| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA
First Half Results
CHICAGO |
|
|
82.5
| 44
Final
44 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 655 | ATLANTA | 82.5 | | 656 | CHICAGO | -2.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(90-49 since 1997.) (64.7%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, off a home loss.
(177-115 since 1997.) (60.6%, +50.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(38-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.5%, +23.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off a home loss.
(77-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (67%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(72-38 since 1997.) (65.5%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(65-31 since 1997.) (67.7%, +30.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(125-80 since 1997.) (61%, +37 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(121-66 since 1997.) (64.7%, +48.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss against a division rival, in August or September games.
(45-18 since 1997.) (71.4%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a win by 6 points or less.
(59-25 since 1997.) (70.2%, +31.5 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
 - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(24-4 since 1997.) (85.7%, +19.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(162-94 since 1997.) (63.3%, +58.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(129-75 since 1997.) (63.2%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(38-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(164-101 since 1997.) (61.9%, +52.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(65-31 since 1997.) (67.7%, +30.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(149-85 since 1997.) (63.7%, +55.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(116-64 since 1997.) (64.4%, +45.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(112-61 since 1997.) (64.7%, +44.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(192-126 since 1997.) (60.4%, +53.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(142-84 since 1997.) (62.8%, +49.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(80-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(39-15 since 1997.) (72.2%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(61-27 since 1997.) (69.3%, +31.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (ATLANTA) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(52-19 since 1997.) (73.2%, +31.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(43-15 since 1997.) (74.1%, +26.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(128-68 since 1997.) (65.3%, +53.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(100-53 since 1997.) (65.4%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(172-111 since 1997.) (60.8%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(83-41 since 1997.) (66.9%, +37.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(68-32 since 1997.) (68%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(117-65 since 1997.) (64.3%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(86-42 since 1997.) (67.2%, +39.8 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(103-62 since 1997.) (62.4%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(74-42 since 1997.) (63.8%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game.
(408-308 since 1997.) (57%, +69.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(518-376 since 1997.) (57.9%, +104.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(391-268 since 1997.) (59.3%, +96.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(213-146 since 1997.) (59.3%, +52.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(503-371 since 1997.) (57.6%, +94.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(119-72 since 1997.) (62.3%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(856-640 since 1997.) (57.2%, +152 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(152-97 since 1997.) (61%, +45.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(619-448 since 1997.) (58%, +126.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(321-230 since 1997.) (58.3%, +68 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(124-77 since 1997.) (61.7%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a losing record.
(236-162 since 1997.) (59.3%, +57.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(84-43 since 1997.) (66.1%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(61-30 since 1997.) (67%, +28 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(56-26 since 1997.) (68.3%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(674-492 since 1997.) (57.8%, +132.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(174-113 since 1997.) (60.6%, +49.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - off a home win, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(109-59 since 1997.) (64.9%, +44.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(821-646 since 1997.) (56%, +110.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(187-117 since 1997.) (61.5%, +58.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(156-92 since 1997.) (62.9%, +54.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, vs. division opponents.
(94-52 since 1997.) (64.4%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(840-630 since 1997.) (57.1%, +147 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(149-91 since 1997.) (62.1%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(422-296 since 1997.) (58.8%, +96.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(285-190 since 1997.) (60%, +76 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(148-85 since 1997.) (63.5%, +54.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(114-61 since 1997.) (65.1%, +46.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(876-660 since 1997.) (57%, +150 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(505-369 since 1997.) (57.8%, +99.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(160-94 since 1997.) (63%, +56.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(120-68 since 1997.) (63.8%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, after a non-conference game.
(313-228 since 1997.) (57.9%, +62.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after a non-conference game.
(677-529 since 1997.) (56.1%, +95.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(518-376 since 1997.) (57.9%, +104.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(391-268 since 1997.) (59.3%, +96.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.), after scoring 75 points or more.
(161-110 since 1997.) (59.4%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.).
(146-93 since 1997.) (61.1%, +43.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(329-231 since 1997.) (58.8%, +74.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(217-148 since 1997.) (59.5%, +54.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(144-83 since 1997.) (63.4%, +52.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(87-46 since 1997.) (65.4%, +36.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (ATLANTA) - winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(276-185 since 1997.) (59.9%, +72.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| ATLANTA | 78 | | 40 | | 28-69 | 40.4% | 3-13 | 26.5% | 19-26 | 75.3% | 44 | 14 | 12 | | CHICAGO | 86 | | 44 | | 33-73 | 45.8% | 4-11 | 36.8% | 15-19 | 82.7% | 47 | 14 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO covered the first half line 549 times, while ATLANTA covered the first half line 451 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 539 games went over first half total, while 461 games went under first half total.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 75-105 against the 1rst half line (-40.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 42.5 |
|
ATLANTA is 75-121 against the 1rst half line (-58.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.9, OPPONENT 42.7 | ATLANTA is 48-85 against the 1rst half line (-45.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.6, OPPONENT 44.2 | CHICAGO is 107-56 against the 1rst half line (+45.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.6, OPPONENT 38.8 | CHICAGO is 70-33 against the 1rst half line (+33.7 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.1, OPPONENT 39.4 |
|
ATLANTA is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 35.6, OPPONENT 37.9 | ATLANTA is 35-20 UNDER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.3, OPPONENT 39.4 | ATLANTA is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 34.0, OPPONENT 37.3 | ATLANTA is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 35.0, OPPONENT 38.2 | CHICAGO is 59-34 UNDER (+21.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 35.6 |
|
| | | | |
|
ATLANTA is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.9, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 49.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.3, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-22 against the 1rst half line (-17.2 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-12 against the 1rst half line (-11.2 Units) in home games versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.6, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-16 against the 1rst half line (-12.6 Units) in home games versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-24 against the 1rst half line (-16.4 Units) in home games versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-13 against the 1rst half line (-11.3 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 79-54 OVER (+19.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 106-77 OVER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.6, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 59-39 OVER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.7, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.3, OPPONENT 49.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 44.1, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 45-29 OVER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 45-29 OVER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.6, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 37.7, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 33.3, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 8-0 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 35.6, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 33.4, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 8-0 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 35.8, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 8-0 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 35.4, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 36.4, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 9-0 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 35.6, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 34.3, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 23-12 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.2, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-43 against the 1rst half line (-29.3 Units) in home games in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 47-70 against the 1rst half line (-30.0 Units) in home games vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 48-70 against the 1rst half line (-29.0 Units) in home games after a division game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) in home games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in home games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.2, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in home games off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.3, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-17 against the 1rst half line (-12.7 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 3-13 against the 1rst half line (-11.3 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.2, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-14 against the 1rst half line (-11.4 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 51-75 against the 1rst half line (-31.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 35-55 against the 1rst half line (-25.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-14 against the 1rst half line (-10.4 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.3, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-21 against the 1rst half line (-14.1 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.2, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-11 against the 1rst half line (-10.1 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 27-45 against the 1rst half line (-22.5 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.0, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-12 against the 1rst half line (-11.2 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 8-21 against the 1rst half line (-15.1 Units) after a game forcing opponent to commit 8 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.0, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 8-19 against the 1rst half line (-12.9 Units) after a game with 55 or more rebounds since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 39.4, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 60-39 OVER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.5, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 23-7 OVER (+15.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 2 or less 3 point shots since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 40.7, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 63-40 OVER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 39-22 OVER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.8, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 39-24 OVER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 25-14 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.9, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 34-20 OVER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.4, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 23-10 OVER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 42-25 OVER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 34-19 OVER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.7, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-11 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.3, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 42-25 OVER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 33-17 OVER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 29-16 OVER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.0, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 42.4, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-5 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 43.6, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 37-23 OVER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.2, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 75-52 OVER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 58-34 OVER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 28-15 OVER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.3, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 39-23 OVER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.1, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 35-20 OVER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.9, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 53-33 OVER (+16.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 35.7, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 35.7, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 35.7, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games off an home win scoring 85 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 36.0, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.6, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 36.8, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 38.5, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 80 points or more this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 36.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 37.8, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 37.8, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 35.2, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 35.6, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 34.7, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a home game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 36.2, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 13-12 | +1.8 | 13-12 | 12-12 | 81.2 | 39.5 | 41.5% | 46.2 | 83.6 | 40.6 | 43.5% | 45.6 | | Road Games | 5-8 | -1.9 | 6-7 | 3-9 | 75.7 | 35.7 | 40.7% | 45.7 | 80.9 | 39.2 | 43.9% | 44.0 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +1.2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 76.6 | 36.8 | 41.7% | 44.4 | 81.8 | 40.6 | 44.9% | 43.0 | | Division Games | 7-6 | 0 | 5-8 | 6-7 | 80.2 | 39.5 | 40.5% | 46.5 | 83.8 | 40.6 | 43.4% | 48.3 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 81.2 | 39.5 | 29-69 | 41.5% | 3-13 | 26.6% | 20-27 | 75.5% | 46 | 11 | 15 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82 | 40.6 | 30-67 | 44.4% | 5-16 | 33.8% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.7 | 35.7 | 27-66 | 40.7% | 4-13 | 27.2% | 18-25 | 73.2% | 46 | 11 | 12 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.6 | 40.6 | 31-70 | 43.5% | 5-15 | 31.1% | 18-23 | 77.8% | 46 | 10 | 20 | 22 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 82 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-16 | 34.0% | 16-20 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.9 | 39.2 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 4-13 | 28.9% | 17-23 | 75.8% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 20 | 10 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 11-13 | -9.5 | 10-14 | 15-9 | 84.5 | 43.9 | 46.1% | 43.7 | 84.5 | 41.2 | 43.2% | 41.0 | | Home Games | 6-6 | -3.8 | 3-9 | 8-4 | 85.5 | 41.7 | 46.6% | 43.2 | 84.7 | 41.8 | 43.6% | 40.7 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.6 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 82.0 | 41.8 | 45.4% | 41.8 | 82.6 | 35.8 | 46.6% | 40.2 | | Division Games | 5-6 | -5.9 | 5-6 | 7-4 | 86.4 | 44.3 | 46.2% | 44.8 | 83.0 | 41.4 | 41.0% | 43.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 84.5 | 43.9 | 33-71 | 46.1% | 4-11 | 38.7% | 14-17 | 82.8% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 5-16 | 33.8% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.5 | 41.7 | 33-72 | 46.6% | 4-11 | 34.9% | 15-18 | 82.1% | 43 | 10 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.5 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 43.2% | 7-19 | 34.6% | 19-23 | 81.0% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.1 | 40.4 | 30-67 | 44.1% | 6-17 | 33.9% | 17-22 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 84.7 | 41.8 | 29-68 | 43.6% | 6-18 | 35.0% | 19-24 | 81.7% | 41 | 8 | 21 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 70.8, CHICAGO 71.5 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/17/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 91-74 | 43-40 | 5 | W | 79.5 | O | 30-69 | 43.5% | 47 | 9 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 42 | 12 | | 7/20/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 65-83 | 28-40 | 7.5 | L | 81 | U | 23-60 | 38.3% | 38 | 17 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 39 | 12 | | 7/22/2016 | DALLAS | 93-88 | 50-52 | -1 | L | 81 | O | 33-67 | 49.3% | 59 | 14 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 39 | 10 | | 8/26/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/28/2016 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2016 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2016 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2016 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/17/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 91-88 | 56-32 | -1 | W | 81 | O | 36-75 | 48.0% | 48 | 13 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 35 | 12 | | 7/19/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 79-77 | 42-30 | 2.5 | W | 86.5 | U | 28-68 | 41.2% | 43 | 8 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 42 | 12 | | 7/22/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 89-94 | 38-38 | -2.5 | L | 82.5 | U | 34-65 | 52.3% | 37 | 15 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 39 | 7 | | 8/26/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/28/2016 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/2/2016 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/7/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2016 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| ATLANTA is 20-19 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997 | | 21 of 38 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 7-7 versus the first half line when playing against ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons | | 8 of 14 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| ATLANTA is 11-6 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997 | | 9 of 16 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| ATLANTA is 3-2 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/17/2016 | CHICAGO | 97 | -5 | Over | 55 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 18-25 | 72.0% | 51 | 11 | 11 | | | ATLANTA | 101 | 177 | SU ATS | 55 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 30-38 | 78.9% | 50 | 9 | 9 | 5/22/2016 | CHICAGO | 81 | -4.5 | Under | 41 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 60 | 14 | 13 | | | ATLANTA | 87 | 170.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 22-31 | 71.0% | 44 | 7 | 5 | 8/29/2015 | CHICAGO | 98 | -1 | SU ATS | 52 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 45 | 11 | 10 | | | ATLANTA | 96 | 159.5 | Over | 45 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 2-14 | 14.3% | 28-37 | 75.7% | 45 | 15 | 6 | 7/21/2015 | ATLANTA | 92 | 163 | ATS | 48 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 33 | 7 | 14 | | | CHICAGO | 97 | -9.5 | SU Over | 44 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 28-32 | 87.5% | 42 | 9 | 15 | 6/24/2015 | ATLANTA | 96 | 159.5 | ATS | 34 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 50 | 15 | 13 | | | CHICAGO | 100 | -8.5 | SU Over | 40 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 34-36 | 94.4% | 49 | 10 | 15 | 6/19/2015 | CHICAGO | 73 | -3.5 | Under | 36 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 25-28 | 89.3% | 41 | 9 | 18 | | | ATLANTA | 74 | 158 | SU ATS | 37 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 1-9 | 11.1% | 13-21 | 61.9% | 51 | 10 | 17 |
|
| | |
|
Cooper is 23-12 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 41.2, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 92-112 against the 1rst half line (-31.2 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 54-67 against the 1rst half line (-19.7 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 29-55 against the 1rst half line (-31.5 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 15-33 against the 1rst half line (-21.3 Units) as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 10-22 against the 1rst half line (-14.2 Units) as a home favorite of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 35-65 against the 1rst half line (-36.5 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 34-65 against the 1rst half line (-37.5 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 29-44 against the 1rst half line (-19.4 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 30-52 against the 1rst half line (-27.2 Units) in August or September games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 10-22 against the 1rst half line (-14.2 Units) in home games on Friday as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 23-34 against the 1rst half line (-14.4 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 56-75 against the 1rst half line (-26.5 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 53-72 against the 1rst half line (-26.2 Units) after a division game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 28-43 against the 1rst half line (-19.3 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 60-74 against the 1rst half line (-21.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 8-23 against the 1rst half line (-17.3 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.8, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 8-17 against the 1rst half line (-10.7 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.7, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 18-31 against the 1rst half line (-16.1 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.3, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 20-32 against the 1rst half line (-15.2 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 22-37 against the 1rst half line (-18.7 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 43-61 against the 1rst half line (-24.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 38-51 against the 1rst half line (-18.1 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 25-38 against the 1rst half line (-16.8 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 21-35 against the 1rst half line (-17.5 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 49-67 against the 1rst half line (-24.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 37-49 against the 1rst half line (-16.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 51-72 against the 1rst half line (-28.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 29-49 against the 1rst half line (-24.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 19-30 against the 1rst half line (-14.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 4-14 against the 1rst half line (-11.4 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.6, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 16-26 against the 1rst half line (-12.6 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 30-42 against the 1rst half line (-16.2 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 17-28 against the 1rst half line (-13.8 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 48-64 against the 1rst half line (-22.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 32-54 against the 1rst half line (-27.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 24-40 against the 1rst half line (-20.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 34-46 against the 1rst half line (-16.6 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 51-67 against the 1rst half line (-22.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 9-23 against the 1rst half line (-16.3 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.9, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 5-17 against the 1rst half line (-13.7 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.9, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 14-25 against the 1rst half line (-13.5 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.8, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 46-59 against the 1rst half line (-18.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) in home games after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 16-33 against the 1rst half line (-20.3 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 17-31 against the 1rst half line (-17.1 Units) in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 43-55 against the 1rst half line (-17.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 28-41 against the 1rst half line (-17.1 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.9, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 22-33 against the 1rst half line (-14.3 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 16-27 against the 1rst half line (-13.7 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) after a game forcing opponent to commit 8 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 36-54 against the 1rst half line (-23.4 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 21-34 against the 1rst half line (-16.4 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.5, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 3-15 against the 1rst half line (-13.5 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 2-11 against the 1rst half line (-10.1 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.7, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 3-13 against the 1rst half line (-11.3 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.8, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 11-23 against the 1rst half line (-14.3 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.8, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 42-62 against the 1rst half line (-26.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.9, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 72-90 against the 1rst half line (-27.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 8-17 against the 1rst half line (-10.7 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 14-26 against the 1rst half line (-14.6 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 20-31 against the 1rst half line (-14.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 16-27 against the 1rst half line (-13.7 Units) in home games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 1-10 against the 1rst half line (-10.0 Units) in home games versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.5, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) in home games versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 13-34 against the 1rst half line (-24.4 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 24-47 against the 1rst half line (-27.7 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 4-18 against the 1rst half line (-15.8 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Chatman is 11-26 against the 1rst half line (-17.6 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 37-49 against the 1rst half line (-16.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.3, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 21-38 against the 1rst half line (-20.8 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 8-22 against the 1rst half line (-16.2 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 16-27 against the 1rst half line (-13.7 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 24-36 against the 1rst half line (-15.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.1, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 15-25 against the 1rst half line (-12.5 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Cooper is 28-46 against the 1rst half line (-22.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 38.0, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 46-69 against the 1rst half line (-29.9 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 34.1, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Chatman is 114-92 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 67-53 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.4, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 72-58 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 77-59 OVER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 63-47 OVER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.0, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 60-44 OVER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.5, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 42-29 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 36-25 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 51-37 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.7, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 66-51 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.1, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 54-33 OVER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 42-28 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 35-19 OVER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.2, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 43-30 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 32-14 OVER (+16.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.5, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 22-8 OVER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.6, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 67-46 OVER (+16.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 54-33 OVER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 42-24 OVER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 68-53 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.3, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 45-30 OVER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 29-18 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.1, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.5, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 52-36 OVER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.7, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 63-42 OVER (+16.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.8, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 67-51 OVER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 47-34 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 55-43 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 42-28 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.9, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 54-39 OVER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.4, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 89-75 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 38.9, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 48-36 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 40.0, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 75-58 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.2, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Cooper is 53-34 UNDER (+15.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 36.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 38-17 UNDER (+19.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 35.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 13-3 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 34.3, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 39-22 UNDER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 36.0, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 46-26 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 35.5, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 74-48 UNDER (+21.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 34.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 33.1, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 34.4, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 87-62 UNDER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 35.1, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 183 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 161 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 19 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 11 times. |
|
|
| |
|
Since 1997, 5 games went under the first half total, while 1 games went over the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Under | | Over the last 3 seasons, 0 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 4 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 2 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 2 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 0 times. | | Since 1997, 4 games went under the first half total, while 2 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went under the first half total, while 0 games went over the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [F] 08/25/2016 - Sancho Lyttle is upgraded to "?" Friday vs. Chicago Sky ( Foot ) | |
| [C] 08/26/2016 - Clarissa Dos Santos is upgraded to probable Friday vs. Atlanta Dream ( Personal ) | | [F] 08/26/2016 - Erika de Souza is upgraded to probable Friday vs. Atlanta Dream ( Personal ) | | [G] 06/08/2016 - Betnijah Laney out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 6/1/2024 7:49:42 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|