| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON
First Half Results
CHICAGO |
|
|
78.5
| 38
Final
50 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 601 | WASHINGTON | 78 | | 602 | CHICAGO | -5.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off a close home win by 3 points or less.
(134-82 since 1997.) (62%, +43.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - off a home no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(31-9 since 1997.) (77.5%, +21.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (WASHINGTON) - off a home no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite.
(60-26 since 1997.) (69.8%, +31.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off a no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite.
(50-20 since 1997.) (71.4%, +28 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off a home no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite.
(48-14 since 1997.) (77.4%, +32.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off a home win.
(229-151 since 1997.) (60.3%, +62.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - off a home win against opponent off an road win where they scored 85 or more points.
(67-32 since 1997.) (67.7%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins against opponent off an road win where they scored 85 or more points.
(23-4 since 1997.) (85.2%, +18.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 90 points or more.
(104-60 since 1997.) (63.4%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after scoring 90 points or more.
(56-24 since 1997.) (70%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 90 points or more.
(88-50 since 1997.) (63.8%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (CHICAGO) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, playing with 2 days rest.
(30-9 since 1997.) (76.9%, +20.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(505-369 since 1997.) (57.8%, +99.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after one or more consecutive overs.
(642-479 since 1997.) (57.3%, +115.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(137-79 since 1997.) (63.4%, +50.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(405-279 since 1997.) (59.2%, +98.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(196-118 since 1997.) (62.4%, +66.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games.
(219-141 since 1997.) (60.8%, +63.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning record on the season.
(197-127 since 1997.) (60.8%, +57.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(108-52 since 1997.) (67.5%, +50.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, in July games.
(112-62 since 1997.) (64.4%, +43.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in July games.
(396-269 since 1997.) (59.5%, +100.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(45-18 since 1997.) (71.4%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(702-505 since 1997.) (58.2%, +146.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in July games.
(270-153 since 1997.) (63.8%, +101.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in May, June, or July games.
(446-301 since 1997.) (59.7%, +114.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(259-173 since 1997.) (60%, +68.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(92-46 since 1997.) (66.7%, +41.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(157-97 since 1997.) (61.8%, +50.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(171-109 since 1997.) (61.1%, +51.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games.
(197-128 since 1997.) (60.6%, +56.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(125-74 since 1997.) (62.8%, +43.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(142-82 since 1997.) (63.4%, +51.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(86-43 since 1997.) (66.7%, +38.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(93-47 since 1997.) (66.4%, +41.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(698-474 since 1997.) (59.6%, +176.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(219-124 since 1997.) (63.8%, +82.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(453-305 since 1997.) (59.8%, +117.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(143-89 since 1997.) (61.6%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(389-273 since 1997.) (58.8%, +88.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in May, June, or July games.
(858-652 since 1997.) (56.8%, +140.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents.
(819-615 since 1997.) (57.1%, +142.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, after a non-conference game.
(244-161 since 1997.) (60.2%, +66.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a non-conference game.
(541-382 since 1997.) (58.6%, +120.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(326-229 since 1997.) (58.7%, +74.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in July games.
(396-269 since 1997.) (59.5%, +100.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - off a win against a division rival.
(432-314 since 1997.) (57.9%, +86.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(660-490 since 1997.) (57.4%, +121 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - in May, June, or July games.
(858-652 since 1997.) (56.8%, +140.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents.
(819-615 since 1997.) (57.1%, +142.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a division game.
(839-628 since 1997.) (57.2%, +148.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CHICAGO) - after a division game against opponent after a non-conference game.
(322-227 since 1997.) (58.7%, +72.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| WASHINGTON | 69 | | 35 | | 25-66 | 38.5% | 4-12 | 33.4% | 14-18 | 78.5% | 42 | 8 | 14 | | CHICAGO | 80 | | 40 | | 29-70 | 40.9% | 6-17 | 33.3% | 18-22 | 81.2% | 50 | 13 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO covered the first half line 535 times, while WASHINGTON covered the first half line 465 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 606 games went under first half total, while 344 games went over first half total.
Edge against first half total=Under |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 19-9 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 36.8 |
|
WASHINGTON is 32-58 against the 1rst half line (-31.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 38.4 | WASHINGTON is 14-31 against the 1rst half line (-20.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 42.1 | CHICAGO is 24-11 against the 1rst half line (+11.9 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 39.9, OPPONENT 36.7 | CHICAGO is 67-25 against the 1rst half line (+39.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 41.8, OPPONENT 37.4 |
|
WASHINGTON is 73-30 UNDER (+40.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 30.7, OPPONENT 35.1 | WASHINGTON is 87-53 UNDER (+28.7 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 34.9 | WASHINGTON is 152-114 UNDER (+26.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.7 | WASHINGTON is 111-77 UNDER (+26.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 34.8 | WASHINGTON is 64-43 UNDER (+16.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.5, OPPONENT 36.0 | WASHINGTON is 150-115 UNDER (+23.5 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.4 | CHICAGO is 43-26 UNDER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 37.5 | CHICAGO is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 33.8, OPPONENT 31.8 | CHICAGO is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 34.7, OPPONENT 37.1 | CHICAGO is 30-9 UNDER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 34.9, OPPONENT 33.9 | CHICAGO is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 31.1, OPPONENT 35.6 | CHICAGO is 40-20 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.7, OPPONENT 35.2 |
|
| | | | |
|
WASHINGTON is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.3, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-23 against the 1rst half line (-14.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.5, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-24 against the 1rst half line (-14.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.4, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-21 against the 1rst half line (-12.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.1, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 32.9, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 14-30 against the 1rst half line (-19.0 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.2, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 138-103 UNDER (+24.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 67-35 UNDER (+28.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 157-113 UNDER (+32.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 126-79 UNDER (+39.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 129-91 UNDER (+28.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 112-67 UNDER (+38.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 41-17 UNDER (+22.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.1, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 233-158 UNDER (+59.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 65-44 UNDER (+16.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 55-30 UNDER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 115-81 UNDER (+25.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 75-48 UNDER (+22.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 122-86 UNDER (+27.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 74-47 UNDER (+22.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 57-37 UNDER (+16.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.9, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.9, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.1, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 20-8 against the 1rst half line (+11.2 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-29 against the 1rst half line (-14.9 Units) versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.9, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-17 against the 1rst half line (-12.7 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.0, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 5-17 against the 1rst half line (-13.7 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.8, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.8, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-18 against the 1rst half line (-12.8 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.1, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-14 against the 1rst half line (-11.4 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.7, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 34.9, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 16-38 against the 1rst half line (-25.8 Units) on Wednesday since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 8-21 against the 1rst half line (-15.1 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.3, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 104-137 against the 1rst half line (-46.7 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 12-28 against the 1rst half line (-18.8 Units) after a close win by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 33-56 against the 1rst half line (-28.6 Units) after a win by 6 points or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 74-115 against the 1rst half line (-52.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 10-1 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 297-214 UNDER (+61.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 192-137 UNDER (+41.3 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.5, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-3 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total in July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 202-149 UNDER (+38.1 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 62-41 UNDER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing with 3 or more days rest since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 108-79 UNDER (+21.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 135-98 UNDER (+27.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 38-16 UNDER (+20.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where opponent was called for 22 or more fouls since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 13-2 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 115-73 UNDER (+34.7 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 87-62 UNDER (+18.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 71-47 UNDER (+19.3 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 99-70 UNDER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 87-58 UNDER (+23.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 144-100 UNDER (+34.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 154-113 UNDER (+29.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 115-78 UNDER (+29.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-12 UNDER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.5, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 33.6, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 20-7 UNDER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 51-28 UNDER (+20.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a division game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 25-12 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.7, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 19-6 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.3, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 34.6, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.4, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 6-6 | +6.7 | 7-5 | 6-6 | 77.3 | 37.3 | 42.8% | 43.3 | 78.1 | 38.5 | 41.8% | 42.9 | | Road Games | 2-4 | +0.2 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 78.8 | 36.5 | 43.6% | 42.3 | 83.8 | 43.0 | 45.5% | 41.7 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 77.4 | 38.8 | 42.6% | 45.2 | 77.2 | 36.8 | 42.1% | 41.2 | | Division Games | 2-2 | +1.1 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 67.0 | 28.5 | 40.3% | 40.7 | 70.2 | 34.7 | 40.1% | 46.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.3 | 37.3 | 28-66 | 42.8% | 4-10 | 36.3% | 17-22 | 77.2% | 43 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.4 | 38.8 | 29-67 | 42.9% | 5-14 | 33.8% | 15-20 | 77.8% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 78.8 | 36.5 | 29-67 | 43.6% | 4-10 | 35.5% | 16-22 | 75.6% | 42 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.1 | 38.5 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 6-17 | 33.8% | 16-20 | 79.0% | 43 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 77.9 | 38.8 | 29-67 | 42.7% | 5-16 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 83.8 | 43.0 | 31-68 | 45.5% | 5-14 | 38.8% | 16-20 | 82.4% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 8-4 | -0.6 | 7-5 | 7-5 | 81.2 | 42.2 | 42.3% | 49.5 | 74.8 | 38.7 | 39.4% | 41.2 | | Home Games | 5-1 | +0.4 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 81.8 | 41.8 | 41.8% | 51.7 | 73.5 | 38.0 | 39.1% | 41.3 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +0.4 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 81.0 | 39.8 | 40.0% | 47.6 | 70.0 | 37.0 | 38.0% | 43.4 | | Division Games | 4-1 | +3 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 82.2 | 42.4 | 43.0% | 47.8 | 72.4 | 40.0 | 39.0% | 42.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 81.2 | 42.2 | 29-69 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 34.2% | 18-21 | 82.7% | 49 | 12 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 7 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.4 | 38.5 | 29-67 | 43.5% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.8 | 41.8 | 30-71 | 41.8% | 5-16 | 31.9% | 17-21 | 82.7% | 52 | 11 | 16 | 16 | 6 | 11 | 8 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.8 | 38.7 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 5-15 | 37.1% | 14-18 | 75.6% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 75.6 | 37.3 | 28-68 | 41.6% | 5-16 | 33.4% | 14-18 | 77.0% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 73.5 | 38.0 | 28-72 | 39.1% | 6-15 | 38.2% | 11-16 | 73.4% | 41 | 8 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 70.4, CHICAGO 68.8 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/2/2013 | ATLANTA | 63-73 | 26-39 | 2.5 | L | 80.5 | U | 27-69 | 39.1% | 41 | 21 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 48 | 18 | | 6/7/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 66-62 | 29-30 | 3.5 | W | 74.5 | U | 24-63 | 38.1% | 42 | 11 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 53 | 11 | | 6/8/2013 | MINNESOTA | 85-80 | 43-36 | 7 | W | 77.5 | O | 30-61 | 49.2% | 39 | 14 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 55 | 13 | | 6/16/2013 | INDIANA | 64-60 | 31-31 | -1 | L | 70.5 | U | 22-57 | 38.6% | 44 | 16 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 39 | 10 | | 6/18/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 86-96 | 40-47 | 2 | L | 69 | O | 31-63 | 49.2% | 36 | 15 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 34 | 12 | | 6/21/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 82-90 | 38-49 | 5 | L | 82 | O | 29-72 | 40.3% | 42 | 10 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 36 | 12 | | 6/23/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 69-79 | 37-47 | 7.5 | L | 79 | O | 30-70 | 42.9% | 48 | 19 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 37 | 11 | | 6/27/2013 | PHOENIX | 97-101 | 50-43 | 2 | W | 82 | O | 36-77 | 46.8% | 41 | 9 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 42 | 14 | | 6/28/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 75-86 | 28-39 | 5.5 | L | 77 | U | 31-69 | 44.9% | 36 | 15 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 46 | 16 | | 6/30/2013 | TULSA | 84-61 | 44-34 | -2 | W | 79 | U | 29-67 | 43.3% | 62 | 18 | 17-70 | 24.3% | 40 | 15 | | 7/6/2013 | SEATTLE | 62-59 | 35-21 | -3 | W | 71.5 | U | 18-55 | 32.7% | 39 | 17 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 41 | 23 | | 7/10/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/16/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2013 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/31/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 86-75 | 44-39 | -3.5 | W | 78.5 | O | 32-70 | 45.7% | 54 | 13 | 34-85 | 40.0% | 40 | 6 | | 6/2/2013 | TULSA | 92-71 | 40-38 | -9.5 | L | 80.5 | U | 37-71 | 52.1% | 48 | 14 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 33 | 12 | | 6/7/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 69-81 | 36-44 | -2 | L | 74 | O | 27-70 | 38.6% | 46 | 14 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 43 | 11 | | 6/9/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 72-70 | 45-34 | -4 | W | 74.5 | O | 25-59 | 42.4% | 62 | 19 | 27-86 | 31.4% | 41 | 7 | | 6/16/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 74-88 | 47-51 | 3 | L | 76 | O | 27-71 | 38.0% | 49 | 17 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 40 | 8 | | 6/20/2013 | @ TULSA | 74-83 | 39-41 | -3 | L | 79 | O | 25-64 | 39.1% | 51 | 15 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 46 | 9 | | 6/22/2013 | @ INDIANA | 71-61 | 35-37 | -3 | L | 71.5 | O | 27-59 | 45.8% | 48 | 14 | 20-63 | 31.7% | 35 | 9 | | 6/26/2013 | NEW YORK | 87-74 | 44-42 | -5 | L | 74.5 | O | 33-79 | 41.8% | 44 | 4 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 47 | 17 | | 6/29/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 94-82 | 47-41 | -2 | W | 79.5 | O | 31-80 | 38.7% | 55 | 7 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 44 | 13 | | 7/2/2013 | SEATTLE | 60-69 | 31-34 | -4.5 | L | 74 | U | 20-67 | 29.9% | 47 | 12 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 43 | 11 | | 7/7/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 93-64 | 42-31 | -1.5 | W | 74.5 | U | 29-65 | 44.6% | 44 | 10 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 48 | 15 | | 7/10/2013 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/18/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/20/2013 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| WASHINGTON is 16-10 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997 | | 15 of 26 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 5-3 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons | | 5 of 8 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| WASHINGTON is 10-3 versus the first half line when playing against CHICAGO since 1997 | | 8 of 13 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 2-2 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/22/2012 | WASHINGTON | 58 | 143 | Under | 28 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 32 | 10 | 15 | | | CHICAGO | 77 | -12 | SU ATS | 23 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 21-28 | 75.0% | 55 | 13 | 15 | 8/19/2012 | CHICAGO | 71 | -5.5 | Over | 25 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 50 | 13 | 20 | | | WASHINGTON | 75 | 145 | SU ATS | 28 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 19-30 | 63.3% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 6/1/2012 | WASHINGTON | 63 | 142 | ATS | 27 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 46 | 6 | 15 | | | CHICAGO | 65 | -10.5 | SU Under | 29 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 36 | 11 | 14 | 5/19/2012 | CHICAGO | 69 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 27-52 | 51.9% | 5-8 | 62.5% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 32 | 6 | 21 | | | WASHINGTON | 57 | 143.5 | Under | 25 | 24-59 | 40.7% | 2-12 | 16.7% | 7-11 | 63.6% | 36 | 10 | 23 |
|
| | |
|
Pokey is 14-26 against the 1rst half line (-14.6 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 13-26 against the 1rst half line (-15.6 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.5, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) in home games vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 17-30 against the 1rst half line (-16.0 Units) after a division game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.7, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 9-21 against the 1rst half line (-14.1 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.1, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.3, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 8-17 against the 1rst half line (-10.7 Units) in home games after playing a road game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.4, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.2, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 12-22 against the 1rst half line (-12.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.4, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 34.9, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 9-21 against the 1rst half line (-14.1 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.5, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 10-20 against the 1rst half line (-12.0 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.6, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 9-20 against the 1rst half line (-13.0 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.9, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Mike is 61-88 against the 1rst half line (-35.8 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.5, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 30-48 against the 1rst half line (-22.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.4, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 29-53 against the 1rst half line (-29.3 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.4, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 76-104 against the 1rst half line (-38.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.3, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Mike is 84-59 OVER (+19.1 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.2, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 48-28 OVER (+17.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.5, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 57-32 OVER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.0, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 54-27 OVER (+24.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.5, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Mike is 134-103 UNDER (+20.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 19-10 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.7, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 26-12 UNDER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.5, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 15-3 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total in July games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Pokey is 30-19 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 37.6, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 16-7 UNDER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games vs. division opponents as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 34.6, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Pokey is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after playing a road game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.4, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 19-10 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.5, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.9, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Pokey is 23-13 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 36.8, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Pokey is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 35.8, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 44 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 43 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 5 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 4 times. |
|
|
| |
|
Since 1997, 11 games went over the first half total, while 2 games went under the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Over | Over the last 3 seasons, 9 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Over |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 3 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 2 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 3 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 0 times. | | Since 1997, 3 games went over the first half total, while 2 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/25/2024 5:34:47 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|