| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
ATLANTA |
|
|
166.5
| 93
Final
82 |
|
|
| | |
|
| IMG Academy - Bradenton, FL | | |  | |
| 649 | CONNECTICUT | -210 | | 650 | ATLANTA | +175 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(72-26 since 1997.) (73.5%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 2 straight games making 50% of their shots or better.
(45-20 since 1997.) (69.2%, +25.7 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(140-40 since 1997.) (77.8%, +55.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(41-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 90 points or more.
(75-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals, on Monday nights.
(32-13 since 1997.) (71.1%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 84 | | 33-75 | 43.8% | 7-22 | 32.5% | 11-15 | 75.0% | 39 | 12 | 12 | | ATLANTA | 88 | | 31-64 | 47.8% | 6-16 | 37.7% | 20-24 | 84.7% | 46 | 11 | 17 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, ATLANTA won the game straight up 588 times, while CONNECTICUT won 388 times.
Edge against the money line=ATLANTA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 187-136 against the money line (+32.2 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 75.1 | CONNECTICUT is 14-7 against the money line (+8.5 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 84.0 | CONNECTICUT is 25-7 against the money line (+19.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 79.4 | CONNECTICUT is 18-4 against the money line (+14.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.4, OPPONENT 81.4 | ATLANTA is 6-27 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 72.4, OPPONENT 80.5 | ATLANTA is 102-127 against the money line (-51.3 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 81.3 | ATLANTA is 4-20 against the money line (-16.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 88.4 | ATLANTA is 7-27 against the money line (-17.4 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 90.9 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 7-13 against the money line (-25.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 83.0 | CONNECTICUT is 41-67 against the money line (-58.9 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 80.9 | CONNECTICUT is 13-15 against the money line (-21.4 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 80.0 | CONNECTICUT is 5-8 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 87.2 | CONNECTICUT is 69-89 against the money line (-38.4 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.1, OPPONENT 74.7 | CONNECTICUT is 52-85 against the money line (-46.8 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.1, OPPONENT 78.2 | CONNECTICUT is 3-10 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 83.8 | CONNECTICUT is 8-16 against the money line (-12.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 89.2 | CONNECTICUT is 5-13 against the money line (-10.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 92.5 | CONNECTICUT is 2-6 against the money line (-9.1 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 87.1 | CONNECTICUT is 6-12 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 85.8 | ATLANTA is 46-35 against the money line (+15.2 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.8, OPPONENT 80.6 | ATLANTA is 79-55 against the money line (+28.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.7, OPPONENT 79.9 | ATLANTA is 12-7 against the money line (+14.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 86.2, OPPONENT 84.4 | ATLANTA is 7-4 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in road games when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 85.8, OPPONENT 83.3 | ATLANTA is 8-3 against the money line (+8.0 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 72.5 | ATLANTA is 26-25 against the money line (+12.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.6, OPPONENT 83.6 | ATLANTA is 26-10 against the money line (+28.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 86.8, OPPONENT 82.1 | ATLANTA is 16-6 against the money line (+15.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 91.0, OPPONENT 84.6 |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 3-14 against the money line (-12.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 70.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-24 against the money line (-16.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 71.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 21-59 against the money line (-28.9 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 158-193 against the money line (-61.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 161-198 against the money line (-67.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 74-114 against the money line (-53.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 150-177 against the money line (-64.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 46-40 against the money line (-32.4 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 142-181 against the money line (-59.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 14-18 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-19 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-20 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-7 against the money line (-18.1 Units) in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 5*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 95-73 against the money line (+20.3 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 208-240 against the money line (-71.5 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 81-95 against the money line (-39.2 Units) in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 128-143 against the money line (-59.0 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-17 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 73.2, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 41-62 against the money line (-32.3 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-10 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 72.6, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-13 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after a game being outrebounded by opponent by 15 or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-14 against the money line (-13.6 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 73.6, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 1-8 against the money line (-8.1 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 69.6, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 5-22 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 73.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-16 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.2, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-12 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 73.8, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 51-70 against the money line (-35.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 103-132 against the money line (-55.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 55-73 against the money line (-35.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-23 against the money line (-19.1 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 1-9 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 73.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 37-67 against the money line (-42.6 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 3-16 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 70.9, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 63-70 against the money line (-33.6 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.5, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-16 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 73.3, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 92-118 against the money line (-49.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 94-133 against the money line (-61.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 19-53 against the money line (-29.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 2-8 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-21 against the money line (-20.0 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-11 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in road games after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-7 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-8.0 Units) when playing their 3rd road game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-13 against the money line (-14.6 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-13 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-9 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-8 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.6, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-12 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-18 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-8 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-7 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-9 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-18 against the money line (-17.0 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-13 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-9 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-9 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-17 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-12 against the money line (-13.9 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 14-10 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 13-8 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 24-19 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 22-14 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 21-10 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 20-8 against the money line (+18.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 85.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 17-11 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 1-6 | -5.6 | 2-5 | 3-3 | 80.1 | 42.3 | 43.3% | 43.6 | 83.6 | 39.0 | 45.2% | 41.6 | | Road Games | 1-6 | -5.6 | 2-5 | 3-3 | 80.1 | 42.3 | 43.3% | 43.6 | 83.6 | 39.0 | 45.2% | 41.6 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.2 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 80.6 | 41.4 | 44.6% | 42.4 | 82.8 | 39.4 | 45.2% | 41.0 | | Division Games | 1-6 | -5.6 | 2-5 | 3-3 | 80.1 | 42.3 | 43.3% | 43.6 | 83.6 | 39.0 | 45.2% | 41.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.1 | 42.3 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 6-19 | 30.8% | 17-23 | 71.6% | 44 | 8 | 18 | 20 | 10 | 15 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81 | 40.2 | 29-66 | 44.4% | 8-22 | 35.2% | 14-19 | 77.3% | 42 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 16 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.1 | 42.3 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 6-19 | 30.8% | 17-23 | 71.6% | 44 | 8 | 18 | 20 | 10 | 15 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.6 | 39.0 | 30-67 | 45.2% | 7-21 | 33.1% | 16-20 | 79.6% | 42 | 8 | 17 | 21 | 10 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 83.5 | 40.7 | 31-68 | 45.0% | 8-22 | 35.5% | 14-18 | 79.7% | 41 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 10 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 83.6 | 39.0 | 30-67 | 45.2% | 7-21 | 33.1% | 16-20 | 79.6% | 42 | 8 | 17 | 21 | 10 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 2-5 | -1.9 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 82.4 | 40.6 | 44.4% | 39.4 | 89.3 | 44.9 | 44.8% | 44.9 | | Road Games | 2-5 | -1.9 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 82.4 | 40.6 | 44.4% | 39.4 | 89.3 | 44.9 | 44.8% | 44.9 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.1 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 80.4 | 39.2 | 43.5% | 40.6 | 86.0 | 43.6 | 43.3% | 43.4 | | Division Games | 2-5 | -1.9 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 82.4 | 40.6 | 44.4% | 39.4 | 89.3 | 44.9 | 44.8% | 44.9 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.4 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 6-18 | 32.8% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 39 | 8 | 14 | 21 | 7 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83.2 | 42.1 | 30-69 | 44.1% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 16-19 | 81.5% | 42 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 82.4 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 6-18 | 32.8% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 39 | 8 | 14 | 21 | 7 | 16 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 89.3 | 44.9 | 32-72 | 44.8% | 8-22 | 35.5% | 17-21 | 81.8% | 45 | 10 | 19 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.6 | 41.5 | 30-69 | 43.4% | 7-22 | 33.0% | 16-20 | 79.1% | 43 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 89.3 | 44.9 | 32-72 | 44.8% | 8-22 | 35.5% | 17-21 | 81.8% | 45 | 10 | 19 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 74.4, ATLANTA 69.4 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/26/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 69-77 | L | -140 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 50 | 14 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 45 | 14 | | 7/28/2020 | *WASHINGTON | 89-94 | L | +155 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 43 | 16 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 41 | 15 | | 7/30/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | 76-81 | L | +200 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 56 | 14 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 43 | 15 | | 8/1/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 69-78 | L | -125 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 38 | 16 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 53 | 17 | | 8/4/2020 | *SEATTLE | 74-87 | L | +400 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 47 | 14 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 35 | 9 | | 8/6/2020 | *DALLAS | 91-68 | W | -165 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 44 | 14 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 39 | 17 | | 8/8/2020 | *CHICAGO | 93-100 | L | +135 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 27 | 19 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 35 | 21 | | 8/10/2020 | *ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2020 | *DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2020 | *CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2020 | *SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2020 | *INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/20/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/22/2020 | *NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/26/2020 | *PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/26/2020 | *DALLAS | 105-95 | W | +220 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 43 | 16 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 39 | 13 | | 7/29/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 70-100 | L | +250 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 30 | 16 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 58 | 19 | | 7/31/2020 | *NEW YORK | 84-78 | W | -210 | 28-75 | 37.3% | 59 | 15 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 40 | 15 | | 8/2/2020 | *INDIANA | 77-93 | L | -105 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 29 | 12 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 44 | 15 | | 8/4/2020 | *PHOENIX | 74-81 | L | +210 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 43 | 23 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 40 | 10 | | 8/6/2020 | *SEATTLE | 92-93 | L | +450 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 38 | 17 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 43 | 11 | | 8/8/2020 | *DALLAS | 75-85 | L | -105 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 34 | 12 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 50 | 13 | | 8/10/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2020 | *SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/14/2020 | *PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2020 | *CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/19/2020 | *WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/21/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/23/2020 | *MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/26/2020 | *WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| ATLANTA is 28-20 (+3.7 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| ATLANTA is 4-3 (+5.4 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
7/19/2019 | ATLANTA | 69 | 150 | Over | 40 | 22-58 | 37.9% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 40 | 5 | 14 | | | CONNECTICUT | 98 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 38-78 | 48.7% | 11-26 | 42.3% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 46 | 12 | 8 | 7/10/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 75 | -6 | Over | 41 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 43 | 12 | 14 | | | ATLANTA | 78 | 152 | SU ATS | 43 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 19-23 | 82.6% | 45 | 12 | 20 | 6/21/2019 | ATLANTA | 76 | 152.5 | ATS | 25 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 45 | 5 | 10 | | | CONNECTICUT | 86 | -13 | SU Over | 39 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 12-23 | 52.2% | 16-24 | 66.7% | 43 | 7 | 12 | 6/9/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 65 | -6.5 | SU Under | 44 | 21-74 | 28.4% | 6-25 | 24.0% | 17-26 | 65.4% | 58 | 16 | 11 | | | ATLANTA | 59 | 160 | ATS | 32 | 22-68 | 32.4% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 53 | 13 | 18 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 21-9 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 13-7 against the money line (+15.7 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 69-45 against the money line (+13.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 39-27 against the money line (+15.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 5-17 against the money line (-12.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.9, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 2-11 against the money line (-10.1 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 72.5, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Miller is 35-39 against the money line (-30.5 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 6-12 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 1-6 against the money line (-8.0 Units) when playing their 3rd road game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-21 against the money line (-14.5 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 24-26 against the money line (-22.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 13-15 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 13-16 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 4-9 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in road games vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 8-9 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 11-9 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Collen is 14-10 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 16-12 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 13-8 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 24-19 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 22-14 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 21-10 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Collen is 20-8 against the money line (+18.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 85.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Collen is 17-11 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | | Line Movement Analysis not posted for neutral court games. |
|
| | |
| [G] 07/29/2020 - Briann January is out indefinitely ( COVID-19 ) | | [F] 06/22/2020 - Jonquel Jones is out for season ( Personal ) | |
| [G] 07/31/2020 - Tiffany Hayes is out for season ( Personal ) | | [C] 07/24/2020 - Kalani Brown is out indefinitely ( COVID-19 ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/18/2024 2:59:23 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|