| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA
CHICAGO |
|
|
156.5
| 92
Final
83 |
|
|
| | |
|
| Eastern Conference Playoffs - Best of 3 - Game 1 - CHI leads 1-0 | | |  | |
| 613 | ATLANTA | +145 | | 614 | CHICAGO | -165 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(299-120 since 1997.) (71.4%, +82.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(250-103 since 1997.) (70.8%, +79.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(250-103 since 1997.) (70.8%, +79.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(250-103 since 1997.) (70.8%, +79.2 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(250-103 since 1997.) (70.8%, +79.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(250-103 since 1997.) (70.8%, +79.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(250-103 since 1997.) (70.8%, +79.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(290-124 since 1997.) (70%, +77.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(290-124 since 1997.) (70%, +77.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(262-88 since 1997.) (74.9%, +77.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(257-84 since 1997.) (75.4%, +76.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(221-72 since 1997.) (75.4%, +74.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(221-72 since 1997.) (75.4%, +74.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(221-72 since 1997.) (75.4%, +74.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(225-76 since 1997.) (74.8%, +73.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(225-76 since 1997.) (74.8%, +73.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(225-76 since 1997.) (74.8%, +73.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(238-192 since 1997.) (55.3%, +63.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(198-71 since 1997.) (73.6%, +63.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(179-62 since 1997.) (74.3%, +58.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(147-48 since 1997.) (75.4%, +57.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(207-100 since 1997.) (67.4%, +55 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(132-41 since 1997.) (76.3%, +53.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(153-69 since 1997.) (68.9%, +51.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, on Sunday games.
(120-65 since 1997.) (64.9%, +50.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games.
(65-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.1%, +39 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(64-21 since 1997.) (75.3%, +41.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(64-21 since 1997.) (75.3%, +41.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(64-21 since 1997.) (75.3%, +41.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(41-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +36.8 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(80-32 since 1997.) (71.4%, +40.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(183-97 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +78.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(49-7 since 1997.) (87.5%, +36.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(34-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.1%, +36.4 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(34-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.1%, +36.4 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(34-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.1%, +36.4 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(104-73 since 1997.) (58.8%, +35 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(88-58 since 1997.) (60.3%, +32.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(57-24 since 1997.) (70.4%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a close win by 3 points or less.
(31-12 since 1997.) (72.1%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(127-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +54.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(127-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +54.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(127-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +54.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - triple revenge - 3 straight losses vs. opponent, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(80-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.2%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset win as an underdog against opponent after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(44-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - triple revenge - 3 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(33-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.6%, +28.6 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points against opponent off an upset win as a road underdog.
(37-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +19.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - triple revenge - 3 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(34-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.1%, +25.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(51-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(55-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +20.3 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(149-127 over the last 5 seasons.) (54%, +64.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(135-99 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.7%, +52.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off a close win by 3 points or less over a division rival.
(152-118 since 1997.) (56.3%, +50.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after a combined score of 155 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(88-72 over the last 5 seasons.) (55%, +50.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more.
(156-116 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.4%, +45.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(52-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.5%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(88-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.5%, +38.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(117-90 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.5%, +57.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(72-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.5%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(45-20 since 1997.) (69.2%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(39-12 since 1997.) (76.5%, +29.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival.
(40-18 since 1997.) (69%, +28.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(28-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +18.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(46-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(38-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +15.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(31-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.5%, +13.7 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| ATLANTA | 75 | | 29-70 | 41.3% | 4-15 | 29.1% | 13-18 | 73.7% | 46 | 12 | 15 | | CHICAGO | 76 | | 28-65 | 43.3% | 4-10 | 35.1% | 16-19 | 82.6% | 42 | 8 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 499 times, while ATLANTA won 473 times.
Edge against the money line=ATLANTA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 63-106 against the money line (-58.5 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 78.5 | CHICAGO is 37-53 against the money line (-27.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.2 | CHICAGO is 12-16 against the money line (-15.5 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.5, OPPONENT 74.7 | CHICAGO is 37-40 against the money line (-27.2 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 82.1 | CHICAGO is 7-11 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.1, OPPONENT 76.2 |
|
ATLANTA is 4-10 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 82.4 | ATLANTA is 14-18 against the money line (-24.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 77.8 | ATLANTA is 8-9 against the money line (-14.6 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 78.6 | ATLANTA is 8-13 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 76.0 | ATLANTA is 1-5 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 73.0, OPPONENT 80.7 | ATLANTA is 5-13 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.3, OPPONENT 84.7 | ATLANTA is 6-12 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 83.4 | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the money line (-18.0 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.7, OPPONENT 78.8 | ATLANTA is 3-7 against the money line (-7.8 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 81.7 | CHICAGO is 16-5 against the money line (+13.5 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 75.3 | CHICAGO is 22-14 against the money line (+9.9 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 75.7 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 98-138 against the money line (-48.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 17-16 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 99-141 against the money line (-51.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 51-69 against the money line (-31.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 72-123 against the money line (-50.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 39-88 against the money line (-37.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 11-13 against the money line (-19.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 6-10 against the money line (-16.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 8-11 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-6 against the money line (-10.1 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-5 against the money line (-8.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-11 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 5-9 against the money line (-8.4 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 14-21 against the money line (-18.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-16 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 72.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-9.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 8-13 against the money line (-12.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-11 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 12-13 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-11 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-10 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.7, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 5-9 against the money line (-13.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-9.0 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 8-12 against the money line (-16.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 15-14 against the money line (-13.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-12 against the money line (-17.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 12-13 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-11 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 20-25 against the money line (-22.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 5-8 against the money line (-9.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-18 against the money line (-19.2 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 73.2, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 5*) | CHICAGO is 10-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 19-6 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 25-10 against the money line (+16.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 6-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.1, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 21-13 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 7-12 against the money line (-12.9 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 75-78 against the money line (-39.5 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 72-74 against the money line (-38.5 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 30-35 against the money line (-22.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-8.5 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-10 against the money line (-7.2 Units) after one or more consecutive overs this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 25-37 against the money line (-22.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-13 against the money line (-7.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-11 against the money line (-8.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-13 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-10 against the money line (-8.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 32-54 against the money line (-31.9 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 0-9 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.3, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-11 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-6.4 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 71.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 3-11 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-5.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-23 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-19 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.1, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 19-16 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-11 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in road games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-11 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in August or September games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 3-7 against the money line (-12.8 Units) on Sunday games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 73.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 11-12 against the money line (-17.5 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-15 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 23-18 against the money line (-17.6 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 26-39 against the money line (-23.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-14 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-10 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in road games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 68.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-13 against the money line (-11.5 Units) off a upset loss as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 6-10 against the money line (-15.8 Units) off a home loss over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 10-13 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-12 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 6-11 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 4-11 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 6*) | ATLANTA is 12-13 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-12 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 5-10 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-7.4 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 69.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-16 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 36-41 against the money line (-23.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.7, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 9-18 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 73.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 11-17 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-17 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-13 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in road games after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 16-22 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-12 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-9 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-15 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 5*) | CHICAGO is 15-8 against the money line (+9.7 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+8.2 Units) off a road win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 20-10 against the money line (+10.9 Units) off a win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-4 against the money line (+9.2 Units) off a road win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 19-16 | -14.3 | 17-17 | 19-16 | 80.5 | 40.4 | 43.2% | 45.8 | 78.6 | 39.0 | 42.9% | 43.0 | | Road Games | 6-11 | -10.6 | 7-10 | 7-10 | 77.2 | 39.4 | 41.0% | 44.8 | 81.2 | 41.0 | 44.5% | 43.9 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.3 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 77.8 | 42.2 | 42.2% | 48.0 | 80.4 | 36.0 | 42.7% | 41.2 | | Division Games | 11-12 | -17.4 | 8-14 | 12-11 | 78.5 | 39.9 | 42.3% | 46.3 | 77.0 | 38.6 | 42.7% | 43.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.5 | 40.4 | 31-71 | 43.2% | 5-15 | 30.5% | 15-20 | 73.5% | 46 | 12 | 20 | 19 | 9 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.8 | 37.7 | 29-66 | 43.4% | 5-14 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 77.8% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.2 | 39.4 | 29-71 | 41.0% | 5-17 | 31.6% | 13-18 | 73.6% | 45 | 12 | 17 | 19 | 10 | 16 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.6 | 39.0 | 29-68 | 42.9% | 5-15 | 35.8% | 15-20 | 76.2% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.1 | 37.4 | 29-66 | 43.3% | 4-14 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.2 | 41.0 | 30-68 | 44.5% | 6-16 | 38.9% | 15-19 | 76.7% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 16 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 16-19 | -3.1 | 16-18 | 15-20 | 76.3 | 38.1 | 43.5% | 41.8 | 78.2 | 39.2 | 42.0% | 44.0 | | Home Games | 9-8 | -3.7 | 9-8 | 10-7 | 80.1 | 38.4 | 44.4% | 42.1 | 78.4 | 38.6 | 42.2% | 43.8 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.8 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 74.2 | 33.0 | 44.9% | 40.2 | 74.0 | 39.4 | 40.8% | 42.4 | | Division Games | 15-8 | +9.6 | 15-7 | 8-15 | 76.5 | 38.4 | 43.3% | 42.3 | 75.0 | 37.7 | 40.1% | 44.7 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 76.3 | 38.1 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 4-11 | 33.7% | 15-19 | 81.1% | 42 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.9 | 37.7 | 29-66 | 43.6% | 5-14 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 77.8% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.1 | 38.4 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 4-10 | 34.3% | 16-20 | 82.1% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 7 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.2 | 39.2 | 29-70 | 42.0% | 5-15 | 31.7% | 15-20 | 76.4% | 44 | 11 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.8 | 37.8 | 29-67 | 43.2% | 5-14 | 32.5% | 14-19 | 76.9% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 78.4 | 38.6 | 29-69 | 42.2% | 5-14 | 34.7% | 15-20 | 75.9% | 44 | 11 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 6 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 69.9, CHICAGO 69.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/16/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 75-77 | L | -220 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 37 | 14 | 31-76 | 40.8% | 53 | 18 | | 7/22/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 108-112 | L | +175 | 42-93 | 45.2% | 45 | 14 | 42-86 | 48.8% | 58 | 21 | | 7/25/2014 | CHICAGO | 75-79 | L | -450 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 33 | 20 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 34 | 24 | | 7/27/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 67-77 | L | -155 | 28-75 | 37.3% | 42 | 15 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 44 | 15 | | 7/29/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 89-80 | W | -450 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 49 | 14 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 43 | 12 | | 7/31/2014 | @ TULSA | 85-75 | W | -155 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 39 | 23 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 40 | 17 | | 8/3/2014 | NEW YORK | 76-83 | L | -360 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 32 | 15 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 44 | 17 | | 8/5/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 67-75 | L | +375 | 27-79 | 34.2% | 54 | 11 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 40 | 16 | | 8/7/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 68-88 | L | -220 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 37 | 12 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 44 | 11 | | 8/8/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 77-80 | L | +145 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 51 | 19 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 47 | 17 | | 8/10/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 69-80 | L | +210 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 46 | 15 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 42 | 11 | | 8/13/2014 | PHOENIX | 96-82 | W | +100 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 49 | 11 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 38 | 9 | | 8/15/2014 | TULSA | 92-76 | W | -250 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 54 | 16 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 45 | 18 | | 8/17/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 55-84 | L | -165 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 49 | 26 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 42 | 12 | | 8/22/2014 | CHICAGO | 77-80 | L | -165 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 42 | 11 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 39 | 13 | | 8/24/2014 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/17/2014 | @ INDIANA | 64-82 | L | +175 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 44 | 21 | 35-74 | 47.3% | 39 | 8 | | 7/22/2014 | INDIANA | 60-57 | W | +145 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 38 | 11 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 48 | 18 | | 7/25/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 79-75 | W | +325 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 34 | 24 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 33 | 20 | | 7/27/2014 | @ TULSA | 69-79 | L | +105 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 42 | 12 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 50 | 12 | | 7/29/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-92 | L | +155 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 36 | 14 | 38-75 | 50.7% | 41 | 11 | | 7/31/2014 | NEW YORK | 87-74 | W | -165 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 42 | 8 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 45 | 12 | | 8/3/2014 | WASHINGTON | 76-65 | W | -200 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 43 | 8 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 45 | 19 | | 8/5/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 82-66 | W | -175 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 46 | 14 | 25-76 | 32.9% | 40 | 8 | | 8/7/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 64-74 | L | +300 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 45 | 11 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 52 | 6 | | 8/10/2014 | ATLANTA | 80-69 | W | -270 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 42 | 11 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 46 | 15 | | 8/13/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 72-69 | W | -155 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 48 | 14 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 37 | 6 | | 8/16/2014 | @ INDIANA | 67-71 | L | +145 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 38 | 12 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 44 | 11 | | 8/17/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 72-84 | L | -330 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 34 | 15 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 43 | 11 | | 8/22/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 80-77 | W | +145 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 39 | 13 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 42 | 11 | | 8/24/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CHICAGO is 19-12 (+14.0 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 9-6 (+6.2 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CHICAGO is 9-5 (+2.4 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 5-2 (+2.3 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/22/2014 | CHICAGO | 80 | 154 | SU ATS | 36 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 39 | 6 | 13 | | | ATLANTA | 77 | -3.5 | Over | 37 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 42 | 9 | 11 | 8/10/2014 | ATLANTA | 69 | 156 | Under | 36 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 46 | 10 | 15 | | | CHICAGO | 80 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 32 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 42 | 6 | 11 | 7/25/2014 | CHICAGO | 79 | 160 | SU ATS | 43 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 22-25 | 88.0% | 34 | 7 | 24 | | | ATLANTA | 75 | -9 | Under | 29 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 33 | 10 | 20 | 7/13/2014 | CHICAGO | 79 | 159 | ATS | 46 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 22-28 | 78.6% | 55 | 13 | 21 | | | ATLANTA | 81 | -7 | SU Over | 42 | 29-82 | 35.4% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 20-30 | 66.7% | 60 | 21 | 18 | 6/7/2014 | CHICAGO | 59 | 160 | Under | 31 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 40 | 10 | 18 | | | ATLANTA | 97 | -6 | SU ATS | 56 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 19-27 | 70.4% | 59 | 20 | 13 | 5/24/2014 | ATLANTA | 73 | 152.5 | Over | 39 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 37 | 10 | 15 | | | CHICAGO | 87 | -2 | SU ATS | 41 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 41 | 10 | 16 | 9/13/2013 | ATLANTA | 82 | 154 | ATS | 44 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 43 | 12 | 7 | | | CHICAGO | 87 | -7 | SU Over | 45 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 25-30 | 83.3% | 43 | 9 | 12 | 8/31/2013 | ATLANTA | 68 | 155 | Under | 39 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 7-10 | 70.0% | 40 | 7 | 17 | | | CHICAGO | 85 | -7 | SU ATS | 40 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 22-27 | 81.5% | 46 | 13 | 8 | 8/24/2013 | CHICAGO | 67 | 154 | SU ATS | 35 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 2-7 | 28.6% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 53 | 12 | 20 | | | ATLANTA | 56 | -4 | Under | 26 | 20-70 | 28.6% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 47 | 10 | 22 | 6/16/2013 | CHICAGO | 74 | 155 | Over | 47 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 18-19 | 94.7% | 49 | 15 | 17 | | | ATLANTA | 88 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 17-24 | 70.8% | 40 | 8 | 8 |
|
| | |
|
Michael is 149-68 against the money line (+45.6 Units) after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 75.5, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 103-50 against the money line (+30.7 Units) after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 75.8, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 98-39 against the money line (+41.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 76.4, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 80-42 against the money line (+25.6 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 76.9, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 56-29 against the money line (+18.3 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 78.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 13-5 against the money line (+9.6 Units) triple revenge - 3 straight losses vs. opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 81.1, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 29-9 against the money line (+21.2 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 81.2, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 18-4 against the money line (+15.0 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 78.7, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 19-7 against the money line (+15.3 Units) off a home loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 78.1, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 48-26 against the money line (+18.0 Units) off a loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 78.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 11-3 against the money line (+11.1 Units) off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 79.1, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 167-72 against the money line (+34.3 Units) after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 75.9, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 60-31 against the money line (+22.1 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 74.0, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 52-24 against the money line (+23.1 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 73.7, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 67-70 against the money line (-19.4 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 40-51 against the money line (-30.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 3-10 against the money line (-9.5 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 23-28 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 10-15 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 27-43 against the money line (-31.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 16-35 against the money line (-29.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 32-41 against the money line (-23.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 16-25 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 19-25 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 25-31 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 12-18 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 6-14 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 49-60 against the money line (-29.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 43-44 against the money line (-17.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 51-62 against the money line (-29.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 50-55 against the money line (-17.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 24-33 against the money line (-21.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 33-50 against the money line (-22.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 19-43 against the money line (-23.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 6-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Michael is 6-11 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in road games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 6-11 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 5-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 2-7 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in August or September games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 3-7 against the money line (-12.8 Units) on Sunday games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 73.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 11-12 against the money line (-17.5 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 20-35 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 73.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 10-13 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 7-12 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 6-11 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 4-11 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 5*) | Michael is 12-13 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 7-12 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 5-10 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 1-6 against the money line (-7.4 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 69.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 5-11 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 76.7, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 6-9 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 11-13 against the money line (-19.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 6-10 against the money line (-16.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 2-6 against the money line (-10.1 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 8-11 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 2-7 against the money line (-9.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 5-11 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 12-13 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 8-11 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 4-10 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.7, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 5-9 against the money line (-13.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 2-7 against the money line (-9.0 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 8-12 against the money line (-16.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 4-10 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 7-11 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 1-6 against the money line (-6.9 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.6, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 11-3 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in home games off a road win against a division rival as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 10-5 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 23-17 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 9-3 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 15-8 against the money line (+10.7 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 189 times, while the road underdog won straight up 118 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 18 times, while the road underdog won straight up 10 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/6/2024 2:06:24 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|