| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
PHOENIX CONNECTICUT |
|
| 148.5 | 81 Final 80 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
601 | PHOENIX | -270 | 602 | CONNECTICUT | +210 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - off an upset win as an underdog against opponent off a road loss against a division rival. (138-92 since 1997.) (60%, +50 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a loss by 10 points or more. (87-31 since 1997.) (73.7%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog against opponent off a road loss against a division rival. (88-56 since 1997.) (61.1%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (93-69 since 1997.) (57.4%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - off a win against a division rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a marginal losing team after 15 or more games. (47-28 since 1997.) (62.7%, +31.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (67-31 since 1997.) (68.4%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - off a win against a division rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a marginal losing team. (55-37 since 1997.) (59.8%, +29.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover the spread in 5 or more consecutive games, with a losing record. (42-22 since 1997.) (65.6%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a marginal losing team after 15 or more games. (23-11 since 1997.) (67.6%, +23.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less. (21-6 since 1997.) (77.8%, +18.4 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (328-123 since 1997.) (72.7%, +89.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (313-115 since 1997.) (73.1%, +82.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws. (289-275 since 1997.) (51.2%, +79.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (268-111 since 1997.) (70.7%, +76 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game. (138-38 since 1997.) (78.4%, +57.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws. (158-62 since 1997.) (71.8%, +56 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (150-55 since 1997.) (73.2%, +53.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season. (126-44 since 1997.) (74.1%, +51.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games. (139-73 since 1997.) (65.6%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season. (66-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (122-45 since 1997.) (73.1%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (135-74 since 1997.) (64.6%, +43.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (87-34 since 1997.) (71.9%, +42 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, on Thursday nights. (95-60 since 1997.) (61.3%, +40.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game. (119-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.6%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (39-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +29 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an good defensive team (38-40.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (97-49 since 1997.) (66.4%, +39.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (21-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +24.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (30-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +29.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (30-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +29.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (30-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +29.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team. (40-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +22.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in August or September games. (62-18 since 1997.) (77.5%, +34.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (71-22 since 1997.) (76.3%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (70-27 since 1997.) (72.2%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team. (85-34 since 1997.) (71.4%, +33.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games. (63-43 since 1997.) (59.4%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (36-16 since 1997.) (69.2%, +32.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (36-16 since 1997.) (69.2%, +32.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (36-16 since 1997.) (69.2%, +32.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after 5 or more consecutive unders, good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season. (69-38 since 1997.) (64.5%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (58-17 since 1997.) (77.3%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - in non-conference games, off an upset win over a division rival as a home underdog. (40-29 since 1997.) (58%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (60-28 since 1997.) (68.2%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (83-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +27.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (219-174 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.7%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (204-153 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.1%, +50.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (29-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (39-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.9%, +27 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season. (135-79 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (53-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +31 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX | 74 | | 27-63 | 43.1% | 5-14 | 35.4% | 15-18 | 82.5% | 42 | 8 | 14 | CONNECTICUT | 76 | | 29-70 | 41.1% | 7-20 | 35.1% | 11-15 | 74.9% | 44 | 12 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 557 times, while PHOENIX won 411 times. Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
PHOENIX is 115-83 against the money line (+32.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 80.0, OPPONENT 77.3 | PHOENIX is 6-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 77.0 | PHOENIX is 10-2 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.4, OPPONENT 74.5 | PHOENIX is 19-9 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 77.0, OPPONENT 72.8 | PHOENIX is 19-6 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.6, OPPONENT 74.4 | PHOENIX is 12-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 77.5, OPPONENT 70.8 | PHOENIX is 98-67 against the money line (+30.6 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 78.4, OPPONENT 76.2 | PHOENIX is 21-10 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.8, OPPONENT 82.3 | PHOENIX is 13-6 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 78.9, OPPONENT 78.5 | CONNECTICUT is 8-24 against the money line (-18.5 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.9, OPPONENT 78.3 | CONNECTICUT is 13-32 against the money line (-19.8 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.1, OPPONENT 75.7 |
|
PHOENIX is 88-99 against the money line (-43.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 75.5, OPPONENT 75.7 | PHOENIX is 1-6 against the money line (-9.6 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game this season. The average score was PHOENIX 69.7, OPPONENT 74.7 | CONNECTICUT is 49-16 against the money line (+19.0 Units) in home games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.8, OPPONENT 72.3 | CONNECTICUT is 7-3 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 75.8 | CONNECTICUT is 138-100 against the money line (+25.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 72.8 | CONNECTICUT is 109-88 against the money line (+26.9 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.9, OPPONENT 73.2 | CONNECTICUT is 65-44 against the money line (+17.5 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.5, OPPONENT 72.1 |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX is 30-7 against the money line (+17.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 20-2 against the money line (+16.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 22-1 against the money line (+20.0 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 5*) | PHOENIX is 17-1 against the money line (+15.0 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 22-9 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 77.4, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 33-13 against the money line (+21.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 28-7 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 39-14 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 27-5 against the money line (+20.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 5*) | PHOENIX is 40-11 against the money line (+23.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 31-7 against the money line (+20.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.1, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 44-14 against the money line (+20.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.2, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 29-7 against the money line (+18.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.4, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 39-11 against the money line (+21.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.9, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 27-6 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 4*) | PHOENIX is 35-11 against the money line (+16.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 24-6 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.3, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 33-10 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.2, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-26 against the money line (-17.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-43 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 86-95 against the money line (-48.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 80.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 34-11 against the money line (+16.3 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.2, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX is 50-17 against the money line (+21.2 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 45-12 against the money line (+17.7 Units) as a favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 46-22 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after a division game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 30-13 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 14-2 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after 3 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 85.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 21-13 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 189-133 against the money line (+27.0 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 80.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 24-9 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 78.7, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 37-15 against the money line (+20.5 Units) after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 85.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 39-10 against the money line (+22.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-14 against the money line (-11.0 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-21 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 7-10 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was PHOENIX 73.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 75-89 against the money line (-40.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 75.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 2-6 against the money line (-9.5 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 76.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 2-6 against the money line (-9.9 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 78.5, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 37-54 against the money line (-26.7 Units) off an upset win as an underdog since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 75.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) against Western conference opponents this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-7 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in home games after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in home games after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in non-conference games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-3 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-15 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in home games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-9 against the money line (+16.9 Units) in home games after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.1, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-3 against the money line (+16.1 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.9, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 62-30 against the money line (+22.6 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.7, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-17 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 63-40 against the money line (+25.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-18 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 16-11 | -2.9 | 9-17 | 8-17 | 75.5 | 36.4 | 42.7% | 40.8 | 73.1 | 35.5 | 39.9% | 43.9 | Road Games | 5-7 | -4.3 | 4-8 | 4-8 | 72.2 | 34.7 | 40.3% | 39.6 | 73.8 | 35.8 | 40.4% | 45.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -5.2 | 2-3 | 0-3 | 70.4 | 34.6 | 41.4% | 40.6 | 72.0 | 35.2 | 41.9% | 39.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.5 | 36.4 | 27-64 | 42.7% | 5-14 | 32.6% | 16-20 | 82.4% | 41 | 7 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 76 | 38.2 | 28-65 | 43.0% | 5-15 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.2 | 34.7 | 26-64 | 40.3% | 5-14 | 34.3% | 16-20 | 80.7% | 40 | 6 | 15 | 19 | 9 | 11 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.1 | 35.5 | 27-69 | 39.9% | 5-15 | 32.4% | 13-16 | 80.9% | 44 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 75.2 | 37.9 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 73.8 | 35.8 | 27-67 | 40.4% | 5-15 | 35.0% | 15-18 | 81.7% | 45 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 12-15 | +4 | 13-14 | 17-10 | 76.2 | 37.1 | 42.3% | 40.9 | 76.8 | 38.7 | 43.7% | 41.9 | Home Games | 7-7 | -0.3 | 8-6 | 8-6 | 78.0 | 39.5 | 44.4% | 41.3 | 75.9 | 41.9 | 44.7% | 38.6 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5 | 0-5 | 4-1 | 76.0 | 37.2 | 42.6% | 37.6 | 87.4 | 42.4 | 47.7% | 41.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.2 | 37.1 | 29-68 | 42.3% | 7-19 | 34.6% | 12-16 | 74.7% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.9 | 38.2 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 78.0 | 39.5 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 6-18 | 36.4% | 11-15 | 75.0% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.8 | 38.7 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 5-13 | 35.2% | 16-20 | 83.0% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 76.2 | 38.5 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.9 | 41.9 | 29-65 | 44.7% | 4-13 | 34.4% | 13-16 | 84.5% | 39 | 8 | 15 | 15 | 8 | 15 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: PHOENIX 69.4, CONNECTICUT 69.8 |
| | |
|
|
7/18/2015 | NEW YORK | 73-75 | L | -300 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 36 | 12 | 25-77 | 32.5% | 61 | 9 | 7/21/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 65-70 | L | -175 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 30 | 7 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 38 | 10 | 7/28/2015 | CHICAGO | 89-87 | W | -175 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 43 | 13 | 33-86 | 38.4% | 53 | 12 | 7/30/2015 | @ TULSA | 78-66 | W | -125 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 40 | 16 | 21-72 | 29.2% | 46 | 12 | 8/2/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 71-68 | W | -250 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 47 | 14 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 40 | 12 | 8/4/2015 | TULSA | 87-84 | W | -360 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 43 | 13 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 49 | 8 | 8/7/2015 | MINNESOTA | 73-66 | W | +105 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 44 | 6 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 37 | 9 | 8/9/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 64-74 | L | +155 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 44 | 9 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 54 | 7 | 8/12/2015 | SEATTLE | 83-66 | W | | 30-67 | 44.8% | 46 | 12 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 32 | 10 | 8/16/2015 | INDIANA | 63-75 | L | -220 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 36 | 10 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 42 | 10 | 8/18/2015 | @ TULSA | 59-74 | L | -200 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 38 | 15 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 53 | 17 | 8/21/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 68-78 | L | -200 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 40 | 15 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 34 | 8 | 8/23/2015 | MINNESOTA | 79-67 | W | -105 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 43 | 12 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 36 | 12 | 8/27/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/28/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/30/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/2/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/5/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/19/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 82-89 | L | +210 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 47 | 15 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 38 | 12 | 7/22/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 78-77 | W | +280 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 42 | 15 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 50 | 16 | 7/28/2015 | INDIANA | 73-75 | L | -115 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 37 | 18 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 52 | 13 | 7/31/2015 | SEATTLE | 67-66 | W | -300 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 47 | 16 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 40 | 15 | 8/2/2015 | @ INDIANA | 70-83 | L | +200 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 33 | 12 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 43 | 13 | 8/4/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 82-51 | W | -165 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 50 | 17 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 29 | 21 | 8/7/2015 | WASHINGTON | 86-72 | W | +105 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 40 | 9 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 34 | 11 | 8/9/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 73-84 | L | +220 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 38 | 8 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 40 | 11 | 8/12/2015 | TULSA | 80-74 | W | -175 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 43 | 10 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 39 | 13 | 8/14/2015 | NEW YORK | 78-90 | L | +175 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 36 | 17 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 33 | 7 | 8/16/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 77-90 | L | +145 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 33 | 14 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 47 | 12 | 8/21/2015 | @ TULSA | 76-84 | L | +180 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 44 | 14 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 44 | 10 | 8/23/2015 | ATLANTA | 92-102 | L | +120 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 35 | 12 | 40-67 | 59.7% | 34 | 15 | 8/25/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 57-71 | L | +250 | 19-63 | 30.2% | 40 | 12 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 49 | 9 | 8/27/2015 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/29/2015 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/30/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 15-14 (-0.0 Units) against the money line versus PHOENIX since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 2-3 (+0.9 Units) against the money line versus PHOENIX over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CONNECTICUT is 9-4 (+3.2 Units) against the money line versus PHOENIX since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 1-1 (+1.1 Units) against the money line versus PHOENIX over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/19/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 90 | 144.5 | SU ATS | 29 | 38-92 | 41.3% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 10-16 | 62.5% | 58 | 20 | 13 | | PHOENIX | 78 | -5.5 | Over | 31 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 18-25 | 72.0% | 54 | 13 | 21 | 7/17/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 85 | 161 | Over | 39 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 9-20 | 45.0% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 45 | 15 | 15 | | PHOENIX | 101 | -11.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 37 | 9 | 8 | 6/12/2014 | PHOENIX | 95 | -6.5 | Over | 42 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 25-28 | 89.3% | 38 | 11 | 7 | | CONNECTICUT | 96 | 155.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 38 | 11 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Sandy is 50-17 against the money line (+21.2 Units) in all games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 45-12 against the money line (+17.7 Units) as a favorite as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 14-2 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 85.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 39-10 against the money line (+22.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 30-7 against the money line (+17.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 20-2 against the money line (+16.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 22-1 against the money line (+20.0 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 5*) | Sandy is 17-1 against the money line (+15.0 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 28-7 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 39-14 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 27-5 against the money line (+20.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 5*) | Sandy is 40-11 against the money line (+23.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 31-7 against the money line (+20.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.1, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Sandy is 44-14 against the money line (+20.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.2, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 29-7 against the money line (+18.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.4, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 39-11 against the money line (+21.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.9, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Sandy is 27-6 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Sandy is 35-11 against the money line (+16.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 24-6 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.3, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 33-10 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.2, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 16-34 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 6-14 against the money line (-11.0 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 10-21 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 16-30 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 23-49 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 12-18 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in home games versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of <=40% in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 74.6, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 12-33 against the money line (-17.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 10-33 against the money line (-18.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 17-43 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Sandy is 1-6 against the money line (-11.7 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Sandy 72.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Anne is 19-12 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in home games after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.8, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 14-8 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in home games after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 75-39 against the money line (+27.8 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 75.0, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 63-32 against the money line (+23.8 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 75.0, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 30-10 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 74.7, OPPONENT 67.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 23-5 against the money line (+15.2 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 72.6, OPPONENT 65.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 16-4 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in home games vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 79.7, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 19 times, while the home underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 1 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 06/04/2015 - Diana Taurasi out for season ( Personal ) | [G] 06/04/2015 - Eshaya Murphy out for season ( Knee ) | |
[G] 08/24/2015 - Alex Bentley out indefinitely ( Ankle ) | [F] 08/15/2015 - Alyssa Thomas out indefinitely ( Shoulder ) | [C] 08/13/2015 - Elizabeth Williams out indefinitely ( Knee ) | [G] 06/05/2015 - Allison Hightower out for season ( Suspension ) | [F] 06/05/2015 - Kelsey Griffin out for season ( Hip ) | [F] 06/04/2015 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/4/2024 3:47:37 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|