| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA
CHICAGO |
|
|
172
| 98
Final
108 |
|
|
| | |
|
| WNBA Playoffs - Second Round | | |  | |
| 607 | ATLANTA | +120 | | 608 | CHICAGO | -140 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(259-92 since 1997.) (73.8%, +77.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(209-74 since 1997.) (73.9%, +62.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.), after a loss by 10 points or more.
(126-41 since 1997.) (75.4%, +54.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, in August or September games.
(155-53 since 1997.) (74.5%, +54 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season.
(187-64 since 1997.) (74.5%, +50.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(246-102 since 1997.) (70.7%, +47.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a loss by 10 points or more.
(95-29 since 1997.) (76.6%, +46.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a loss by 10 points or more.
(92-27 since 1997.) (77.3%, +46.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(149-89 since 1997.) (62.6%, +37 units. Rating = 1*) |  - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(80-21 since 1997.) (79.2%, +34.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(87-32 since 1997.) (73.1%, +34.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after a loss by 10 points or more.
(87-43 since 1997.) (66.9%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - playing with 3 or more days rest, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(24-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(105-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +30.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(70-35 since 1997.) (66.7%, +24.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(70-35 since 1997.) (66.7%, +24.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(70-35 since 1997.) (66.7%, +24.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(34-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.9%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(42-22 since 1997.) (65.6%, +20.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - playing with 3 or more days rest, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(33-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games against opponent after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(31-14 since 1997.) (68.9%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(44-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +28.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(125-101 since 1997.) (55.3%, +17.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(88-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.5%, +16.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(88-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.5%, +16.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(88-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.5%, +16.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(53-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.6%, +13.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games against opponent after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(26-11 since 1997.) (70.3%, +15.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by more than 6 points in three consecutive games.
(44-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.5%, +18.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(23-7 since 1997.) (76.7%, +12.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(86-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.6%, +22.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(86-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.6%, +22.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(86-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.6%, +22.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(39-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.2%, -2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(48-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.5%, +8.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(59-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.8%, +4.3 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(327-328 since 1997.) (49.9%, +71.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more.
(306-296 since 1997.) (50.8%, +48.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(103-67 since 1997.) (60.6%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points.
(79-44 since 1997.) (64.2%, +40.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(98-99 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.7%, +26.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(70-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(85-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.9%, +24.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(65-33 since 1997.) (66.3%, +35.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, off an home win scoring 85 or more points.
(58-29 since 1997.) (66.7%, +34.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(77-45 since 1997.) (63.1%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(59-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.7%, +28 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(36-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.3%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(52-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(63-33 since 1997.) (65.6%, +31.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season.
(83-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +27.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season.
(53-26 since 1997.) (67.1%, +29.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(46-21 since 1997.) (68.7%, +29.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(58-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.3%, +41.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - playing with 3 or more days rest, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(24-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(31-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, on Sunday games.
(30-10 since 1997.) (75%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games.
(38-20 since 1997.) (65.5%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games.
(32-14 since 1997.) (69.6%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - playing with 3 or more days rest, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(33-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(79-79 over the last 5 seasons.) (50%, +10.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(60-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(26-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +17.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games.
(42-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.5%, +21.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(47-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.6%, +19.4 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| ATLANTA | 81 | | 29-68 | 43.0% | 4-13 | 30.6% | 18-24 | 75.5% | 43 | 14 | 12 | | CHICAGO | 89 | | 34-74 | 45.5% | 4-12 | 35.4% | 17-21 | 83.0% | 46 | 15 | 10 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 719 times, while ATLANTA won 253 times.
Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
ATLANTA is 9-5 against the money line (+7.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 79.9 | ATLANTA is 15-12 against the money line (+7.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 86.3, OPPONENT 86.7 | ATLANTA is 15-9 against the money line (+10.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 87.8, OPPONENT 87.3 | CHICAGO is 101-138 against the money line (-64.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 79.7 | CHICAGO is 47-72 against the money line (-32.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 78.3 | CHICAGO is 35-49 against the money line (-32.4 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 77.8 | CHICAGO is 21-48 against the money line (-31.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 80.3 | CHICAGO is 10-15 against the money line (-11.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 90.2 |
|
ATLANTA is 130-139 against the money line (-63.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 81.1 | ATLANTA is 7-17 against the money line (-14.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 83.1 | ATLANTA is 5-11 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in road games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 73.4, OPPONENT 81.6 | ATLANTA is 8-12 against the money line (-15.2 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 78.8 | ATLANTA is 14-29 against the money line (-14.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.7, OPPONENT 88.8 | ATLANTA is 8-14 against the money line (-8.1 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.9, OPPONENT 90.3 | ATLANTA is 15-19 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 84.6 | ATLANTA is 0-6 against the money line (-10.8 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 91.8 | CHICAGO is 57-36 against the money line (+19.1 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 78.6 | CHICAGO is 65-54 against the money line (+16.8 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 77.5 | CHICAGO is 21-7 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in home games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.8, OPPONENT 82.7 | CHICAGO is 31-9 against the money line (+18.9 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 92.1, OPPONENT 84.2 |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 15-11 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 37-36 against the money line (-29.7 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 105-149 against the money line (-49.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 47-65 against the money line (-32.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 21-38 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.8, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 34-53 against the money line (-25.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.0, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 85-96 against the money line (-39.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 120-135 against the money line (-54.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 10-21 against the money line (-17.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.1, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-15 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 17-25 against the money line (-17.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-20 against the money line (-15.6 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 89-99 against the money line (-41.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 13-27 against the money line (-14.9 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-9 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 16-24 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-11 against the money line (-8.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-11 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.7, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 18-21 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 78-84 against the money line (-42.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 37-41 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 23-26 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 76-90 against the money line (-38.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 105-123 against the money line (-52.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 29-32 against the money line (-21.7 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-4 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.7, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 91.0, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-4 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 5-0 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 90.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 11-7 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after one or more consecutive overs this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.8, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-2 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 85.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-8 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-2 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 85.8, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 8-3 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.0, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 31-21 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 57-81 against the money line (-34.5 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 107-132 against the money line (-48.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-39 against the money line (-24.3 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-33 against the money line (-25.8 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-7.9 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in home games after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 9-13 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 95-129 against the money line (-51.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-32 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.9, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 82-101 against the money line (-37.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 59-75 against the money line (-35.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 42-56 against the money line (-28.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 25-31 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 27-28 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 25-27 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-27 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 23-32 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 19-25 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-22 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 25-31 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 84-114 against the money line (-40.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-20 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a game where a team made 15% of their 3 point shots or worse since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 53-52 against the money line (-24.5 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 39-46 against the money line (-33.7 Units) on Sunday games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 31-32 against the money line (-27.2 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 52-68 against the money line (-43.3 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-11 against the money line (-9.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.7, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 11-16 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 15-23 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 27-36 against the money line (-26.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 23-33 against the money line (-24.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 19-31 against the money line (-25.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 18-20 against the money line (-21.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 81-98 against the money line (-48.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-17 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 10-15 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 21-27 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-17 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-2 against the money line (+5.8 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 89.7, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 18-17 | +1.6 | 17-17 | 19-15 | 82.1 | 39.6 | 42.5% | 46.0 | 84.0 | 40.9 | 43.4% | 44.6 | | Road Games | 6-11 | -1.6 | 7-10 | 6-10 | 77.3 | 37.2 | 41.7% | 45.5 | 82.6 | 41.0 | 43.9% | 43.9 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -3.3 | 1-3 | 3-2 | 83.4 | 39.6 | 44.6% | 47.2 | 85.6 | 45.8 | 43.0% | 42.8 | | Division Games | 9-7 | +1 | 6-9 | 8-8 | 81.6 | 40.7 | 41.4% | 46.7 | 83.9 | 40.7 | 42.9% | 47.7 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.1 | 39.6 | 29-69 | 42.5% | 4-13 | 29.0% | 20-27 | 75.3% | 46 | 11 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 40.6 | 30-67 | 44.3% | 5-16 | 33.8% | 17-21 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.3 | 37.2 | 27-66 | 41.7% | 4-13 | 31.1% | 19-26 | 72.8% | 45 | 11 | 13 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.0 | 40.9 | 31-71 | 43.4% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 18-23 | 78.9% | 45 | 10 | 20 | 22 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 82 | 40.8 | 30-67 | 44.4% | 6-17 | 33.9% | 17-21 | 80.3% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 82.6 | 41.0 | 30-69 | 43.9% | 4-14 | 29.9% | 18-23 | 76.7% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 21 | 9 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 18-16 | -4.8 | 16-17 | 23-11 | 86.2 | 44.3 | 46.2% | 43.7 | 85.6 | 42.1 | 43.6% | 41.7 | | Home Games | 11-6 | +2 | 7-10 | 12-5 | 87.9 | 43.6 | 46.8% | 44.2 | 83.8 | 41.9 | 43.3% | 40.9 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.2 | 3-1 | 3-2 | 89.8 | 42.4 | 47.8% | 42.8 | 86.8 | 42.8 | 43.6% | 44.8 | | Division Games | 8-8 | -5.1 | 8-7 | 11-5 | 87.3 | 44.2 | 45.3% | 45.0 | 85.1 | 43.2 | 43.1% | 43.9 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 86.2 | 44.3 | 33-72 | 46.2% | 4-11 | 36.8% | 16-19 | 83.1% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 11 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.7 | 40.6 | 30-67 | 44.3% | 5-16 | 33.4% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 87.9 | 43.6 | 34-73 | 46.8% | 4-10 | 34.7% | 16-20 | 82.2% | 44 | 11 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 85.6 | 42.1 | 30-69 | 43.6% | 7-19 | 35.0% | 19-23 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.6 | 40.4 | 29-67 | 43.9% | 6-17 | 33.5% | 17-21 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 83.8 | 41.9 | 29-68 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 19-24 | 80.9% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 70.9, CHICAGO 71.1 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/26/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 82-90 | L | +175 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 41 | 12 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 50 | 7 | | 8/28/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 87-73 | W | -165 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 51 | 14 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 45 | 15 | | 9/4/2016 | SEATTLE | 82-91 | L | -175 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 38 | 9 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 40 | 14 | | 9/6/2016 | PHOENIX | 91-87 | W | +155 | 41-77 | 53.2% | 42 | 13 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 37 | 15 | | 9/8/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 86-81 | W | +325 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 47 | 12 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 36 | 9 | | 9/11/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 75-86 | L | +210 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 54 | 19 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 40 | 10 | | 9/13/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 67-71 | L | -400 | 23-75 | 30.7% | 52 | 11 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 48 | 16 | | 9/15/2016 | WASHINGTON | 94-91 | W | -155 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 50 | 14 | 34-80 | 42.5% | 40 | 7 | | 9/17/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 87-95 | L | +220 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 37 | 15 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 49 | 12 | | 9/21/2016 | SEATTLE | 94-85 | W | +170 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 43 | 9 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 37 | 6 | | 9/25/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/26/2016 | ATLANTA | 90-82 | W | -210 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 50 | 7 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 41 | 12 | | 8/28/2016 | @ DALLAS | 92-85 | W | +105 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 42 | 9 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 44 | 12 | | 9/2/2016 | SEATTLE | 92-88 | W | -330 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 45 | 5 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 45 | 8 | | 9/4/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 97-73 | W | -750 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 46 | 9 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 32 | 8 | | 9/7/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 81-118 | L | -165 | 32-84 | 38.1% | 40 | 9 | 45-74 | 60.8% | 47 | 9 | | 9/9/2016 | @ INDIANA | 88-95 | L | +220 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 40 | 11 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 45 | 17 | | 9/11/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 96-86 | W | +145 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 46 | 12 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 47 | 12 | | 9/13/2016 | MINNESOTA | 98-97 | W | +180 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 41 | 17 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 44 | 15 | | 9/16/2016 | NEW YORK | 92-68 | W | -200 | 39-83 | 47.0% | 51 | 8 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 45 | 18 | | 9/18/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 75-88 | L | +200 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 36 | 16 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 43 | 12 | | 9/25/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CHICAGO is 24-16 (+12.2 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 9-6 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CHICAGO is 12-6 (+3.9 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 5-1 (+3.5 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/26/2016 | ATLANTA | 82 | 167 | Over | 44 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 22-31 | 71.0% | 41 | 6 | 12 | | | CHICAGO | 90 | -5 | SU ATS | 44 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 22-25 | 88.0% | 50 | 18 | 7 | 6/17/2016 | CHICAGO | 97 | -5 | Over | 55 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 18-25 | 72.0% | 51 | 11 | 11 | | | ATLANTA | 101 | 177 | SU ATS | 55 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 30-38 | 78.9% | 50 | 9 | 9 | 5/22/2016 | CHICAGO | 81 | -4.5 | Under | 41 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 60 | 14 | 13 | | | ATLANTA | 87 | 170.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 22-31 | 71.0% | 44 | 7 | 5 | 8/29/2015 | CHICAGO | 98 | -1 | SU ATS | 52 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 45 | 11 | 10 | | | ATLANTA | 96 | 159.5 | Over | 45 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 2-14 | 14.3% | 28-37 | 75.7% | 45 | 15 | 6 | 7/21/2015 | ATLANTA | 92 | 163 | ATS | 48 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 33 | 7 | 14 | | | CHICAGO | 97 | -9.5 | SU Over | 44 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 28-32 | 87.5% | 42 | 9 | 15 | 6/24/2015 | ATLANTA | 96 | 159.5 | ATS | 34 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 50 | 15 | 13 | | | CHICAGO | 100 | -8.5 | SU Over | 40 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 34-36 | 94.4% | 49 | 10 | 15 | 6/19/2015 | CHICAGO | 73 | -3.5 | Under | 36 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 25-28 | 89.3% | 41 | 9 | 18 | | | ATLANTA | 74 | 158 | SU ATS | 37 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 1-9 | 11.1% | 13-21 | 61.9% | 51 | 10 | 17 |
|
| | |
|
Cooper is 117-59 against the money line (+37.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 77.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 98-61 against the money line (+21.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 77.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 73-46 against the money line (+18.2 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 78.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 33-20 against the money line (+18.1 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 81.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 22-15 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in road games revenging a road loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 76.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 18-12 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 29-16 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 78.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 31-21 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 103-76 against the money line (+22.6 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 75.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 109-106 against the money line (-27.1 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 35-43 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 68-75 against the money line (-36.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 10-20 against the money line (-15.8 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 2-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 28-32 against the money line (-16.6 Units) off a road loss as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 63-66 against the money line (-30.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 44-50 against the money line (-26.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 20-24 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 53-60 against the money line (-27.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 29-35 against the money line (-20.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 37-47 against the money line (-31.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 31-35 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 48-52 against the money line (-24.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 18-18 against the money line (-14.6 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 86-88 against the money line (-27.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 44-44 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 66-76 against the money line (-22.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 42-62 against the money line (-23.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 32-41 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 43-54 against the money line (-26.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Cooper is 53-52 against the money line (-24.5 Units) in all games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 31-32 against the money line (-27.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 16-22 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 1-9 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 72.7, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 15-23 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 34-39 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 27-36 against the money line (-26.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 23-33 against the money line (-24.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 19-31 against the money line (-25.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 18-20 against the money line (-21.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 10-15 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 21-27 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 14-17 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 33-32 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 18-22 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 24-29 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 39-43 against the money line (-20.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 10-21 against the money line (-17.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.1, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 19-26 against the money line (-13.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.1, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 17-25 against the money line (-17.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 29-32 against the money line (-16.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 39-42 against the money line (-18.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 3-6 against the money line (-9.7 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 16-24 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 26-34 against the money line (-24.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 10-14 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 18-21 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 37-41 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 23-26 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 10-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in home games hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 28-9 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 15-4 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 16-7 against the money line (+9.6 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 36-22 against the money line (+19.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 52-37 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 14-7 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 24-15 against the money line (+9.8 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 208 times, while the road underdog won straight up 143 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 17 times, while the road underdog won straight up 11 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 09/22/2016 - Sancho Lyttle "?" Sunday vs. Chicago Sky ( Foot ) | | [G] 09/21/2016 - Tiffany Hayes probable Sunday vs. Chicago Sky ( Suspension Served ) | | [F] 09/21/2016 - Angel McCoughtry probable Sunday vs. Chicago Sky ( Back ) | |
| [G] 09/14/2016 - Elena Delle Donne out indefinitely ( Thumb ) | | [G] 06/08/2016 - Betnijah Laney out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/3/2024 4:51:36 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|