| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO ATLANTA |
|
| 165.5 | 87 Final 83 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
641 | CHICAGO | -250 | 642 | ATLANTA | +200 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (281-120 since 1997.) (70.1%, +88.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (281-120 since 1997.) (70.1%, +88.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (281-120 since 1997.) (70.1%, +88.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (281-120 since 1997.) (70.1%, +88.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (281-120 since 1997.) (70.1%, +88.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (281-120 since 1997.) (70.1%, +88.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss. (28-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.7%, +25.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, in August or September games. (72-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +40.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%), after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (67-42 since 1997.) (61.5%, +29.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss by 10 points or more. (38-17 since 1997.) (69.1%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (28-12 since 1997.) (70%, +16.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (28-12 since 1997.) (70%, +16.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (28-12 since 1997.) (70%, +16.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (43-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 7 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (42-15 since 1997.) (73.7%, +25.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a road loss. (80-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO | 81 | | 30-70 | 43.4% | 8-23 | 34.6% | 13-15 | 81.4% | 50 | 11 | 14 | ATLANTA | 72 | | 26-72 | 36.6% | 7-23 | 27.9% | 14-18 | 76.8% | 45 | 12 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 722 times, while ATLANTA won 246 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 7-3 against the money line (+8.2 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 75.0 | CHICAGO is 7-1 against the money line (+10.4 Units) when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 79.5 | CHICAGO is 14-9 against the money line (+16.6 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 85.6 | CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 80.0 | CHICAGO is 46-37 against the money line (+17.8 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 78.5 | CHICAGO is 13-5 against the money line (+10.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 82.8 | ATLANTA is 3-18 against the money line (-15.5 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.7, OPPONENT 79.1 | ATLANTA is 22-62 against the money line (-61.6 Units) when they make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 72.5, OPPONENT 80.2 | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-8.8 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.6, OPPONENT 79.8 | ATLANTA is 2-12 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 70.0, OPPONENT 80.6 | ATLANTA is 64-75 against the money line (-43.2 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 79.1 | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-6.7 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season. The average score was ATLANTA 68.6, OPPONENT 78.3 | ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-6.0 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.9, OPPONENT 81.4 | ATLANTA is 30-48 against the money line (-32.4 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 80.2 | ATLANTA is 1-13 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.6, OPPONENT 87.9 | ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-7.1 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.6, OPPONENT 76.6 | ATLANTA is 3-17 against the money line (-14.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 86.0 | ATLANTA is 36-63 against the money line (-32.6 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 77.7 |
|
CHICAGO is 133-187 against the money line (-63.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 81.7 | CHICAGO is 52-82 against the money line (-38.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 79.2 | CHICAGO is 4-12 against the money line (-9.3 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 90.6 | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-7.3 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 75.3, OPPONENT 83.8 | CHICAGO is 37-63 against the money line (-31.2 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.8, OPPONENT 81.8 | CHICAGO is 82-120 against the money line (-54.4 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 81.0 | CHICAGO is 88-141 against the money line (-55.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 80.1 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 7-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-3 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 88.1, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 22-24 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-3 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 88.1, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 17-21 against the money line (+15.6 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.0, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-8 against the money line (+17.9 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.1, OPPONENT 90.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+7.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 88.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 13-8 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-3 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 88.1, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-17 against the money line (+14.1 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-2 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 88.6, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-4 against the money line (+8.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-10 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 17-12 against the money line (+17.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.7, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 8-3 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 88.1, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-8 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 20-21 against the money line (+16.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-18 against the money line (+15.4 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-6 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.2, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-8 against the money line (+13.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-11 against the money line (+15.2 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.7, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-13 against the money line (-13.6 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-14 against the money line (-11.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-18 against the money line (-12.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-15 against the money line (-11.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 34-58 against the money line (-31.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 49-82 against the money line (-39.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-18 against the money line (-12.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 112-130 against the money line (-43.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-18 against the money line (-12.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 52-72 against the money line (-38.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-11 against the money line (-9.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 72.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 46-80 against the money line (-46.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 71-112 against the money line (-59.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 103-117 against the money line (-46.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-17 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 69.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 1-9 against the money line (-9.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 140-174 against the money line (-57.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-13 against the money line (-10.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 97-98 against the money line (-45.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 58-60 against the money line (-30.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 87-126 against the money line (-48.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 103-160 against the money line (-52.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 17-14 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 20-17 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 20-17 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-2 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 84.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 28-31 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-5 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 26-27 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 17-15 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-3 against the money line (+6.6 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-2 against the money line (+6.3 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread this season. The average score was CHICAGO 86.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-2 against the money line (+9.4 Units) off a home loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 95.3, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-8 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 21-22 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-19 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.8, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-22 against the money line (+15.6 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-19 against the money line (+15.9 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-12 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.6, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-10 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.8, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 19-17 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-4 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-6 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in road games after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-16 against the money line (+17.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-5 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-4 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-10 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 19-18 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 21-21 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-4 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-16 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-7 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-12 against the money line (+14.3 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-18 against the money line (+18.4 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-11 against the money line (+20.9 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 7-7 against the money line (+14.4 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 20-23 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-13 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-27 against the money line (+20.8 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-9 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.2, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-1 against the money line (+5.3 Units) after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots this season. The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-21 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in all games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 78-86 against the money line (-37.6 Units) in August or September games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 24-23 against the money line (-22.5 Units) in home games on Tuesday since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-8.4 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest this season. The average score was ATLANTA 69.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 125-136 against the money line (-55.9 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-11 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was ATLANTA 69.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 13-30 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after 3 straight games where opponent grabbed 45 or more rebounds since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in home games after 4 straight games where opponent grabbed 45 or more rebounds since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after 5 straight games where opponent grabbed 45 or more rebounds since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 56-77 against the money line (-36.1 Units) off a road loss since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-13 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in home games off 2 or more consecutive road losses since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-6.1 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was ATLANTA 64.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 69-84 against the money line (-35.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 49-66 against the money line (-33.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-18 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog this season. The average score was ATLANTA 69.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-16 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog this season. The average score was ATLANTA 69.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 2-13 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog this season. The average score was ATLANTA 69.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 3-14 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 91-121 against the money line (-61.0 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 41-59 against the money line (-30.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-12 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was ATLANTA 69.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 91-127 against the money line (-62.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-14 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.2, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 17-51 against the money line (-33.9 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 14-36 against the money line (-20.2 Units) after 4 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-27 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after 5 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 46-63 against the money line (-34.8 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 40-78 against the money line (-36.4 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-15 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-35 against the money line (-21.0 Units) in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 30-61 against the money line (-31.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-32 against the money line (-28.5 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 30-20 against the money line (+22.2 Units) as a home underdog of +200 or less since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 15-12 against the money line (+13.4 Units) as a home underdog of +145 to +180 since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.2, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 17-13 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 19-16 against the money line (+13.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 22-12 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in home games revenging a home loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 10-6 against the money line (+8.8 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 12-6 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 15-11 | +5.8 | 17-8 | 15-10 | 82.4 | 42.1 | 44.1% | 43.2 | 81.6 | 42.9 | 41.5% | 44.7 | Road Games | 5-7 | -0.3 | 8-3 | 10-2 | 81.8 | 42.3 | 44.0% | 42.4 | 85.3 | 45.4 | 42.5% | 44.8 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.2 | 4-1 | 5-0 | 89.0 | 44.0 | 42.7% | 42.8 | 88.2 | 42.6 | 44.9% | 45.6 | Division Games | 8-4 | +4.2 | 8-4 | 7-4 | 84.8 | 41.2 | 45.6% | 43.5 | 81.5 | 42.5 | 41.2% | 45.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 82.4 | 42.1 | 30-69 | 44.1% | 8-22 | 34.4% | 14-17 | 82.2% | 43 | 8 | 21 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.8 | 39.3 | 29-68 | 42.0% | 7-20 | 34.1% | 14-17 | 80.5% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.8 | 42.3 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 8-22 | 35.1% | 15-18 | 81.8% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.6 | 42.9 | 31-74 | 41.5% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 14-18 | 79.7% | 45 | 10 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 77.6 | 39.2 | 29-69 | 41.9% | 7-20 | 33.7% | 13-17 | 79.9% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 85.3 | 45.4 | 32-75 | 42.5% | 7-21 | 34.4% | 15-19 | 77.8% | 45 | 11 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 5-21 | -16.2 | 11-15 | 11-13 | 70.7 | 35.1 | 36.9% | 44.6 | 79.3 | 39.0 | 41.4% | 47.4 | Home Games | 4-9 | -6.8 | 4-9 | 5-8 | 69.8 | 35.5 | 35.8% | 46.6 | 77.4 | 40.3 | 40.5% | 47.8 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 76.8 | 42.0 | 38.6% | 42.4 | 86.0 | 41.2 | 43.2% | 48.2 | Division Games | 2-11 | -9 | 7-6 | 8-3 | 71.8 | 36.6 | 37.1% | 45.0 | 82.0 | 42.3 | 42.7% | 47.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.7 | 35.1 | 25-69 | 36.9% | 6-22 | 28.2% | 13-18 | 76.3% | 45 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.3 | 39.3 | 29-68 | 42.2% | 7-20 | 33.2% | 13-16 | 80.7% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 69.8 | 35.5 | 25-69 | 35.8% | 6-22 | 25.6% | 15-19 | 77.7% | 47 | 11 | 15 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.3 | 39.0 | 29-71 | 41.4% | 7-21 | 34.2% | 14-18 | 77.1% | 47 | 11 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 78.8 | 40 | 29-69 | 42.7% | 7-20 | 34.4% | 13-17 | 80.1% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 77.4 | 40.3 | 29-73 | 40.5% | 6-20 | 32.1% | 12-16 | 77.2% | 48 | 12 | 19 | 19 | 9 | 12 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 71.5, ATLANTA 72.2 |
| | |
|
|
7/12/2019 | NEW YORK | 99-83 | W | -165 | 38-70 | 54.3% | 43 | 12 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 40 | 15 | 7/14/2019 | @ DALLAS | 89-79 | W | -105 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 10 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 42 | 7 | 7/17/2019 | ATLANTA | 77-76 | W | -270 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 52 | 17 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 46 | 8 | 7/21/2019 | INDIANA | 78-70 | W | -220 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 45 | 18 | 29-84 | 34.5% | 53 | 11 | 7/30/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | 94-100 | L | +220 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 42 | 14 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 45 | 16 | 8/3/2019 | @ ATLANTA | 87-75 | W | -175 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 46 | 20 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 46 | 14 | 8/7/2019 | NEW YORK | 101-92 | W | -330 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 41 | 8 | 38-75 | 50.7% | 45 | 16 | 8/9/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 87-84 | W | +220 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 41 | 14 | 31-84 | 36.9% | 55 | 15 | 8/11/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | 81-84 | L | +220 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 44 | 24 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 39 | 23 | 8/16/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 91-81 | W | +100 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 44 | 18 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 37 | 13 | 8/18/2019 | LAS VEGAS | 85-100 | L | +105 | 26-76 | 34.2% | 44 | 7 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 52 | 12 | 8/20/2019 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/23/2019 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2019 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2019 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/29/2019 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2019 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/12/2019 | MINNESOTA | 60-53 | W | +100 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 51 | 12 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 42 | 12 | 7/14/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 71-76 | L | +135 | 25-76 | 32.9% | 63 | 11 | 30-87 | 34.5% | 52 | 5 | 7/17/2019 | @ CHICAGO | 76-77 | L | +210 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 46 | 8 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 52 | 17 | 7/19/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | 69-98 | L | +350 | 22-58 | 37.9% | 40 | 14 | 38-78 | 48.7% | 46 | 8 | 7/21/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | 65-93 | L | +650 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 39 | 15 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 44 | 11 | 7/23/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 66-78 | L | -105 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 37 | 12 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 44 | 13 | 7/31/2019 | @ INDIANA | 59-61 | L | +175 | 22-76 | 28.9% | 58 | 15 | 20-65 | 30.8% | 53 | 15 | 8/3/2019 | CHICAGO | 75-87 | L | +155 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 46 | 14 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 46 | 20 | 8/6/2019 | MINNESOTA | 69-85 | L | +175 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 45 | 18 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 51 | 10 | 8/10/2019 | @ INDIANA | 82-87 | L | +180 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 40 | 15 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 49 | 10 | 8/13/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 90-94 | L | +650 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 41 | 10 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 50 | 12 | 8/16/2019 | @ PHOENIX | 68-77 | L | +145 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 40 | 13 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 45 | 12 | 8/20/2019 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/23/2019 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2019 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/29/2019 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2019 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/5/2019 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CHICAGO is 31-19 (+17.6 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 6-3 (+4.4 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CHICAGO is 15-11 (+11.7 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 3-1 (+3.4 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/3/2019 | CHICAGO | 87 | -4 | SU ATS | 46 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 11-25 | 44.0% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 46 | 5 | 20 | | ATLANTA | 75 | 157 | Over | 42 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 8-28 | 28.6% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 46 | 8 | 14 | 7/17/2019 | ATLANTA | 76 | 153 | ATS | 46 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 46 | 8 | 8 | | CHICAGO | 77 | -6.5 | SU | 36 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 52 | 9 | 17 | 8/3/2018 | CHICAGO | 74 | 169 | Under | 43 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 40 | 7 | 17 | | ATLANTA | 89 | -9 | SU ATS | 42 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 52 | 13 | 12 | 6/27/2018 | ATLANTA | 80 | 158 | Over | 38 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 9-19 | 47.4% | 11-21 | 52.4% | 43 | 10 | 16 | | CHICAGO | 93 | -2 | SU ATS | 30 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 46 | 13 | 14 | 5/23/2018 | ATLANTA | 81 | -2 | SU ATS | 39 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 53 | 12 | 16 | | CHICAGO | 63 | 163.5 | Under | 27 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 34 | 8 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Wade is 12-5 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 10-4 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 8-2 against the money line (+7.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 88.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 11-4 against the money line (+8.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 7-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 1-12 against the money line (-15.6 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 7*) | Collen is 8-21 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 4-16 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Collen is 17-13 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Collen is 19-16 against the money line (+13.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 10-6 against the money line (+8.8 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Collen is 12-6 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Collen is 17-14 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Collen is 20-17 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Collen is 20-17 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Collen is 8-2 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 84.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 37 times, while the home underdog won straight up 26 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 10 times, while the home underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[F/C] 08/13/2019 - Jantel Lavender is out for season ( Foot ) | |
[F] 05/10/2019 - Angel McCoughtry is out indefinitely ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/3/2024 6:08:21 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|