| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON CHICAGO |
|
| 167 | 84 Final 86 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
653 | WASHINGTON | +155 | 654 | CHICAGO | -175 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (248-201 since 1997.) (55.2%, +67.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (151-49 since 1997.) (75.5%, +59.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (207-77 since 1997.) (72.9%, +59.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (200-72 since 1997.) (73.5%, +59.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (132-31 since 1997.) (81%, +59 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (178-65 since 1997.) (73.3%, +58 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (136-42 since 1997.) (76.4%, +55.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread. (156-55 since 1997.) (73.9%, +55.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (159-72 since 1997.) (68.8%, +54.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (141-48 since 1997.) (74.6%, +54.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games. (194-124 since 1997.) (61%, +53.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (158-56 since 1997.) (73.8%, +52.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (126-40 since 1997.) (75.9%, +51.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (150-73 since 1997.) (67.3%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.), after a loss by 10 points or more. (119-41 since 1997.) (74.4%, +47.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (235-98 since 1997.) (70.6%, +45.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (120-42 since 1997.) (74.1%, +44.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (97-33 since 1997.) (74.6%, +44 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (91-30 since 1997.) (75.2%, +43.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (106-38 since 1997.) (73.6%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (93-29 since 1997.) (76.2%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a loss by 10 points or more. (88-28 since 1997.) (75.9%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (76-46 since 1997.) (62.3%, +40.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (58-10 since 1997.) (85.3%, +39.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a loss by 10 points or more. (85-27 since 1997.) (75.9%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (96-70 since 1997.) (57.8%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (61-13 since 1997.) (82.4%, +37.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (124-85 since 1997.) (59.3%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents. (47-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (46-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (46-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (46-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (107-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.4%, +31.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (68-32 since 1997.) (68%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread. (48-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +28.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (55-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents. (23-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +17.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (87-64 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents. (31-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents. (35-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +30.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more against opponent off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival. (38-14 since 1997.) (73.1%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents. (32-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents. (25-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +19.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (23-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.1%, +18.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (33-15 since 1997.) (68.8%, +19.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more. (24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +14 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a double digit loss as a favorite of 6 points or more against opponent off a home win. (25-9 since 1997.) (73.5%, +17 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (62-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (35-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +21.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread. (75-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (62%, +40.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (46-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (35-12 since 1997.) (74.5%, +5.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in July games. (31-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +28.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +18.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (70-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.8%, +30.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (93-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (298-293 since 1997.) (50.4%, +76.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (281-261 since 1997.) (51.8%, +63.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (195-194 since 1997.) (50.1%, +55.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (161-144 since 1997.) (52.8%, +54.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss. (112-83 since 1997.) (57.4%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (114-78 since 1997.) (59.4%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (68-28 since 1997.) (70.8%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (76-33 since 1997.) (69.7%, +38.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (93-61 since 1997.) (60.4%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season. (76-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (79-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +39.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals. (24-12 since 1997.) (66.7%, +32.7 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better. (67-36 since 1997.) (65%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half. (59-31 since 1997.) (65.6%, +31.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (37-19 since 1997.) (66.1%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (37-15 since 1997.) (71.2%, +29.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (62-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (62-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (62-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (50-26 since 1997.) (65.8%, +28.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (35-16 since 1997.) (68.6%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals. (47-28 since 1997.) (62.7%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals. (22-13 since 1997.) (62.9%, +25.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (62-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.9%, +24.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (36-16 since 1997.) (69.2%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (23-10 since 1997.) (69.7%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (38-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +15.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (60-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (60-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (60-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (36-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +24.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (34-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half. (26-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.8%, +19.5 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON | 80 | | 28-67 | 42.2% | 7-19 | 37.4% | 17-21 | 79.4% | 41 | 10 | 12 | CHICAGO | 84 | | 33-72 | 46.3% | 4-12 | 34.9% | 14-17 | 82.7% | 45 | 12 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 602 times, while WASHINGTON won 364 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 9-4 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.7, OPPONENT 72.5 | WASHINGTON is 5-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 85.6, OPPONENT 87.6 | WASHINGTON is 8-2 against the money line (+12.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 87.3, OPPONENT 79.4 | CHICAGO is 89-131 against the money line (-69.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 79.2 | CHICAGO is 29-47 against the money line (-31.9 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 78.9 | CHICAGO is 43-71 against the money line (-34.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 77.8 | CHICAGO is 20-48 against the money line (-32.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 80.3 | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 89.2 | CHICAGO is 3-9 against the money line (-11.9 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 86.8 | CHICAGO is 4-9 against the money line (-10.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 85.6 |
|
WASHINGTON is 9-18 against the money line (-11.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 78.1 | WASHINGTON is 32-95 against the money line (-68.5 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 77.8 | WASHINGTON is 130-201 against the money line (-70.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 74.2 | WASHINGTON is 8-28 against the money line (-19.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 85.7 | WASHINGTON is 1-8 against the money line (-8.0 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 92.0 | WASHINGTON is 69-147 against the money line (-73.0 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 75.9 | WASHINGTON is 35-101 against the money line (-76.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.9, OPPONENT 74.8 | CHICAGO is 53-35 against the money line (+16.3 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 78.4 | CHICAGO is 36-18 against the money line (+15.7 Units) in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 74.8 | CHICAGO is 20-6 against the money line (+10.9 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 92.5, OPPONENT 83.4 |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 10-5 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.7, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-4 against the money line (+7.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 84.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-4 against the money line (+7.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 84.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-4 against the money line (+7.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 84.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 45-78 against the money line (-42.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-25 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-33 against the money line (-24.7 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 72.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 20-52 against the money line (-37.1 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 34-57 against the money line (-36.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 53-89 against the money line (-60.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 44-79 against the money line (-46.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 66-113 against the money line (-67.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 123-159 against the money line (-51.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 66-112 against the money line (-58.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 124-162 against the money line (-56.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 49-61 against the money line (-34.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 60-75 against the money line (-34.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 94-142 against the money line (-53.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 51-100 against the money line (-41.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-18 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 20-26 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 125-150 against the money line (-58.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 64-85 against the money line (-45.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 38-68 against the money line (-35.3 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 24-51 against the money line (-35.0 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.8, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 78-140 against the money line (-60.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 94-154 against the money line (-65.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.9, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 143-213 against the money line (-68.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 124-204 against the money line (-85.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 195-294 against the money line (-96.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 71-111 against the money line (-52.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-7.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.0, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 67-115 against the money line (-42.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 12-9 against the money line (+11.1 Units) as a road underdog of +145 to +200 over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 85.6, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 85.6, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 85.6, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 85.6, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 90.0, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-4 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 84.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 85.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 86.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 7-3 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.6, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 12-5 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 5-9 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in all games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-24 against the money line (-22.4 Units) as a home favorite of -165 to -250 since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 92-88 against the money line (-41.9 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 89-84 against the money line (-40.9 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-9 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 99-127 against the money line (-51.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-9 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 14-14 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-23 against the money line (-18.4 Units) in home games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-33 against the money line (-22.7 Units) off a home loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 27-53 against the money line (-32.3 Units) off a home loss since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 9-17 against the money line (-17.0 Units) in home games after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 77-126 against the money line (-66.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 56-95 against the money line (-52.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 3-7 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 50-80 against the money line (-39.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 32-49 against the money line (-28.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 5-15 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 6*) | CHICAGO is 19-44 against the money line (-29.6 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 48-69 against the money line (-40.0 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 27-45 against the money line (-29.7 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-27 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 50-68 against the money line (-36.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 33-50 against the money line (-31.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-34 against the money line (-21.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-7 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-14 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-14 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-7 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.5, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-12 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-25 against the money line (-20.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-14 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 69-89 against the money line (-37.5 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 47-70 against the money line (-34.2 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 64-104 against the money line (-50.2 Units) after playing a home game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-6.6 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season. The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-10 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.8, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 3-16 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 5*) | WASHINGTON is 256-379 against the money line (-107.1 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 75-114 against the money line (-46.5 Units) in July games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 163-244 against the money line (-86.6 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 120-195 against the money line (-75.7 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 116-186 against the money line (-78.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 49-88 against the money line (-45.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 41-78 against the money line (-44.6 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 42-62 against the money line (-27.1 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 59-89 against the money line (-39.9 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-9 against the money line (-8.4 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 15-43 against the money line (-39.7 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 25-56 against the money line (-40.3 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 10-29 against the money line (-25.7 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 13-24 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-67 against the money line (-33.2 Units) in road games revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-29 against the money line (-20.4 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-13 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 4-12 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-1 against the money line (+8.1 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 9-8 | +6.8 | 9-7 | 13-4 | 82.0 | 41.1 | 43.0% | 42.5 | 82.4 | 40.9 | 43.9% | 41.9 | Road Games | 5-2 | +7.8 | 4-2 | 7-0 | 85.6 | 40.1 | 42.0% | 44.6 | 87.6 | 42.0 | 43.1% | 45.3 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +4.6 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 84.2 | 44.6 | 46.1% | 39.8 | 69.6 | 36.2 | 40.5% | 39.4 | Division Games | 5-3 | +5.5 | 4-3 | 6-2 | 84.5 | 39.9 | 41.7% | 42.1 | 82.4 | 42.6 | 43.8% | 44.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 82.0 | 41.1 | 28-65 | 43.0% | 7-19 | 36.2% | 19-24 | 80.0% | 42 | 8 | 16 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 83.5 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 5-16 | 33.4% | 18-23 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 85.6 | 40.1 | 28-66 | 42.0% | 7-19 | 35.8% | 24-29 | 81.7% | 45 | 9 | 15 | 22 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.4 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 6-17 | 32.8% | 17-22 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 22 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 83.3 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 5-16 | 32.4% | 18-22 | 79.3% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 87.6 | 42.0 | 31-73 | 43.1% | 6-20 | 31.4% | 19-24 | 78.1% | 45 | 11 | 19 | 24 | 6 | 12 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 6-9 | -9.9 | 6-9 | 9-6 | 84.4 | 43.8 | 46.7% | 43.8 | 84.1 | 40.7 | 42.0% | 41.0 | Home Games | 3-3 | -2.5 | 2-4 | 4-2 | 85.8 | 42.2 | 47.1% | 43.0 | 83.7 | 39.3 | 43.2% | 39.8 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -6.6 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 85.0 | 41.0 | 45.0% | 40.0 | 89.8 | 45.4 | 47.4% | 42.6 | Division Games | 4-4 | -3.6 | 5-3 | 4-4 | 86.2 | 45.6 | 46.1% | 45.6 | 80.9 | 39.6 | 40.4% | 42.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 84.4 | 43.8 | 33-71 | 46.7% | 3-10 | 33.5% | 15-18 | 83.9% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 40.5 | 30-67 | 44.0% | 5-16 | 32.9% | 17-22 | 78.9% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.8 | 42.2 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 2-8 | 23.5% | 18-21 | 84.3% | 43 | 10 | 20 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.1 | 40.7 | 29-68 | 42.0% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 20-25 | 81.2% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 82 | 40.2 | 29-67 | 43.5% | 5-16 | 32.6% | 18-23 | 78.8% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 83.7 | 39.3 | 28-66 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 34.5% | 20-25 | 80.3% | 40 | 7 | 20 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 71.5, CHICAGO 71.5 |
| | |
|
|
5/26/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 84-82 | W | +170 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 49 | 16 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 35 | 11 | 5/29/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 77-93 | L | +280 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 40 | 6 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 41 | 9 | 6/1/2016 | CHICAGO | 78-86 | L | +155 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 42 | 13 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 35 | 12 | 6/3/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 72-98 | L | +400 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 32 | 14 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 45 | 11 | 6/5/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 86-79 | W | +350 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 49 | 7 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 45 | 8 | 6/8/2016 | @ DALLAS | 87-79 | W | +155 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 52 | 15 | 26-74 | 35.1% | 43 | 10 | 6/11/2016 | MINNESOTA | 76-83 | L | +250 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 32 | 13 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 46 | 19 | 6/14/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 109-106 | W | -155 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 18 | 39-86 | 45.3% | 55 | 19 | 6/18/2016 | ATLANTA | 95-65 | W | -175 | 35-67 | 52.2% | 40 | 12 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 38 | 21 | 6/22/2016 | INDIANA | 76-62 | W | -200 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 37 | 13 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 44 | 18 | 6/24/2016 | PHOENIX | 79-91 | L | -140 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 41 | 11 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 40 | 9 | 6/26/2016 | MINNESOTA | 87-63 | W | +300 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 44 | 9 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 36 | 14 | 6/29/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 84-67 | W | -500 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 7 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 39 | 11 | 7/1/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2016 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2016 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/22/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 81-87 | L | -200 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 60 | 13 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 44 | 5 | 5/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 80-93 | L | +135 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 40 | 15 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 8 | 5/27/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 78-79 | L | -330 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 50 | 15 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 33 | 11 | 5/29/2016 | @ DALLAS | 92-87 | W | -120 | 41-70 | 58.6% | 39 | 13 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 43 | 12 | 6/1/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 86-78 | W | -175 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 35 | 12 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 42 | 13 | 6/3/2016 | WASHINGTON | 98-72 | W | -600 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 45 | 11 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 32 | 14 | 6/10/2016 | @ INDIANA | 73-64 | W | -120 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 51 | 14 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 41 | 9 | 6/12/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 80-86 | L | +120 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 41 | 13 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 46 | 11 | 6/14/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 85-98 | L | +280 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 36 | 9 | 39-67 | 58.2% | 31 | 6 | 6/17/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 97-101 | L | -210 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 51 | 11 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 50 | 9 | 6/21/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 81-75 | W | | 30-73 | 41.1% | 45 | 13 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 45 | 16 | 6/24/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 79-80 | L | +170 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 36 | 8 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 46 | 10 | 6/29/2016 | INDIANA | 83-95 | L | -250 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 32 | 14 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 41 | 13 | 7/1/2016 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2016 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2016 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CHICAGO is 26-16 (+7.9 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 8-3 (+4.5 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CHICAGO is 15-6 (+4.4 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 5-1 (+3.4 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/3/2016 | WASHINGTON | 72 | 162 | Over | 36 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 23-27 | 85.2% | 32 | 7 | 14 | | CHICAGO | 98 | -10.5 | SU ATS | 60 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 45 | 11 | 11 | 6/1/2016 | CHICAGO | 86 | -4 | SU ATS | 45 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 35 | 5 | 12 | | WASHINGTON | 78 | 163 | Over | 37 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 42 | 12 | 13 | 8/23/2015 | CHICAGO | 66 | 156.5 | SU ATS | 35 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 2-8 | 25.0% | 16-23 | 69.6% | 46 | 10 | 15 | | WASHINGTON | 64 | -2.5 | Under | 33 | 22-66 | 33.3% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 47 | 10 | 16 | 8/21/2015 | WASHINGTON | 85 | 154 | ATS | 43 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 3-17 | 17.6% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 34 | 4 | 12 | | CHICAGO | 87 | -5.5 | SU Over | 45 | 37-79 | 46.8% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 49 | 15 | 15 | 8/2/2015 | WASHINGTON | 68 | 158 | ATS | 39 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 41 | 10 | 5 | | CHICAGO | 71 | -5.5 | SU Under | 34 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 50 | 9 | 6 | 7/15/2015 | WASHINGTON | 57 | 157.5 | Under | 32 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 44 | 9 | 14 | | CHICAGO | 85 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 38-83 | 45.8% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 54 | 15 | 8 | 6/28/2015 | CHICAGO | 71 | 154 | Over | 34 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 0-8 | 0.0% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 31 | 4 | 9 | | WASHINGTON | 86 | -1 | SU ATS | 43 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 10-19 | 52.6% | 6-7 | 85.7% | 40 | 9 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 29-42 against the money line (+16.6 Units) as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 22-28 against the money line (+14.8 Units) as a road underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 14-12 against the money line (+11.6 Units) as a road underdog of +145 to +200 as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 42-38 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 67-44 against the money line (+18.1 Units) on Friday in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.5, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 98-77 against the money line (+20.3 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 50-32 against the money line (+26.9 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 25-14 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 32-27 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 98-75 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 123-94 against the money line (+30.6 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.3, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 86-64 against the money line (+23.4 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 45-30 against the money line (+21.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 78.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 53-39 against the money line (+24.5 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 14-11 against the money line (+10.1 Units) revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 36-21 against the money line (+19.6 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 12-5 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.1, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 20-10 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.7, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 12-4 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 5*) | Thibault is 44-21 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 79.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 34-28 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 34-29 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 17-9 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 7-3 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.5, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 65-46 against the money line (+16.9 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 116-78 against the money line (+21.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 74.0, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 58-41 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 73.6, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 90-68 against the money line (+22.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 74.2, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 97-99 against the money line (-32.1 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 22-22 against the money line (-16.5 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 55-57 against the money line (-23.0 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 35-34 against the money line (-17.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 60-70 against the money line (-39.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 45-50 against the money line (-28.5 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 40-40 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 15-20 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 15-21 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 15-16 against the money line (-13.6 Units) in home games off a loss against a division rival as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 48-60 against the money line (-35.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 32-47 against the money line (-31.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 51-61 against the money line (-37.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 30-38 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 16-24 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 34-46 against the money line (-34.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 6-12 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 15-21 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 18-23 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 32-38 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 54-57 against the money line (-21.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 32-34 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 33-46 against the money line (-33.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 42-53 against the money line (-31.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 19-28 against the money line (-23.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 21-28 against the money line (-22.8 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 9-16 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 41-50 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 48-51 against the money line (-21.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 43-50 against the money line (-27.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 27-30 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 19-25 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 12-20 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 21-40 against the money line (-30.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 37-58 against the money line (-37.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 3-16 against the money line (-16.1 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 71.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 5*) | Chatman is 8-25 against the money line (-22.2 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Chatman is 15-24 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 72.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 27-42 against the money line (-40.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Chatman is 23-36 against the money line (-24.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 36-52 against the money line (-38.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 45-53 against the money line (-19.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 74-81 against the money line (-32.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 29-41 against the money line (-22.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 40-62 against the money line (-44.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 49-56 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 76-83 against the money line (-33.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 38-37 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 69-72 against the money line (-24.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 33-39 against the money line (-24.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 55-69 against the money line (-26.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 31-55 against the money line (-27.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 20-35 against the money line (-25.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 31-48 against the money line (-32.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Thibault is 0-7 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 12-21 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 11-21 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 3-11 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 1-7 against the money line (-7.0 Units) in road games after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 21-27 against the money line (-20.5 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 72.7, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 11-19 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 15-28 against the money line (-19.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 43-49 against the money line (-29.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 73.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 22-15 against the money line (+8.1 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 14-7 against the money line (+7.6 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 29-20 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 199 times, while the road underdog won straight up 145 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 20 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 18 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 06/08/2016 - Betnijah Laney out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 8:39:13 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|