WNBA CONNECTICUT Matchup 20150804

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.

WNBA : First Half Matchup

Tuesday 8/4/2015

Line

$ Line

OU Line

Score

SAN ANTONIO
First Half Results
CONNECTICUT

-2

30
Final
37

SAN ANTONIO (6 - 14) at CONNECTICUT (9 - 9)

Tuesday, 8/4/2015 7:05 PM

Board		First Half
651	SAN ANTONIO	73.5
652	CONNECTICUT	-2.5

	Current First Half FoxSheets
	ATS FoxSheet
	First Half FoxSheet
	Money Line FoxSheet
	Teaser Line FoxSheet

KEY GAME INFORMATION

STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™

StatFox Super Situations favoring CONNECTICUT to cover the first half line

There are 5 situations with a total rating of 8 stars.

- Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread.
(55-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(29-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +15.8 units. Rating = 1*)

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a loss by 10 points or more.
(82-40 since 1997.) (67.2%, +38 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a loss by 10 points or more.
(59-27 since 1997.) (68.6%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread.
(23-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +13.1 units. Rating = 0*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the first half line

There are 2 situations with a total rating of 5 stars.

- Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(75-35 since 1997.) (68.2%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(46-20 since 1997.) (69.7%, +24 units. Rating = 2*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring the game to go UNDER the first half total

There are 183 situations with a total rating of 396 stars.

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - off a road loss, in August or September games.
(103-57 since 1997.) (64.4%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - off a road loss, on Tuesday nights.
(47-21 since 1997.) (69.1%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more.
(360-239 since 1997.) (60.1%, +97.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(172-102 since 1997.) (62.8%, +59.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(103-58 since 1997.) (64%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(75-36 since 1997.) (67.6%, +35.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a loss by 10 points or more.
(201-135 since 1997.) (59.8%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(95-54 since 1997.) (63.8%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts.
(405-291 since 1997.) (58.2%, +84.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game.
(237-158 since 1997.) (60%, +63.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game.
(324-224 since 1997.) (59.1%, +77.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, on Tuesday nights.
(58-30 since 1997.) (65.9%, +25 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(164-107 since 1997.) (60.5%, +46.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(400-280 since 1997.) (58.8%, +92 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, on Tuesday nights.
(69-32 since 1997.) (68.3%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after playing a road game.
(435-297 since 1997.) (59.4%, +108.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(177-110 since 1997.) (61.7%, +56 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread.
(411-279 since 1997.) (59.6%, +104.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread against opponent after a game where they covered the spread.
(215-132 since 1997.) (62%, +69.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(193-127 since 1997.) (60.3%, +53.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games against opponent after a game where they covered the spread.
(111-63 since 1997.) (63.8%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games.
(97-56 since 1997.) (63.4%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games against opponent after a game where they covered the spread.
(55-24 since 1997.) (69.6%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses.
(416-282 since 1997.) (59.6%, +105.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, in August or September games.
(149-92 since 1997.) (61.8%, +47.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(145-90 since 1997.) (61.7%, +46 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(126-70 since 1997.) (64.3%, +49 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(126-70 since 1997.) (64.3%, +49 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(126-70 since 1997.) (64.3%, +49 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(148-94 since 1997.) (61.2%, +44.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(128-71 since 1997.) (64.3%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(90-54 since 1997.) (62.5%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(128-71 since 1997.) (64.3%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(128-71 since 1997.) (64.3%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(90-54 since 1997.) (62.5%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(90-54 since 1997.) (62.5%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%).
(348-252 since 1997.) (58%, +70.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(112-66 since 1997.) (62.9%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(74-45 since 1997.) (62.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(58-27 since 1997.) (68.2%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(262-183 since 1997.) (58.9%, +60.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(112-66 since 1997.) (62.9%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(112-66 since 1997.) (62.9%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(58-27 since 1997.) (68.2%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(58-27 since 1997.) (68.2%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(467-323 since 1997.) (59.1%, +111.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(352-229 since 1997.) (60.6%, +100.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG).
(94-52 since 1997.) (64.4%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - off a road loss against a division rival, on Tuesday nights.
(68-37 since 1997.) (64.8%, +27.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in August or September games.
(299-198 since 1997.) (60.2%, +81.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - on Tuesday nights.
(135-86 since 1997.) (61.1%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a division game.
(507-351 since 1997.) (59.1%, +120.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(254-161 since 1997.) (61.2%, +76.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, in August or September games.
(103-59 since 1997.) (63.6%, +38.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days.
(158-97 since 1997.) (62%, +51.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(343-211 since 1997.) (61.9%, +110.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(102-59 since 1997.) (63.4%, +37.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(91-45 since 1997.) (66.9%, +41.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(46-21 since 1997.) (68.7%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(36-15 since 1997.) (70.6%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games.
(157-99 since 1997.) (61.3%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(91-45 since 1997.) (66.9%, +41.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(91-45 since 1997.) (66.9%, +41.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(46-21 since 1997.) (68.7%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(46-21 since 1997.) (68.7%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(231-151 since 1997.) (60.5%, +64.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(103-58 since 1997.) (64%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(87-48 since 1997.) (64.4%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(87-48 since 1997.) (64.4%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(87-48 since 1997.) (64.4%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(85-48 since 1997.) (63.9%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(33-13 since 1997.) (71.7%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(170-109 since 1997.) (60.9%, +50.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(65-32 since 1997.) (67%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(33-13 since 1997.) (71.7%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(33-13 since 1997.) (71.7%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%).
(197-133 since 1997.) (59.7%, +50.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(90-48 since 1997.) (65.2%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(152-95 since 1997.) (61.5%, +47.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(66-33 since 1997.) (66.7%, +29.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(316-193 since 1997.) (62.1%, +103.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(238-135 since 1997.) (63.8%, +89.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(122-76 since 1997.) (61.6%, +38.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in non-conference games.
(332-223 since 1997.) (59.8%, +86.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - in non-conference games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(110-64 since 1997.) (63.2%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after one or more consecutive overs.
(384-270 since 1997.) (58.7%, +87 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games.
(260-171 since 1997.) (60.3%, +71.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(310-192 since 1997.) (61.8%, +98.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(96-47 since 1997.) (67.1%, +44.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(235-148 since 1997.) (61.4%, +72.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - off 2 or more consecutive home losses.
(46-20 since 1997.) (69.7%, +24 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(295-211 since 1997.) (58.3%, +62.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(133-80 since 1997.) (62.4%, +45 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 80 points or more.
(85-44 since 1997.) (65.9%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more.
(332-235 since 1997.) (58.6%, +73.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after scoring 75 points or more.
(371-239 since 1997.) (60.8%, +108.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(231-159 since 1997.) (59.2%, +56.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(442-322 since 1997.) (57.9%, +87.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(173-112 since 1997.) (60.7%, +49.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(79-45 since 1997.) (63.7%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(327-226 since 1997.) (59.1%, +78.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - being called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents on the season.
(142-90 since 1997.) (61.2%, +43 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after playing a home game.
(445-291 since 1997.) (60.5%, +124.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after playing 2 consecutive home games.
(218-138 since 1997.) (61.2%, +66.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(454-266 since 1997.) (63.1%, +161.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(165-111 since 1997.) (59.8%, +42.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where they covered the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(127-63 since 1997.) (66.8%, +57.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where they covered the spread, tired team - playing their 4th game in 7 days.
(73-38 since 1997.) (65.8%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where they covered the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(61-29 since 1997.) (67.8%, +29.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(167-91 since 1997.) (64.7%, +66.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(643-479 since 1997.) (57.3%, +116.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(145-90 since 1997.) (61.7%, +46 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(126-70 since 1997.) (64.3%, +49 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(126-70 since 1997.) (64.3%, +49 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(126-70 since 1997.) (64.3%, +49 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in August or September games.
(299-198 since 1997.) (60.2%, +81.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - on Tuesday nights.
(135-86 since 1997.) (61.1%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a division game.
(580-370 since 1997.) (61.1%, +173 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(217-126 since 1997.) (63.3%, +78.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, in August or September games.
(98-49 since 1997.) (66.7%, +44.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(102-59 since 1997.) (63.4%, +37.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(91-45 since 1997.) (66.9%, +41.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(46-21 since 1997.) (68.7%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games.
(157-99 since 1997.) (61.3%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(91-45 since 1997.) (66.9%, +41.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(91-45 since 1997.) (66.9%, +41.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(46-21 since 1997.) (68.7%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(46-21 since 1997.) (68.7%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(234-150 since 1997.) (60.9%, +69 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(108-60 since 1997.) (64.3%, +42 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(94-46 since 1997.) (67.1%, +43.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(59-27 since 1997.) (68.6%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(51-19 since 1997.) (72.9%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(53-26 since 1997.) (67.1%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games.
(190-115 since 1997.) (62.3%, +63.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(94-46 since 1997.) (67.1%, +43.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(94-46 since 1997.) (67.1%, +43.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(51-19 since 1997.) (72.9%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(51-19 since 1997.) (72.9%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(53-26 since 1997.) (67.1%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(53-26 since 1997.) (67.1%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(33-13 since 1997.) (71.7%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(170-109 since 1997.) (60.9%, +50.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(33-13 since 1997.) (71.7%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(33-13 since 1997.) (71.7%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(316-193 since 1997.) (62.1%, +103.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(238-135 since 1997.) (63.8%, +89.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG).
(88-48 since 1997.) (64.7%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games.
(332-223 since 1997.) (59.8%, +86.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, after a division game.
(209-129 since 1997.) (61.8%, +67.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after one or more consecutive overs.
(396-260 since 1997.) (60.4%, +110 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games.
(282-195 since 1997.) (59.1%, +67.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread.
(102-60 since 1997.) (63%, +36 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread against opponent after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(43-15 since 1997.) (74.1%, +26.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss against a division rival.
(284-181 since 1997.) (61.1%, +84.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games.
(113-60 since 1997.) (65.3%, +47 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss against a division rival, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(75-36 since 1997.) (67.6%, +35.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - off a road loss against a division rival.
(200-116 since 1997.) (63.3%, +72.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - off a road loss against a division rival, in August or September games.
(80-42 since 1997.) (65.6%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - off a road loss against a division rival, on Tuesday nights.
(38-15 since 1997.) (71.7%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - off a road loss against a division rival, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(53-24 since 1997.) (68.8%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(137-86 since 1997.) (61.4%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, in August or September games.
(58-27 since 1997.) (68.2%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, on Tuesday nights.
(31-9 since 1997.) (77.5%, +21.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - off a road loss.
(270-175 since 1997.) (60.7%, +77.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%).
(348-252 since 1997.) (58%, +70.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(145-84 since 1997.) (63.3%, +52.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(112-66 since 1997.) (62.9%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(74-45 since 1997.) (62.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(58-27 since 1997.) (68.2%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(262-183 since 1997.) (58.9%, +60.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(106-59 since 1997.) (64.2%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(112-66 since 1997.) (62.9%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(112-66 since 1997.) (62.9%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(58-27 since 1997.) (68.2%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(58-27 since 1997.) (68.2%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(156-100 since 1997.) (60.9%, +46 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(467-323 since 1997.) (59.1%, +111.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(352-229 since 1997.) (60.6%, +100.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(411-297 since 1997.) (58.1%, +84.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread.
(245-168 since 1997.) (59.3%, +60.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(774-568 since 1997.) (57.7%, +149.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(306-213 since 1997.) (59%, +71.7 units. Rating = 2*)

STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™

	Projection				Shooting		3pt Shots		Free Throws		Rebounding
Teams	Score	Edge	Half	Edge	FGM-A	Pct.	FGM-A	Pct.	FTM-A	Pct.	Tot.	OFF	TO
SAN ANTONIO	68		35		26-63	41.0%	4-12	30.3%	13-17	77.5%	43	10	17
CONNECTICUT	78		39		30-70	43.6%	6-18	34.5%	11-14	74.2%	43	11	12

The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total.

In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT covered the first half line 587 times, while SAN ANTONIO covered the first half line 413 times.
Edge against first half line=CONNECTICUT

In 1000 simulated games, 501 games went under first half total, while 499 games went over first half total.
No Edge.

Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the first half line

CONNECTICUT is 3-14 against the 1rst half line (-12.4 Units) in home games when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.2, OPPONENT 40.4

CONNECTICUT is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) in home games in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.6, OPPONENT 38.5

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring CONNECTICUT to cover the first half line

SAN ANTONIO is 69-120 against the 1rst half line (-63.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 41.4

SAN ANTONIO is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.3, OPPONENT 40.3

SAN ANTONIO is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.4, OPPONENT 37.9

CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the 1rst half line (+7.5 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.3, OPPONENT 37.1

CONNECTICUT is 19-9 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.0, OPPONENT 35.8

CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.1, OPPONENT 36.1

CONNECTICUT is 18-6 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 37.2

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring the OVER against the first half total

SAN ANTONIO is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 42.6

CONNECTICUT is 127-66 OVER (+54.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.0, OPPONENT 38.0

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring the UNDER against the first half total

SAN ANTONIO is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in games where they attempt 57 to 63 shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.0, OPPONENT 35.1

SAN ANTONIO is 19-7 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.3, OPPONENT 36.7

SAN ANTONIO is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 36.1

SAN ANTONIO is 54-31 UNDER (+19.9 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.4, OPPONENT 36.3

SAN ANTONIO is 46-22 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.4, OPPONENT 36.5

SAN ANTONIO is 11-1 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.8, OPPONENT 36.4

SAN ANTONIO is 32-18 UNDER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 38.6

SAN ANTONIO is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.4, OPPONENT 37.9

SAN ANTONIO is 132-73 UNDER (+51.7 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.9, OPPONENT 35.8

CONNECTICUT is 22-8 UNDER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.5, OPPONENT 35.4

CONNECTICUT is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.9, OPPONENT 35.4

CONNECTICUT is 43-24 UNDER (+16.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.3, OPPONENT 35.7

CONNECTICUT is 28-16 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.3, OPPONENT 36.1

CONNECTICUT is 60-38 UNDER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.9, OPPONENT 35.4

STATFOX POWERLINE™

	Power Rating
	Estimate	Edge
SAN ANTONIO
CONNECTICUT	-2

STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the first half line

There are 3 trends with a total rating of 4 stars.

CONNECTICUT is 19-36 against the 1rst half line (-20.6 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 9-25 against the 1rst half line (-18.5 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.4, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 30-51 against the 1rst half line (-26.1 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.2, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 2 trends with a total rating of 0 stars.

SAN ANTONIO is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.8, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 24 trends with a total rating of 12 stars.

SAN ANTONIO is 52-32 UNDER (+16.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.4, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 140-107 UNDER (+22.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 85-55 UNDER (+24.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 118-73 UNDER (+37.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.8, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 21-10 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.1, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 23-11 UNDER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.9, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.7, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 21-9 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 53-32 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 40-21 UNDER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.6, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 29-13 UNDER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 22-9 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.4, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 24-11 UNDER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.6, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 31-14 UNDER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 13-3 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.8, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.9, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 41-24 UNDER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.3, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.1, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 26-14 UNDER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.4, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 52-33 UNDER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.1, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*)

STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the first half line

There are 3 trends with a total rating of 4 stars.

SAN ANTONIO is 16-3 against the 1rst half line (+12.7 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home losses since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 3*)

SAN ANTONIO is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.7, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.6, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring CONNECTICUT to cover the first half line

There are 11 trends with a total rating of 4 stars.

SAN ANTONIO is 6-13 against the 1rst half line (-8.3 Units) versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.9, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.4, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 100-136 against the 1rst half line (-49.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.6, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.3, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.5, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.7, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 25-13 against the 1rst half line (+10.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.2, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.1, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.4, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 5 trends with a total rating of 8 stars.

SAN ANTONIO is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.2, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 9-1 OVER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.3, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 3*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 30 trends with a total rating of 20 stars.

SAN ANTONIO is 252-187 UNDER (+46.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 153-108 UNDER (+34.2 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.2, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 30-14 UNDER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 30-14 UNDER (+14.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 28-14 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.1, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 100-57 UNDER (+37.3 Units) the 1rst half total against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.7, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*)

SAN ANTONIO is 20-8 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 100-57 UNDER (+37.3 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.7, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*)

SAN ANTONIO is 124-93 UNDER (+21.7 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 33-17 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.2, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 37-19 UNDER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.7, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 121-89 UNDER (+23.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 88-57 UNDER (+25.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 132-99 UNDER (+23.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 90-64 UNDER (+19.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 65-36 UNDER (+25.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 20-8 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 94-65 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 142-109 UNDER (+22.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.8, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 93-65 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.0, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 119-88 UNDER (+22.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

SAN ANTONIO is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*)

SAN ANTONIO is 78-55 UNDER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 69-47 UNDER (+17.3 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.6, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 19-7 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.8, OPPONENT 29.7 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 8 or more of their last 10 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*)

ADVANCED TEAM STATS

SAN ANTONIO - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	6-14	-6.2	11-8	9-11	72.0	34.9	41.8%	40.8	77.6	38.9	45.5%	41.3
Road Games	0-9	-8	5-3	5-4	70.6	31.9	40.3%	38.6	81.4	39.7	48.0%	42.3
Last 5 Games	2-3	-1	4-1	3-2	79.0	41.2	47.4%	36.6	81.6	42.2	48.8%	38.2

SAN ANTONIO Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	72.0	34.9	26-63	41.8%	4-12	30.9%	15-19	78.4%	41	8	16	16	6	13	4
vs opponents surrendering	75.6	37.4	28-65	42.2%	5-15	33.2%	15-19	79.0%	42	9	16	19	7	13	4
Team Stats (Road Games)	70.6	31.9	26-65	40.3%	4-13	27.3%	15-18	81.5%	39	8	14	15	6	13	4
Stats Against (All Games)	77.6	38.9	31-68	45.5%	4-12	33.9%	12-16	74.5%	41	9	17	19	8	12	5
vs opponents averaging	76.3	38.4	28-66	42.5%	5-15	33.4%	15-19	80.2%	42	9	16	19	7	13	5
Stats Against (Road Games)	81.4	39.7	33-68	48.0%	4-12	32.1%	12-16	77.5%	42	9	17	19	8	11	6

CONNECTICUT - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	9-9	+6.9	10-8	10-8	75.4	37.2	41.6%	41.3	75.3	38.0	42.5%	43.5
Home Games	4-5	-1.4	5-4	4-5	74.9	38.0	42.0%	41.6	74.8	40.1	43.1%	41.2
Last 5 Games	2-3	+0.6	1-4	3-2	74.0	37.8	42.2%	41.2	78.0	37.0	41.6%	44.6

CONNECTICUT Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	75.4	37.2	29-69	41.6%	6-18	33.6%	12-17	73.8%	41	9	15	20	10	13	3
vs opponents surrendering	75.8	38.2	28-66	42.3%	5-15	33.0%	15-19	78.9%	42	9	17	19	7	13	4
Team Stats (Home Games)	74.9	38.0	28-68	42.0%	6-17	34.0%	12-16	75.2%	42	9	15	18	9	14	3
Stats Against (All Games)	75.3	38.0	27-65	42.5%	4-14	32.4%	16-19	83.2%	43	10	15	16	7	16	4
vs opponents averaging	76.3	38.3	28-65	43.2%	5-14	33.2%	15-19	80.2%	41	9	17	19	7	13	5
Stats Against (Home Games)	74.8	40.1	28-66	43.1%	4-13	31.0%	14-17	86.6%	41	9	14	16	8	16	3

Average power rating of opponents played: SAN ANTONIO 71.1, CONNECTICUT 70.9

SCHEDULE AND RESULTS

SAN ANTONIO - Season Results Against the First Half Line
								Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	Half	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
6/25/2015	PHOENIX	76-71	32-27	1.5	W	73	U	27-63	42.9%	54	19	27-74	36.5%	37	10
6/27/2015	SEATTLE	73-71	38-40	-3	L	71	O	30-67	44.8%	45	15	29-65	44.6%	34	14
6/30/2015	@ PHOENIX	78-85	32-43	6	L	73.5	O	28-65	43.1%	32	10	34-57	59.6%	32	11
7/2/2015	@ LOS ANGELES	81-86	40-38	3	W	74	O	33-60	55.0%	34	14	31-62	50.0%	31	10
7/8/2015	LOS ANGELES	70-63	35-38	2	L	76.5	U	29-61	47.5%	45	11	24-69	34.8%	39	11
7/10/2015	@ INDIANA	76-83	38-38	4	W	75	O	28-66	42.4%	44	13	31-61	50.8%	37	10
7/12/2015	@ MINNESOTA	49-66	26-39	9	L	73.5	U	20-69	29.0%	49	13	29-70	41.4%	44	10
7/15/2015	@ NEW YORK	68-84	30-39	5	L	71.5	U	23-62	37.1%	38	11	35-73	47.9%	47	12
7/17/2015	TULSA	65-58	32-35	2.5	L	74.5	U	21-55	38.2%	54	15	21-68	30.9%	45	11
7/19/2015	@ CHICAGO	82-93	35-50	6.5	L	76.5	O	32-67	47.8%	32	9	40-74	54.1%	43	12
7/21/2015	INDIANA	80-62	48-32	1	W	74.5	O	27-45	60.0%	43	20	21-62	33.9%	25	10
7/29/2015	ATLANTA	102-85	47-42	-2	W	74.5	O	35-65	53.8%	45	17	29-66	43.9%	37	13
7/31/2015	WASHINGTON	53-88	27-49	1	L	73.5	O	22-63	34.9%	30	12	36-63	57.1%	47	14
8/2/2015	LOS ANGELES	78-80	49-38	2.5	W	75	O	28-64	43.7%	33	7	35-65	53.8%	39	10
8/4/2015	@ CONNECTICUT
8/5/2015	@ WASHINGTON
8/8/2015	SEATTLE
8/11/2015	@ MINNESOTA
8/16/2015	@ SEATTLE
8/19/2015	NEW YORK

CONNECTICUT - Season Results Against the First Half Line
								Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	Half	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
6/26/2015	LOS ANGELES	80-76	26-32	-3.5	L	70	U	26-75	34.7%	50	12	29-66	43.9%	44	19
6/30/2015	INDIANA	84-92	44-49	-2.5	L	74.5	O	33-66	50.0%	31	10	31-56	55.4%	36	19
7/2/2015	CHICAGO	74-77	42-38	2	W	75.5	O	30-74	40.5%	43	14	29-62	46.8%	36	15
7/12/2015	@ CHICAGO	76-96	41-49	4.5	L	77.5	O	28-62	45.2%	30	9	38-67	56.7%	41	10
7/14/2015	MINNESOTA	79-85	40-42	3.5	W	72	O	31-69	44.9%	40	14	32-63	50.8%	34	15
7/16/2015	@ NEW YORK	57-64	33-28	3	W	72.5	U	21-70	30.0%	47	15	21-61	34.4%	53	13
7/19/2015	@ WASHINGTON	82-89	41-39	3.5	W	70.5	O	32-74	43.2%	47	15	28-58	48.3%	38	12
7/22/2015	@ MINNESOTA	78-77	35-32	4.5	W	72.5	U	30-72	41.7%	42	15	29-75	38.7%	50	16
7/28/2015	INDIANA	73-75	34-42	-0.5	L	75	O	28-65	43.1%	37	18	33-81	40.7%	52	13
7/31/2015	SEATTLE	67-66	38-40	-3.5	L	73	O	24-63	38.1%	47	16	24-61	39.3%	40	15
8/2/2015	@ INDIANA	70-83	41-32	3	W	74.5	U	25-55	45.5%	33	12	25-59	42.4%	43	13
8/4/2015	SAN ANTONIO
8/7/2015	WASHINGTON
8/9/2015	@ WASHINGTON
8/12/2015	TULSA
8/14/2015	NEW YORK
8/16/2015	@ ATLANTA

HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORY

All games in this series since 1997

SAN ANTONIO is 15-14 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997

18 of 28 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997

Games over the last 3 seasons

CONNECTICUT is 3-1 versus the first half line when playing against SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons

4 of 4 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

All games played at CONNECTICUT since 1997

SAN ANTONIO is 8-6 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT since 1997

10 of 13 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997

Games played at CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons.

CONNECTICUT is 1-1 versus the first half line when playing against SAN ANTONIO over the last 3 seasons

2 of 2 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

						Shooting		3pt shots		Free Throws		Rebounds
Date	Teams	Score	Line	Result	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	Pct	FTM-A	Pct	Tot.	OFF	TO
8/1/2014	CONNECTICUT	89	156	SU ATS	43	35-65	53.8%	5-12	41.7%	14-20	70.0%	44	9	13
	SAN ANTONIO	79	-5	Over	30	32-78	41.0%	7-23	30.4%	8-9	88.9%	39	12	11
7/1/2014	SAN ANTONIO	74	153.5	SU ATS	27	27-61	44.3%	4-15	26.7%	16-17	94.1%	33	6	15
	CONNECTICUT	71	-3.5	Under	30	31-73	42.5%	5-17	29.4%	4-7	57.1%	47	10	19

COACHING TRENDS

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring SAN ANTONIO to cover the first half line

There are 24 trends with a total rating of 15 stars.

Dan is 107-88 against the 1rst half line (+10.2 Units) as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 91-78 against the 1rst half line (+5.2 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 61-46 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) in road games after a division game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 19-9 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) in road games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 22-9 against the 1rst half line (+12.1 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 35.1, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 48-36 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 70-51 against the 1rst half line (+13.9 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 64-49 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 47-30 against the 1rst half line (+14.0 Units) off a home loss as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.4, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 15-0 against the 1rst half line (+15.0 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 40.5, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 7*)

Dan is 52-32 against the 1rst half line (+16.8 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.1, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 31-18 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 35-23 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.5, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 90-77 against the 1rst half line (+5.3 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 96-81 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 19-8 against the 1rst half line (+10.2 Units) in road games after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 35.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 42-30 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 65-52 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 60-47 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.6, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.2, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 11-24 against the 1rst half line (-15.4 Units) in home games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.3, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 6-17 against the 1rst half line (-12.7 Units) in home games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.5, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring CONNECTICUT to cover the first half line

There are 18 trends with a total rating of 10 stars.

Dan is 55-68 against the 1rst half line (-19.8 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 84-97 against the 1rst half line (-22.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 55-68 against the 1rst half line (-19.8 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 11-21 against the 1rst half line (-12.1 Units) in road games after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 4-15 against the 1rst half line (-12.5 Units) in road games versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 32.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 156-116 against the 1rst half line (+28.4 Units) after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 86-53 against the 1rst half line (+27.7 Units) off a loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 36.4, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 57-32 against the 1rst half line (+21.8 Units) off a road loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 36.3, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 83-49 against the 1rst half line (+29.1 Units) off a road loss in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.5, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 39-20 against the 1rst half line (+17.0 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 37.3, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 53-33 against the 1rst half line (+16.7 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 36.9, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 127-80 against the 1rst half line (+39.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.7, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 101-59 against the 1rst half line (+36.1 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.8, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 120-81 against the 1rst half line (+30.9 Units) after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.9, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 117-84 against the 1rst half line (+24.6 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 36.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 54-33 against the 1rst half line (+17.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 36.6, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 28-13 against the 1rst half line (+13.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 36.7, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 128-82 against the 1rst half line (+37.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.8, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 4 trends with a total rating of 2 stars.

Dan is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 39.5, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 35-22 OVER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.4, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 26-16 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.5, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 25-11 OVER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 38.0, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 98 trends with a total rating of 80 stars.

Dan is 191-147 UNDER (+29.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 109-83 UNDER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 82-52 UNDER (+24.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.5, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 34-22 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 37-18 UNDER (+17.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 33.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 101-66 UNDER (+28.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 49-31 UNDER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 33.5, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 88-59 UNDER (+23.1 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 56-32 UNDER (+20.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in August or September games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 33.2, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 38-26 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total on Tuesday as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.3, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 77-46 UNDER (+26.4 Units) the 1rst half total against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 182-137 UNDER (+31.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 35.0, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 97-83 UNDER (+5.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 54-42 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 72-34 UNDER (+34.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 4th game in 7 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 33.8, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 41-25 UNDER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 59-35 UNDER (+20.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 35.4, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 60-38 UNDER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 33.8, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 77-46 UNDER (+26.4 Units) the 1rst half total in non-conference games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 31-15 UNDER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.0, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 95-72 UNDER (+15.8 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 71-51 UNDER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 48-30 UNDER (+15.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 33.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 28-15 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.4, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 52-39 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 21-11 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 35-19 UNDER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games off a home loss in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 96-70 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 71-44 UNDER (+22.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 99-83 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 69-55 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 52-33 UNDER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.1, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 30-19 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 94-74 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 17-8 UNDER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 81-57 UNDER (+18.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 104-83 UNDER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 68-47 UNDER (+16.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.7, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 53-39 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a home game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 64-36 UNDER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive home games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.6, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 3 consecutive home games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.9, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 95-68 UNDER (+20.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 101-77 UNDER (+16.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 54-38 UNDER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 19-7 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 35.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 27-13 UNDER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 32.0, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 113-84 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 98-84 UNDER (+5.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 67-45 UNDER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 30-19 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 87-58 UNDER (+23.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 45-32 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 127-113 UNDER (+2.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.4, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 64-48 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 102-68 UNDER (+27.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Dan is 162-113 UNDER (+37.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.9, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 149-125 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 43-28 UNDER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.4, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 118-102 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.8, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Dan is 43-28 UNDER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 60-42 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.5, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Dan is 28-14 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.5, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 240-184 UNDER (+37.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.9, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 118-84 UNDER (+25.6 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.8, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 19-7 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 154-115 UNDER (+27.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 83-50 UNDER (+28.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.5, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 124-82 UNDER (+33.8 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.7, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 86-55 UNDER (+25.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.1, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 8 or more of their last 10 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 124-82 UNDER (+33.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.7, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 96-64 UNDER (+25.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.8, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 117-83 UNDER (+25.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.9, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 24-14 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.8, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 46-20 UNDER (+24.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.6, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 29-14 UNDER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.2, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 29-13 UNDER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 38-26 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.0, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 22-9 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.4, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 97-69 UNDER (+21.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 24-11 UNDER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.6, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 155-102 UNDER (+42.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.9, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 31-14 UNDER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 39-27 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.0, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 60-33 UNDER (+23.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.6, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 18-8 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.9, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 14-5 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.1, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 57-28 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 32.9, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 26-14 UNDER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.4, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 91-66 UNDER (+18.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 36.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 36-20 UNDER (+14.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.1, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 57-29 UNDER (+25.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.1, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 61-38 UNDER (+19.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.1, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 82-54 UNDER (+22.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.8, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*)

STATFOX LINE TRACKER™

Here is a summary of past results against the first half line in games where the line movement was similar to:

Opening First Half Line = -2.5, Closing First Half Line = -2.5

Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 195 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 193 times.

Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 18 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 14 times.

Here is a summary of past over/under results in games where the first half total movement was similar to:

Opening First Half Total = 73, Closing First Half Total = 73.5

Since 1997, 17 games went over the first half total, while 12 games went under the first half total.

Over the last 3 seasons, 6 games went under the first half total, while 3 games went over the first half total.

Here is a summary of past ATS and Over/Under results in games where the first half line and first half total were similar to:

Closing First Half Line = -2.5, Closing First Half Total = 73.5

Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 15 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 13 times.

Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 5 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 1 times.
Edge against the first half line=CONNECTICUT

Since 1997, 17 games went under the first half total, while 11 games went over the first half total.

Over the last 3 seasons, 5 games went under the first half total, while 1 games went over the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Under

KEY PLAYER INJURIES

SAN ANTONIO

[F] 08/03/2015 - Danielle Adams probable Tuesday vs. Connecticut Sun ( Suspension Served )

[F] 08/02/2015 - Dearica Hamby "?" Tuesday vs. Connecticut Sun ( Ankle )

[G] 07/17/2015 - Alex Montgomery out indefinitely ( Knee )

CONNECTICUT

[G] 06/05/2015 - Allison Hightower out for season ( Suspension )

[F] 06/05/2015 - Kelsey Griffin out for season ( Hip )

[F] 06/04/2015 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Knee )

Last Updated: 5/19/2024 4:11:08 AM EST.