| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
CHICAGO |
|
|
168
| 77
Final
74 |
|
|
| | |
|
| IMG Academy - Bradenton, FL | | |  | |
| 673 | CONNECTICUT | +200 | | 674 | CHICAGO | -250 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals.
(26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +20.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(26-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor foul drawing team - attempting <=17 free throws/game, on Friday nights.
(18-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +28.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals.
(27-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73%, +20.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%).
(50-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 82 | | 31-70 | 44.8% | 7-20 | 37.3% | 13-17 | 74.9% | 39 | 10 | 15 | | CHICAGO | 89 | | 35-68 | 50.7% | 7-18 | 39.0% | 13-17 | 76.4% | 43 | 9 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 675 times, while CONNECTICUT won 307 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 90-39 against the money line (+47.1 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+8.0 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.5, OPPONENT 82.2 | CONNECTICUT is 23-7 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 77.5 | CONNECTICUT is 188-136 against the money line (+33.2 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 75.1 | CONNECTICUT is 15-7 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 83.2 | CONNECTICUT is 61-38 against the money line (+23.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 77.8 | CONNECTICUT is 26-7 against the money line (+20.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 79.5 | CHICAGO is 144-194 against the money line (-62.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 81.9 | CHICAGO is 28-64 against the money line (-45.7 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 82.9 | CHICAGO is 83-197 against the money line (-133.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 87.7 | CHICAGO is 95-145 against the money line (-56.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 80.3 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 2-10 against the money line (-12.2 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 93.7 | CONNECTICUT is 5-8 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 87.2 | CONNECTICUT is 3-10 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 83.8 | CONNECTICUT is 9-16 against the money line (-11.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 88.9 | CONNECTICUT is 5-13 against the money line (-10.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 92.5 | CONNECTICUT is 2-13 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.5, OPPONENT 87.3 | CONNECTICUT is 13-19 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 85.7 | CONNECTICUT is 5-12 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.4, OPPONENT 81.7 | CHICAGO is 13-2 against the money line (+14.3 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 93.7, OPPONENT 84.2 | CHICAGO is 13-7 against the money line (+13.0 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.3, OPPONENT 89.3 | CHICAGO is 11-2 against the money line (+10.2 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 79.2 | CHICAGO is 7-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 79.1 | CHICAGO is 18-8 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.3, OPPONENT 83.4 | CHICAGO is 12-5 against the money line (+10.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.7, OPPONENT 81.9 | CHICAGO is 80-63 against the money line (+35.8 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 77.8 | CHICAGO is 25-11 against the money line (+13.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 89.0, OPPONENT 84.5 | CHICAGO is 20-8 against the money line (+12.1 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 91.5, OPPONENT 86.5 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 25-25 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-8 against the money line (+8.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 101-99 against the money line (-47.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 95-131 against the money line (-48.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 110-165 against the money line (-56.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-13 against the money line (-10.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 23-25 against the money line (+15.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 20-16 against the money line (+11.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.5, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 110-90 against the money line (+20.0 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 62-46 against the money line (+25.8 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 49-21 against the money line (+17.3 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 9 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 51-67 against the money line (-36.7 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-26 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-23 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after a game where a team made 15% of their 3 point shots or worse since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 12-16 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in road games vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-11 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in road games after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-13 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-8 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-8 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in road games revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.2, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-22 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-13 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 40-38 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.8, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 17-8 against the money line (+11.2 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 16-8 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-8 against the money line (+8.4 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.3, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-5 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.3, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-7 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.4, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 31-28 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.7, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 28-25 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 29-24 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.5, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 19-10 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.1, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-11 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-15 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-6 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.6, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-10 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.9, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 3-6 | -3.6 | 3-6 | 4-4 | 80.4 | 41.9 | 43.2% | 43.1 | 81.4 | 39.2 | 45.0% | 41.8 | | Road Games | 3-6 | -3.6 | 3-6 | 4-4 | 80.4 | 41.9 | 43.2% | 43.1 | 81.4 | 39.2 | 45.0% | 41.8 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 2-3 | 3-1 | 84.2 | 42.0 | 47.5% | 40.2 | 80.6 | 40.2 | 45.6% | 38.8 | | Division Games | 3-6 | -3.6 | 3-6 | 4-4 | 80.4 | 41.9 | 43.2% | 43.1 | 81.4 | 39.2 | 45.0% | 41.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.4 | 41.9 | 29-67 | 43.2% | 6-19 | 31.8% | 16-23 | 71.4% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 10 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 80.8 | 40.7 | 30-67 | 44.2% | 7-21 | 34.6% | 14-18 | 78.6% | 42 | 8 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.4 | 41.9 | 29-67 | 43.2% | 6-19 | 31.8% | 16-23 | 71.4% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 10 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.4 | 39.2 | 30-66 | 45.0% | 7-20 | 35.2% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 42 | 8 | 17 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.4 | 40.4 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 8-22 | 34.7% | 13-17 | 79.2% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.4 | 39.2 | 30-66 | 45.0% | 7-20 | 35.2% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 42 | 8 | 17 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 6-3 | +2.9 | 4-5 | 3-6 | 86.8 | 41.0 | 49.0% | 40.1 | 84.6 | 42.7 | 46.4% | 38.8 | | Road Games | 6-3 | +2.9 | 4-5 | 3-6 | 86.8 | 41.0 | 49.0% | 40.1 | 84.6 | 42.7 | 46.4% | 38.8 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.4 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 85.6 | 42.8 | 48.9% | 39.6 | 85.6 | 45.0 | 48.0% | 36.0 | | Division Games | 6-3 | +2.9 | 4-5 | 3-6 | 86.8 | 41.0 | 49.0% | 40.1 | 84.6 | 42.7 | 46.4% | 38.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 86.8 | 41.0 | 33-68 | 49.0% | 8-21 | 36.8% | 13-16 | 80.3% | 40 | 8 | 21 | 19 | 9 | 17 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 80.6 | 40.3 | 29-67 | 43.9% | 7-22 | 33.0% | 15-18 | 80.0% | 41 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 86.8 | 41.0 | 33-68 | 49.0% | 8-21 | 36.8% | 13-16 | 80.3% | 40 | 8 | 21 | 19 | 9 | 17 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.6 | 42.7 | 32-68 | 46.4% | 7-18 | 39.8% | 14-19 | 74.9% | 39 | 7 | 19 | 18 | 10 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 83.3 | 41.8 | 31-68 | 45.0% | 7-20 | 34.9% | 15-20 | 77.7% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.6 | 42.7 | 32-68 | 46.4% | 7-18 | 39.8% | 14-19 | 74.9% | 39 | 7 | 19 | 18 | 10 | 15 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 72.9, CHICAGO 73.1 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/26/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 69-77 | L | -140 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 50 | 14 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 45 | 14 | | 7/28/2020 | *WASHINGTON | 89-94 | L | +155 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 43 | 16 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 41 | 15 | | 7/30/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | 76-81 | L | +200 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 56 | 14 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 43 | 15 | | 8/1/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 69-78 | L | -125 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 38 | 16 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 53 | 17 | | 8/4/2020 | *SEATTLE | 74-87 | L | +400 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 47 | 14 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 35 | 9 | | 8/6/2020 | *DALLAS | 91-68 | W | -165 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 44 | 14 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 39 | 17 | | 8/8/2020 | *CHICAGO | 93-100 | L | +135 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 27 | 19 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 35 | 21 | | 8/10/2020 | *ATLANTA | 93-82 | W | -210 | 36-77 | 46.8% | 45 | 8 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 44 | 19 | | 8/12/2020 | *DALLAS | 70-66 | W | -200 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 38 | 9 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 41 | 13 | | 8/14/2020 | *CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2020 | *SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2020 | *INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/20/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/22/2020 | *NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/26/2020 | *PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/28/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/30/2020 | *WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/26/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 88-86 | W | -155 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 38 | 16 | 36-77 | 46.8% | 51 | 17 | | 7/28/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | 96-78 | W | +170 | 37-68 | 54.4% | 42 | 15 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 36 | 16 | | 7/30/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 81-83 | L | -200 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 43 | 14 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 38 | 15 | | 8/1/2020 | *WASHINGTON | 88-86 | W | +175 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 40 | 17 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 44 | 14 | | 8/4/2020 | *DALLAS | 82-79 | W | -270 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 46 | 13 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 40 | 10 | | 8/6/2020 | *PHOENIX | 86-96 | L | -155 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 38 | 19 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 36 | 21 | | 8/8/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | 100-93 | W | -155 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 35 | 21 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 27 | 19 | | 8/10/2020 | *SEATTLE | 71-89 | L | +170 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 36 | 21 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 41 | 13 | | 8/12/2020 | *PHOENIX | 89-71 | W | -210 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 43 | 15 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 36 | 14 | | 8/14/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2020 | *ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/20/2020 | *NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/22/2020 | *INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2020 | *NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2020 | *INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/29/2020 | *SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CHICAGO is 25-27 (+3.6 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 4-3 (+5.5 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
8/8/2020 | CHICAGO | 100 | -3 | SU ATS | 52 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 29-32 | 90.6% | 35 | 7 | 21 | | N | CONNECTICUT | 93 | 167 | Over | 46 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 27 | 4 | 19 | 9/6/2019 | CHICAGO | 109 | 175 | SU ATS | 52 | 41-77 | 53.2% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 21-24 | 87.5% | 47 | 7 | 20 | | | CONNECTICUT | 104 | -6 | Over | 52 | 38-89 | 42.7% | 12-26 | 46.2% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 49 | 12 | 17 | 7/30/2019 | CHICAGO | 94 | 161.5 | ATS | 43 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 10-29 | 34.5% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 42 | 8 | 14 | | | CONNECTICUT | 100 | -7 | SU Over | 57 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 10-25 | 40.0% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 45 | 10 | 16 | 6/23/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 75 | -5 | Over | 35 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 12-21 | 57.1% | 45 | 7 | 15 | | | CHICAGO | 93 | 163 | SU ATS | 56 | 38-72 | 52.8% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 42 | 5 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 8-2 against the money line (+6.3 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 70-45 against the money line (+14.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 40-27 against the money line (+16.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Miller is 37-39 against the money line (-28.5 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 8-15 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in road games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 25-26 against the money line (-21.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-18 against the money line (-12.1 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 17-8 against the money line (+11.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 16-8 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after a division game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 13-8 against the money line (+8.4 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.3, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 11-5 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.3, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 19-10 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.1, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 22-11 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 12-6 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.6, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | | Line Movement Analysis not posted for neutral court games. |
|
| | |
| [F] 06/22/2020 - Jonquel Jones is out for season ( Personal ) | |
| [F/C] 08/05/2020 - Jantel Lavender is out for season ( Foot ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/8/2024 1:05:48 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|