| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
CHICAGO |
|
|
160.5
| 86
Final
82 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 611 | CONNECTICUT | -220 | | 612 | CHICAGO | +180 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, team that had a losing record last season.
(38-29 since 1997.) (56.7%, +31.2 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good free throw shooting team from last season - made >=76% of their free throws, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(37-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good free throw shooting team from last season - made >=76% of their free throws, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(59-34 since 1997.) (63.4%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team from last season (60% to 75%) playing a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) from last year, after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(20-11 since 1997.) (64.5%, +18.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging from last season 62 or more shots/game, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(40-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - team who 5 or more 3 point shots/game last season, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(39-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(58-69 over the last 5 seasons.) (45.7%, +51.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(49-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.6%, +39.3 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team from last season - outscored opponents by 3 or more points/game, after a win by 6 points or less.
(44-15 since 1997.) (74.6%, +29.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, on Saturday games.
(37-6 since 1997.) (86%, +28.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, on Saturday games.
(48-26 since 1997.) (64.9%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(59-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.2%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(106-105 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.2%, +54.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team from last season - outscored opponents by 3 or more points/game, after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(28-8 since 1997.) (77.8%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team from last season - scored 72 or more points/game, after allowing 75 points or more.
(41-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.4%, +26.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(48-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.5%, +41.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - horrible defensive team from last season - allowed 75 or more points/game, after allowing 75 points or more.
(41-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.4%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent offensive team from last season - scored 75 or more points/game, after allowing 75 points or more.
(40-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(111-105 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.4%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3 point shooting team from last season - made >=34% of their attempts.
(46-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.4%, +27.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team from last season - allowed 72 or more points/game, after allowing 75 points or more.
(41-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.4%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(133-128 over the last 5 seasons.) (51%, +58.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor pressure defensive team from last season - forced <=14 turnovers/game.
(49-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.3%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent offensive team from last season - scored 75 or more points/game.
(65-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.1%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor foul drawing team from last season - attempted <=18 free throws/game.
(45-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.8%, +31 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team from last season - scored 72 or more points/game.
(66-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.5%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset win as a road underdog, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(25-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(41-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.9%, +37.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(86-70 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.1%, +44.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(76-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (46.3%, +46 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(108-87 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.4%, +44.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(159-157 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.3%, +53.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 82 | | 31-69 | 44.3% | 8-21 | 36.6% | 13-17 | 78.0% | 42 | 10 | 13 | | CHICAGO | 83 | | 31-69 | 45.1% | 8-22 | 36.8% | 13-17 | 76.8% | 44 | 10 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 513 times, while CONNECTICUT won 453 times.
Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.1 | CONNECTICUT is 99-59 against the money line (+45.3 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 75.5 | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in road games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 76.7 | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 76.2 | CONNECTICUT is 33-9 against the money line (+18.7 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 77.1 | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 76.6 | CONNECTICUT is 15-3 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in road games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 78.6 | CHICAGO is 49-59 against the money line (-45.2 Units) in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.2, OPPONENT 80.4 | CHICAGO is 122-246 against the money line (-157.8 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 87.7 | CHICAGO is 126-173 against the money line (-57.3 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 80.6 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 10-15 against the money line (-28.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 81.7 | CONNECTICUT is 60-81 against the money line (-70.4 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 80.6 | CONNECTICUT is 13-13 against the money line (-20.2 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 81.9 | CONNECTICUT is 9-16 against the money line (-28.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 87.2 | CONNECTICUT is 4-14 against the money line (-28.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 90.0 | CONNECTICUT is 13-13 against the money line (-17.5 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 83.1 | CONNECTICUT is 39-29 against the money line (-28.2 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 82.4 | CHICAGO is 19-16 against the money line (+16.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 84.1 | CHICAGO is 5-1 against the money line (+9.3 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 85.9 | CHICAGO is 16-5 against the money line (+14.9 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 81.3 | CHICAGO is 6-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.0, OPPONENT 77.7 | CHICAGO is 107-78 against the money line (+42.6 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 77.9 | CHICAGO is 97-85 against the money line (+28.8 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.9, OPPONENT 81.5 | CHICAGO is 15-12 against the money line (+15.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 86.5 | CHICAGO is 16-4 against the money line (+24.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 91.7, OPPONENT 85.8 | CHICAGO is 15-1 against the money line (+27.2 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 94.3, OPPONENT 86.4 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 19-18 against the money line (+13.7 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 17-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in May games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 117-114 against the money line (+25.5 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in road games after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-6 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-4 against the money line (+17.7 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in road games off a home win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-2 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-0 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-9 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-13 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-7 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-10 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-7 against the money line (+14.1 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in road games after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-3 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-9 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in road games after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-7 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 27-26 against the money line (-25.5 Units) in home games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 158-150 against the money line (-63.5 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 155-146 against the money line (-62.5 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.0, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 117-111 against the money line (-48.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-22 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in home games in May games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 36-38 against the money line (-26.9 Units) in home games after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-16 against the money line (-17.9 Units) off 2 or more consecutive road wins since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 94-111 against the money line (-63.2 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 81-93 against the money line (-50.6 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 100-111 against the money line (-63.2 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 73-81 against the money line (-50.1 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 69-71 against the money line (-42.0 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 94-85 against the money line (-41.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 72-69 against the money line (-42.2 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 36-33 against the money line (-25.2 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 26-30 against the money line (-33.3 Units) in home games after scoring 90 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 81-91 against the money line (-58.8 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 51-59 against the money line (-45.5 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 59-56 against the money line (-32.4 Units) in home games after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-13 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in home games after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 34-37 against the money line (-30.0 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-27 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after playing 3 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.9, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 33-31 against the money line (-23.7 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 12-18 against the money line (-17.8 Units) off a close home win by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-19 against the money line (-18.0 Units) in road games after a close win by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 70.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-12 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-12 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-11 against the money line (-21.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-6 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-5 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 6*) | CHICAGO is 48-36 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 33-23 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 34-20 against the money line (+17.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-5 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 23-16 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-5 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.9, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 25-15 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.5, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 29-22 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-12 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-10 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-7 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 9-6 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 4-0 | +4 | 1-3 | 3-1 | 86.7 | 40.7 | 44.0% | 39.7 | 78.5 | 38.5 | 48.2% | 38.5 | | Road Games | 1-0 | +1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 88.0 | 41.0 | 40.5% | 43.0 | 84.0 | 44.0 | 47.8% | 44.0 | | Last 5 Games | 4-0 | +4 | 1-3 | 3-1 | 86.7 | 40.7 | 44.0% | 39.7 | 78.5 | 38.5 | 48.2% | 38.5 | | Division Games | 3-0 | +3 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 88.0 | 42.0 | 43.7% | 39.7 | 77.3 | 39.7 | 48.0% | 37.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 86.7 | 40.7 | 30-69 | 44.0% | 5-18 | 28.2% | 21-25 | 83.3% | 40 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 10 | 12 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 86.6 | 43.2 | 31-71 | 43.5% | 7-21 | 31.7% | 18-21 | 84.4% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 10 | 15 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 88.0 | 41.0 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 4-19 | 21.1% | 24-30 | 80.0% | 43 | 15 | 15 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.5 | 38.5 | 29-61 | 48.2% | 7-21 | 32.5% | 13-16 | 77.3% | 38 | 7 | 20 | 21 | 7 | 20 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 79.7 | 38.9 | 30-68 | 43.5% | 8-24 | 32.7% | 12-16 | 77.3% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 20 | 9 | 17 | 6 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.0 | 44.0 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 44 | 13 | 20 | 24 | 4 | 17 | 7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 2-1 | +0.6 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 84.0 | 37.7 | 41.9% | 50.7 | 80.7 | 38.0 | 41.5% | 47.3 | | Home Games | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | | Last 5 Games | 2-1 | +0.6 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 84.0 | 37.7 | 41.9% | 50.7 | 80.7 | 38.0 | 41.5% | 47.3 | | Division Games | 1-0 | 0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 90.0 | 40.0 | 46.7% | 48.0 | 81.0 | 32.0 | 43.5% | 45.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 84.0 | 37.7 | 32-76 | 41.9% | 5-19 | 28.1% | 15-22 | 65.7% | 51 | 15 | 20 | 20 | 10 | 13 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 79.7 | 36.8 | 30-74 | 40.2% | 6-21 | 28.2% | 14-20 | 68.9% | 48 | 14 | 19 | 20 | 10 | 13 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.7 | 38.0 | 30-72 | 41.5% | 7-18 | 36.4% | 14-18 | 79.2% | 47 | 12 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 18 | 8 | | vs opponents averaging | 82 | 43.1 | 30-71 | 42.6% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 15-18 | 85.3% | 47 | 11 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 17 | 8 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 68.5, CHICAGO 71.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/14/2024 | INDIANA | 92-71 | W | -270 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 39 | 15 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 31 | 25 | | 5/17/2024 | WASHINGTON | 84-77 | W | -360 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 37 | 10 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 36 | 20 | | 5/20/2024 | @ INDIANA | 88-84 | W | -200 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 8 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 44 | 17 | | 5/23/2024 | MINNESOTA | 83-82 | W | -250 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 40 | 16 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 43 | 17 | | 5/25/2024 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/28/2024 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/31/2024 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/2/2024 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/4/2024 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/8/2024 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/10/2024 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/15/2024 | @ DALLAS | 79-87 | L | +250 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 54 | 12 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 49 | 15 | | 5/18/2024 | @ DALLAS | 83-74 | W | +155 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 50 | 17 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 48 | 25 | | 5/23/2024 | @ NEW YORK | 90-81 | W | | 35-75 | 46.7% | 48 | 9 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 45 | 14 | | 5/25/2024 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/28/2024 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/30/2024 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/1/2024 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/4/2024 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/6/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/8/2024 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CHICAGO is 37-37 (+7.9 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 7-6 (+3.6 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CHICAGO is 21-17 (+1.2 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 4-3 (+2.1 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
09/10/2023 | CHICAGO | 102 | 159 | SU ATS | 41 | 39-72 | 54.2% | 12-23 | 52.2% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 43 | 6 | 17 | | | CONNECTICUT | 91 | -9.5 | Over | 43 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 44 | 10 | 10 | 08/20/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 79 | -6 | SU | 45 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 42 | 5 | 11 | | | CHICAGO | 73 | 160.5 | Under | 40 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 3-21 | 14.3% | 18-25 | 72.0% | 37 | 7 | 10 | 07/12/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 84 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 40 | 8 | 10 | | | CHICAGO | 72 | 160.5 | Under | 38 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 43 | 7 | 16 | 06/25/2023 | CHICAGO | 72 | 157.5 | Over | 42 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 37 | 8 | 19 | | | CONNECTICUT | 96 | -6 | SU ATS | 54 | 40-80 | 50.0% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 47 | 11 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
White is 13-1 against the money line (+11.8 Units) as a road favorite of -245 or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 82.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 13-0 against the money line (+13.0 Units) as a road favorite of -165 to -250 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 84.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 17-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 17-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 17-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 8-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in May games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 22-12 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.6, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 10-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 12-5 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 19-12 against the money line (+14.5 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 12-2 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 4*) | White is 7-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in road games off a home win as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 12-3 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 21-10 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 19-8 against the money line (+14.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 10-3 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 16-9 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 10-3 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 10-3 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 16-7 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 12-3 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in road games after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.7, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 12-5 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 14-8 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 10-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in road games after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 17-7 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 18-8 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 81.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 25-16 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
White is 35-37 against the money line (-31.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 26-26 against the money line (-22.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 14-12 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 9-11 against the money line (-21.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 2-6 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 6*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 35 times, while the home underdog won straight up 19 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 4 times, while the home underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 6/26/2024 5:36:42 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|