| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES CHICAGO |
|
| 163.5 | 81 Final 72 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
315 | LOS ANGELES | -550 | 316 | CHICAGO | +375 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (196-137 since 1997.) (58.9%, +62.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (79-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.4%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning record on the season, on Sunday games. (64-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.4%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (51-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (47.7%, +51.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (73-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (74-66 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.9%, +57.2 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (122-32 since 1997.) (79.2%, +59.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (116-31 since 1997.) (78.9%, +57.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (100-23 since 1997.) (81.3%, +55.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (129-93 since 1997.) (58.1%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (105-73 since 1997.) (59%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (71-44 since 1997.) (61.7%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (82-38 since 1997.) (68.3%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (73-44 since 1997.) (62.4%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (77-27 since 1997.) (74%, +34.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half. (47-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +28 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (73-46 since 1997.) (61.3%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (48-20 since 1997.) (70.6%, +27 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off 2 or more consecutive road losses, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (37-9 since 1997.) (80.4%, +24.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in non-conference games. (32-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off 2 or more consecutive road losses, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record. (30-6 since 1997.) (83.3%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (33-13 since 1997.) (71.7%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half. (51-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.5%, +32.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (55-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +31.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (23-3 since 1997.) (88.5%, +17.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half. (42-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +27.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in June games. (51-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +21.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in June games. (32-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +16.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points, off a road loss. (24-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +20.4 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 84 | | 34-69 | 49.1% | 5-16 | 30.5% | 12-15 | 80.7% | 40 | 8 | 12 | CHICAGO | 76 | | 28-65 | 44.1% | 6-16 | 36.1% | 13-16 | 80.5% | 40 | 9 | 16 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 724 times, while CHICAGO won 243 times. Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 38-5 against the money line (+28.4 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.4, OPPONENT 76.5 | LOS ANGELES is 13-1 against the money line (+10.8 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.7, OPPONENT 73.5 | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.2, OPPONENT 78.8 | LOS ANGELES is 13-3 against the money line (+9.1 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 72.8 | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.1, OPPONENT 74.3 | LOS ANGELES is 37-13 against the money line (+15.8 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.4, OPPONENT 75.7 | LOS ANGELES is 13-1 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.4, OPPONENT 72.1 | LOS ANGELES is 13-2 against the money line (+10.6 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 73.3 | LOS ANGELES is 49-8 against the money line (+26.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.6, OPPONENT 78.0 | LOS ANGELES is 19-3 against the money line (+13.1 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 91.0, OPPONENT 81.0 | CHICAGO is 4-13 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 89.6 | CHICAGO is 48-72 against the money line (-33.3 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 78.4 | CHICAGO is 3-15 against the money line (-12.2 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 95.1 | CHICAGO is 7-19 against the money line (-13.7 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 86.9 | CHICAGO is 40-71 against the money line (-31.3 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.6 | CHICAGO is 28-52 against the money line (-33.2 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 80.6 | CHICAGO is 3-15 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in home games when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.0, OPPONENT 92.4 | CHICAGO is 5-22 against the money line (-15.9 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 94.1 | CHICAGO is 4-12 against the money line (-9.6 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 88.5 | CHICAGO is 1-9 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in home games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 90.8 | CHICAGO is 31-50 against the money line (-27.5 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.3 | CHICAGO is 4-16 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 87.8 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 102-89 against the money line (-43.6 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.6, OPPONENT 72.1 | LOS ANGELES is 191-158 against the money line (-78.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.2, OPPONENT 82.1 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 83-138 against the money line (-62.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-8 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 93.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 84-83 against the money line (-40.2 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 27-66 against the money line (-43.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 55-54 against the money line (-33.3 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-7.5 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 49-57 against the money line (-29.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 37-46 against the money line (-25.7 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 65-75 against the money line (-38.3 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 91.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-10 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 91.5 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 120-109 against the money line (-70.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 171-144 against the money line (-59.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 92-103 against the money line (-42.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 205-154 against the money line (-68.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 70-111 against the money line (-48.6 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 106-77 against the money line (-55.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 15-2 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) off an road win where they scored 85 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) off a road win over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.7, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-3 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-3 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-2 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-5 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-3 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 5-15 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-15 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-15 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-15 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in June games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-17 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 63-101 against the money line (-43.2 Units) against Western conference opponents since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-14 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in home games after 3 consecutive non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 119-153 against the money line (-53.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 23-37 against the money line (-20.4 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 63-101 against the money line (-43.2 Units) in non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 92-123 against the money line (-42.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-23 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in home games after having lost 4 of their last 5 games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 55-62 against the money line (-31.6 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-11 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in home games revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 72.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-7.1 Units) off a road loss over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-13 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 91.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 4-13 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 91.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 4-11 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-12 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-10 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 90.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-10 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in home games after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 94.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 30-66 against the money line (-39.5 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 37-45 against the money line (-25.2 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-12 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 91.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 3-9 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 90.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in home games after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-8 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 1-11 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 91.9 - (Rating = 5*) | CHICAGO is 42-50 against the money line (-25.7 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 29-40 against the money line (-25.1 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 0-7 against the money line (-8.0 Units) in home games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 90.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 44-57 against the money line (-33.4 Units) in road games in June games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-34 against the money line (-24.0 Units) in road games on Sunday games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 148-125 against the money line (-63.3 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-6 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 58% of their shots or better since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 119-78 against the money line (-53.1 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-13 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 31-36 against the money line (-23.7 Units) in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 29-35 against the money line (-31.4 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-9 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 7-2 | +2.9 | 6-3 | 3-6 | 80.4 | 43.0 | 48.2% | 34.7 | 76.2 | 38.1 | 44.9% | 38.8 | Road Games | 3-1 | +3.5 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 88.7 | 45.2 | 51.4% | 29.2 | 83.5 | 38.5 | 48.8% | 38.5 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -0.6 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 77.2 | 41.2 | 48.5% | 37.8 | 73.2 | 35.4 | 41.5% | 37.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 80.4 | 43.0 | 30-63 | 48.2% | 5-14 | 35.4% | 14-18 | 81.8% | 35 | 6 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.7 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 6-19 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 78.8% | 41 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 88.7 | 45.2 | 33-65 | 51.4% | 6-15 | 42.4% | 16-18 | 86.5% | 29 | 5 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 11 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.2 | 38.1 | 28-62 | 44.9% | 5-16 | 31.1% | 15-19 | 82.6% | 39 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 81.6 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 7-20 | 33.7% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 83.5 | 38.5 | 30-62 | 48.8% | 6-15 | 40.3% | 16-18 | 90.3% | 38 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 5 | 17 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 3-6 | -0.8 | 3-5 | 6-3 | 78.4 | 37.4 | 42.1% | 41.4 | 87.2 | 43.4 | 46.9% | 43.7 | Home Games | 2-2 | +1.1 | 1-2 | 3-1 | 77.5 | 36.2 | 40.3% | 41.5 | 89.2 | 44.7 | 46.5% | 46.2 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2 | 0-4 | 4-1 | 78.0 | 38.4 | 39.2% | 39.0 | 93.8 | 47.4 | 52.6% | 43.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.4 | 37.4 | 29-68 | 42.1% | 6-18 | 34.8% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 41 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 81 | 40.9 | 29-67 | 43.6% | 6-19 | 32.7% | 16-20 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 77.5 | 36.2 | 26-66 | 40.3% | 5-15 | 35.0% | 19-23 | 82.8% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 6 | 16 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 87.2 | 43.4 | 33-71 | 46.9% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 44 | 9 | 22 | 18 | 8 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 82.7 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-20 | 33.2% | 16-20 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 89.2 | 44.7 | 34-74 | 46.5% | 7-19 | 37.7% | 13-18 | 73.2% | 46 | 10 | 24 | 21 | 9 | 14 | 6 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 71.2, CHICAGO 72.2 |
| | |
|
|
5/20/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 77-76 | W | +250 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 31 | 6 | 27-55 | 49.1% | 47 | 24 | 5/22/2018 | @ INDIANA | 87-70 | W | -360 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 37 | 10 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 36 | 14 | 5/24/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | 94-102 | L | +170 | 35-64 | 54.7% | 18 | 11 | 40-64 | 62.5% | 40 | 20 | 5/27/2018 | PHOENIX | 80-72 | W | -330 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 37 | 15 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 37 | 18 | 6/3/2018 | MINNESOTA | 77-69 | W | -250 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 31 | 11 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 38 | 18 | 6/7/2018 | SEATTLE | 63-88 | L | -360 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 35 | 17 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 40 | 16 | 6/10/2018 | CHICAGO | 77-59 | W | | 29-59 | 49.2% | 49 | 13 | 21-74 | 28.4% | 41 | 7 | 6/12/2018 | ATLANTA | 72-64 | W | -400 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 13 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 39 | 11 | 6/15/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 97-86 | W | -175 | 35-56 | 62.5% | 31 | 16 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 31 | 12 | 6/17/2018 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/19/2018 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/22/2018 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/24/2018 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/26/2018 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2018 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2018 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/19/2018 | @ INDIANA | 82-64 | W | +105 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 49 | 12 | 28-76 | 36.8% | 39 | 5 | 5/20/2018 | NEW YORK | 80-76 | W | +210 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 49 | 15 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 38 | 8 | 5/23/2018 | ATLANTA | 63-81 | L | +105 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 34 | 13 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 53 | 16 | 5/25/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 91-95 | L | +375 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 46 | 14 | 34-81 | 42.0% | 44 | 7 | 6/1/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 72-110 | L | +350 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 30 | 23 | 42-82 | 51.2% | 56 | 16 | 6/3/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 95-90 | W | -210 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 53 | 13 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 38 | 15 | 6/8/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 79-96 | L | +350 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 32 | 13 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 36 | 9 | 6/10/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 59-77 | L | | 21-74 | 28.4% | 41 | 7 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 49 | 13 | 6/12/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 85-96 | L | +400 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 39 | 9 | 35-62 | 56.5% | 40 | 13 | 6/17/2018 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/19/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/22/2018 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/24/2018 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2018 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2018 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2018 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2018 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 21-8 (+1.7 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 2-8 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 10-5 (+2.7 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 4-1 (+0.4 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/10/2018 | CHICAGO | 59 | 167.5 | Under | 31 | 21-74 | 28.4% | 3-23 | 13.0% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 41 | 14 | 7 | | LOS ANGELES | 77 | -14 | SU ATS | 38 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 2-13 | 15.4% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 49 | 7 | 13 | 8/18/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 115 | -7 | SU ATS | 40 | 45-99 | 45.5% | 12-23 | 52.2% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 49 | 14 | 6 | | CHICAGO | 106 | 167 | Over | 42 | 41-82 | 50.0% | 14-27 | 51.9% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 49 | 11 | 21 | 7/20/2017 | CHICAGO | 82 | 164 | SU ATS | 35 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 38 | 7 | 12 | | LOS ANGELES | 80 | -12 | Under | 45 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 35 | 4 | 11 | 6/6/2017 | CHICAGO | 70 | 168.5 | ATS | 35 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 48 | 8 | 18 | | LOS ANGELES | 79 | -13 | SU Under | 41 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 31-40 | 77.5% | 44 | 7 | 7 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 60-40 against the money line (+24.1 Units) on Sunday games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 73.6, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 32-15 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 164-107 against the money line (+43.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 134-83 against the money line (+31.4 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.4, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 9-2 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in road games after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 33-11 against the money line (+16.9 Units) off a road win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 78.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 24-7 against the money line (+12.0 Units) off a road win as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 87-43 against the money line (+26.0 Units) after a win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 13-3 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 39-11 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 29-8 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 62-32 against the money line (+19.3 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.6, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 113-61 against the money line (+32.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 191-139 against the money line (+35.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.7, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 194-127 against the money line (+29.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 138-65 against the money line (+44.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 78.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 136-100 against the money line (+24.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.8, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 5-15 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in home games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 5-15 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 5-15 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 2-8 against the money line (-7.1 Units) off a road loss as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 4-13 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 91.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 4-13 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 91.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 4-11 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 3-12 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 2-10 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 90.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 2-9 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 2-10 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Stocks is 1-7 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in home games after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 94.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 3-12 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 91.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 3-9 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 2-9 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 90.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 2-9 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in home games after playing a road game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 1-8 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Stocks is 1-11 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 91.9 - (Rating = 5*) | Stocks is 0-7 against the money line (-8.0 Units) in home games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 90.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 1-8 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 93.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 3-10 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 2-8 against the money line (-7.5 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 3-10 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 91.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 2-10 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 91.5 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Agler is 17-17 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in road games after a non-conference game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 22-27 against the money line (-21.0 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 73.0, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 14-17 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 32-49 against the money line (-25.1 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 73.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 16-19 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 9-14 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 20-21 against the money line (-19.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 14-16 against the money line (-20.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 9-11 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 3-10 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after 2 straight games where they had 5 or less steals as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 13-20 against the money line (-23.1 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 18-19 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 6-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 2 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 0 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[C] 06/08/2018 - Stefanie Dolson is out indefinitely ( Hamstring ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/29/2024 12:28:29 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|