 15 | 16 |
|
| | |
|
Stocks is 6-4 against the money line (+10.3 Units) as a road underdog as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 80.9, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in July games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 91.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 90.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 3-0 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 90.3, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 3-0 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 5-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 3-0 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 90.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 90.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 90.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 3-0 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 5-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 90.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 90.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 90.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 4-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 90.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Miller is 9-5 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 9-4 against the money line (+11.6 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 14-10 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 20-20 against the money line (+12.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 20-20 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 19-16 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-13 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 15-11 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-19 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 17-15 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-12 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-20 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-18 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 18-16 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 16-12 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 14-9 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 20-14 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 15-13 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 14-12 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 7-2 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 16-9 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.7, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 10-1 against the money line (+15.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 8*) | Miller is 7-5 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 10-9 against the money line (+12.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 14-8 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 13-10 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 11-9 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 7-5 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 11-8 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 13-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-18 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 14-9 against the money line (+15.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 22-16 against the money line (+20.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 8-4 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 13-5 against the money line (+17.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.9, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 11-7 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 21-13 against the money line (+19.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 6-0 against the money line (+8.7 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 14-11 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 23-20 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 13-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-20 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-11 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 18-20 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 225 times, while the road underdog won straight up 65 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 18 times, while the road underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 05/28/2017 - Jamierra Faulkner out for season ( ACL ) | [C] 05/21/2017 - Alaina Coates out indefinitely ( Ankle ) | |
[F] 05/13/2017 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Achilles ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/3/2024 3:12:13 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|