| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
INDIANA
CHICAGO |
|
|
147.5
| 84
Final
86 |
|
|
| | |
|
| Eastern Conference Finals - Best of 3 - Game 2 - IND leads 1-0 | | |  | |
| 607 | INDIANA | +135 | | 608 | CHICAGO | -155 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(340-141 since 1997.) (70.7%, +87.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(265-102 since 1997.) (72.2%, +86.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(350-147 since 1997.) (70.4%, +86 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(270-107 since 1997.) (71.6%, +81.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games.
(244-88 since 1997.) (73.5%, +80.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(255-103 since 1997.) (71.2%, +77.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games.
(289-111 since 1997.) (72.2%, +77 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(261-108 since 1997.) (70.7%, +74.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(197-71 since 1997.) (73.5%, +73.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a losing record.
(232-98 since 1997.) (70.3%, +67.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(196-74 since 1997.) (72.6%, +66 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a losing record.
(251-112 since 1997.) (69.1%, +63.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(239-194 since 1997.) (55.2%, +62.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(198-72 since 1997.) (73.3%, +61.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(174-62 since 1997.) (73.7%, +60.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(179-63 since 1997.) (74%, +57.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(147-49 since 1997.) (75%, +55.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(164-109 since 1997.) (60.1%, +55.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(154-53 since 1997.) (74.4%, +55.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(207-102 since 1997.) (67%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(161-63 since 1997.) (71.9%, +52.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(132-42 since 1997.) (75.9%, +51.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(117-37 since 1997.) (76%, +51.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(138-48 since 1997.) (74.2%, +51.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off a road loss against a division rival.
(113-39 since 1997.) (74.3%, +49.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(145-58 since 1997.) (71.4%, +49.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games.
(66-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (68%, +38 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(132-48 since 1997.) (73.3%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(123-40 since 1997.) (75.5%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(153-71 since 1997.) (68.3%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(181-92 since 1997.) (66.3%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(142-54 since 1997.) (72.4%, +46.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(92-27 since 1997.) (77.3%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(152-63 since 1997.) (70.7%, +45 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(145-71 since 1997.) (67.1%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(137-69 since 1997.) (66.5%, +43.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(117-42 since 1997.) (73.6%, +43.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(65-23 since 1997.) (73.9%, +40.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(65-23 since 1997.) (73.9%, +40.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(65-23 since 1997.) (73.9%, +40.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(81-34 since 1997.) (70.4%, +39.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(100-36 since 1997.) (73.5%, +39 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(93-30 since 1997.) (75.6%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(108-55 since 1997.) (66.3%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a win against a division rival, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a marginal losing team after 15 or more games.
(46-28 since 1997.) (62.2%, +30.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(68-34 since 1997.) (66.7%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(61-38 since 1997.) (61.6%, +27.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (INDIANA) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(42-8 since 1997.) (84%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(32-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +15.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots against opponent after a game where a team made 15% of their 3 point shots or worse.
(22-8 since 1997.) (73.3%, +24.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(25-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.6%, +19.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(26-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +18.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(32-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(28-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +18 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(35-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +19.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(76-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +47.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(46-24 since 1997.) (65.7%, +23.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(33-14 since 1997.) (70.2%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(48-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more.
(74-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.8%, +24.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(75-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.9%, +40.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(57-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +21.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(42-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +22.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season.
(250-222 over the last 5 seasons.) (53%, +42.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(144-78 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +48.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| INDIANA | 73 | | 27-67 | 40.2% | 5-16 | 33.7% | 14-18 | 77.3% | 43 | 12 | 13 | | CHICAGO | 74 | | 27-62 | 43.3% | 3-10 | 31.7% | 18-21 | 82.2% | 41 | 9 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 523 times, while INDIANA won 449 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
INDIANA is 25-11 against the money line (+16.8 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 76.1, OPPONENT 71.9 | INDIANA is 74-50 against the money line (+23.8 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 73.3, OPPONENT 70.8 | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-7.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.2, OPPONENT 76.9 | CHICAGO is 13-17 against the money line (-14.9 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.6, OPPONENT 75.0 | CHICAGO is 21-37 against the money line (-24.0 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 78.1 | CHICAGO is 37-41 against the money line (-28.7 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 82.2 | CHICAGO is 7-11 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.1, OPPONENT 76.2 |
|
INDIANA is 94-116 against the money line (-69.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 76.1 | INDIANA is 41-67 against the money line (-39.2 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 71.8, OPPONENT 74.4 | INDIANA is 81-89 against the money line (-44.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 81.7, OPPONENT 82.1 | CHICAGO is 7-3 against the money line (+6.5 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.2, OPPONENT 75.9 |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 27-10 against the money line (+12.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 75.2, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 42-29 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 74.8, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 14-9 against the money line (+8.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 72.7, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 45-30 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 74.6, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 20-11 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 72.5, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 26-16 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 73.1, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 42-30 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 74.7, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 6-0 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season this season.
The average score was INDIANA 77.0, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 1-8 against the money line (-8.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 67.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 3-12 against the money line (-11.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-6.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 69.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-9.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 99-140 against the money line (-49.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 43-49 against the money line (-21.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-6.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 70.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-11 against the money line (-8.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 73-125 against the money line (-51.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-8.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 70.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 1-10 against the money line (-11.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 5*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 7-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 29-27 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 73.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 15-10 against the money line (+8.1 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was INDIANA 73.7, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 15-9 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was INDIANA 74.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 12-6 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after 2 consecutive division games this season.
The average score was INDIANA 73.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 9-3 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after 3 consecutive division games this season.
The average score was INDIANA 73.3, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 15-9 against the money line (+6.7 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 10-3 against the money line (+10.6 Units) as a # 2 seed in the playoffs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 78.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 21-12 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 73.6, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 5-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was INDIANA 79.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 4-0 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was INDIANA 79.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 30-13 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 11-5 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was INDIANA 76.5, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-13 against the money line (-14.4 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 75-79 against the money line (-41.1 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 72-75 against the money line (-40.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 30-37 against the money line (-25.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-30 against the money line (-20.5 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-19 against the money line (-13.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-6 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-6 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-17 against the money line (-16.9 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-15 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-13 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-10 against the money line (-8.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-15 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-12 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-10 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-6.8 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 70.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 33-56 against the money line (-32.9 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-36 against the money line (-27.7 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 5-21 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.4, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 35-52 against the money line (-26.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-37 against the money line (-25.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-22 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-15 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-13 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 57-88 against the money line (-36.6 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 22-28 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-10 against the money line (-9.2 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 89-92 against the money line (-39.7 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.5, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 58-59 against the money line (-33.0 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.5, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 96-101 against the money line (-42.8 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.0, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 30-66 against the money line (-33.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 70.5, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 143-144 against the money line (-54.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 72.1, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 66-78 against the money line (-33.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was INDIANA 71.3, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-10 against the money line (+8.7 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 19-18 | +2.3 | 23-13 | 18-19 | 74.5 | 37.1 | 41.4% | 40.6 | 74.9 | 35.3 | 44.1% | 41.0 | | Road Games | 10-8 | +6.9 | 13-5 | 11-7 | 74.0 | 36.3 | 41.5% | 40.5 | 74.8 | 34.9 | 44.4% | 40.4 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.4 | 3-1 | 2-3 | 73.6 | 35.6 | 37.5% | 44.6 | 71.8 | 32.6 | 43.8% | 40.4 | | Division Games | 15-10 | +8 | 14-10 | 12-13 | 73.7 | 36.0 | 40.8% | 41.4 | 73.8 | 34.8 | 43.5% | 42.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 74.5 | 37.1 | 27-64 | 41.4% | 5-15 | 34.8% | 16-21 | 75.9% | 41 | 10 | 14 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.2 | 38.2 | 29-67 | 43.2% | 5-14 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 77.3% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.0 | 36.3 | 26-64 | 41.5% | 5-15 | 31.6% | 16-21 | 77.8% | 40 | 10 | 15 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.9 | 35.3 | 27-61 | 44.1% | 4-12 | 30.4% | 17-22 | 78.7% | 41 | 9 | 15 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.9 | 37.8 | 29-67 | 43.5% | 4-14 | 32.2% | 14-19 | 78.0% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 74.8 | 34.9 | 27-60 | 44.4% | 3-12 | 26.4% | 18-24 | 77.1% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 17-21 | -4.1 | 17-20 | 17-21 | 76.4 | 38.2 | 43.5% | 41.6 | 78.6 | 39.8 | 42.2% | 44.0 | | Home Games | 9-9 | -5.2 | 9-9 | 11-7 | 80.2 | 38.6 | 44.4% | 41.9 | 79.1 | 38.9 | 42.8% | 43.3 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.8 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 77.2 | 37.6 | 45.0% | 38.6 | 82.0 | 45.6 | 44.4% | 43.4 | | Division Games | 16-10 | +8.6 | 16-9 | 10-16 | 76.7 | 38.5 | 43.4% | 42.0 | 75.9 | 38.7 | 40.5% | 44.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 76.4 | 38.2 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 3-11 | 32.1% | 16-20 | 80.8% | 42 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77 | 37.7 | 29-66 | 43.6% | 5-14 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 77.8% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.2 | 38.6 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 4-11 | 33.2% | 17-20 | 81.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 7 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.6 | 39.8 | 29-69 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 32.2% | 15-20 | 76.5% | 44 | 11 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 77 | 38 | 29-67 | 43.2% | 5-14 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 76.7% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 79.1 | 38.9 | 29-69 | 42.8% | 5-14 | 34.6% | 15-20 | 76.7% | 43 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: INDIANA 69.6, CHICAGO 69.8 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/26/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 75-68 | W | +100 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 42 | 8 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 35 | 11 | | 7/28/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 73-77 | L | +170 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 31 | 15 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 40 | 16 | | 7/31/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 76-67 | W | -140 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 38 | 14 | 27-53 | 50.9% | 27 | 18 | | 8/2/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 69-79 | L | +450 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 47 | 9 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 41 | 5 | | 8/5/2014 | MINNESOTA | 64-66 | L | +170 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 36 | 9 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 52 | 10 | | 8/8/2014 | WASHINGTON | 61-74 | L | -210 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 38 | 10 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 44 | 10 | | 8/10/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 90-76 | W | -110 | 35-61 | 57.4% | 33 | 11 | 29-53 | 54.7% | 27 | 14 | | 8/14/2014 | NEW YORK | 76-63 | W | -250 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 45 | 14 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 41 | 17 | | 8/16/2014 | CHICAGO | 71-67 | W | -165 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 44 | 11 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 38 | 12 | | 8/17/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 61-73 | L | +170 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 43 | 17 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 38 | 10 | | 8/21/2014 | WASHINGTON | 78-73 | W | -210 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 45 | 10 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 40 | 16 | | 8/23/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 81-76 | W | +135 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 44 | 10 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 44 | 13 | | 8/30/2014 | CHICAGO | 77-70 | W | -175 | 25-71 | 35.2% | 47 | 4 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 42 | 12 | | 9/1/2014 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/25/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 79-75 | W | +325 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 34 | 24 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 33 | 20 | | 7/27/2014 | @ TULSA | 69-79 | L | +105 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 42 | 12 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 50 | 12 | | 7/29/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-92 | L | +155 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 36 | 14 | 38-75 | 50.7% | 41 | 11 | | 7/31/2014 | NEW YORK | 87-74 | W | -165 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 42 | 8 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 45 | 12 | | 8/3/2014 | WASHINGTON | 76-65 | W | -200 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 43 | 8 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 45 | 19 | | 8/5/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 82-66 | W | -175 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 46 | 14 | 25-76 | 32.9% | 40 | 8 | | 8/7/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 64-74 | L | +300 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 45 | 11 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 52 | 6 | | 8/10/2014 | ATLANTA | 80-69 | W | -270 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 42 | 11 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 46 | 15 | | 8/13/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 72-69 | W | -155 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 48 | 14 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 37 | 6 | | 8/16/2014 | @ INDIANA | 67-71 | L | +145 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 38 | 12 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 44 | 11 | | 8/17/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 72-84 | L | -330 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 34 | 15 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 43 | 11 | | 8/22/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 80-77 | W | +145 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 39 | 13 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 42 | 11 | | 8/24/2014 | ATLANTA | 83-92 | L | -155 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 39 | 15 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 36 | 13 | | 8/26/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 81-80 | W | +155 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 39 | 9 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 49 | 13 | | 8/30/2014 | @ INDIANA | 70-77 | L | +155 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 42 | 12 | 25-71 | 35.2% | 47 | 4 | | 9/1/2014 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| INDIANA is 33-8 (+19.9 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
| INDIANA is 14-3 (+14.6 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| INDIANA is 14-6 (+11.4 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
| INDIANA is 6-2 (+7.6 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/30/2014 | CHICAGO | 70 | 148 | Under | 33 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 1-8 | 12.5% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 42 | 11 | 12 | | | INDIANA | 77 | -4 | SU ATS | 42 | 25-71 | 35.2% | 9-21 | 42.9% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 47 | 14 | 4 | 8/16/2014 | CHICAGO | 67 | 146 | Under | 31 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 38 | 5 | 12 | | | INDIANA | 71 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 44 | 16 | 11 | 7/22/2014 | INDIANA | 57 | -3.5 | Under | 20 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 9-20 | 45.0% | 48 | 10 | 18 | | | CHICAGO | 60 | 150 | SU ATS | 29 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 2-13 | 15.4% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 38 | 8 | 11 | 7/17/2014 | CHICAGO | 64 | 151 | Under | 31 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 44 | 10 | 21 | | | INDIANA | 82 | -5 | SU ATS | 45 | 35-74 | 47.3% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 39 | 10 | 8 | 6/20/2014 | INDIANA | 83 | 151 | SU ATS | 40 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 28-35 | 80.0% | 52 | 8 | 14 | | | CHICAGO | 75 | -3.5 | Over | 38 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 36 | 3 | 14 | 5/16/2014 | INDIANA | 71 | 140.5 | Over | 46 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 43 | 12 | 10 | | | CHICAGO | 74 | -2 | SU ATS | 36 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 2-8 | 25.0% | 22-26 | 84.6% | 51 | 13 | 15 | 9/22/2013 | CHICAGO | 57 | 145.5 | Under | 27 | 17-57 | 29.8% | 1-8 | 12.5% | 22-28 | 78.6% | 39 | 7 | 10 | | | INDIANA | 79 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 44 | 8 | 11 | 9/20/2013 | INDIANA | 85 | 142 | SU ATS | 50 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 10-16 | 62.5% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 40 | 7 | 12 | | | CHICAGO | 72 | -7.5 | Over | 37 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 21-24 | 87.5% | 30 | 5 | 9 | 9/6/2013 | INDIANA | 82 | 145.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 22-26 | 84.6% | 47 | 14 | 8 | | | CHICAGO | 77 | -6.5 | Over | 34 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 44 | 13 | 8 | 8/6/2013 | INDIANA | 64 | 146.5 | SU ATS | 29 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 35 | 10 | 9 | | | CHICAGO | 58 | -6 | Under | 29 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 12-20 | 60.0% | 52 | 15 | 15 | 8/3/2013 | CHICAGO | 58 | 144 | Under | 32 | 20-61 | 32.8% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 39 | 11 | 14 | | | INDIANA | 79 | -3 | SU ATS | 40 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 21-28 | 75.0% | 50 | 15 | 10 | 6/22/2013 | CHICAGO | 71 | -6 | SU ATS | 35 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 48 | 10 | 14 | | | INDIANA | 61 | 145 | Under | 37 | 20-63 | 31.7% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 35 | 6 | 9 |
|
| | |
|
Lin is 155-119 against the money line (+4.1 Units) in all games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 62-69 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 74.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 111-71 against the money line (+24.6 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 75.3, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 102-73 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after a division game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 73-51 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 75.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 96-63 against the money line (+22.6 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 9-4 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in the 2nd game of a playoff series as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 79.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 10-3 against the money line (+10.6 Units) as a # 2 seed in the playoffs as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 78.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Lin is 68-36 against the money line (+28.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Lin is 41-23 against the money line (+17.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 28-10 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 78.7, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Lin is 39-24 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 11-6 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 31-17 against the money line (+10.9 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 22-12 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 77.9, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 93-70 against the money line (+8.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.5, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 129-97 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 27-25 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 74.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 71-55 against the money line (+7.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 23-17 against the money line (+9.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 79.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 36-25 against the money line (+14.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 78.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 85-61 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 74.9, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 92-65 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 127-93 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 40-22 against the money line (+19.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 52-31 against the money line (+22.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 124-93 against the money line (+6.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 20-11 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 30-17 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 68-72 against the money line (-20.4 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 14-17 against the money line (-13.7 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 40-53 against the money line (-33.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 24-29 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 10-16 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 32-40 against the money line (-18.5 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 26-35 against the money line (-17.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 18-22 against the money line (-15.4 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 28-45 against the money line (-32.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 17-37 against the money line (-30.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 33-43 against the money line (-24.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 17-27 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 7-17 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 8-18 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 25-33 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 30-38 against the money line (-21.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 31-38 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 13-20 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 7-16 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 11-32 against the money line (-28.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 5*) | Pokey is 23-45 against the money line (-34.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 13-28 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.6, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 19-41 against the money line (-40.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 5*) | Pokey is 50-62 against the money line (-30.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 52-64 against the money line (-30.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 6-14 against the money line (-14.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 70.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 13-24 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 51-57 against the money line (-18.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 34-52 against the money line (-23.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 8-24 against the money line (-19.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 12-32 against the money line (-28.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
Lin is 10-24 against the money line (-13.5 Units) as a road underdog of +135 or less as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 71.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 86-79 against the money line (-22.8 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of INDIANA.
The average score was INDIANA 76.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 155 times, while the road underdog won straight up 114 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 12 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 9 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/18/2024 1:38:37 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|