WNBA CONNECTICUT Matchup 20130906

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.

WNBA : First Half Matchup

Friday 9/6/2013

Line

$ Line

OU Line

Score

WASHINGTON
First Half Results
CONNECTICUT

-3

72.5

34
Final
36

WASHINGTON (14 - 15) at CONNECTICUT (7 - 22)

Friday, 9/6/2013 7:05 PM

Board		First Half
601	WASHINGTON	-2.5
602	CONNECTICUT	72.5

	Current First Half FoxSheets
	ATS FoxSheet
	First Half FoxSheet
	Money Line FoxSheet
	Teaser Line FoxSheet

STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™

StatFox Super Situations favoring CONNECTICUT to cover the first half line

There are 2 situations with a total rating of 4 stars.

- Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(86-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive road losses, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(25-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +17.3 units. Rating = 2*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring the game to go UNDER the first half total

There are 227 situations with a total rating of 518 stars.

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in August or September games.
(276-184 since 1997.) (60%, +73.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - playing with 3 or more days rest.
(189-115 since 1997.) (62.2%, +62.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents.
(501-329 since 1997.) (60.4%, +139.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(106-59 since 1997.) (64.2%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher against opponent after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(45-19 since 1997.) (70.3%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(54-24 since 1997.) (69.2%, +27.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher against opponent after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(26-5 since 1997.) (83.9%, +20.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(285-164 since 1997.) (63.5%, +104.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(75-37 since 1997.) (67%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games.
(137-85 since 1997.) (61.7%, +43.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(75-37 since 1997.) (67%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(75-37 since 1997.) (67%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(202-131 since 1997.) (60.7%, +57.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(74-38 since 1997.) (66.1%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games.
(162-99 since 1997.) (62.1%, +53.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(74-38 since 1997.) (66.1%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(74-38 since 1997.) (66.1%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(289-173 since 1997.) (62.6%, +98.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(214-120 since 1997.) (64.1%, +82 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(90-47 since 1997.) (65.7%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(424-276 since 1997.) (60.6%, +120.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(294-177 since 1997.) (62.4%, +99.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(99-45 since 1997.) (68.8%, +49.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(70-30 since 1997.) (70%, +37 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - with a losing record.
(266-174 since 1997.) (60.5%, +74.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(178-114 since 1997.) (61%, +52.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(425-233 since 1997.) (64.6%, +168.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(167-97 since 1997.) (63.3%, +60.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(112-68 since 1997.) (62.2%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(151-84 since 1997.) (64.3%, +58.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win against a division rival.
(44-18 since 1997.) (71%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a win against a division rival.
(150-85 since 1997.) (63.8%, +56.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win.
(91-43 since 1997.) (67.9%, +43.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(230-127 since 1997.) (64.4%, +90.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(105-59 since 1997.) (64%, +40.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(296-160 since 1997.) (64.9%, +120 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(134-71 since 1997.) (65.4%, +55.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(104-60 since 1997.) (63.4%, +38 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(115-60 since 1997.) (65.7%, +49 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win against a division rival.
(36-10 since 1997.) (78.3%, +25 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a win against a division rival.
(112-65 since 1997.) (63.3%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset win as a road underdog.
(43-16 since 1997.) (72.9%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win.
(70-26 since 1997.) (72.9%, +41.4 units. Rating = 4*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent.
(233-118 since 1997.) (66.4%, +103.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a losing record.
(99-51 since 1997.) (66%, +42.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(71-34 since 1997.) (67.6%, +33.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off a road loss.
(81-41 since 1997.) (66.4%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off a win against a division rival.
(79-41 since 1997.) (65.8%, +33.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(331-180 since 1997.) (64.8%, +133 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(133-75 since 1997.) (63.9%, +50.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(132-68 since 1997.) (66%, +57.2 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win.
(70-34 since 1997.) (67.3%, +32.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(190-102 since 1997.) (65.1%, +77.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - off a road loss.
(242-160 since 1997.) (60.2%, +66 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(124-74 since 1997.) (62.6%, +42.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(76-39 since 1997.) (66.1%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(47-20 since 1997.) (70.1%, +25 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(49-21 since 1997.) (70%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more.
(323-214 since 1997.) (60.1%, +87.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(149-91 since 1997.) (62.1%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(93-51 since 1997.) (64.6%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(62-26 since 1997.) (70.5%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(28-9 since 1997.) (75.7%, +18.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(150-87 since 1997.) (63.3%, +54.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(89-49 since 1997.) (64.5%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game.
(137-85 since 1997.) (61.7%, +43.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after playing a road game.
(392-268 since 1997.) (59.4%, +97.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(415-262 since 1997.) (61.3%, +126.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(100-50 since 1997.) (66.7%, +45 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses.
(377-256 since 1997.) (59.6%, +95.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(218-133 since 1997.) (62.1%, +71.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive losses.
(190-122 since 1997.) (60.9%, +55.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents.
(856-642 since 1997.) (57.1%, +149.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(526-390 since 1997.) (57.4%, +97 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(112-66 since 1997.) (62.9%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(95-52 since 1997.) (64.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(48-22 since 1997.) (68.6%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(95-52 since 1997.) (64.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(95-52 since 1997.) (64.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(48-22 since 1997.) (68.6%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(48-22 since 1997.) (68.6%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(405-262 since 1997.) (60.7%, +116.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(297-186 since 1997.) (61.5%, +92.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(128-75 since 1997.) (63.1%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(160-98 since 1997.) (62%, +52.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(110-66 since 1997.) (62.5%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(131-78 since 1997.) (62.7%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - with a losing record.
(481-353 since 1997.) (57.7%, +92.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(715-492 since 1997.) (59.2%, +173.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(180-110 since 1997.) (62.1%, +59 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(312-209 since 1997.) (59.9%, +82.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win against a division rival.
(77-41 since 1997.) (65.3%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win.
(154-84 since 1997.) (64.7%, +61.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(380-260 since 1997.) (59.4%, +94 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(508-343 since 1997.) (59.7%, +130.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(252-165 since 1997.) (60.4%, +70.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win against a division rival.
(57-27 since 1997.) (67.9%, +27.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off an upset win as a road underdog.
(67-29 since 1997.) (69.8%, +35.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win.
(113-54 since 1997.) (67.7%, +53.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent.
(383-251 since 1997.) (60.4%, +106.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a losing record.
(188-109 since 1997.) (63.3%, +68.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(131-76 since 1997.) (63.3%, +47.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off an road win where they scored 85 or more points.
(31-7 since 1997.) (81.6%, +23.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off a road win.
(88-42 since 1997.) (67.7%, +41.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(565-380 since 1997.) (59.8%, +147 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(145-82 since 1997.) (63.9%, +54.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(251-167 since 1997.) (60%, +67.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(219-145 since 1997.) (60.2%, +59.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win.
(115-68 since 1997.) (62.8%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(317-213 since 1997.) (59.8%, +82.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - off a road loss against opponent off a road win.
(76-39 since 1997.) (66.1%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after playing a road game, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(96-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +30 units. Rating = 1*)

Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(365-257 since 1997.) (58.7%, +82.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in August or September games.
(276-184 since 1997.) (60%, +73.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - playing with 3 or more days rest.
(146-89 since 1997.) (62.1%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents.
(501-329 since 1997.) (60.4%, +139.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(352-232 since 1997.) (60.3%, +96.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, after 2 consecutive division games.
(237-153 since 1997.) (60.8%, +68.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog.
(59-21 since 1997.) (73.8%, +35.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off an upset win as an underdog.
(72-36 since 1997.) (66.7%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off a road win against a division rival.
(67-25 since 1997.) (72.8%, +39.5 units. Rating = 4*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a road win against a division rival.
(145-74 since 1997.) (66.2%, +63.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a road win against a division rival, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(43-13 since 1997.) (76.8%, +28.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a win against a division rival.
(432-304 since 1997.) (58.7%, +97.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a win against a division rival, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(109-66 since 1997.) (62.3%, +36.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(46-19 since 1997.) (70.8%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off an upset win as a road underdog.
(163-95 since 1997.) (63.2%, +58.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a road win.
(276-161 since 1997.) (63.2%, +98.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(724-520 since 1997.) (58.2%, +152 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games.
(162-103 since 1997.) (61.1%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(157-86 since 1997.) (64.6%, +62.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(88-45 since 1997.) (66.2%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(126-75 since 1997.) (62.7%, +43.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(131-70 since 1997.) (65.2%, +54 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(75-39 since 1997.) (65.8%, +32.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(687-474 since 1997.) (59.2%, +165.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(167-105 since 1997.) (61.4%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(151-97 since 1997.) (60.9%, +44.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(120-70 since 1997.) (63.2%, +43 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(724-494 since 1997.) (59.4%, +180.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(150-95 since 1997.) (61.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(405-287 since 1997.) (58.5%, +89.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off a win against a division rival.
(191-115 since 1997.) (62.4%, +64.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off a road win.
(82-43 since 1997.) (65.6%, +34.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a division game.
(461-310 since 1997.) (59.8%, +120 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 consecutive division games.
(304-192 since 1997.) (61.3%, +92.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 3 consecutive division games.
(193-121 since 1997.) (61.5%, +59.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(147-90 since 1997.) (62%, +48 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(303-186 since 1997.) (62%, +98.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(75-37 since 1997.) (67%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games.
(137-85 since 1997.) (61.7%, +43.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(75-37 since 1997.) (67%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(75-37 since 1997.) (67%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(204-129 since 1997.) (61.3%, +62.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(86-44 since 1997.) (66.2%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(71-35 since 1997.) (67%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(71-35 since 1997.) (67%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(71-35 since 1997.) (67%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(289-173 since 1997.) (62.6%, +98.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(214-120 since 1997.) (64.1%, +82 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG).
(92-47 since 1997.) (66.2%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games.
(62-28 since 1997.) (68.9%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after one or more consecutive overs.
(352-244 since 1997.) (59.1%, +83.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(284-171 since 1997.) (62.4%, +95.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games.
(270-186 since 1997.) (59.2%, +65.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(214-130 since 1997.) (62.2%, +71 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(250-153 since 1997.) (62%, +81.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(50-21 since 1997.) (70.4%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(188-104 since 1997.) (64.4%, +73.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog.
(76-36 since 1997.) (67.9%, +36.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off an upset win as an underdog.
(124-72 since 1997.) (63.3%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a road win against a division rival.
(88-37 since 1997.) (70.4%, +47.3 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a road win against a division rival, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(26-7 since 1997.) (78.8%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a win against a division rival.
(259-152 since 1997.) (63%, +91.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a road win.
(162-86 since 1997.) (65.3%, +67.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(51-22 since 1997.) (69.9%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - off a road win, on Friday nights.
(31-9 since 1997.) (77.5%, +21.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more.
(296-208 since 1997.) (58.7%, +67.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(290-197 since 1997.) (59.5%, +73.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more.
(330-214 since 1997.) (60.7%, +94.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 80 points or more.
(199-120 since 1997.) (62.4%, +67 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(393-279 since 1997.) (58.5%, +86.1 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(289-182 since 1997.) (61.4%, +88.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(405-242 since 1997.) (62.6%, +138.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(252-151 since 1997.) (62.5%, +85.9 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(371-256 since 1997.) (59.2%, +89.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after playing a road game.
(380-251 since 1997.) (60.2%, +103.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(111-50 since 1997.) (68.9%, +56 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(62-26 since 1997.) (70.5%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a losing record.
(48-19 since 1997.) (71.6%, +27.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(85-46 since 1997.) (64.9%, +34.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(92-42 since 1997.) (68.7%, +45.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(53-23 since 1997.) (69.7%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(418-239 since 1997.) (63.6%, +155.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(202-127 since 1997.) (61.4%, +62.3 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(440-249 since 1997.) (63.9%, +166.1 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in August or September games.
(149-83 since 1997.) (64.2%, +57.7 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(241-144 since 1997.) (62.6%, +82.6 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in August or September games.
(90-46 since 1997.) (66.2%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents.
(856-642 since 1997.) (57.1%, +149.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog.
(88-45 since 1997.) (66.2%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off a road win against a division rival.
(106-46 since 1997.) (69.7%, +55.4 units. Rating = 4*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off an upset win as a road underdog.
(83-43 since 1997.) (65.9%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off a road win.
(141-75 since 1997.) (65.3%, +58.5 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(546-394 since 1997.) (58.1%, +112.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(112-66 since 1997.) (62.9%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(95-52 since 1997.) (64.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(48-22 since 1997.) (68.6%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(95-52 since 1997.) (64.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(95-52 since 1997.) (64.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(48-22 since 1997.) (68.6%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(48-22 since 1997.) (68.6%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(110-64 since 1997.) (63.2%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(92-52 since 1997.) (63.9%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(92-52 since 1997.) (63.9%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(92-52 since 1997.) (63.9%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(405-262 since 1997.) (60.7%, +116.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(297-186 since 1997.) (61.5%, +92.4 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG).
(96-50 since 1997.) (65.8%, +41 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games.
(65-30 since 1997.) (68.4%, +32 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(362-244 since 1997.) (59.7%, +93.6 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(82-42 since 1997.) (66.1%, +35.8 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(97-51 since 1997.) (65.5%, +40.9 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(424-300 since 1997.) (58.6%, +94 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(87-42 since 1997.) (67.4%, +40.8 units. Rating = 3*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread.
(212-138 since 1997.) (60.6%, +60.2 units. Rating = 2*)

Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(313-204 since 1997.) (60.5%, +88.6 units. Rating = 2*)

STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™

	Projection				Shooting		3pt Shots		Free Throws		Rebounding
Teams	Score	Edge	Half	Edge	FGM-A	Pct.	FGM-A	Pct.	FTM-A	Pct.	Tot.	OFF	TO
WASHINGTON	74		38		28-67	41.8%	4-13	31.2%	14-18	80.0%	47	11	15
CONNECTICUT	72		36		28-69	40.6%	4-13	28.2%	13-17	74.8%	43	11	12

The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total.

In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT covered the first half line 544 times, while WASHINGTON covered the first half line 456 times.
No Edge.

In 1000 simulated games, 574 games went over first half total, while 426 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over

Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

CONNECTICUT is 6-17 against the 1rst half line (-12.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 39.0

CONNECTICUT is 0-9 against the 1rst half line (-9.9 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 43.1

CONNECTICUT is 7-18 against the 1rst half line (-12.8 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.7, OPPONENT 38.2

CONNECTICUT is 10-23 against the 1rst half line (-15.3 Units) in home games when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.6, OPPONENT 37.6

CONNECTICUT is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.3, OPPONENT 38.6

CONNECTICUT is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 30.6, OPPONENT 40.4

CONNECTICUT is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.5, OPPONENT 38.0

CONNECTICUT is 13-23 against the 1rst half line (-12.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.7, OPPONENT 40.1

CONNECTICUT is 2-12 against the 1rst half line (-11.2 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.3, OPPONENT 38.7

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring the OVER against the first half total

WASHINGTON is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.7, OPPONENT 41.6

CONNECTICUT is 37-19 OVER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 40.4

CONNECTICUT is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 72 to 77 points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.3, OPPONENT 44.8

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring the UNDER against the first half total

WASHINGTON is 89-63 UNDER (+19.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.3

WASHINGTON is 90-56 UNDER (+28.4 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.1

WASHINGTON is 55-29 UNDER (+23.1 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 34.0

WASHINGTON is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.3, OPPONENT 32.7

WASHINGTON is 102-61 UNDER (+34.9 Units) the 1rst half total in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.0

WASHINGTON is 158-117 UNDER (+29.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.7

WASHINGTON is 71-43 UNDER (+23.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.8

WASHINGTON is 155-118 UNDER (+25.2 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.4

CONNECTICUT is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 30.7, OPPONENT 37.9

CONNECTICUT is 65-43 UNDER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.2, OPPONENT 34.4

STATFOX POWERLINE™

	Power Rating
	Estimate	Edge
WASHINGTON	-3
CONNECTICUT

STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 28 trends with a total rating of 30 stars.

WASHINGTON is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.7, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 32-19 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.6, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 18-6 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.7, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 32-21 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.1, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 22-8 against the 1rst half line (+13.2 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.7, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 14-7 against the 1rst half line (+6.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.8, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 13-3 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.4, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.2, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 66-92 against the 1rst half line (-35.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.5, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 4-14 against the 1rst half line (-11.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.4, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 13-24 against the 1rst half line (-13.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.0, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 7-14 against the 1rst half line (-8.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.0, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 4-14 against the 1rst half line (-11.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.8, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.1, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 10-23 against the 1rst half line (-15.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.6, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.9, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 13-26 against the 1rst half line (-15.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.5, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 7-15 against the 1rst half line (-9.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.6, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.6, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 6-20 against the 1rst half line (-16.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.6, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 23-39 against the 1rst half line (-19.9 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.5, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 80-112 against the 1rst half line (-43.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.9, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 83-112 against the 1rst half line (-40.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.6, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 1 trends with a total rating of 1 stars.

CONNECTICUT is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.4, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 20 trends with a total rating of 8 stars.

WASHINGTON is 18-9 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 22-8 UNDER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.8, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 29.7, OPPONENT 29.7 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 94-68 UNDER (+19.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 138-99 UNDER (+29.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 122-87 UNDER (+26.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 172-125 UNDER (+34.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 165-113 UNDER (+40.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 242-166 UNDER (+59.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 44-26 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 61-37 UNDER (+20.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 122-89 UNDER (+24.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.1, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 61-40 UNDER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.2, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 48-30 UNDER (+15.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.3, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 64-42 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.6, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 65-42 UNDER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.6, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 15-8 UNDER (+6.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.6, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 44-27 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.1, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 35-14 UNDER (+19.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.6, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 2*)

STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 29 trends with a total rating of 41 stars.

WASHINGTON is 38-24 against the 1rst half line (+11.6 Units) versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.9, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in August or September games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.0, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 3*)

WASHINGTON is 26-12 against the 1rst half line (+12.8 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) in road games after a division game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.8, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 31-18 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.8, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 21-8 against the 1rst half line (+12.2 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 8-20 against the 1rst half line (-14.0 Units) versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.4, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 6-14 against the 1rst half line (-9.4 Units) as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.4, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 2-12 against the 1rst half line (-11.2 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.4, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 3*)

CONNECTICUT is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.4, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 2-12 against the 1rst half line (-11.2 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.4, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 3*)

CONNECTICUT is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) on Friday over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.7, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.1, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 3*)

CONNECTICUT is 5-12 against the 1rst half line (-8.2 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.9, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.0, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 5-12 against the 1rst half line (-8.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.7, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.2, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 11-23 against the 1rst half line (-14.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.3, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.5, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 12-27 against the 1rst half line (-17.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.8, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 11-21 against the 1rst half line (-12.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.8, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.2, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 12-25 against the 1rst half line (-15.5 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.3, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) after playing a game as an underdog this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 2*)

CONNECTICUT is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 29.5, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.0, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.4, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring CONNECTICUT to cover the first half line

There are 9 trends with a total rating of 10 stars.

WASHINGTON is 43-75 against the 1rst half line (-39.5 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 31-57 against the 1rst half line (-31.7 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 19-46 against the 1rst half line (-31.6 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.0, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 14-36 against the 1rst half line (-25.6 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.8, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 16-32 against the 1rst half line (-19.2 Units) off a road win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 49-73 against the 1rst half line (-31.3 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 28-50 against the 1rst half line (-27.0 Units) off a road win since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 34-58 against the 1rst half line (-29.8 Units) after a win by 6 points or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 80-117 against the 1rst half line (-48.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 6 trends with a total rating of 3 stars.

WASHINGTON is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 20-9 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.3, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 16-6 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.9, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 25-13 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.8, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 33-16 OVER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.8, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 24 trends with a total rating of 19 stars.

WASHINGTON is 306-222 UNDER (+61.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 105-71 UNDER (+26.9 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 101-69 UNDER (+25.1 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 59-36 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 65-43 UNDER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing with 3 or more days rest since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 12-5 UNDER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 187-133 UNDER (+40.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 123-84 UNDER (+30.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 35-13 UNDER (+20.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*)

WASHINGTON is 154-111 UNDER (+31.9 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 76-50 UNDER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 143-103 UNDER (+29.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 110-75 UNDER (+27.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 191-138 UNDER (+39.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 125-86 UNDER (+30.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 131-96 UNDER (+25.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 143-108 UNDER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*)

WASHINGTON is 140-96 UNDER (+34.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)

WASHINGTON is 121-80 UNDER (+33.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)

CONNECTICUT is 76-53 UNDER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 9-0 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.2, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 4*)

CONNECTICUT is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 21-9 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.0, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*)

CONNECTICUT is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 29.5, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*)

ADVANCED TEAM STATS

WASHINGTON - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	14-15	+4.6	16-13	13-15	75.7	36.9	41.6%	43.5	76.5	37.5	41.4%	43.8
Road Games	6-9	0	9-6	9-5	77.7	38.3	43.2%	42.7	80.5	40.7	43.5%	42.1
Last 5 Games	3-2	+2.5	3-2	1-4	71.2	36.2	37.7%	44.4	71.2	35.4	39.8%	49.2
Division Games	7-10	-2.3	8-9	7-9	72.4	33.9	40.1%	42.1	75.0	36.4	40.7%	46.2

WASHINGTON Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	75.7	36.9	28-66	41.6%	4-13	31.9%	17-21	79.3%	43	10	16	19	8	14	4
vs opponents surrendering	75.4	37.4	28-66	42.3%	5-14	32.6%	15-19	78.2%	42	10	16	18	8	14	4
Team Stats (Road Games)	77.7	38.3	29-67	43.2%	4-13	32.1%	16-20	79.9%	43	9	17	20	7	14	3
Stats Against (All Games)	76.5	37.5	28-68	41.4%	5-15	31.0%	15-20	77.8%	44	10	18	19	7	13	4
vs opponents averaging	76	37.9	28-67	42.4%	5-14	31.8%	15-19	77.9%	43	10	16	18	8	14	4
Stats Against (Road Games)	80.5	40.7	30-69	43.5%	5-14	33.8%	16-20	79.1%	42	10	19	17	8	12	5

CONNECTICUT - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	7-22	-17.8	11-18	10-18	71.1	33.4	39.6%	42.9	77.1	38.9	43.9%	45.2
Home Games	5-9	-8.6	6-8	5-8	73.9	35.4	40.7%	43.4	77.3	40.4	44.0%	43.6
Last 5 Games	0-5	-4.4	2-3	3-2	70.8	33.0	39.6%	37.8	82.0	43.4	50.8%	41.4
Division Games	5-12	-7.6	7-10	5-11	71.1	32.9	40.2%	43.9	75.9	38.3	42.8%	44.9

CONNECTICUT Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	71.1	33.4	28-70	39.6%	4-14	30.5%	12-16	74.7%	43	10	14	17	7	13	4
vs opponents surrendering	75.5	37.3	28-67	42.1%	5-14	32.5%	15-19	78.2%	42	10	16	18	8	14	4
Team Stats (Home Games)	73.9	35.4	28-70	40.7%	4-13	32.2%	13-17	76.9%	43	10	15	15	6	11	4
Stats Against (All Games)	77.1	38.9	29-67	43.9%	4-11	33.1%	14-19	77.2%	45	11	15	16	8	14	3
vs opponents averaging	76	37.9	28-66	42.5%	5-14	32.2%	15-19	78.2%	43	10	16	18	8	14	4
Stats Against (Home Games)	77.3	40.4	30-69	44.0%	4-11	34.4%	13-16	79.9%	44	9	15	17	7	12	3

Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 71.8, CONNECTICUT 70.6

SCHEDULE AND RESULTS

WASHINGTON - Season Results Against the First Half Line
								Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	Half	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
7/31/2013	NEW YORK	78-88	33-35	-3	L	72	U	28-77	36.4%	40	11	37-75	49.3%	53	16
8/2/2013	@ CHICAGO	78-85	44-44	3.5	W	76	O	31-66	47.0%	41	19	28-67	41.8%	41	10
8/4/2013	LOS ANGELES	57-75	26-33	0.5	L	77.5	U	25-73	34.2%	42	16	33-70	47.1%	48	13
8/6/2013	@ NEW YORK	88-93	46-45	1.5	W	73	O	30-71	42.3%	39	7	35-64	54.7%	41	10
8/8/2013	@ MINNESOTA	79-75	45-40	8.5	W	80	O	31-68	45.6%	48	16	29-67	43.3%	31	11
8/11/2013	CONNECTICUT	74-63	38-23	-2.5	W	73.5	U	24-58	41.4%	45	14	25-65	38.5%	41	14
8/16/2013	@ NEW YORK	66-57	33-34	1.5	W	74.5	U	28-71	39.4%	40	10	24-60	40.0%	46	15
8/18/2013	@ ATLANTA	58-76	37-38	3.5	W	77.5	U	24-70	34.3%	45	17	27-61	44.3%	50	17
8/20/2013	CHICAGO	73-79	41-37	1.5	W	77	O	22-64	34.4%	51	14	24-64	37.5%	49	11
8/23/2013	ATLANTA	74-64	37-35	1.5	W	75.5	U	26-69	37.7%	42	9	25-69	36.2%	50	14
8/28/2013	@ ATLANTA	85-80	33-33	3.5	W	73.5	U	30-71	42.3%	44	16	34-83	41.0%	51	16
9/6/2013	@ CONNECTICUT
9/8/2013	CHICAGO
9/10/2013	@ INDIANA
9/13/2013	CONNECTICUT
9/15/2013	NEW YORK

CONNECTICUT - Season Results Against the First Half Line
								Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	Half	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
8/1/2013	INDIANA	70-64	25-34	-2.5	L	69	U	27-67	40.3%	36	8	27-61	44.3%	48	13
8/3/2013	@ NEW YORK	88-66	33-34	2.5	W	72	U	34-67	50.7%	44	14	27-61	44.3%	34	16
8/6/2013	LOS ANGELES	72-74	36-43	2	L	76	O	28-65	43.1%	36	13	30-68	44.1%	44	14
8/9/2013	CHICAGO	61-77	27-42	2.5	L	74.5	U	25-78	32.1%	47	9	32-73	43.8%	53	12
8/11/2013	@ WASHINGTON	63-74	23-38	2.5	L	73.5	U	25-65	38.5%	41	14	24-58	41.4%	45	14
8/14/2013	ATLANTA	88-86	54-45	2	W	74.5	O	33-70	47.1%	38	13	35-75	46.7%	48	10
8/16/2013	@ ATLANTA	57-88	24-39	5	L	74.5	U	22-69	31.9%	47	21	31-61	50.8%	38	17
8/18/2013	@ CHICAGO	78-89	43-27	5	W	72.5	U	32-66	48.5%	34	18	31-69	44.9%	46	16
8/22/2013	MINNESOTA	77-91	35-50	5.5	L	76.5	O	31-65	47.7%	39	15	38-66	57.6%	27	9
8/25/2013	NEW YORK	66-74	35-42	-1.5	L	72.5	O	25-69	36.2%	38	6	30-65	46.2%	45	13
8/27/2013	@ LOS ANGELES	78-91	35-49	8	L	75.5	O	29-69	42.0%	38	18	37-65	56.9%	42	13
8/29/2013	@ SEATTLE	65-78	23-40	4	L	69	U	23-61	37.7%	34	12	23-47	48.9%	39	18
8/31/2013	@ PHOENIX	68-76	37-36	7.5	W	76	U	29-82	35.4%	40	9	30-68	44.1%	54	17
9/6/2013	WASHINGTON
9/7/2013	@ INDIANA
9/11/2013	ATLANTA
9/13/2013	@ WASHINGTON
9/15/2013	INDIANA

HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORY

All games in this series since 1997

CONNECTICUT is 31-28 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON since 1997

36 of 58 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997

Games over the last 3 seasons

WASHINGTON is 7-3 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons

7 of 11 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

All games played at CONNECTICUT since 1997

CONNECTICUT is 17-14 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON since 1997

18 of 30 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997

Games played at CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons.

WASHINGTON is 4-1 versus the first half line when playing against CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons

3 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

						Shooting		3pt shots		Free Throws		Rebounds
Date	Teams	Score	Line	Result	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	Pct	FTM-A	Pct	Tot.	OFF	TO
8/11/2013	CONNECTICUT	63	149.5	Under	23	25-65	38.5%	2-12	16.7%	11-15	73.3%	41	9	14
	WASHINGTON	74	-4.5	SU ATS	38	24-58	41.4%	7-13	53.8%	19-27	70.4%	45	9	14
6/7/2013	WASHINGTON	66	151	SU ATS	29	24-63	38.1%	3-10	30.0%	15-18	83.3%	42	6	11
	CONNECTICUT	62	-6.5	Under	30	27-76	35.5%	1-6	16.7%	7-11	63.6%	53	14	11
9/4/2012	CONNECTICUT	77	-8	SU Under	40	28-64	43.7%	5-12	41.7%	16-20	80.0%	47	14	19
	WASHINGTON	70	151	ATS	37	29-68	42.6%	5-15	33.3%	7-11	63.6%	36	7	14
7/11/2012	WASHINGTON	73	153	ATS	33	30-63	47.6%	2-13	15.4%	11-14	78.6%	34	9	16
	CONNECTICUT	85	-14	SU Over	40	33-69	47.8%	3-12	25.0%	16-16	100.0%	38	12	13
7/10/2012	CONNECTICUT	77	-9.5	SU Under	34	28-54	51.9%	7-13	53.8%	14-21	66.7%	31	3	10
	WASHINGTON	70	150	ATS	30	28-69	40.6%	5-15	33.3%	9-15	60.0%	49	15	10
6/29/2012	CONNECTICUT	77	-7.5	SU ATS	36	26-58	44.8%	4-10	40.0%	21-25	84.0%	43	10	13
	WASHINGTON	64	154	Under	32	25-77	32.5%	4-14	28.6%	10-18	55.6%	53	17	11
6/3/2012	WASHINGTON	86	145	ATS	35	32-66	48.5%	6-12	50.0%	16-21	76.2%	39	9	15
	CONNECTICUT	94	-12	SU Over	34	32-61	52.5%	4-8	50.0%	26-31	83.9%	34	9	15

COACHING TRENDS

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring WASHINGTON to cover the first half line

There are 19 trends with a total rating of 24 stars.

Mike is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in August or September games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.0, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Mike is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.8, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.7, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.7, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.7, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 8-20 against the 1rst half line (-14.0 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.4, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 2-12 against the 1rst half line (-11.2 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.4, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 3*)

Anne is 2-12 against the 1rst half line (-11.2 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.4, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 3*)

Anne is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 31.1, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 1-9 against the 1rst half line (-8.9 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.7, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in home games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.3, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.2, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 33.1, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 34.0, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.7, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 32.1, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 35.7, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring CONNECTICUT to cover the first half line

There are 9 trends with a total rating of 5 stars.

Mike is 26-45 against the 1rst half line (-23.5 Units) in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 35.7, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 32-54 against the 1rst half line (-27.4 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.5, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 9-21 against the 1rst half line (-14.1 Units) in road games after a win by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 35.7, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 14-4 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) after a game with 8 or less assists in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 37.9, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 69-44 against the 1rst half line (+20.6 Units) off a road loss in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.5, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 83-50 against the 1rst half line (+28.0 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.7, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 102-71 against the 1rst half line (+23.9 Units) after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.9, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 53-34 against the 1rst half line (+15.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.6, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 32-15 against the 1rst half line (+15.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 36.5, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total

There are 4 trends with a total rating of 2 stars.

Mike is 55-35 OVER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.5, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*)

Mike is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 straight games where they had 10 or more steals in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.2, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Mike is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 42.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 15-4 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 42.0, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total

There are 20 trends with a total rating of 15 stars.

Anne is 210-157 UNDER (+37.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.7, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 44-27 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.4, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 148-94 UNDER (+44.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.4, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 37-19 UNDER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.8, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 51-32 UNDER (+15.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.7, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 82-45 UNDER (+32.5 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.1, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 20-7 UNDER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 31.8, OPPONENT 31.6 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 17-5 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total off a road cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 31.5, OPPONENT 30.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 100-63 UNDER (+30.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.6, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 48-30 UNDER (+15.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.7, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 81-52 UNDER (+23.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.7, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 101-71 UNDER (+22.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.9, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 117-58 UNDER (+53.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.1, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Anne is 86-61 UNDER (+18.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.3, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 60-38 UNDER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.1, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 78-54 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 35.1, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*)

Anne is 98-63 UNDER (+28.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.5, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 135-88 UNDER (+38.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 33.6, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 127-90 UNDER (+28.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.2, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Anne is 179-124 UNDER (+42.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Anne 34.3, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*)

STATFOX LINE TRACKER™

Here is a summary of past results against the first half line in games where the line movement was similar to:

Opening First Half Line = 0.5, Closing First Half Line = 2.5

Since 1997, the road favorite covered the first half line 2 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 0 times.

Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite covered the first half line 1 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 0 times.

Here is a summary of past over/under results in games where the first half total movement was similar to:

Opening First Half Total = 73, Closing First Half Total = 72.5

Since 1997, 40 games went over the first half total, while 31 games went under the first half total.

Over the last 3 seasons, 8 games went over the first half total, while 5 games went under the first half total.

Here is a summary of past ATS and Over/Under results in games where the first half line and first half total were similar to:

Closing First Half Line = 2.5, Closing First Half Total = 72.5

Since 1997, the home underdog covered the first half line 7 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 5 times.

Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite covered the first half line 2 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 2 times.

Since 1997, 7 games went under the first half total, while 5 games went over the first half total.

Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went over the first half total, while 2 games went under the first half total.

KEY PLAYER INJURIES

WASHINGTON

No significant injuries.

CONNECTICUT

[G] 08/26/2013 - Kara Lawson out indefinitely ( Personal )

[G] 08/21/2013 - Kelly Faris out for season ( Foot )

[F] 08/21/2013 - Allison Hightower out for season ( Knee )

[G] 06/16/2013 - Danielle McCray out for season ( Achilles )

[F] 05/25/2013 - Asjha Jones out for season ( Personal )

Last Updated: 4/26/2024 2:20:57 PM EST.