| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
158
| 82
Final
68 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 611 | MINNESOTA | -270 | | 612 | CONNECTICUT | +210 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(44-23 since 1997.) (65.7%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(22-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.4%, +28.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(27-6 since 1997.) (81.8%, +20.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(73-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent offensive team from last season - scored 75 or more points/game, after scoring 75 points or more.
(18-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.1%, +24.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(32-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +28.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent offensive team from last season - scored 75 or more points/game, after scoring 75 points or more.
(35-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - horrible defensive team from last season - allowed 75 or more points/game, after scoring 75 points or more.
(38-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(46-24 since 1997.) (65.7%, +34.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, on Friday nights.
(50-28 since 1997.) (64.1%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good team from last season - outscored opponents by 3 or more points/game, after a win by 6 points or less.
(30-7 since 1997.) (81.1%, +25.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(27-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +21.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent offensive team from last season - scored 75 or more points/game, after a win by 6 points or less.
(23-9 since 1997.) (71.9%, +21.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 consecutive close road losses of 5 points or less.
(27-14 since 1997.) (65.9%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(20-8 since 1997.) (71.4%, +20.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| MINNESOTA | 85 | | 31-65 | 47.7% | 4-10 | 38.7% | 19-23 | 80.2% | 43 | 13 | 16 | | CONNECTICUT | 82 | | 31-70 | 44.7% | 6-17 | 36.4% | 13-18 | 69.7% | 40 | 14 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 549 times, while CONNECTICUT won 426 times.
Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 17-4 against the money line (+10.9 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 75.2 | MINNESOTA is 96-47 against the money line (+39.9 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.7, OPPONENT 72.4 | MINNESOTA is 199-65 against the money line (+106.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.9, OPPONENT 78.8 | MINNESOTA is 148-32 against the money line (+108.6 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 90.3, OPPONENT 80.2 | CONNECTICUT is 1-10 against the money line (-9.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.7, OPPONENT 83.1 | CONNECTICUT is 42-71 against the money line (-41.2 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.7, OPPONENT 76.8 | CONNECTICUT is 54-66 against the money line (-32.8 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 77.9 | CONNECTICUT is 52-143 against the money line (-126.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 86.6 | CONNECTICUT is 26-101 against the money line (-101.3 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 90.5 |
|
MINNESOTA is 67-91 against the money line (-37.8 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 74.0 | MINNESOTA is 51-77 against the money line (-49.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.0, OPPONENT 78.8 | MINNESOTA is 29-36 against the money line (-25.2 Units) in road games when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 78.1 | MINNESOTA is 41-56 against the money line (-41.0 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.7, OPPONENT 79.6 | MINNESOTA is 19-18 against the money line (-37.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 84.0 | MINNESOTA is 22-15 against the money line (-25.7 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 77.2 | CONNECTICUT is 71-33 against the money line (+39.5 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 74.8 | CONNECTICUT is 5-3 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 81.5 | CONNECTICUT is 12-8 against the money line (+14.4 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 79.1 | CONNECTICUT is 114-98 against the money line (+28.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 74.1 | CONNECTICUT is 41-19 against the money line (+19.7 Units) in home games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 73.3 | CONNECTICUT is 53-31 against the money line (+21.9 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 77.4 | CONNECTICUT is 12-11 against the money line (+12.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 86.0 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 79-45 against the money line (+20.5 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 18-9 against the money line (+12.9 Units) in road games in May games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 75-37 against the money line (+30.6 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 16-2 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 115-59 against the money line (+26.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 93-33 against the money line (+25.4 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 57-18 against the money line (+24.0 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-8 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in May games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in home games after 2 straight games being called for 5+ more fouls than opponent since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.1, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-8 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-10 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-22 against the money line (-21.8 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 208-196 against the money line (-73.2 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 22-40 against the money line (-20.6 Units) in road games on Friday since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 68-63 against the money line (-34.5 Units) when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 22-13 against the money line (-23.4 Units) against Eastern conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 176-160 against the money line (-75.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.9, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 22-13 against the money line (-23.4 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 42-75 against the money line (-33.0 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 1-4 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in road games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 62-73 against the money line (-44.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-10 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after a win by 6 points or less over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 150-149 against the money line (-55.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-6 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 63-48 against the money line (+15.8 Units) on Friday since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-6 against the money line (+16.4 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-8 against the money line (+12.0 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-10 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in home games after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-8 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-15 against the money line (+19.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-7 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in home games after 3 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 56-23 against the money line (+24.7 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 60-28 against the money line (+22.7 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-4 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 115-114 against the money line (+24.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 63-64 against the money line (+25.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 54-30 against the money line (+18.7 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-6 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-7 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-8 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-23 against the money line (+18.6 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 4-0 | +3 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 82.2 | 42.7 | 43.4% | 46.2 | 74.2 | 37.2 | 39.9% | 43.0 | | Road Games | 2-0 | +2 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 89.5 | 46.0 | 43.7% | 47.5 | 79.0 | 38.5 | 42.3% | 38.0 | | Last 5 Games | 4-0 | +3 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 82.2 | 42.7 | 43.4% | 46.2 | 74.2 | 37.2 | 39.9% | 43.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.2 | 42.7 | 29-66 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 19-24 | 77.3% | 46 | 11 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.3 | 40.1 | 27-65 | 41.7% | 5-17 | 26.8% | 19-24 | 78.8% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 89.5 | 46.0 | 29-67 | 43.7% | 7-19 | 35.9% | 23-29 | 81.0% | 47 | 11 | 18 | 20 | 5 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.2 | 37.2 | 28-69 | 39.9% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 14-18 | 75.3% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 21 | 9 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.6 | 39 | 28-68 | 40.5% | 5-15 | 31.0% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 46 | 10 | 15 | 22 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.0 | 38.5 | 27-65 | 42.3% | 4-14 | 31.0% | 19-24 | 81.2% | 38 | 8 | 15 | 24 | 9 | 13 | 2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 0-3 | -4.1 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 77.0 | 41.3 | 41.2% | 45.7 | 80.7 | 42.0 | 43.7% | 37.7 | | Home Games | 0-1 | -2.1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 74.0 | 42.0 | 36.5% | 55.0 | 81.0 | 51.0 | 38.8% | 42.0 | | Last 5 Games | 0-3 | -4.1 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 77.0 | 41.3 | 41.2% | 45.7 | 80.7 | 42.0 | 43.7% | 37.7 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.0 | 41.3 | 30-72 | 41.2% | 7-18 | 40.0% | 10-14 | 75.6% | 46 | 10 | 16 | 23 | 7 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.9 | 40.7 | 29-68 | 42.8% | 5-15 | 34.9% | 15-20 | 78.1% | 45 | 10 | 16 | 21 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.0 | 42.0 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 55 | 10 | 11 | 23 | 3 | 17 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.7 | 42.0 | 27-61 | 43.7% | 5-15 | 30.4% | 23-26 | 87.2% | 38 | 7 | 14 | 17 | 10 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.9 | 40.2 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 32.1% | 17-22 | 77.7% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 81.0 | 51.0 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 4-21 | 19.0% | 25-27 | 92.6% | 42 | 3 | 12 | 20 | 9 | 8 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 68.5, CONNECTICUT 73.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/14/2017 | CHICAGO | 70-61 | W | | 27-73 | 37.0% | 48 | 15 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 53 | 23 | | 5/18/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 90-71 | W | -210 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 50 | 11 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 43 | 11 | | 5/20/2017 | @ DALLAS | 89-87 | W | -500 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 45 | 18 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 33 | 16 | | 5/23/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 80-78 | W | -850 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 42 | 20 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 43 | 12 | | 5/26/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/28/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/3/2017 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/9/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/11/2017 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/13/2017 | ATLANTA | 74-81 | L | -210 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 55 | 17 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 42 | 8 | | 5/20/2017 | @ INDIANA | 79-81 | L | +210 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 39 | 18 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 29 | 9 | | 5/23/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 78-80 | L | +550 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 43 | 12 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 42 | 20 | | 5/26/2017 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/28/2017 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/31/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/3/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/10/2017 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 17-18 (+7.1 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 3-3 (+7.3 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 11-7 (+8.1 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 2-1 (+6.5 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
5/23/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 78 | 163 | ATS | 37 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 10-20 | 50.0% | 4-6 | 66.7% | 43 | 9 | 12 | | | MINNESOTA | 80 | -12 | SU Under | 35 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 7-12 | 58.3% | 15-22 | 68.2% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 9/4/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 79 | 162.5 | Over | 34 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 39 | 13 | 18 | | | MINNESOTA | 93 | -10 | SU ATS | 44 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 4-5 | 80.0% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 37 | 11 | 11 | 8/26/2016 | MINNESOTA | 80 | -7.5 | Over | 44 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 1-8 | 12.5% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 41 | 11 | 18 | | | CONNECTICUT | 84 | 160 | SU ATS | 53 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 20-27 | 74.1% | 40 | 12 | 14 | 7/7/2016 | MINNESOTA | 89 | -11.5 | Over | 33 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 4-20 | 20.0% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 54 | 15 | 12 | | | CONNECTICUT | 93 | 163.5 | SU ATS | 34 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 45 | 13 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Reeve is 181-81 against the money line (+22.3 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 20-5 against the money line (+12.9 Units) in May games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 68-23 against the money line (+20.1 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 61-11 against the money line (+41.5 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 5*) | Reeve is 81-26 against the money line (+29.0 Units) off a home win as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 20-8 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 94-38 against the money line (+21.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 133-57 against the money line (+22.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 104-42 against the money line (+22.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 36-7 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 99-38 against the money line (+22.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 148-56 against the money line (+26.7 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 123-44 against the money line (+17.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 106-34 against the money line (+31.8 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 93-28 against the money line (+30.4 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 92-33 against the money line (+27.9 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 95-37 against the money line (+27.6 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 130-53 against the money line (+26.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 97-37 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 70-25 against the money line (+17.9 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 53-14 against the money line (+21.7 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 82-27 against the money line (+22.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 1-8 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in May games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 2-8 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Reeve is 9-14 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in road games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 10-13 against the money line (-13.6 Units) in road games after a win by 6 points or less as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-8 against the money line (+12.0 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-8 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 7-4 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 10 times, while the home underdog won straight up 1 times.
Edge against the money line=MINNESOTA | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 1 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [F] 05/13/2017 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Achilles ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/6/2024 6:58:00 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|