| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
INDIANA CONNECTICUT |
|
| 153 | 75 Final 73 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
653 | INDIANA | +105 | 654 | CONNECTICUT | -125 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (287-97 since 1997.) (74.7%, +93.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (367-223 since 1997.) (62.2%, +91.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (306-108 since 1997.) (73.9%, +89.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (171-52 since 1997.) (76.7%, +63.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite. (24-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +23.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (40-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a close win by 3 points or less. (36-14 since 1997.) (72%, +22.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher. (33-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher. (40-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.1%, +24.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher. (38-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.5%, +25.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off an upset win as an underdog. (31-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (INDIANA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (26-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +19.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off an upset win as a road underdog. (28-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off an upset win as a road underdog. (24-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +23 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (33-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.2%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (285-309 since 1997.) (48%, +77.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (INDIANA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +14.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset win as an underdog against opponent off an upset loss by 15 points or more as a favorite. (29-17 since 1997.) (63%, +19.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (25-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.6%, +22.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (25-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.6%, +22.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games. (25-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.6%, +22.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (39-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +19.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (38-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (209-162 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.3%, +55 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (50-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.7%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (194-143 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +55 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA | 72 | | 26-62 | 41.7% | 5-15 | 37.4% | 15-21 | 74.3% | 42 | 10 | 17 | CONNECTICUT | 78 | | 29-69 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 13-17 | 76.2% | 43 | 12 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 649 times, while INDIANA won 319 times. Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
INDIANA is 129-101 against the money line (+23.1 Units) in games where they attempt 77 to 83 shots since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 70.5, OPPONENT 69.0 | INDIANA is 103-66 against the money line (+35.7 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.7, OPPONENT 70.3 | INDIANA is 77-52 against the money line (+25.5 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.6, OPPONENT 71.0 | INDIANA is 81-46 against the money line (+20.6 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 74.3, OPPONENT 70.7 | CONNECTICUT is 11-29 against the money line (-18.6 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.5, OPPONENT 75.2 | CONNECTICUT is 4-11 against the money line (-10.2 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 68.7, OPPONENT 73.2 |
|
INDIANA is 22-47 against the money line (-52.3 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 74.2, OPPONENT 79.9 | INDIANA is 3-18 against the money line (-15.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 86.2 | INDIANA is 33-67 against the money line (-46.0 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 68.7, OPPONENT 73.6 | INDIANA is 86-95 against the money line (-43.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 81.6, OPPONENT 82.3 | CONNECTICUT is 48-15 against the money line (+19.1 Units) in home games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.8, OPPONENT 72.2 | CONNECTICUT is 136-97 against the money line (+26.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 72.8 | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in home games when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 74.3 | CONNECTICUT is 16-7 against the money line (+15.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 79.3 |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 6-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 5-0 against the money line (+5.9 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 13-5 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 19-9 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.7, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 16-22 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 72.2, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 6-2 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in road games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.0, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 93-68 against the money line (+22.5 Units) off a road loss since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.6, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 22-10 against the money line (+14.5 Units) off 2 or more consecutive road losses since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.8, OPPONENT 68.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 7-3 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.6, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 74-39 against the money line (+31.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.1, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 14-10 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 9-2 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 80.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-21 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-29 against the money line (-24.2 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-28 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-31 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 92-96 against the money line (-42.0 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.5, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 60-63 against the money line (-36.2 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.4, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 4-18 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in road games after playing a game as a road favorite since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 68.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-10 against the money line (+13.0 Units) as a home favorite of -155 or less since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.9, OPPONENT 67.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-2 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-14 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in home games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.5, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-8 against the money line (+16.1 Units) in home games after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 110-84 against the money line (+23.8 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 77-53 against the money line (+24.0 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 41-25 against the money line (+22.5 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 80-61 against the money line (+22.2 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-0 against the money line (+6.8 Units) off an upset win as an underdog this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 66.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-4 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 50-43 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.8, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-28 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.8, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+5.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 8-8 | +2 | 5-10 | 10-6 | 76.4 | 40.7 | 42.4% | 39.4 | 77.9 | 40.7 | 43.7% | 43.8 | Road Games | 3-4 | +0.6 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 75.0 | 40.9 | 41.1% | 38.6 | 79.3 | 40.4 | 45.9% | 42.6 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.8 | 1-3 | 3-2 | 73.2 | 40.8 | 42.8% | 36.6 | 73.8 | 40.0 | 43.5% | 43.8 | Division Games | 4-6 | +0.3 | 4-6 | 6-4 | 76.0 | 40.7 | 41.2% | 40.1 | 79.3 | 40.9 | 44.6% | 43.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.4 | 40.7 | 27-64 | 42.4% | 6-15 | 37.6% | 17-22 | 74.6% | 39 | 9 | 14 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 75 | 37.9 | 28-67 | 41.7% | 5-15 | 33.2% | 14-18 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.0 | 40.9 | 25-62 | 41.1% | 7-16 | 46.0% | 17-22 | 76.8% | 39 | 8 | 16 | 22 | 7 | 15 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.9 | 40.7 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 5-15 | 31.7% | 17-22 | 78.3% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 76.1 | 37.9 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 32.0% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.3 | 40.4 | 29-64 | 45.9% | 4-13 | 31.2% | 16-21 | 76.5% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 8-7 | +8 | 10-5 | 9-6 | 76.5 | 37.1 | 41.5% | 41.8 | 75.5 | 38.0 | 42.8% | 43.2 | Home Games | 3-4 | -1.2 | 5-2 | 4-3 | 76.3 | 38.6 | 42.4% | 41.4 | 76.0 | 39.9 | 44.0% | 39.9 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -1.2 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 74.4 | 38.0 | 40.9% | 41.2 | 82.2 | 38.0 | 45.7% | 43.2 | Division Games | 3-6 | +1.2 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 73.9 | 39.6 | 41.7% | 39.8 | 76.7 | 40.3 | 43.3% | 43.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.5 | 37.1 | 29-70 | 41.5% | 6-18 | 34.6% | 12-16 | 75.2% | 42 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 10 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.4 | 37.7 | 28-66 | 41.9% | 5-16 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 76.3 | 38.6 | 29-69 | 42.4% | 6-17 | 35.2% | 12-16 | 76.1% | 41 | 9 | 15 | 18 | 10 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.5 | 38.0 | 27-64 | 42.8% | 5-14 | 33.8% | 16-19 | 82.3% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 76.3 | 38.1 | 28-66 | 43.2% | 5-14 | 32.5% | 15-18 | 80.5% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.0 | 39.9 | 28-64 | 44.0% | 5-13 | 35.2% | 15-17 | 87.6% | 40 | 9 | 14 | 15 | 8 | 16 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: INDIANA 71.4, CONNECTICUT 70.7 |
| | |
|
|
6/19/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 80-63 | W | +145 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 44 | 9 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 40 | 16 | 6/20/2015 | WASHINGTON | 75-87 | L | -105 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 36 | 13 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 45 | 17 | 6/26/2015 | CHICAGO | 77-83 | L | +135 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 43 | 18 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 43 | 9 | 6/30/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 92-84 | W | +170 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 36 | 19 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | 7/2/2015 | WASHINGTON | 73-50 | W | +145 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 37 | 7 | 17-58 | 29.3% | 39 | 15 | 7/8/2015 | SEATTLE | 88-65 | W | -270 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 32 | 11 | 19-45 | 42.2% | 36 | 19 | 7/10/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 83-76 | W | -330 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 37 | 10 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 44 | 13 | 7/15/2015 | TULSA | 83-80 | W | -155 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 50 | 13 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 48 | 12 | 7/17/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 50-68 | L | +105 | 18-57 | 31.6% | 39 | 17 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 48 | 9 | 7/21/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 62-80 | L | -125 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 25 | 10 | 27-45 | 60.0% | 43 | 20 | 7/28/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/29/2015 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/11/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/19/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 90-78 | W | +180 | 38-92 | 41.3% | 58 | 13 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 54 | 21 | 6/21/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 76-68 | W | -175 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 40 | 8 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 37 | 16 | 6/26/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 80-76 | W | -300 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 50 | 12 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 44 | 19 | 6/30/2015 | INDIANA | 84-92 | L | -200 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 31 | 10 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 36 | 19 | 7/2/2015 | CHICAGO | 74-77 | L | +155 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 14 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 36 | 15 | 7/12/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 76-96 | L | +280 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 30 | 9 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 41 | 10 | 7/14/2015 | MINNESOTA | 79-85 | L | +210 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 14 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 34 | 15 | 7/16/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 57-64 | L | +180 | 21-70 | 30.0% | 47 | 15 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 53 | 13 | 7/19/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 82-89 | L | +210 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 47 | 15 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 38 | 12 | 7/22/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 78-77 | W | +280 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 42 | 15 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 50 | 16 | 7/28/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2015 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 38-28 (+4.8 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 5-5 (+0.0 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CONNECTICUT is 23-10 (+1.5 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 4-1 (+2.6 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/30/2015 | INDIANA | 92 | 152 | SU ATS | 49 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 8-13 | 61.5% | 22-26 | 84.6% | 36 | 8 | 19 | | CONNECTICUT | 84 | -4.5 | Over | 44 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 31 | 5 | 10 | 7/10/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 68 | 149.5 | ATS | 30 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 7-8 | 87.5% | 36 | 8 | 12 | | INDIANA | 72 | -5.5 | SU Under | 21 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 32 | 9 | 14 | 6/17/2014 | INDIANA | 67 | 147.5 | Over | 29 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 37 | 12 | 21 | | CONNECTICUT | 89 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 33 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 4-7 | 57.1% | 29-34 | 85.3% | 43 | 8 | 21 | 6/7/2014 | INDIANA | 71 | 143.5 | Over | 35 | 26-49 | 53.1% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 30 | 5 | 25 | | CONNECTICUT | 88 | -4 | SU ATS | 45 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 24-32 | 75.0% | 40 | 9 | 12 | 5/29/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 65 | 139.5 | Over | 25 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 2-13 | 15.4% | 15-26 | 57.7% | 51 | 21 | 19 | | INDIANA | 79 | -5 | SU ATS | 30 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 31-40 | 77.5% | 44 | 11 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Anne is 5-19 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 38-51 against the money line (-24.4 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 73.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 8-21 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 37-55 against the money line (-30.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 72.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 7-29 against the money line (-24.2 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Anne is 11-28 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 13-31 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 51-68 against the money line (-29.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 73.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 10-25 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 73.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 3-13 against the money line (-10.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Anne is 82-72 against the money line (+20.0 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 74.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 107-102 against the money line (+21.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 72.9, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 61-30 against the money line (+24.0 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 74.7, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 78-61 against the money line (+19.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 74.1, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 15-3 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in home games vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 80.7, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 160 times, while the road underdog won straight up 116 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 11 times, while the road underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[C] 07/10/2015 - Natalie Achonwa out indefinitely ( Personal ) | |
[G] 06/05/2015 - Allison Hightower out for season ( Suspension ) | [F] 06/05/2015 - Kelsey Griffin out for season ( Hip ) | [F] 06/04/2015 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/6/2024 1:14:18 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|