| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES CONNECTICUT |
|
| 155 | 90 Final 64 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
601 | LOS ANGELES | -175 | 602 | CONNECTICUT | +155 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (220-175 since 1997.) (55.7%, +62.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (197-89 since 1997.) (68.9%, +60.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (143-58 since 1997.) (71.1%, +56.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (174-85 since 1997.) (67.2%, +51.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (138-64 since 1997.) (68.3%, +47.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, on Sunday games. (109-60 since 1997.) (64.5%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team, on Sunday games. (44-2 since 1997.) (95.7%, +39.7 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (114-54 since 1997.) (67.9%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a loss against a division rival, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (68-16 since 1997.) (81%, +36 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (96-44 since 1997.) (68.6%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (33-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team, on Sunday games. (41-14 since 1997.) (74.5%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (33-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +25.7 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (463-496 since 1997.) (48.3%, +106.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (261-260 since 1997.) (50.1%, +102.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (150-120 since 1997.) (55.6%, +70.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (230-94 since 1997.) (71%, +68.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games. (79-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.7%, +65.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (220-175 since 1997.) (55.7%, +62.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (186-65 since 1997.) (74.1%, +62.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (138-119 since 1997.) (53.7%, +60.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (125-43 since 1997.) (74.4%, +59.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (221-99 since 1997.) (69.1%, +58.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (135-42 since 1997.) (76.3%, +56.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (149-50 since 1997.) (74.9%, +55.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (42-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (84%, +30.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (120-48 since 1997.) (71.4%, +50 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games. (123-50 since 1997.) (71.1%, +50 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (80-18 since 1997.) (81.6%, +49.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (74-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.9%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (75-20 since 1997.) (78.9%, +45.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games. (38-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.4%, +30 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - with a losing record, in July games. (81-20 since 1997.) (80.2%, +42.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games. (85-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.6%, +43.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games. (48-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +38.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (69-16 since 1997.) (81.2%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (64-14 since 1997.) (82.1%, +36.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games. (35-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.7%, +26.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in July games. (64-14 since 1997.) (82.1%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games. (64-14 since 1997.) (82.1%, +36 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games. (46-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.1%, +29.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team, on Sunday games. (50-8 since 1997.) (86.2%, +35.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (32-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (91.4%, +26.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (33-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (43-6 since 1997.) (87.8%, +31 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season, on Sunday games. (55-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +32.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win, in July games. (59-21 since 1997.) (73.8%, +29.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in July games. (48-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +35 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win, in July games. (35-4 since 1997.) (89.7%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in May, June, or July games. (67-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.8%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 125 points or less. (35-10 since 1997.) (77.8%, +24.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (51-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (81%, +24.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games. (49-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season. (221-183 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.7%, +58.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a win by 10 points or more. (64-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +22.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a win by 10 points or more. (130-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +38.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 76 | | 31-68 | 45.2% | 2-8 | 24.4% | 13-17 | 76.4% | 43 | 11 | 15 | CONNECTICUT | 77 | | 30-69 | 43.1% | 4-14 | 32.8% | 13-17 | 75.4% | 43 | 12 | 16 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 499 times, while LOS ANGELES won 477 times. Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 12-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 76.6 | LOS ANGELES is 107-56 against the money line (+33.9 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 70.7 | LOS ANGELES is 216-128 against the money line (+31.6 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 73.2 | CONNECTICUT is 13-29 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.4, OPPONENT 77.8 | CONNECTICUT is 4-11 against the money line (-13.2 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.1, OPPONENT 82.5 | CONNECTICUT is 8-22 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 69.5, OPPONENT 74.8 | CONNECTICUT is 5-16 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.3, OPPONENT 76.7 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 20-17 against the money line (-22.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 79.2 | LOS ANGELES is 10-10 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in road games when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 82.3 | LOS ANGELES is 46-52 against the money line (-36.8 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.8, OPPONENT 74.4 | LOS ANGELES is 12-14 against the money line (-21.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 78.4 | LOS ANGELES is 63-65 against the money line (-40.5 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 74.6 | LOS ANGELES is 11-11 against the money line (-18.7 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 79.2 | LOS ANGELES is 3-8 against the money line (-9.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.4, OPPONENT 89.6 | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 72.6 | CONNECTICUT is 16-8 against the money line (+11.1 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 73.5 | CONNECTICUT is 63-37 against the money line (+18.1 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.5, OPPONENT 71.3 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 19-6 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games versus poor passing teams, averaging <=14 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 67.4, OPPONENT 65.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-6.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-26 against the money line (-14.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-6.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-6.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-8 against the money line (-8.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 67.4, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-6.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 13-12 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-10.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-11 against the money line (-23.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 28-19 against the money line (-22.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-11 against the money line (-25.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-9 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-10.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in home games versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in road games in July games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-16 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.3, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-34 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-23 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-11 against the money line (-9.1 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-11 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-20 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-15 against the money line (-9.8 Units) off a road loss over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the money line (-7.0 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 67.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 8-11 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in all games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-8 against the money line (-10.1 Units) as a favorite this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-13 against the money line (-19.2 Units) as a road favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-21 against the money line (-18.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-11 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-8.7 Units) on Sunday games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-13 against the money line (-22.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-8 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-4 against the money line (-7.6 Units) off a road win this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-5 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after a win by 10 points or more this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-27 against the money line (-18.0 Units) in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-18 against the money line (-28.9 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-13 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after a game making no 3 point shots since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+6.2 Units) in home games after a division game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-10 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in home games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.1, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in home games after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 50-14 against the money line (+26.7 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-4 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-0 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 56-23 against the money line (+22.2 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.8, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 40-31 against the money line (+15.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.7, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in home games after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 8-11 | -10.6 | 8-11 | 9-9 | 78.3 | 41.4 | 45.4% | 40.6 | 78.9 | 38.5 | 45.5% | 40.1 | Road Games | 5-5 | -2.3 | 5-5 | 5-4 | 79.4 | 42.9 | 44.8% | 41.3 | 79.4 | 38.2 | 44.5% | 41.5 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.7 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 76.4 | 43.0 | 45.2% | 38.4 | 75.4 | 37.8 | 48.2% | 38.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.3 | 41.4 | 31-69 | 45.4% | 2-8 | 30.5% | 13-17 | 76.3% | 41 | 10 | 19 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 78.2 | 39.4 | 29-66 | 44.3% | 5-14 | 34.1% | 15-18 | 78.6% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.4 | 42.9 | 32-72 | 44.8% | 2-7 | 27.8% | 13-17 | 75.1% | 41 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 11 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.9 | 38.5 | 30-65 | 45.5% | 5-14 | 35.0% | 15-18 | 81.5% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 78.5 | 38.7 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 5-15 | 34.3% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 40 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.4 | 38.2 | 29-66 | 44.5% | 5-14 | 32.6% | 16-18 | 87.4% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 9-12 | -0.9 | 12-9 | 9-12 | 75.6 | 36.2 | 41.6% | 43.4 | 77.0 | 35.4 | 44.5% | 41.6 | Home Games | 7-4 | +2.7 | 7-4 | 5-6 | 78.0 | 37.3 | 42.1% | 44.5 | 75.3 | 35.8 | 44.0% | 39.5 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -4 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 74.2 | 33.6 | 43.1% | 41.0 | 80.2 | 33.0 | 45.9% | 42.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.6 | 36.2 | 29-69 | 41.6% | 4-13 | 32.9% | 14-19 | 75.2% | 43 | 12 | 13 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.7 | 38.9 | 29-66 | 43.4% | 5-14 | 33.4% | 16-20 | 77.8% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 78.0 | 37.3 | 29-68 | 42.1% | 5-13 | 34.2% | 16-21 | 77.1% | 44 | 11 | 13 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.0 | 35.4 | 29-64 | 44.5% | 4-12 | 31.5% | 16-21 | 77.2% | 42 | 9 | 15 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 77.1 | 38.3 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 5-14 | 33.5% | 15-20 | 77.4% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.3 | 35.8 | 28-63 | 44.0% | 4-13 | 29.9% | 16-20 | 78.3% | 39 | 9 | 14 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 71.4, CONNECTICUT 69.7 |
| | |
|
|
6/3/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 85-93 | L | -155 | 37-77 | 48.1% | 40 | 16 | 39-73 | 53.4% | 40 | 17 | 6/6/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 102-88 | W | +145 | 43-77 | 55.8% | 38 | 10 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 41 | 17 | 6/8/2014 | MINNESOTA | 72-85 | L | -165 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 41 | 16 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 50 | 14 | 6/13/2014 | @ TULSA | 67-69 | L | -175 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 47 | 13 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 42 | 6 | 6/14/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-101 | L | -140 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 35 | 19 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 29 | 11 | 6/17/2014 | MINNESOTA | 77-94 | L | +100 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 35 | 12 | 37-58 | 63.8% | 35 | 13 | 6/19/2014 | TULSA | 87-77 | W | -270 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 44 | 14 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 45 | 14 | 6/22/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 69-72 | L | -270 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 47 | 22 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 30 | 10 | 6/24/2014 | SEATTLE | 65-57 | W | -300 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 44 | 11 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 31 | 15 | 6/28/2014 | @ TULSA | 92-89 | W | -105 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 46 | 11 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 47 | 16 | 7/1/2014 | CHICAGO | 83-90 | L | -270 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 31 | 11 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 45 | 21 | 7/3/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 70-56 | W | -125 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 36 | 14 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 35 | 18 | 7/6/2014 | PHOENIX | 89-94 | L | +105 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 39 | 15 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 31 | 15 | 7/8/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 72-83 | L | +155 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 49 | 8 | 33-61 | 54.1% | 38 | 8 | 7/11/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 68-54 | W | -175 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 37 | 10 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 41 | 16 | 7/13/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2014 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2014 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/23/2014 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2014 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/26/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/28/2014 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/29/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/5/2014 | WASHINGTON | 66-74 | L | +100 | 26-76 | 34.2% | 38 | 9 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 49 | 15 | 6/7/2014 | INDIANA | 88-71 | W | -175 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 40 | 12 | 26-49 | 53.1% | 30 | 25 | 6/12/2014 | PHOENIX | 96-95 | W | +210 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 38 | 12 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 38 | 7 | 6/13/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 83-75 | W | +200 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 43 | 10 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 41 | 10 | 6/15/2014 | NEW YORK | 76-72 | W | -105 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 46 | 9 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 43 | 14 | 6/17/2014 | INDIANA | 89-67 | W | -165 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 43 | 21 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 37 | 21 | 6/25/2014 | CHICAGO | 79-69 | W | -120 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 55 | 14 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 33 | 12 | 6/27/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 63-69 | L | +135 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 36 | 14 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 48 | 13 | 6/29/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 65-67 | L | +135 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 49 | 16 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 41 | 15 | 7/1/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 71-74 | L | -165 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 47 | 19 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 33 | 15 | 7/3/2014 | TULSA | 83-96 | L | -175 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 38 | 12 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 52 | 12 | 7/5/2014 | @ TULSA | 78-76 | W | +145 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 43 | 14 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 42 | 11 | 7/8/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 71-83 | L | +325 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 41 | 20 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 52 | 20 | 7/10/2014 | @ INDIANA | 68-72 | L | +180 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 36 | 12 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 32 | 14 | 7/13/2014 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/23/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/27/2014 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/29/2014 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 15-12 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 3-0 (+4.2 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 6-7 (+1.2 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 2-0 (+3.2 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/27/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 78 | 154 | ATS | 35 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 38 | 13 | 18 | | LOS ANGELES | 91 | -13.5 | SU Over | 49 | 37-65 | 56.9% | 2-5 | 40.0% | 15-23 | 65.2% | 42 | 8 | 13 | 8/6/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 74 | -3.5 | SU Under | 43 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 0-1 | 0.0% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 44 | 13 | 14 | | CONNECTICUT | 72 | 155 | ATS | 36 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 36 | 8 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Carol is 7-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in road games in July games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 19-34 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 13-23 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 5-11 against the money line (-9.1 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 5-11 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 6-20 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Anne is 7-15 against the money line (-9.8 Units) off a road loss as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 71.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 1-7 against the money line (-7.0 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 67.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 1-8 against the money line (-8.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 67.4, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Carol is 53-35 against the money line (-29.2 Units) in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 44-23 against the money line (-30.6 Units) as a favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 16-13 against the money line (-19.2 Units) as a road favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 24-23 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in road games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 24-23 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 19-21 against the money line (-18.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 31-23 against the money line (-22.5 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 11-11 against the money line (-17.9 Units) off a road win as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 39-26 against the money line (-30.4 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 13-13 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 23-21 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 33-21 against the money line (-28.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 26-15 against the money line (-21.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 26-17 against the money line (-25.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 39-30 against the money line (-32.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 22-17 against the money line (-21.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 33-27 against the money line (-21.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 8-3 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in home games after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 69-32 against the money line (+27.4 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 74.8, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 59-26 against the money line (+24.9 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 75.0, OPPONENT 68.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 16-4 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 78.0, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Anne is 28-12 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 80.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 7-2 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in home games versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 55 times, while the home underdog won straight up 32 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 12 times, while the home underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 06/25/2014 - Danielle McCray out 6-8 weeks ( Thumb ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/21/2024 10:24:12 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|