| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
CHICAGO |
|
|
164.5
| 83
Final
91 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 609 | CONNECTICUT | +105 | | 610 | CHICAGO | -125 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(139-92 since 1997.) (60.2%, +44.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(105-37 since 1997.) (73.9%, +44.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(93-58 since 1997.) (61.6%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(91-66 since 1997.) (58%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(36-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +16.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(67-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.8%, +30.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(45-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +30.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by more than 30 points in their previous game, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(21-7 since 1997.) (75%, +20.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 4 of their last 5 games.
(70-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.3%, +25.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(41-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.7%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(43-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.7%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(202-159 since 1997.) (56%, +59.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(136-94 since 1997.) (59.1%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(110-71 since 1997.) (60.8%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(126-88 since 1997.) (58.9%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(78-100 over the last 5 seasons.) (43.8%, +54.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season, on Wednesday nights.
(23-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +25.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(104-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +48.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - dominant rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game, after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more.
(30-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +17 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, on Wednesday nights.
(31-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +20.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(58-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.9%, +39.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days, in May, June, or July games.
(36-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (45.6%, +29.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(58-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(27-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (54%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(37-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +27 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(91-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(20-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +21.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(55-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (55%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, on Wednesday nights.
(34-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(87-80 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.1%, +48 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(23-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +25.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(31-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (62%, +31.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(23-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +23 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in May, June, or July games.
(114-153 over the last 5 seasons.) (42.7%, +60.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 82 | | 31-71 | 43.9% | 7-18 | 36.4% | 13-16 | 79.6% | 45 | 12 | 15 | | CHICAGO | 84 | | 32-68 | 46.8% | 8-22 | 35.4% | 13-15 | 83.8% | 40 | 7 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 537 times, while CONNECTICUT won 437 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 24-15 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 74.6 | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 71.1 | CONNECTICUT is 15-2 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 71.7 | CONNECTICUT is 87-50 against the money line (+34.7 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 17-3 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 71.2 | CONNECTICUT is 69-44 against the money line (+22.3 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 77.7 | CONNECTICUT is 23-7 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.7, OPPONENT 75.9 | CHICAGO is 177-217 against the money line (-62.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.2, OPPONENT 82.1 | CHICAGO is 6-12 against the money line (-10.5 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 82.9 | CHICAGO is 59-100 against the money line (-51.1 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 79.3 | CHICAGO is 45-50 against the money line (-35.5 Units) in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.5, OPPONENT 78.4 | CHICAGO is 8-11 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in home games when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 88.0 | CHICAGO is 54-91 against the money line (-41.2 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 82.2 | CHICAGO is 1-4 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in home games when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.3, OPPONENT 88.3 | CHICAGO is 88-84 against the money line (-40.5 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.3, OPPONENT 84.8 | CHICAGO is 113-156 against the money line (-54.4 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 80.1 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 2-4 against the money line (-10.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 77.4 | CONNECTICUT is 50-74 against the money line (-62.9 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 80.7 | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-14.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 77.8 | CONNECTICUT is 6-13 against the money line (-20.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 85.5 | CONNECTICUT is 4-8 against the money line (-10.0 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 88.8 | CONNECTICUT is 2-4 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 82.9 | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-10.9 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 78.9 | CONNECTICUT is 16-23 against the money line (-18.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 83.9 | CONNECTICUT is 6-18 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 80.3 | CHICAGO is 81-56 against the money line (+21.3 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 80.5 | CHICAGO is 102-77 against the money line (+36.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.2, OPPONENT 79.7 | CHICAGO is 12-4 against the money line (+10.2 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 89.3, OPPONENT 84.1 | CHICAGO is 7-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.3, OPPONENT 79.3 | CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+6.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.9, OPPONENT 82.0 | CHICAGO is 25-11 against the money line (+11.1 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.4, OPPONENT 84.0 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 18-9 against the money line (+8.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-18 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-11 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-11 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-20 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-35 against the money line (+21.4 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 42-21 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-14 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-10 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 167-110 against the money line (+33.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.6, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-10 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 42-21 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.8, OPPONENT 65.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-15 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-7 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-13 against the money line (+13.9 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-15 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-20 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 107-76 against the money line (+36.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 152-115 against the money line (+28.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 62-60 against the money line (-36.0 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 6-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-6 against the money line (+13.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 25-13 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-3 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 29-16 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-6 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 16-10 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 14-7 against the money line (+7.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-9 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-8 against the money line (+10.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 24-12 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 35-37 against the money line (+21.0 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-4 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 35-36 against the money line (+28.9 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-5 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+8.5 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 against the money line (+15.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.2, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 5*) | CHICAGO is 16-6 against the money line (+17.2 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.8, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 9-4 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 50-43 against the money line (+16.3 Units) in road games in June games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-13 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-7 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-2 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 160-136 against the money line (+24.7 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 125-100 against the money line (+27.7 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 117-100 against the money line (+25.0 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in road games off a road win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 67.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-10 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-10 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-17 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-19 against the money line (-28.6 Units) in home games after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 66-58 against the money line (-35.3 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 141-133 against the money line (-51.1 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 138-129 against the money line (-50.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 24-31 against the money line (-20.9 Units) in home games after 2 consecutive non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-19 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in home games after 3 consecutive non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-15 against the money line (-11.2 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 44-54 against the money line (-28.3 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 133-161 against the money line (-52.6 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-11 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.2, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 33-44 against the money line (-25.3 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 28-32 against the money line (-22.5 Units) in home games off a home win since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 88-97 against the money line (-54.1 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 62-70 against the money line (-43.0 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 60-64 against the money line (-37.1 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 50-72 against the money line (-40.8 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 141-176 against the money line (-56.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 49-48 against the money line (-28.1 Units) in home games after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-11 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 72-97 against the money line (-37.7 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 53-62 against the money line (-34.9 Units) in home games after playing a home game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-36 against the money line (-32.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 35-48 against the money line (-30.6 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 25-26 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after 3 straight games with 45 or more rebounds since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-13 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after 4 straight games with 45 or more rebounds since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 12-5 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+6.2 Units) in June games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-5 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-4 against the money line (+11.3 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 26-13 against the money line (+10.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-5 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-7 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.2, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 9-3 against the money line (+6.2 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in home games after having won 4 of their last 5 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+6.2 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-4 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-4 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 9-3 against the money line (+6.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 129-90 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 47-29 against the money line (+13.3 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 38-32 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 49-29 against the money line (+21.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 25-11 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 27-21 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 24-7 against the money line (+17.7 Units) after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 15-3 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after 4 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 21-14 against the money line (+13.9 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 51-27 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 111-71 against the money line (+22.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 69-49 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 82-47 against the money line (+18.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 48-32 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 68-52 against the money line (+8.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 65-32 against the money line (+12.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 33-25 against the money line (+8.2 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 21-24 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 75-43 against the money line (+20.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 111-71 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 72-39 against the money line (+23.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 106-64 against the money line (+23.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 49-25 against the money line (+25.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 69-43 against the money line (+21.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 56-28 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 87-47 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 67-38 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 105-65 against the money line (+12.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 40-20 against the money line (+15.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 61-37 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 76-43 against the money line (+21.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 111-73 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 32-23 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 48-40 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 19-18 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 71-43 against the money line (+16.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 106-71 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 62-40 against the money line (+15.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 87-66 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 55-34 against the money line (+23.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 79-55 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 2-5 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 21-24 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 16-20 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.7, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Miller is 63-57 against the money line (-28.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 22-11 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in June games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 19-7 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 43-25 against the money line (+14.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 28-16 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.2, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 46-26 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 32-25 against the money line (+18.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.2, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 16-14 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 7-2 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 26-15 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.3, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 34-22 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 10-6 against the money line (+10.0 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.2, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 25-14 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 39-23 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 16-8 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.9, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 18-10 against the money line (+14.5 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 12-6 against the money line (+12.2 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 14-10 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.3, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 23-16 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 13-9 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 79 times, while the road underdog won straight up 79 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 5 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 05/24/2022 - Jasmine Thomas is out for season ( Knee ) | |
| [F] 06/28/2022 - Kahleah Copper is upgraded to probable Wednesday vs Connecticut Sun ( Back ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/20/2024 4:21:07 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|