| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
DALLAS
CHICAGO |
|
|
167
| 64
Final
81 |
|
|
| | |
|
| WNBA Playoffs - Round 1 | | |  | |
| 601 | DALLAS | +180 | | 602 | CHICAGO | -220 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in August or September games.
(117-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +51.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home win, in August or September games.
(84-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +47.2 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(63-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.7%, +38.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(63-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.7%, +38.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(63-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.7%, +38.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(59-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.4%, +37.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(59-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.4%, +37.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(59-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.4%, +37.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in August or September games.
(147-101 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +35 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home win by 10 points or more, in August or September games.
(50-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.7%, +40.2 units. Rating = 6*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home win by 10 points or more, in August or September games.
(46-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (93.9%, +39.8 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, in August or September games.
(34-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.2%, +29.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(123-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +56.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(69-43 since 1997.) (61.6%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games.
(90-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.2%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a win against a division rival, in August or September games.
(55-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.7%, +34 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(42-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.8%, +18.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(64-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.7%, +15.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, in August or September games.
(49-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +25.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(106-84 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.8%, +22.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(31-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.8%, +16.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(38-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.5%, +20.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(69-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +42.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a win against a division rival against opponent off a home win.
(27-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.8%, +15.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home win against a division rival against opponent off a home win.
(28-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.8%, +24.8 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(98-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a win against a division rival against opponent off a home win.
(31-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +14.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home win by 10 points or more, in August or September games.
(78-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.9%, +38.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(59-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.7%, +36.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(42-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.7%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, off a home win.
(37-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.2%, +21 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(44-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.9%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, off a home win.
(50-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +29.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(141-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +60.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(75-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (56%, +28.3 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(84-52 since 1997.) (61.8%, +47.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(69-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (57%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a close win by 3 points or less.
(59-28 since 1997.) (67.8%, +31 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(51-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (58%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, on Thursday nights.
(40-16 since 1997.) (71.4%, +26.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(21-13 since 1997.) (61.8%, +26.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(41-16 since 1997.) (71.9%, +26.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +16.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, on Thursday nights.
(30-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| DALLAS | 79 | | 29-71 | 40.9% | 8-23 | 35.0% | 12-15 | 84.2% | 44 | 11 | 14 | | CHICAGO | 85 | | 32-69 | 46.8% | 8-22 | 34.8% | 13-15 | 83.6% | 43 | 8 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 673 times, while DALLAS won 298 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 6-8 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 85.6 | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-10.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 84.6 | CHICAGO is 4-7 against the money line (-10.7 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 82.5 | CHICAGO is 7-9 against the money line (-17.0 Units) in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 81.6 | CHICAGO is 8-14 against the money line (-15.7 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 82.9 | CHICAGO is 37-60 against the money line (-27.7 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 80.2 | CHICAGO is 8-12 against the money line (-15.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 88.0 | CHICAGO is 6-8 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 84.7 |
|
DALLAS is 59-96 against the money line (-41.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 85.5 | DALLAS is 3-13 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 80.8, OPPONENT 84.6 | DALLAS is 3-10 against the money line (-8.9 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 85.9 | DALLAS is 2-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 87.8 | DALLAS is 3-16 against the money line (-17.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 88.9 | DALLAS is 2-14 against the money line (-16.4 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 90.6 | DALLAS is 27-59 against the money line (-40.5 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 85.6 | CHICAGO is 75-52 against the money line (+21.4 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 80.6 | CHICAGO is 97-76 against the money line (+29.5 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.0, OPPONENT 79.7 | CHICAGO is 90-66 against the money line (+39.3 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 78.0 | CHICAGO is 20-9 against the money line (+13.9 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 81.5 | CHICAGO is 188-100 against the money line (+110.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.8, OPPONENT 83.4 | CHICAGO is 140-59 against the money line (+96.1 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 91.2, OPPONENT 85.5 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 6-7 against the money line (-11.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.2, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-4 against the money line (-10.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 33-49 against the money line (-37.6 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 0-4 against the money line (-9.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 90.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 6-11 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 111-174 against the money line (-67.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-12 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.7, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 19-19 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.7, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-4 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 3-5 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-5 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 18-20 against the money line (-16.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-5 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 21-21 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-5 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 127-180 against the money line (-62.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-5 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-5 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-12 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.7, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 74-71 against the money line (-42.2 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-5 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 102-102 against the money line (-52.4 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-7 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 8-9 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 3-5 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 21-26 against the money line (-20.1 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 34-41 against the money line (-29.5 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-5 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 21-21 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-5 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-6 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-5 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 21-21 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-5 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 4-6 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-6 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 92.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 6-9 against the money line (-10.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 38-39 against the money line (-28.8 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-16 against the money line (-16.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.1, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 19-45 against the money line (-28.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 26-49 against the money line (-37.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 27-55 against the money line (-39.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.9, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 49-83 against the money line (-33.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.2, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 26-48 against the money line (-25.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-33 against the money line (-26.1 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 32-63 against the money line (-44.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 61-97 against the money line (-37.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 27-54 against the money line (-40.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 49-78 against the money line (-36.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.9, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 32-61 against the money line (-42.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.5, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 58-93 against the money line (-39.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-11 against the money line (-13.7 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 13-19 against the money line (-15.6 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 34-62 against the money line (-41.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 30-48 against the money line (-36.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-14 against the money line (-10.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 80.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 57-98 against the money line (-42.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 25-56 against the money line (-42.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 46-88 against the money line (-43.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 21-45 against the money line (-25.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 81-77 against the money line (+28.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 9-19 against the money line (-32.6 Units) in home games after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 6*) | CHICAGO is 16-16 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 20-17 against the money line (-20.0 Units) as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-8 against the money line (-15.2 Units) as a home favorite this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-10.7 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 1-4 against the money line (-8.0 Units) as a home favorite of -165 to -250 this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-10 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in home games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 6-10 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 6-10 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 2-5 against the money line (-10.1 Units) on Thursday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-5 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in home games when playing with 3 or more days rest this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 77-77 against the money line (-36.4 Units) in home games after a division game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-6 against the money line (-10.1 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-6 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-10.1 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 12-15 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 6-8 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-6 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 1-4 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in home games revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-12 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in home games revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 3-6 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-6 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-6 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in home games after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 26-39 against the money line (-21.6 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 30-41 against the money line (-23.2 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 25-31 against the money line (-25.0 Units) in home games off a home win since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-13 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.0, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-8 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 13-17 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-14 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-15 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 9-12 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-17 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-6 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 6-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 3-6 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 55-92 against the money line (-51.5 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 5-7 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-13 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-12 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-13 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.0, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-11 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-10 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after scoring 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-8 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-13 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-6 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-9 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-4 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in home games after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-5 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 9-12 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-8.5 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-9 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after playing a home game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-8.0 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive home games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 3-9 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in home games after playing 3 consecutive home games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-11 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 50-60 against the money line (-31.7 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 33-48 against the money line (-33.1 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-37 against the money line (-28.4 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 74-114 against the money line (-41.0 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 32-56 against the money line (-40.4 Units) against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 22-41 against the money line (-26.9 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 33-65 against the money line (-35.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 79.7, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-16 against the money line (-11.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 20-33 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 16-33 against the money line (-23.6 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-13 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-14 against the money line (-10.1 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.3, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 32-56 against the money line (-40.4 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 17-31 against the money line (-19.9 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 16-35 against the money line (-31.8 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 2-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) off a home win over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 75.1, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 54-89 against the money line (-44.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 46-79 against the money line (-43.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 40-71 against the money line (-42.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 49-77 against the money line (-41.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 41-65 against the money line (-36.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 31-57 against the money line (-40.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 29-51 against the money line (-34.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 2-7 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after a win by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 77.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 45-69 against the money line (-34.0 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 6-17 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 81.5, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 52-79 against the money line (-35.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-21 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 44-73 against the money line (-44.5 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 8-16 against the money line (-9.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 81.5, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 38-61 against the money line (-35.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 27-46 against the money line (-32.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 1-7 against the money line (-6.9 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 77.1, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 16-31 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-6.0 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 38-64 against the money line (-35.0 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 22-38 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 14-28 against the money line (-22.3 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 26-53 against the money line (-35.8 Units) after playing a home game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-19 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 3-10 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 26-48 against the money line (-30.8 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 17-35 against the money line (-25.7 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 13-25 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 2-9 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 79.0, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 14-4 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 14-18 | -5.2 | 15-16 | 12-18 | 81.1 | 40.1 | 42.0% | 43.5 | 81.7 | 39.6 | 44.9% | 41.3 | | Road Games | 7-9 | +1.3 | 10-6 | 4-10 | 82.9 | 41.0 | 43.5% | 44.5 | 81.2 | 38.2 | 43.7% | 41.2 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.7 | 1-3 | 1-4 | 71.8 | 37.2 | 37.4% | 41.8 | 79.4 | 39.6 | 46.2% | 43.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 81.1 | 40.1 | 30-71 | 42.0% | 8-23 | 35.4% | 14-16 | 82.9% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 80.4 | 41 | 30-69 | 43.2% | 7-21 | 34.3% | 14-17 | 81.1% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 82.9 | 41.0 | 31-71 | 43.5% | 7-21 | 34.4% | 14-17 | 82.3% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.7 | 39.6 | 30-67 | 44.9% | 7-22 | 33.9% | 14-18 | 77.7% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.8 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 43.7% | 7-21 | 34.4% | 14-17 | 80.7% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.2 | 38.2 | 29-67 | 43.7% | 7-23 | 32.2% | 15-20 | 75.8% | 41 | 7 | 19 | 16 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 16-16 | -11.2 | 12-19 | 19-13 | 83.2 | 42.4 | 44.1% | 41.3 | 81.9 | 40.5 | 43.3% | 44.1 | | Home Games | 6-10 | -16.2 | 4-12 | 12-4 | 83.1 | 40.5 | 43.3% | 39.9 | 85.3 | 42.8 | 44.5% | 44.9 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -4 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 82.8 | 42.4 | 45.2% | 36.4 | 88.6 | 50.4 | 47.7% | 44.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 83.2 | 42.4 | 31-70 | 44.1% | 7-21 | 34.3% | 14-17 | 84.5% | 41 | 8 | 22 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 80.6 | 41 | 30-68 | 43.5% | 7-21 | 34.3% | 14-17 | 81.1% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.1 | 40.5 | 30-70 | 43.3% | 7-21 | 32.1% | 15-17 | 87.1% | 40 | 8 | 22 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.9 | 40.5 | 30-70 | 43.3% | 7-19 | 35.2% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 44 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.4 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.3% | 7-21 | 34.4% | 14-17 | 80.4% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 85.3 | 42.8 | 31-70 | 44.5% | 7-18 | 40.8% | 16-19 | 80.3% | 45 | 9 | 21 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: DALLAS 71.8, CHICAGO 71.4 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/15/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 59-80 | L | +170 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 26 | 19 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 38 | 11 | | 8/17/2021 | @ CHICAGO | 80-76 | W | +200 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 56 | 12 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 36 | 10 | | 8/20/2021 | INDIANA | 81-83 | L | -330 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 39 | 14 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 33 | 8 | | 8/26/2021 | @ WASHINGTON | 82-77 | W | +170 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 44 | 12 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 32 | 13 | | 8/28/2021 | @ WASHINGTON | 75-76 | L | -115 | 25-47 | 53.2% | 41 | 23 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 34 | 13 | | 9/2/2021 | ATLANTA | 72-68 | W | -270 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 52 | 9 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 39 | 14 | | 9/5/2021 | ATLANTA | 64-69 | L | -270 | 26-78 | 33.3% | 53 | 14 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 45 | 9 | | 9/7/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 56-83 | L | +325 | 17-64 | 26.6% | 38 | 12 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 52 | 13 | | 9/11/2021 | NEW YORK | 77-76 | W | -200 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 44 | 6 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 45 | 9 | | 9/13/2021 | @ LAS VEGAS | 75-85 | L | +400 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 44 | 14 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 39 | 9 | | 9/19/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 87-84 | W | -155 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 30 | 14 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 35 | 17 | | 9/23/2021 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/15/2021 | SEATTLE | 87-85 | W | -270 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 54 | 18 | 29-84 | 34.5% | 57 | 8 | | 8/17/2021 | DALLAS | 76-80 | L | -250 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 36 | 10 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 56 | 12 | | 8/21/2021 | MINNESOTA | 95-101 | L | +120 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 27 | 9 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 48 | 13 | | 8/24/2021 | @ ATLANTA | 86-79 | W | -300 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 41 | 12 | 33-79 | 41.8% | 44 | 7 | | 8/27/2021 | @ SEATTLE | 73-69 | W | +200 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 48 | 18 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 40 | 17 | | 8/29/2021 | @ SEATTLE | 107-75 | W | +210 | 41-73 | 56.2% | 43 | 9 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 27 | 12 | | 8/31/2021 | @ PHOENIX | 83-103 | L | -110 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 36 | 11 | 39-75 | 52.0% | 42 | 8 | | 9/2/2021 | @ LAS VEGAS | 83-90 | L | +145 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 36 | 13 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 49 | 12 | | 9/5/2021 | LAS VEGAS | 92-84 | W | +105 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 44 | 7 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 41 | 6 | | 9/12/2021 | WASHINGTON | 71-79 | L | -400 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 37 | 14 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 41 | 15 | | 9/17/2021 | LAS VEGAS | 70-103 | L | +145 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 22 | 12 | 41-73 | 56.2% | 54 | 15 | | 9/19/2021 | INDIANA | 98-87 | W | -950 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 43 | 10 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 37 | 15 | | 9/23/2021 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CHICAGO is 19-22 (-6.7 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
| DALLAS is 3-5 (+2.6 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| DALLAS is 10-10 (+1.3 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
| DALLAS is 2-1 (+5.5 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/17/2021 | DALLAS | 80 | 167.5 | SU ATS | 33 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 56 | 15 | 12 | | | CHICAGO | 76 | -6 | Under | 36 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 8-8 | 100.0% | 36 | 10 | 10 | 7/2/2021 | CHICAGO | 91 | -2.5 | Over | 48 | 37-66 | 56.1% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 34 | 6 | 10 | | | DALLAS | 100 | 167.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 11-20 | 55.0% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 31 | 10 | 13 | 6/30/2021 | CHICAGO | 91 | -2 | SU ATS | 51 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 10-23 | 43.5% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 44 | 8 | 16 | | | DALLAS | 81 | 166 | Over | 29 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 6-25 | 24.0% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 46 | 9 | 17 | 9/11/2020 | CHICAGO | 95 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 34-59 | 57.6% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 21-23 | 91.3% | 42 | 5 | 12 | | N | DALLAS | 88 | 170.5 | Over | 44 | 33-83 | 39.8% | 10-31 | 32.3% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 40 | 15 | 4 | 8/4/2020 | DALLAS | 79 | 172 | ATS | 42 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 10-28 | 35.7% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 40 | 9 | 10 | | N | CHICAGO | 82 | -6.5 | SU Under | 43 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 9-20 | 45.0% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 46 | 10 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Wade is 30-20 against the money line (-19.8 Units) as a favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 13-12 against the money line (-18.3 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 2-5 against the money line (-10.1 Units) on Thursday as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 26-25 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.8, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 2-5 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in home games revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 4-8 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in home games after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 36-35 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 37-36 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 30-32 against the money line (-19.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 18-25 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 25-23 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 7-8 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 31-30 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 34-34 against the money line (-20.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 32-29 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 11-16 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 14-20 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.1, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 36-34 against the money line (-19.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 28-27 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 25-24 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.8, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 12-14 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 12-13 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 2-7 against the money line (-8.0 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 8-9 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 16-20 against the money line (-12.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.9, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 4-7 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Wade is 9-9 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 14-20 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.3, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 27-31 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Johnson is 6-21 against the money line (-15.9 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Johnson 72.9, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 8-16 against the money line (-11.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 7-13 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Johnson is 2-10 against the money line (-9.0 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Johnson 76.9, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Johnson is 1-8 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Johnson 77.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 1-7 against the money line (-6.9 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 77.1, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 1-8 against the money line (-8.0 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Johnson 77.4, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Johnson is 3-10 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Johnson is 2-8 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Johnson 78.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 26-15 against the money line (+9.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.2, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 7-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) off a home win against a division rival as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 14-4 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 196 times, while the road underdog won straight up 81 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 12 times, while the road underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [C] 09/23/2021 - Stefanie Dolson is upgraded to probable Thursday vs Dallas Wings ( Knee ) | | [F] 05/12/2021 - Gabby Williams is out for season ( Suspension ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/25/2024 2:26:44 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|