| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES CHICAGO |
|
| 165.5 | 93 Final 80 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
653 | LOS ANGELES | -140 | 654 | CHICAGO | +120 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win. (27-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.1%, +19.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - marginal winning team from last season who won between 51% and 60% of their games, after 2 or more consecutive losses. (24-6 since 1997.) (80%, +12.2 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (133-44 since 1997.) (75.1%, +55.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (49-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +32.2 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 81 | | 31-66 | 47.2% | 5-15 | 30.9% | 13-17 | 78.8% | 41 | 7 | 11 | CHICAGO | 78 | | 30-71 | 41.9% | 4-12 | 32.2% | 15-19 | 81.1% | 45 | 12 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 560 times, while CHICAGO won 414 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 77-31 against the money line (+31.5 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 74.7 | LOS ANGELES is 15-3 against the money line (+14.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.5, OPPONENT 75.8 | LOS ANGELES is 15-8 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 72.2 | CHICAGO is 85-125 against the money line (-64.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 79.0 | CHICAGO is 43-59 against the money line (-28.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.8 | CHICAGO is 20-45 against the money line (-32.1 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 80.4 | CHICAGO is 4-8 against the money line (-11.4 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 80.7 | CHICAGO is 46-67 against the money line (-28.1 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 75.6 | CHICAGO is 23-42 against the money line (-28.7 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 79.0 | CHICAGO is 19-46 against the money line (-28.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 80.3 | CHICAGO is 14-30 against the money line (-24.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.8, OPPONENT 87.8 | CHICAGO is 50-80 against the money line (-49.0 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 77.8 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 16-21 against the money line (-19.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 78.9 | LOS ANGELES is 4-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 77.9 | LOS ANGELES is 31-55 against the money line (-47.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 5-11 against the money line (-15.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 84.8 | LOS ANGELES is 10-16 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 75.2 | LOS ANGELES is 4-10 against the money line (-8.5 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.6, OPPONENT 74.0 | LOS ANGELES is 97-102 against the money line (-61.8 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 74.7 | LOS ANGELES is 15-20 against the money line (-22.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 84.2 | CHICAGO is 35-18 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 74.8 | CHICAGO is 35-19 against the money line (+21.2 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 76.2 | CHICAGO is 18-7 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 90.8, OPPONENT 82.4 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 6-7 against the money line (-12.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.1, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 68-53 against the money line (+18.0 Units) in road games when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 91-86 against the money line (-39.4 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 88-82 against the money line (-38.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 20-38 against the money line (-21.3 Units) on Tuesday since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-20 against the money line (-15.4 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-20 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-6 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 73-121 against the money line (-60.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 52-91 against the money line (-48.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 80-118 against the money line (-51.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 47-75 against the money line (-32.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-23 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 44-64 against the money line (-34.1 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-41 against the money line (-25.9 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 46-61 against the money line (-28.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-20 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-15 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-20 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-31 against the money line (-27.9 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 72.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 10-14 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-15 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-21 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-16 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 65-86 against the money line (-38.5 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-23 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-10 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 18-22 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-20 against the money line (-21.3 Units) as a favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-29 against the money line (-23.1 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-5 against the money line (-12.7 Units) on Tuesday over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 120-112 against the money line (-53.3 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-23 against the money line (-24.0 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-12 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.7, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-14 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-20 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-19 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-9 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 65.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-5 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 15-22 | -16.9 | 15-21 | 18-18 | 73.8 | 37.1 | 45.2% | 39.2 | 74.7 | 35.7 | 41.6% | 40.5 | Road Games | 5-14 | -8.5 | 8-10 | 10-8 | 72.2 | 34.7 | 44.4% | 39.4 | 76.7 | 37.2 | 42.2% | 41.5 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 70.2 | 35.2 | 42.1% | 40.8 | 77.8 | 37.2 | 42.0% | 44.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.8 | 37.1 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 4-14 | 30.5% | 13-16 | 80.8% | 39 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 74.9 | 37.9 | 28-65 | 42.8% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 79.7% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.2 | 34.7 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 5-15 | 31.0% | 12-15 | 78.5% | 39 | 7 | 18 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.7 | 35.7 | 27-65 | 41.6% | 5-14 | 32.6% | 16-21 | 77.9% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 74.4 | 37.4 | 27-65 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 32.5% | 15-18 | 79.6% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.7 | 37.2 | 27-65 | 42.2% | 4-13 | 31.0% | 18-23 | 77.4% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 22-15 | -1.5 | 16-20 | 22-15 | 82.9 | 42.4 | 44.8% | 43.9 | 79.5 | 39.8 | 42.9% | 42.1 | Home Games | 14-5 | +1.7 | 8-10 | 13-6 | 86.0 | 43.1 | 45.9% | 44.8 | 78.5 | 39.9 | 42.9% | 40.2 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.8 | 1-3 | 4-1 | 83.0 | 44.6 | 46.4% | 41.2 | 83.6 | 44.0 | 44.7% | 42.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 82.9 | 42.4 | 32-71 | 44.8% | 4-13 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 82.8% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 74.9 | 37.9 | 28-65 | 42.7% | 5-14 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 80.1% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 86.0 | 43.1 | 33-71 | 45.9% | 5-13 | 35.1% | 16-19 | 84.5% | 45 | 10 | 19 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.5 | 39.8 | 30-69 | 42.9% | 5-15 | 34.0% | 15-20 | 76.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 74.8 | 37.7 | 28-65 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 33.4% | 15-18 | 78.9% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 78.5 | 39.9 | 29-68 | 42.9% | 6-16 | 34.6% | 14-19 | 76.0% | 40 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 70.2, CHICAGO 70.7 |
| | |
|
|
5/15/2016 | SEATTLE | 96-66 | W | -500 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 26 | 10 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 39 | 24 | 5/20/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 97-67 | W | -330 | 37-66 | 56.1% | 36 | 11 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 41 | 21 | 5/21/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 79-72 | W | -120 | 31-88 | 35.2% | 57 | 11 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 61 | 15 | 5/24/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/26/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/2/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/4/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/7/2016 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/14/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 93-70 | W | -550 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 55 | 16 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 43 | 17 | 5/18/2016 | MINNESOTA | 80-97 | L | +145 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 12 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 41 | 9 | 5/22/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 81-87 | L | -200 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 60 | 13 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 44 | 5 | 5/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/27/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 5/29/2016 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/1/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/3/2016 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 13-6 (+5.8 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 3-1 (+1.5 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 6-4 (+2.3 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 2-0 (+3.2 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/16/2015 | CHICAGO | 64 | 162 | Under | 35 | 23-71 | 32.4% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 49 | 14 | 9 | | LOS ANGELES | 76 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 41 | 4 | 11 | 7/31/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 88 | 163 | SU ATS | 39 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 21-25 | 84.0% | 42 | 7 | 6 | | CHICAGO | 77 | -5 | Over | 39 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 37 | 8 | 9 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 28-18 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 78.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 77-60 against the money line (+24.2 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 72.3, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 36-24 against the money line (+22.8 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 72.7, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 47-25 against the money line (+19.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.0, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 28-13 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.5, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 54-40 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 71.3, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 93-92 against the money line (-24.2 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 10-18 against the money line (-13.3 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 24-38 against the money line (-26.4 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 24-38 against the money line (-26.4 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 2-7 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after a game with 55 or more rebounds as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 44-55 against the money line (-29.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 28-43 against the money line (-27.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 48-55 against the money line (-29.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 27-33 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 33-41 against the money line (-25.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 30-41 against the money line (-27.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 8-13 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 1-6 against the money line (-7.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 71.9, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 10-21 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Chatman is 38-47 against the money line (-24.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 15-23 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Chatman is 19-24 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Chatman is 42-45 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Agler is 18-22 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in all games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 6-17 against the money line (-15.3 Units) as a road favorite of -155 or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 66.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 2-5 against the money line (-12.7 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 7-12 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.7, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 1-7 against the money line (-7.9 Units) after a game where opponent grabbed 55 or more rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 68.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 0-9 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 65.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 6-7 against the money line (-12.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.1, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Chatman is 21-14 against the money line (+8.1 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 31 times, while the home underdog won straight up 26 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog won the game straight up 3 times, while the road favorite won the game straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 05/23/2016 - Courtney Vandersloot "?" Tuesday vs. LA Sparks ( Ankle ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/3/2024 5:33:15 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|