| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA CONNECTICUT |
|
| 149.5 | 78 Final 77 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
603 | ATLANTA | -155 | 604 | CONNECTICUT | +135 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents. (48-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +29.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (42-24 since 1997.) (63.6%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (30-12 since 1997.) (71.4%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better. (23-4 since 1997.) (85.2%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a double digit loss as a favorite of 6 points or more against opponent off a home win. (22-7 since 1997.) (75.9%, +15.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a double digit loss as a home favorite of 6 or more against opponent off a home win. (20-6 since 1997.) (76.9%, +14.1 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG). (259-91 since 1997.) (74%, +84.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game. (217-57 since 1997.) (79.2%, +82.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game. (252-110 since 1997.) (69.6%, +77.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games. (221-71 since 1997.) (75.7%, +71.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season. (215-86 since 1997.) (71.4%, +70.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season. (182-44 since 1997.) (80.5%, +70.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record. (157-46 since 1997.) (77.3%, +68.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home loss by 10 points or more. (247-85 since 1997.) (74.4%, +68.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (193-74 since 1997.) (72.3%, +65.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (174-52 since 1997.) (77%, +63.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (199-81 since 1997.) (71.1%, +63.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents. (152-42 since 1997.) (78.4%, +60.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (193-84 since 1997.) (69.7%, +58.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game. (140-48 since 1997.) (74.5%, +56 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, off a home loss by 10 points or more. (174-55 since 1997.) (76%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (119-38 since 1997.) (75.8%, +49.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 2 or more consecutive wins. (110-40 since 1997.) (73.3%, +47.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (77-15 since 1997.) (83.7%, +46.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (83-32 since 1997.) (72.2%, +46.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (97-43 since 1997.) (69.3%, +46.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (67-11 since 1997.) (85.9%, +46.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (96-28 since 1997.) (77.4%, +43.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (78-28 since 1997.) (73.6%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points. (60-32 since 1997.) (65.2%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record. (44-6 since 1997.) (88%, +33.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (83-48 since 1997.) (63.4%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record. (38-4 since 1997.) (90.5%, +32.7 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games. (52-15 since 1997.) (77.6%, +30.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record. (48-14 since 1997.) (77.4%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record. (41-11 since 1997.) (78.8%, +29.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season. (42-18 since 1997.) (70%, +28.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, off an home win scoring 85 or more points. (44-21 since 1997.) (67.7%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after a win by 10 points or more. (52-25 since 1997.) (67.5%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (35-16 since 1997.) (68.6%, +27.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season. (41-15 since 1997.) (73.2%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, in May, June, or July games. (38-19 since 1997.) (66.7%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (30-12 since 1997.) (71.4%, +20.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, on Sunday games. (22-7 since 1997.) (75.9%, +16.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest. (64-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +24.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team. (61-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.2%, +35.5 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA | 75 | | 30-70 | 43.1% | 3-13 | 24.7% | 11-15 | 76.7% | 45 | 12 | 14 | CONNECTICUT | 76 | | 28-69 | 40.7% | 6-17 | 36.6% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 45 | 13 | 15 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 524 times, while ATLANTA won 454 times. Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
ATLANTA is 6-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 72.4 | ATLANTA is 11-4 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 74.5 | ATLANTA is 9-2 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 73.0 |
|
ATLANTA is 6-9 against the money line (-14.1 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 78.8 | ATLANTA is 13-21 against the money line (-19.7 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 80.3 | ATLANTA is 33-46 against the money line (-26.4 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 82.2 | ATLANTA is 59-73 against the money line (-33.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 85.5, OPPONENT 86.0 | CONNECTICUT is 12-1 against the money line (+13.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 75.0 | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 75.3 | CONNECTICUT is 60-25 against the money line (+27.8 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.6, OPPONENT 72.0 | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 73.9 | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+8.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 75.8 | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+7.7 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 74.9 | CONNECTICUT is 61-34 against the money line (+18.3 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.4, OPPONENT 71.0 |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 8-1 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 36-21 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-2 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 21-12 against the money line (+17.5 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.1, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 12-0 against the money line (+14.8 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.5, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 11-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-6 against the money line (-17.2 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 22-32 against the money line (-20.6 Units) in June games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in home games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.2, OPPONENT 68.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.5 Units) off an upset loss as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) off a home loss over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-3 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 6-1 | +4.2 | 5-1 | 3-4 | 79.3 | 42.7 | 44.0% | 45.1 | 69.4 | 37.7 | 38.8% | 41.9 | Road Games | 2-1 | +0.2 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 75.3 | 39.3 | 41.9% | 44.3 | 72.0 | 35.0 | 41.4% | 42.0 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.5 | 3-1 | 1-4 | 74.2 | 41.0 | 41.0% | 46.0 | 65.6 | 34.6 | 38.3% | 44.0 | Division Games | 4-1 | +2.2 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 77.8 | 42.6 | 42.6% | 45.2 | 69.2 | 37.0 | 39.9% | 43.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.3 | 42.7 | 30-69 | 44.0% | 4-12 | 29.1% | 15-19 | 76.5% | 45 | 11 | 18 | 16 | 13 | 14 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.6 | 37.9 | 29-68 | 41.8% | 5-16 | 32.8% | 14-19 | 77.2% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.3 | 39.3 | 28-68 | 41.9% | 3-14 | 24.4% | 15-19 | 82.1% | 44 | 13 | 17 | 15 | 13 | 16 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.4 | 37.7 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 4-13 | 29.2% | 13-16 | 84.7% | 42 | 11 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 18 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 74.9 | 36.8 | 28-66 | 41.9% | 5-14 | 35.1% | 14-19 | 77.3% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.0 | 35.0 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 4-12 | 29.7% | 10-13 | 79.5% | 42 | 12 | 17 | 17 | 9 | 16 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 2-5 | -7.4 | 2-5 | 1-5 | 71.3 | 36.0 | 39.3% | 44.4 | 75.4 | 38.0 | 42.1% | 47.1 | Home Games | 1-2 | -5.7 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 69.7 | 34.3 | 38.6% | 44.7 | 71.0 | 37.0 | 41.9% | 43.0 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -7.4 | 1-4 | 0-5 | 68.6 | 34.6 | 39.1% | 44.6 | 74.6 | 36.0 | 42.2% | 46.2 | Division Games | 2-3 | -2.4 | 2-3 | 1-3 | 71.8 | 36.0 | 39.8% | 46.2 | 72.0 | 34.8 | 39.0% | 48.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.3 | 36.0 | 29-74 | 39.3% | 5-15 | 34.6% | 8-11 | 73.7% | 44 | 12 | 17 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.8 | 37.9 | 28-68 | 40.9% | 5-16 | 33.2% | 14-19 | 78.0% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 69.7 | 34.3 | 28-72 | 38.6% | 4-14 | 31.0% | 10-13 | 78.9% | 45 | 12 | 15 | 14 | 8 | 10 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.4 | 38.0 | 29-69 | 42.1% | 5-12 | 40.7% | 13-17 | 75.4% | 47 | 12 | 15 | 15 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 75.1 | 37.1 | 28-67 | 42.5% | 4-13 | 34.8% | 14-18 | 76.5% | 44 | 11 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.0 | 37.0 | 28-66 | 41.9% | 5-11 | 42.4% | 11-14 | 80.5% | 43 | 8 | 14 | 16 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 69, CONNECTICUT 70.4 |
| | |
|
|
5/25/2013 | TULSA | 98-81 | W | -400 | 38-72 | 52.8% | 44 | 15 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 37 | 22 | 5/31/2013 | @ INDIANA | 86-77 | W | +175 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 42 | 13 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 36 | 13 | 6/2/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 73-63 | W | -210 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 48 | 18 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 41 | 21 | 6/7/2013 | NEW YORK | 75-56 | W | -650 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 53 | 13 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 40 | 19 | 6/9/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 67-76 | L | -250 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 43 | 18 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 49 | 15 | 6/14/2013 | SEATTLE | 68-59 | W | -450 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 46 | 14 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 41 | 18 | 6/16/2013 | CHICAGO | 88-74 | W | -220 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 40 | 8 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 49 | 17 | 6/23/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/25/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2013 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/9/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/25/2013 | NEW YORK | 81-69 | W | -400 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 48 | 10 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 45 | 16 | 5/31/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 75-86 | L | +220 | 34-85 | 40.0% | 40 | 6 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 54 | 13 | 6/1/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 74-90 | L | +450 | 28-78 | 35.9% | 47 | 14 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 47 | 10 | 6/7/2013 | WASHINGTON | 62-66 | L | -270 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 53 | 11 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 42 | 11 | 6/12/2013 | @ INDIANA | 73-61 | W | +145 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 47 | 17 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 37 | 11 | 6/14/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 68-78 | L | -110 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 43 | 11 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 63 | 16 | 6/16/2013 | SEATTLE | 66-78 | L | -400 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 33 | 10 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 42 | 13 | 6/23/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2013 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
ATLANTA is 11-9 (+4.3 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 5-5 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CONNECTICUT is 7-3 (+0.4 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 4-1 (+2.4 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/23/2012 | ATLANTA | 72 | 158.5 | Over | 24 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 1-14 | 7.1% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 43 | 9 | 19 | | CONNECTICUT | 92 | -5 | SU ATS | 36 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 42 | 5 | 15 | 9/2/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 80 | 158 | Over | 39 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 10-20 | 50.0% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 38 | 7 | 13 | | ATLANTA | 87 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 50 | 14 | 12 | 6/17/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 75 | 166.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 11-11 | 100.0% | 42 | 7 | 24 | | ATLANTA | 73 | -1 | Under | 39 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 26 | 4 | 12 | 6/10/2012 | ATLANTA | 73 | 165 | | 38 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 45 | 18 | 21 | | CONNECTICUT | 92 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 37-60 | 61.7% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 11-18 | 61.1% | 41 | 5 | 19 |
|
| | |
|
Fred is 17-9 against the money line (+11.0 Units) vs. division opponents in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 75.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 20-19 against the money line (-20.9 Units) in home games when playing with 3 or more days rest in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 74.3, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 24-32 against the money line (-20.3 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 72.9, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 3-7 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in home games off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 73.2, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 86-96 against the money line (-45.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 72.4, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Anne is 69-74 against the money line (-33.5 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 72.4, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Anne is 18-32 against the money line (-20.8 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Anne 69.0, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 52 times, while the home underdog won straight up 26 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 6 times, while the home underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[F] 05/25/2013 - Asjha Jones out for season ( Personal ) | [G] 06/06/2013 - Tan White expected to miss 3 weeks ( Finger ) | [G] 06/06/2013 - Renee Montgomery expected to miss 3-4 weeks ( Ankle ) | [G] 06/16/2013 - Danielle McCray out for season ( Undisclosed ) | [C] 06/22/2013 - Kayla Pedersen probable Sunday vs. Atlanta Dream ( Acquired ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/26/2024 1:04:37 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|