| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT CHICAGO |
|
| 156 | 81 Final 91 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
601 | CONNECTICUT | +210 | 602 | CHICAGO | -270 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (135-84 since 1997.) (61.6%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 3 or more consecutive wins. (77-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (77%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more. (104-39 since 1997.) (72.7%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a loss by 6 points or less. (80-54 since 1997.) (59.7%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (66-38 since 1997.) (63.5%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (50-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.8%, +30.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (108-63 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +42.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT | 78 | | 28-66 | 42.2% | 7-19 | 33.5% | 15-19 | 79.8% | 45 | 11 | 16 | CHICAGO | 80 | | 29-70 | 42.2% | 7-21 | 31.3% | 14-17 | 84.0% | 43 | 10 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 533 times, while CONNECTICUT won 444 times. Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 19-12 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 117-84 against the money line (+26.4 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 75.1 | CONNECTICUT is 96-54 against the money line (+31.9 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 85-49 against the money line (+34.0 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 27-13 against the money line (+14.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 74.1 | CONNECTICUT is 63-40 against the money line (+23.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 77.9 | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+5.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 73.4 | CHICAGO is 152-202 against the money line (-66.5 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 82.0 | CHICAGO is 8-13 against the money line (-12.2 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 83.8 | CHICAGO is 0-4 against the money line (-7.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 83.0 | CHICAGO is 75-102 against the money line (-37.5 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.0 | CHICAGO is 0-4 against the money line (-7.5 Units) in home games when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 87.3 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 37-56 against the money line (-37.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 79.6 | CONNECTICUT is 4-17 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 86.5 | CONNECTICUT is 10-22 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 85.6 | CONNECTICUT is 2-12 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 82.1 | CHICAGO is 93-74 against the money line (+32.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 79.7 | CHICAGO is 25-12 against the money line (+16.3 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.1, OPPONENT 81.5 | CHICAGO is 9-2 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 88.5, OPPONENT 80.3 | CHICAGO is 15-8 against the money line (+10.3 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 81.2 | CHICAGO is 179-95 against the money line (+109.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 87.6, OPPONENT 83.4 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 166-91 against the money line (+27.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 65-39 against the money line (+18.1 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-7 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-12 against the money line (+8.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-11 against the money line (+8.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-8 against the money line (+8.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-12 against the money line (+8.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-12 against the money line (+8.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-11 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-12 against the money line (+8.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 103-167 against the money line (-64.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 103-141 against the money line (-58.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-12 against the money line (-12.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 118-171 against the money line (-55.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 98-97 against the money line (-43.4 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-9.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 52-49 against the money line (+25.2 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 53-53 against the money line (+29.2 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 50-33 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-13 against the money line (+11.2 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-12 against the money line (+9.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 111-98 against the money line (+20.3 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 102-75 against the money line (+25.9 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 139-138 against the money line (+22.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 84-53 against the money line (+20.3 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-6 against the money line (-8.5 Units) as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-6 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-6 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-6 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 0-4 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in home games after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-13 against the money line (-12.7 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-10 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-11 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 64-69 against the money line (-41.7 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 53-70 against the money line (-39.8 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-16 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-14 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 6-13 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 3-7 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-15 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 7-13 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 5-12 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 53-57 against the money line (-29.1 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-13 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-14 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-13 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 37-47 against the money line (-32.7 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 0-5 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite this season. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-7.0 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite this season. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-7.0 Units) after playing a home game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 60-67 against the money line (-35.3 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 47-59 against the money line (-27.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 17-30 against the money line (-28.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in road games after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-16 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where they had 5 or less steals since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 20-9 against the money line (+15.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 9-4 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 90.2, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-4 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in home games after 4 or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 8-4 | +4.8 | 8-4 | 4-8 | 79.6 | 38.9 | 43.5% | 45.5 | 74.6 | 35.7 | 41.0% | 37.3 | Road Games | 3-3 | +0.8 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 78.3 | 38.5 | 41.2% | 49.2 | 74.8 | 34.3 | 39.4% | 39.8 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.4 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 74.8 | 35.6 | 41.4% | 41.2 | 76.0 | 34.8 | 43.5% | 38.6 | Division Games | 4-1 | +3 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 82.4 | 43.2 | 46.7% | 45.6 | 72.0 | 36.2 | 39.2% | 35.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.6 | 38.9 | 29-67 | 43.5% | 8-21 | 37.2% | 14-18 | 78.2% | 45 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82 | 41.5 | 30-71 | 42.4% | 7-22 | 33.6% | 14-18 | 79.9% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 78.3 | 38.5 | 29-70 | 41.2% | 8-22 | 35.1% | 13-17 | 77.2% | 49 | 10 | 17 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.6 | 35.7 | 27-65 | 41.0% | 7-21 | 32.7% | 14-17 | 83.5% | 37 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 83.4 | 42.3 | 30-69 | 43.9% | 7-21 | 34.5% | 16-20 | 80.5% | 44 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 74.8 | 34.3 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 7-22 | 31.5% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 40 | 7 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 6-7 | -4.7 | 5-8 | 7-6 | 80.3 | 41.2 | 40.9% | 44.2 | 78.6 | 40.0 | 41.6% | 44.7 | Home Games | 2-5 | -7.2 | 2-5 | 5-2 | 80.6 | 39.0 | 40.9% | 42.9 | 82.3 | 41.7 | 43.6% | 42.3 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.4 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 84.8 | 45.4 | 44.3% | 41.6 | 77.4 | 42.6 | 42.5% | 43.2 | Division Games | 5-2 | +0.3 | 4-3 | 5-2 | 82.7 | 45.0 | 41.1% | 45.3 | 78.0 | 39.3 | 40.7% | 45.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 80.3 | 41.2 | 28-68 | 40.9% | 7-19 | 33.7% | 18-21 | 85.9% | 44 | 10 | 20 | 21 | 8 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.7 | 42 | 29-68 | 43.4% | 8-22 | 36.9% | 16-20 | 81.7% | 44 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.6 | 39.0 | 28-70 | 40.9% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 18-19 | 91.8% | 43 | 11 | 19 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.6 | 40.0 | 29-69 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 15-20 | 74.0% | 45 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 17 | 6 | vs opponents averaging | 78.8 | 40 | 29-69 | 41.6% | 7-22 | 33.2% | 14-18 | 77.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 82.3 | 41.7 | 30-68 | 43.6% | 8-19 | 42.9% | 14-18 | 78.9% | 42 | 10 | 19 | 20 | 8 | 17 | 7 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.2, CHICAGO 72.8 |
| | |
|
|
5/14/2021 | @ ATLANTA | 78-67 | W | -140 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 54 | 20 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 32 | 13 | 5/16/2021 | PHOENIX | 86-78 | W | -115 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 44 | 12 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 35 | 15 | 5/19/2021 | INDIANA | 88-67 | W | -300 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 41 | 13 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 35 | 12 | 5/21/2021 | @ PHOENIX | 84-67 | W | +135 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 59 | 11 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 31 | 6 | 5/23/2021 | @ LAS VEGAS | 72-65 | W | +180 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 54 | 8 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 37 | 14 | 5/25/2021 | @ SEATTLE | 87-90 | L | +145 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 46 | 16 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 44 | 12 | 5/28/2021 | WASHINGTON | 86-81 | W | -330 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 42 | 14 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 41 | 10 | 5/30/2021 | @ MINNESOTA | 74-79 | L | -140 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 39 | 11 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 51 | 14 | 6/1/2021 | LAS VEGAS | 74-67 | W | +100 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 41 | 14 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 33 | 12 | 6/5/2021 | NEW YORK | 85-64 | W | -500 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 48 | 11 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 27 | 15 | 6/13/2021 | SEATTLE | 66-89 | L | +175 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 35 | 17 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 38 | 8 | 6/17/2021 | @ CHICAGO | 75-81 | L | +170 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 43 | 14 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 44 | 12 | 6/19/2021 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/22/2021 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2021 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2021 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2021 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2021 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/15/2021 | @ WASHINGTON | 70-56 | W | -140 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 44 | 14 | 18-72 | 25.0% | 54 | 14 | 5/19/2021 | @ ATLANTA | 85-77 | W | -175 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 60 | 24 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 49 | 18 | 5/23/2021 | NEW YORK | 85-93 | L | -220 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 42 | 12 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 48 | 22 | 5/25/2021 | ATLANTA | 83-90 | L | -250 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 47 | 21 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 39 | 10 | 5/28/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 61-76 | L | -175 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 38 | 27 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 36 | 19 | 5/30/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 79-82 | L | -155 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 51 | 22 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 41 | 19 | 6/1/2021 | PHOENIX | 83-84 | L | -120 | 30-79 | 38.0% | 36 | 10 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 48 | 19 | 6/3/2021 | @ PHOENIX | 74-77 | L | +100 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 48 | 8 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 50 | 17 | 6/5/2021 | @ LOS ANGELES | 63-68 | L | +100 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 49 | 18 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 48 | 11 | 6/9/2021 | INDIANA | 92-76 | W | -650 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 42 | 10 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 41 | 16 | 6/12/2021 | @ INDIANA | 83-79 | W | -650 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 38 | 16 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 41 | 17 | 6/15/2021 | @ MINNESOTA | 105-89 | W | +145 | 40-70 | 57.1% | 35 | 13 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 43 | 20 | 6/17/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 81-75 | W | -200 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 44 | 12 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 43 | 14 | 6/19/2021 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/22/2021 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/24/2021 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2021 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2021 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2021 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CHICAGO is 26-29 (+0.8 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 4-3 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CHICAGO is 15-13 (-0.5 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 2-0 (+2.8 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/17/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 75 | 155.5 | Over | 36 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 21-27 | 77.8% | 43 | 8 | 14 | | CHICAGO | 81 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 31 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 5-23 | 21.7% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 44 | 10 | 12 | 9/15/2020 | CONNECTICUT | 94 | 165.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 27-29 | 93.1% | 49 | 17 | 12 | N | CHICAGO | 81 | -2 | Over | 41 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 25 | 5 | 12 | 8/14/2020 | CONNECTICUT | 77 | 168 | SU ATS | 37 | 29-76 | 38.2% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 14-24 | 58.3% | 53 | 12 | 8 | N | CHICAGO | 74 | -6 | Under | 28 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 4-20 | 20.0% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 40 | 6 | 15 | 8/8/2020 | CHICAGO | 100 | -3 | SU ATS | 52 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 29-32 | 90.6% | 35 | 7 | 21 | N | CONNECTICUT | 93 | 167 | Over | 46 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 27 | 4 | 19 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 102-80 against the money line (+6.2 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 57-41 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 25-19 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 18-5 against the money line (+15.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 59-46 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 86-62 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 84-55 against the money line (+22.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 52-35 against the money line (+23.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 64-39 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 80-56 against the money line (+8.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 82-62 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 9-13 against the money line (-12.7 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 20-24 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 10-19 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 81.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 18-23 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.2, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 13-21 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Miller is 52-49 against the money line (-19.8 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 9-16 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 20-9 against the money line (+15.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 9-4 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 90.2, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 158 times, while the road underdog won straight up 69 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 8 times, while the road underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[F] 06/19/2021 - Alyssa Thomas is downgraded to OUT Saturday vs Chicago Sky ( Achilles ) | [F] 06/07/2021 - Jonquel Jones is out indefinitely, could be through 6/29 ( Personal ) | |
[F] 05/12/2021 - Gabby Williams is out for season ( Suspension ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/19/2024 11:26:55 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|