| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON CHICAGO |
|
| 158.5 | 85 Final 89 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
601 | WASHINGTON | +350 | 602 | CHICAGO | -500 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 3 of their last 4 games. (157-40 since 1997.) (79.7%, +63.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less. (74-28 since 1997.) (72.5%, +35 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a close win by 3 points or less. (37-13 since 1997.) (74%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a close home win by 3 points or less, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (35-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.9%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off a road win by 10 points or more. (43-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.1%, +27.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest. (48-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.4%, +31.8 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (226-234 since 1997.) (49.1%, +72.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (128-106 since 1997.) (54.7%, +57.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games. (65-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.6%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (23-8 since 1997.) (74.2%, +23.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 90 points or more. (30-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +24.9 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON | 69 | | 25-66 | 38.5% | 4-12 | 33.4% | 14-18 | 78.5% | 42 | 8 | 14 | CHICAGO | 80 | | 29-70 | 40.9% | 6-17 | 33.3% | 18-22 | 81.2% | 50 | 13 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 801 times, while WASHINGTON won 181 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 5-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 76.0 | CHICAGO is 19-29 against the money line (-20.5 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 77.3 | CHICAGO is 7-17 against the money line (-17.1 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 72.9, OPPONENT 76.0 | CHICAGO is 4-9 against the money line (-9.4 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.7, OPPONENT 80.2 | CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-10.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 72.3, OPPONENT 75.9 |
|
WASHINGTON is 3-17 against the money line (-13.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 81.9 | WASHINGTON is 25-82 against the money line (-52.6 Units) when they make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 65.4, OPPONENT 74.1 | WASHINGTON is 48-89 against the money line (-49.0 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 74.6 | WASHINGTON is 8-32 against the money line (-22.4 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 80.0 | WASHINGTON is 17-73 against the money line (-56.1 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 79.7 | WASHINGTON is 31-165 against the money line (-135.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 85.2 | WASHINGTON is 25-83 against the money line (-68.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.9, OPPONENT 74.6 | WASHINGTON is 32-74 against the money line (-48.1 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.6, OPPONENT 74.1 | CHICAGO is 23-12 against the money line (+14.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 76.3 | CHICAGO is 12-4 against the money line (+9.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 88.1, OPPONENT 77.3 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 15-26 against the money line (-14.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 4-17 against the money line (-15.9 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 13-20 against the money line (-16.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-13 against the money line (-16.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 5*) | CHICAGO is 14-21 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-19 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-19 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-11 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-16 against the money line (-10.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-30 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 80-164 against the money line (-57.1 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 103-171 against the money line (-54.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-25 against the money line (-16.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-27 against the money line (-18.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 24-59 against the money line (-30.2 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-14 against the money line (-12.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-45 against the money line (-28.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 32-90 against the money line (-48.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 4-21 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-18 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 3-21 against the money line (-18.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 95-146 against the money line (-49.3 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 57-67 against the money line (-36.4 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 54-63 against the money line (-35.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-32 against the money line (-24.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-46 against the money line (-24.4 Units) in July games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 72.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 34-42 against the money line (-22.7 Units) in home games vs. division opponents since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-10 against the money line (-15.6 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-16 against the money line (-15.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-12 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 44-72 against the money line (-38.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-24 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 13-20 against the money line (-15.6 Units) in home games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 69.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 4-10 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in home games after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 36-58 against the money line (-27.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 27-59 against the money line (-45.3 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 10-25 against the money line (-25.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 73.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 29-37 against the money line (-22.0 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 22-27 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 17-60 against the money line (-31.3 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 94-240 against the money line (-74.8 Units) as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 61-103 against the money line (-49.1 Units) in July games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 142-216 against the money line (-67.2 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 16-38 against the money line (-30.0 Units) on Wednesday since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 9-38 against the money line (-23.6 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-16 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-19 against the money line (-14.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-37 against the money line (-28.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 84-154 against the money line (-75.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 35-66 against the money line (-38.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.5, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 4-24 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 37-92 against the money line (-55.7 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 10-35 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-36 against the money line (-23.7 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-28 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after a close win by 3 points or less since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.9, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 34-58 against the money line (-32.0 Units) after a combined score of 125 points or less since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.5, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-28 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 2-16 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 99-174 against the money line (-67.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 83-114 against the money line (-40.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-3 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in home games after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 6-6 | +6.7 | 7-5 | 6-6 | 77.3 | 37.3 | 42.8% | 43.3 | 78.1 | 38.5 | 41.8% | 42.9 | Road Games | 2-4 | +0.2 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 78.8 | 36.5 | 43.6% | 42.3 | 83.8 | 43.0 | 45.5% | 41.7 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 77.4 | 38.8 | 42.6% | 45.2 | 77.2 | 36.8 | 42.1% | 41.2 | Division Games | 2-2 | +1.1 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 67.0 | 28.5 | 40.3% | 40.7 | 70.2 | 34.7 | 40.1% | 46.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.3 | 37.3 | 28-66 | 42.8% | 4-10 | 36.3% | 17-22 | 77.2% | 43 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.4 | 38.8 | 29-67 | 42.9% | 5-14 | 33.8% | 15-20 | 77.8% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 78.8 | 36.5 | 29-67 | 43.6% | 4-10 | 35.5% | 16-22 | 75.6% | 42 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.1 | 38.5 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 6-17 | 33.8% | 16-20 | 79.0% | 43 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 77.9 | 38.8 | 29-67 | 42.7% | 5-16 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 83.8 | 43.0 | 31-68 | 45.5% | 5-14 | 38.8% | 16-20 | 82.4% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 8-4 | -0.6 | 7-5 | 7-5 | 81.2 | 42.2 | 42.3% | 49.5 | 74.8 | 38.7 | 39.4% | 41.2 | Home Games | 5-1 | +0.4 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 81.8 | 41.8 | 41.8% | 51.7 | 73.5 | 38.0 | 39.1% | 41.3 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +0.4 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 81.0 | 39.8 | 40.0% | 47.6 | 70.0 | 37.0 | 38.0% | 43.4 | Division Games | 4-1 | +3 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 82.2 | 42.4 | 43.0% | 47.8 | 72.4 | 40.0 | 39.0% | 42.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.2 | 42.2 | 29-69 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 34.2% | 18-21 | 82.7% | 49 | 12 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 78.4 | 38.5 | 29-67 | 43.5% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.8 | 41.8 | 30-71 | 41.8% | 5-16 | 31.9% | 17-21 | 82.7% | 52 | 11 | 16 | 16 | 6 | 11 | 8 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.8 | 38.7 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 5-15 | 37.1% | 14-18 | 75.6% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 75.6 | 37.3 | 28-68 | 41.6% | 5-16 | 33.4% | 14-18 | 77.0% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 73.5 | 38.0 | 28-72 | 39.1% | 6-15 | 38.2% | 11-16 | 73.4% | 41 | 8 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 70.4, CHICAGO 68.8 |
| | |
|
|
6/2/2013 | ATLANTA | 63-73 | L | +175 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 41 | 21 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 48 | 18 | 6/7/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 66-62 | W | +210 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 42 | 11 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 53 | 11 | 6/8/2013 | MINNESOTA | 85-80 | W | +550 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 39 | 14 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 55 | 13 | 6/16/2013 | INDIANA | 64-60 | W | -120 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 44 | 16 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 39 | 10 | 6/18/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 86-96 | L | +145 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 36 | 15 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 34 | 12 | 6/21/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 82-90 | L | +325 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 42 | 10 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 36 | 12 | 6/23/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 69-79 | L | +650 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 48 | 19 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 37 | 11 | 6/27/2013 | PHOENIX | 97-101 | L | +145 | 36-77 | 46.8% | 41 | 9 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 42 | 14 | 6/28/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 75-86 | L | +350 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 36 | 15 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 46 | 16 | 6/30/2013 | TULSA | 84-61 | W | -165 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 62 | 18 | 17-70 | 24.3% | 40 | 15 | 7/6/2013 | SEATTLE | 62-59 | W | -250 | 18-55 | 32.7% | 39 | 17 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 41 | 23 | 7/10/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/16/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2013 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/31/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 86-75 | W | -300 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 54 | 13 | 34-85 | 40.0% | 40 | 6 | 6/2/2013 | TULSA | 92-71 | W | | 37-71 | 52.1% | 48 | 14 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 33 | 12 | 6/7/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 69-81 | L | -175 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 46 | 14 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 43 | 11 | 6/9/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 72-70 | W | -330 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 62 | 19 | 27-86 | 31.4% | 41 | 7 | 6/16/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 74-88 | L | +180 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 49 | 17 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 40 | 8 | 6/20/2013 | @ TULSA | 74-83 | L | -250 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 51 | 15 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 46 | 9 | 6/22/2013 | @ INDIANA | 71-61 | W | -250 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 48 | 14 | 20-63 | 31.7% | 35 | 9 | 6/26/2013 | NEW YORK | 87-74 | W | -400 | 33-79 | 41.8% | 44 | 4 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 47 | 17 | 6/29/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 94-82 | W | -175 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 55 | 7 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 44 | 13 | 7/2/2013 | SEATTLE | 60-69 | L | -360 | 20-67 | 29.9% | 47 | 12 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 43 | 11 | 7/7/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 93-64 | W | -155 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 44 | 10 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 48 | 15 | 7/10/2013 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/18/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/20/2013 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CHICAGO is 14-12 (+1.2 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 7-1 (+5.5 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CHICAGO is 8-5 (-1.0 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 4-0 (+4.0 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/22/2012 | WASHINGTON | 58 | 143 | Under | 28 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 32 | 10 | 15 | | CHICAGO | 77 | -12 | SU ATS | 23 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 21-28 | 75.0% | 55 | 13 | 15 | 8/19/2012 | CHICAGO | 71 | -5.5 | Over | 25 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 50 | 13 | 20 | | WASHINGTON | 75 | 145 | SU ATS | 28 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 19-30 | 63.3% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 6/1/2012 | WASHINGTON | 63 | 142 | ATS | 27 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 46 | 6 | 15 | | CHICAGO | 65 | -10.5 | SU Under | 29 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 36 | 11 | 14 | 5/19/2012 | CHICAGO | 69 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 27-52 | 51.9% | 5-8 | 62.5% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 32 | 6 | 21 | | WASHINGTON | 57 | 143.5 | Under | 25 | 24-59 | 40.7% | 2-12 | 16.7% | 7-11 | 63.6% | 36 | 10 | 23 |
|
| | |
|
Mike is 144-94 against the money line (+27.7 Units) in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 42-24 against the money line (+23.4 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 11-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.6, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 21-14 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 75.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 35-43 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 20-25 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after a division game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 13-16 against the money line (-16.4 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 22-32 against the money line (-24.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 18-23 against the money line (-13.4 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 2-8 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 69.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 16-23 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 8-12 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 15-26 against the money line (-14.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 4-17 against the money line (-15.9 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Pokey is 22-37 against the money line (-27.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 9-25 against the money line (-25.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 5*) | Pokey is 23-36 against the money line (-24.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 10-19 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 22-35 against the money line (-25.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 14-23 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 14-33 against the money line (-24.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 9-30 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Mike is 6-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) off a close home win by 3 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 70.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 17-24 against the money line (-23.1 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 72.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 2-8 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in road games after a close win by 3 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 68.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 30-31 against the money line (-24.2 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 71.9, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 13-3 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.9, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 8-2 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in home games after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 70 times, while the road underdog won straight up 19 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 9 times, while the road underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/28/2024 11:16:59 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|