Login  | Free Registration

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.
WNBA : Money Line Matchup
Tuesday 6/27/2017Line$ LineOU LineScore
LOS ANGELES
 
CONNECTICUT
-2.5  

+2.5  
-140

+120

168.5
 		87
Final
79

Go to Top
LOS ANGELES (9 - 3) at CONNECTICUT (6 - 6)
View Previous GameNo Next Game
Tuesday, 6/27/2017 7:00 PM
Go to Top
Board Money Line
653LOS ANGELES-125
654CONNECTICUT+105
BETTING TRENDSGo to Top

One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time.

(Money)

 (0%)

OVER

 (0%)
(Money) (0%)UNDER (0%)
STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™Go to Top
StatFox Super Situations favoring CONNECTICUT against the money line
There are 21 situations with a total rating of 41 stars.
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(180-121 since 1997.) (59.8%, +64.6 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(152-111 since 1997.) (57.8%, +48 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(68-43 since 1997.) (61.3%, +39.3 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(74-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(126-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.7%, +52.3 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(63-31 since 1997.) (67%, +29.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(100-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(43-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(29-13 since 1997.) (69%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(65-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.1%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(80-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.8%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(49-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +33 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(30-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.9%, +14.4 units. Rating = 0*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(77-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.6%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(83-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +24.3 units. Rating = 1*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(28-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +15.8 units. Rating = 1*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(66-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.1%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(83-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games against opponent hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(33-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(52-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(44-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring LOS ANGELES against the money line
There are 69 situations with a total rating of 150 stars.
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(370-159 since 1997.) (69.9%, +87.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(180-121 since 1997.) (59.8%, +64.6 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(236-94 since 1997.) (71.5%, +64.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(129-30 since 1997.) (81.1%, +64.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(112-27 since 1997.) (80.6%, +60.1 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(72-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +24.2 units. Rating = 1*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(178-105 since 1997.) (62.9%, +53.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(90-19 since 1997.) (82.6%, +53.1 units. Rating = 4*)
- Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(104-27 since 1997.) (79.4%, +52.8 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(152-111 since 1997.) (57.8%, +48 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(153-111 since 1997.) (58%, +45.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(116-62 since 1997.) (65.2%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after playing a road game, playing with 2 days rest.
(55-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.9%, +28.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(43-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +25.6 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(68-43 since 1997.) (61.3%, +39.3 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, in May, June, or July games.
(19-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season.
(120-82 since 1997.) (59.4%, +39 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(66-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.7%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(96-59 since 1997.) (61.9%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(70-34 since 1997.) (67.3%, +37.6 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(83-48 since 1997.) (63.4%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(99-65 since 1997.) (60.4%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(67-32 since 1997.) (67.7%, +36.6 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in June games.
(94-62 since 1997.) (60.3%, +34.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - excellent 3 point shooting team - making >=36% of their attempts, in May, June, or July games.
(96-64 since 1997.) (60%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(84-59 since 1997.) (58.7%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(46-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(73-43 since 1997.) (62.9%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(51-20 since 1997.) (71.8%, +32.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(63-42 since 1997.) (60%, +32.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(66-34 since 1997.) (66%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(59-29 since 1997.) (67%, +31.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(57-29 since 1997.) (66.3%, +31.1 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more.
(64-34 since 1997.) (65.3%, +30.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(64-37 since 1997.) (63.4%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(53-25 since 1997.) (67.9%, +29.1 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(56-29 since 1997.) (65.9%, +29 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - hot team - having covered 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(30-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +24.4 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(41-17 since 1997.) (70.7%, +27.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(55-31 since 1997.) (64%, +26.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(55-31 since 1997.) (64%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(47-23 since 1997.) (67.1%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(48-25 since 1997.) (65.8%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(38-14 since 1997.) (73.1%, +24.4 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(39-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (83%, +23 units. Rating = 1*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(41-20 since 1997.) (67.2%, +23.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(37-16 since 1997.) (69.8%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(40-17 since 1997.) (70.2%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(48-26 since 1997.) (64.9%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(44-23 since 1997.) (65.7%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(36-16 since 1997.) (69.2%, +22.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(28-8 since 1997.) (77.8%, +21.6 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(82-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +36 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(34-15 since 1997.) (69.4%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(39-18 since 1997.) (68.4%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(37-17 since 1997.) (68.5%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(33-15 since 1997.) (68.8%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(32-12 since 1997.) (72.7%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(31-12 since 1997.) (72.1%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(33-14 since 1997.) (70.2%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(32-15 since 1997.) (68.1%, +19 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(31-14 since 1997.) (68.9%, +18.6 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(26-9 since 1997.) (74.3%, +18 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game.
(26-10 since 1997.) (72.2%, +17 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(22-6 since 1997.) (78.6%, +17 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(38-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.6%, +20.6 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(49-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.8%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(30-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.9%, +14.4 units. Rating = 0*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(48-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*)

View Expanded Details
STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™Go to Top
 ProjectionShooting   3pt Shots Free ThrowsRebounding 
TeamsScoreEdgeFGM-APct.FGM-APct.FTM-APct.Tot.OFFTO
LOS ANGELES81 30-6347.2%6-1635.8%16-1981.8%37714
CONNECTICUT86 33-7246.3%6-1738.3%12-1771.1%451413

The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated.
In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 608 times, while LOS ANGELES won 357 times.
Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT
Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring LOS ANGELES to win against the money line
LOS ANGELES is 82-50 against the money line (+20.4 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 74.5
LOS ANGELES is 13-3 against the money line (+9.1 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 90.0, OPPONENT 80.4
LOS ANGELES is 80-34 against the money line (+28.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 74.9
LOS ANGELES is 30-5 against the money line (+18.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 89.7, OPPONENT 79.2
CONNECTICUT is 2-10 against the money line (-8.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 82.1
CONNECTICUT is 4-13 against the money line (-10.7 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 83.9
CONNECTICUT is 55-67 against the money line (-32.6 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 77.9
CONNECTICUT is 27-44 against the money line (-25.5 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 79.5
CONNECTICUT is 55-146 against the money line (-123.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 86.6

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
LOS ANGELES is 48-74 against the money line (-78.3 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 79.7
LOS ANGELES is 64-57 against the money line (-35.4 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 76.1
LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.4, OPPONENT 86.0
LOS ANGELES is 11-12 against the money line (-22.4 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.5, OPPONENT 88.7
LOS ANGELES is 109-106 against the money line (-59.2 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 74.9
LOS ANGELES is 71-75 against the money line (-42.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 75.8
LOS ANGELES is 178-153 against the money line (-79.2 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.0, OPPONENT 82.1
LOS ANGELES is 15-17 against the money line (-22.3 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 75.9
CONNECTICUT is 32-36 against the money line (+16.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 81.1
CONNECTICUT is 73-33 against the money line (+42.2 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 74.9
CONNECTICUT is 6-4 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 81.1
CONNECTICUT is 14-9 against the money line (+16.1 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 79.6
CONNECTICUT is 13-7 against the money line (+14.6 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.6, OPPONENT 75.0
CONNECTICUT is 114-99 against the money line (+27.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 74.1
CONNECTICUT is 82-64 against the money line (+20.0 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 74.0
CONNECTICUT is 60-36 against the money line (+18.1 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 74.9
CONNECTICUT is 18-12 against the money line (+20.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.4, OPPONENT 85.3
CONNECTICUT is 6-0 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 95.7, OPPONENT 80.8

View Expanded Details
STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™Go to Top
StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
There are 22 trends with a total rating of 24 stars.
LOS ANGELES is 101-102 against the money line (-71.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*)
LOS ANGELES is 151-135 against the money line (-58.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 75-96 against the money line (-41.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 11-17 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*)
LOS ANGELES is 181-145 against the money line (-71.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 174-177 against the money line (-64.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 94-74 against the money line (-54.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 81-46 against the money line (+21.5 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 8-7 against the money line (+12.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 10-7 against the money line (+9.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.1, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 8-7 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 8-6 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 5-2 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 3*)
CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+6.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 17-13 against the money line (+18.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 3*)
CONNECTICUT is 10-8 against the money line (+10.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 3*)
CONNECTICUT is 28-12 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus teams who average 37 or less rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.8, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 18-17 against the money line (+12.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 26-21 against the money line (+24.4 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 16-17 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 16-13 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*)

View Expanded Details
STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™Go to Top
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring LOS ANGELES to win against the money line
There are 4 trends with a total rating of 2 stars.
LOS ANGELES is 22-7 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 126-52 against the money line (+29.2 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 2-8 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after 5 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 22-23 against the money line (-22.8 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
There are 44 trends with a total rating of 41 stars.
LOS ANGELES is 65-79 against the money line (-34.2 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 41-57 against the money line (-36.4 Units) in road games in June games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 12-14 against the money line (-17.2 Units) in road games after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 9-12 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 5-7 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*)
LOS ANGELES is 88-79 against the money line (-48.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 5-9 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 11-10 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*)
LOS ANGELES is 8-8 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 7-9 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*)
LOS ANGELES is 5-8 against the money line (-14.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*)
LOS ANGELES is 10-12 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*)
LOS ANGELES is 24-34 against the money line (-28.6 Units) in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*)
LOS ANGELES is 24-34 against the money line (-36.2 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*)
LOS ANGELES is 6-13 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*)
LOS ANGELES is 5-11 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in road games after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*)
LOS ANGELES is 2-9 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in road games after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*)
CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) in June games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 93.2, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 12-10 against the money line (+13.4 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 6-3 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+6.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in home games hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 47-23 against the money line (+18.0 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.7, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 21-11 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in home games after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 12-10 against the money line (+13.4 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 56-24 against the money line (+23.7 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 4-0 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 98.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 8-5 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 17-17 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 16-14 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+6.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 12-10 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 8-5 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 11-7 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 16-16 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 14-13 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 12-10 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 16-17 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 40-23 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+6.3 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 12-10 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 4-0 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after playing 3 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 5*)

View Expanded Details
ADVANCED TEAM STATSGo to Top
LOS ANGELES - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games9-3-0.76-66-686.645.249.1%37.078.937.245.0%38.4
Road Games3-3-5.73-34-286.043.050.4%36.583.238.246.2%38.8
Last 5 Games5-0+43-22-388.046.451.8%38.076.235.441.6%37.4
LOS ANGELES Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)86.645.231-6349.1%6-1637.8%19-2382.4%37619189124
vs opponents surrendering82.741.630-6744.4%6-1733.1%18-2280.6%42917207134
Team Stats (Road Games)86.043.031-6250.4%6-1540.4%17-2181.6%36618197134
Stats Against (All Games)78.937.229-6445.0%6-1933.5%15-1978.5%38918217153
vs opponents averaging80.639.729-6643.0%6-1831.2%18-2281.1%41916207134
Stats Against (Road Games)83.238.230-6646.2%7-1937.7%15-2075.0%391017207133
CONNECTICUT - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games6-6+1.29-37-585.940.844.8%45.181.938.844.0%40.7
Home Games2-2-1.12-22-285.539.243.7%43.777.539.241.5%43.2
Last 5 Games4-1+5.14-15-094.843.850.7%41.085.038.448.6%37.2
CONNECTICUT Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)85.940.832-7244.8%7-1643.1%14-1973.7%451017207123
vs opponents surrendering8140.229-6743.2%6-1733.2%17-2180.1%42917207134
Team Stats (Home Games)85.539.230-7043.7%6-1737.3%18-2377.7%44913206113
Stats Against (All Games)81.938.829-6544.0%6-1734.6%19-2380.4%41816198134
vs opponents averaging81.540.730-6843.6%5-1732.0%17-2179.0%431017207134
Stats Against (Home Games)77.539.227-6541.5%4-1724.6%19-2481.1%43811206132
Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 69.4,  CONNECTICUT 70.9
View Expanded Details
SCHEDULE AND RESULTSGo to Top
LOS ANGELES - Season Results Against the Money Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreSUMoneyShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
5/19/2017WASHINGTON99-89W-22034-6254.8%321131-6250.0%2914
5/24/2017@ INDIANA90-93L-27034-6254.8%33936-6753.7%358
5/27/2017@ ATLANTA73-75L-30025-6041.7%401728-6344.4%4513
5/30/2017@ NEW YORK90-75W-14031-6250.0%381130-6645.5%3918
6/6/2017CHICAGO79-70W-105022-6434.4%44727-6541.5%4818
6/9/2017@ DALLAS90-96L-30036-7250.0%341533-7146.5%4414
6/10/2017@ PHOENIX89-87W+10031-5952.5%371129-6544.6%3814
6/13/2017DALLAS97-87W-75035-6157.4%351028-6443.7%3814
6/15/2017SAN ANTONIO80-75W 27-5648.2%341330-6744.8%3713
6/18/2017PHOENIX90-59W-33032-6747.8%471322-6732.8%4219
6/24/2017@ INDIANA84-73W-25032-6053.3%371427-6442.2%3212
6/27/2017@ CONNECTICUT           
6/30/2017@ ATLANTA           
7/2/2017WASHINGTON           
7/6/2017@ MINNESOTA           
7/8/2017@ SEATTLE           
7/13/2017CONNECTICUT           

CONNECTICUT - Season Results Against the Money Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreSUMoneyShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
5/20/2017@ INDIANA79-81L+21030-6248.4%391825-5942.4%299
5/23/2017@ MINNESOTA78-80L+55032-8040.0%431229-5750.9%4220
5/26/2017MINNESOTA68-82L+20025-6439.1%341227-6640.9%5115
5/28/2017@ CHICAGO97-79W+12033-8439.3%69727-7038.6%4811
5/31/2017@ WASHINGTON76-78L+25030-7739.0%491023-6535.4%489
6/3/2017@ SAN ANTONIO85-77W-21033-7444.6%471029-7240.3%4313
6/10/2017ATLANTA104-71W-16536-7448.6%45826-5844.8%3920
6/14/2017NEW YORK96-76W-12534-6750.7%41829-6942.0%4111
6/17/2017@ MINNESOTA98-93W+35041-7455.4%461737-7251.4%3013
6/23/2017@ NEW YORK94-89W+17035-7347.9%38832-6053.3%3914
6/25/2017@ DALLAS82-96L-21033-6550.8%351833-6451.6%3714
6/27/2017LOS ANGELES           
6/29/2017SEATTLE           
7/1/2017@ INDIANA           
7/5/2017@ SAN ANTONIO           
7/8/2017WASHINGTON           
7/12/2017@ SEATTLE           
7/13/2017@ LOS ANGELES           
View Expanded Details
HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORYGo to Top
All games in this series since 1997
LOS ANGELES is 19-14 (+5.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997
Games over the last 3 seasons
CONNECTICUT is 2-2 (+0.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons

All games played at CONNECTICUT since 1997
LOS ANGELES is 9-8 (+3.2 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997
Games played at CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons.
LOS ANGELES is 2-1 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons

 Shooting   3pt shotsFree ThrowsRebounds 
DateTeamsScoreLineResultHalfFGM-APctFGM-APctFTM-APctTot.OFFTO
7/15/2016LOS ANGELES98-9SU Over4437-7549.3%6-2128.6%18-1994.7%47914
 CONNECTICUT92158 ATS5538-8345.8%7-2429.2%9-1560.0%431513
6/26/2016CONNECTICUT73164.5 ATS3831-6845.6%3-1618.7%8-1266.7%42915
 LOS ANGELES80-16SU Under3630-6943.5%6-1442.9%14-1877.8%421211
5/26/2016LOS ANGELES77-11SU Under4129-5750.9%4-1428.6%15-2365.2%44517
 CONNECTICUT72157.5 ATS4326-7037.1%4-1921.1%16-2466.7%44912
View Expanded Details
COACHING TRENDSGo to Top
StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring LOS ANGELES to win against the money line
There are 14 trends with a total rating of 6 stars.
Agler is 141-98 against the money line (+41.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Agler is 51-27 against the money line (+16.9 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Agler is 117-77 against the money line (+23.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.8, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Agler is 29-10 against the money line (+13.9 Units) off a road win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.6, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Agler is 75-39 against the money line (+27.8 Units) after a win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.9, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Agler is 41-16 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 79.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Agler is 35-13 against the money line (+15.7 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 78.8, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Agler is 119-102 against the money line (+20.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.6, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Agler is 94-54 against the money line (+31.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Agler is 112-77 against the money line (+20.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Agler is 168-130 against the money line (+34.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.1, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Agler is 170-118 against the money line (+26.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*)
Agler is 118-60 against the money line (+43.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 78.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*)
Agler is 116-91 against the money line (+25.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
There are 55 trends with a total rating of 74 stars.
Agler is 8-18 against the money line (-14.7 Units) as a road favorite of -155 or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 68.3, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Agler is 22-24 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in road games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Agler is 22-23 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Agler is 12-14 against the money line (-17.2 Units) in road games after a non-conference game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Agler is 9-12 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Agler is 17-25 against the money line (-23.1 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 71.5, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 2*)
Agler is 10-14 against the money line (-19.5 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 72.3, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Agler is 7-9 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Agler is 9-10 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Agler is 7-15 against the money line (-23.6 Units) in road games red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 71.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 5*)
Agler is 25-37 against the money line (-37.0 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 71.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*)
Agler is 5-9 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Agler is 13-15 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*)
Agler is 8-11 against the money line (-19.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*)
Agler is 7-9 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*)
Agler is 5-8 against the money line (-14.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*)
Agler is 10-12 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Agler is 11-12 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Agler is 3-7 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 3*)
Agler is 11-12 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Agler is 6-13 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 3*)
Agler is 5-11 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in road games after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Agler is 2-9 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in road games after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 4*)
Agler is 11-17 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Agler is 14-18 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 12-10 against the money line (+13.4 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 6-3 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 17-17 against the money line (+12.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 5-1 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.7, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 4*)
Miller is 12-10 against the money line (+13.4 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 9-6 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.5, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 8-5 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 17-17 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 16-14 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 15-11 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 12-10 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 8-5 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 16-16 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 14-13 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 12-10 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 16-17 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 17-12 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 12-10 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 4-0 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after playing 3 consecutive road games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 5*)
Miller is 8-7 against the money line (+12.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 10-7 against the money line (+9.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.1, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 8-7 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 8-6 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 18-15 against the money line (+17.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 17-13 against the money line (+18.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 3*)
Miller is 10-8 against the money line (+10.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 16-10 against the money line (+18.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 3*)
Miller is 18-17 against the money line (+12.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 16-17 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 16-13 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*)

View Expanded Details
STATFOX LINE TRACKER™Go to Top
Here is a summary of past results against the money line in games where the line movement was similar to:
Opening Money Line: Home=-110 (Road=+-110), Closing Money Line: Home=+105 (Road=-125)
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 17 times, while the home underdog won straight up 6 times.
Edge against the money line=LOS ANGELES
Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 4 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge.
KEY PLAYER INJURIESGo to Top
LOS ANGELES
[F] 06/24/2017 - Essence Carson "?" Tuesday vs. Connecticut Sun ( Groin )
CONNECTICUT
[F] 06/25/2017 - Morgan Tuck "?" Tuesday vs. LA Sparks ( Knee )
[F] 06/25/2017 - Lynetta Kizer "?" Tuesday vs. LA Sparks ( Back )
[F] 05/13/2017 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Achilles )

Last Updated: 5/2/2024 12:16:28 AM EST.


You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.