| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
SEATTLE
ATLANTA |
|
|
163.5
| 83
Final
89 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 605 | SEATTLE | -155 | | 606 | ATLANTA | +135 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(48-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +31.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(76-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +43.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in August or September games.
(45-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +34 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, in August or September games.
(23-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.1%, +22.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(28-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.4%, +26.1 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(43-14 since 1997.) (75.4%, +29.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(37-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(31-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.5%, +25.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(62-35 since 1997.) (63.9%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better against opponent after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(61-38 since 1997.) (61.6%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games.
(33-19 since 1997.) (63.5%, +25.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(35-20 since 1997.) (63.6%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(27-7 since 1997.) (79.4%, +22.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - poor three point shooting team (<=30%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(35-23 since 1997.) (60.3%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(58-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +33.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(42-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +29 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after being beaten by the spread by 36 or more points total in their last five games.
(23-12 since 1997.) (65.7%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record.
(38-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +10.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after being beaten by the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games.
(19-8 since 1997.) (70.4%, +18.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(25-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (46.3%, +21 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(35-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +27.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor three point shooting team (<=30%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(24-11 since 1997.) (68.6%, +13.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(48-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a losing record.
(24-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +11.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(74-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off an upset win as a road underdog, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season.
(40-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(62-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(33-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.9%, +13.3 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Road favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(118-30 since 1997.) (79.7%, +60.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(96-22 since 1997.) (81.4%, +53.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(110-30 since 1997.) (78.6%, +53.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record.
(119-38 since 1997.) (75.8%, +51.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(122-85 since 1997.) (58.9%, +49.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(96-69 since 1997.) (58.2%, +40.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after playing a road game, playing with 2 days rest.
(60-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.2%, +25.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(102-64 since 1997.) (61.4%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(73-39 since 1997.) (65.2%, +37.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(104-69 since 1997.) (60.1%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(74-38 since 1997.) (66.1%, +36.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(71-36 since 1997.) (66.4%, +36.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(48-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +22.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(84-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(90-57 since 1997.) (61.2%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record.
(30-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +23.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after a win by 10 points or more.
(58-26 since 1997.) (69%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(52-21 since 1997.) (71.2%, +32.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more.
(70-40 since 1997.) (63.6%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(64-35 since 1997.) (64.6%, +29.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - after one or more consecutive overs, terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season.
(78-51 since 1997.) (60.5%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(57-29 since 1997.) (66.3%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, on Wednesday nights.
(39-19 since 1997.) (67.2%, +27.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(37-7 since 1997.) (84.1%, +27.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(69-44 since 1997.) (61.1%, +26.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(71-46 since 1997.) (60.7%, +26.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after a blowout win by 15 points or more.
(31-7 since 1997.) (81.6%, +26.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a losing record.
(40-18 since 1997.) (69%, +26 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record.
(49-25 since 1997.) (66.2%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(37-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +17.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(37-17 since 1997.) (68.5%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(53-30 since 1997.) (63.9%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 7 or more consecutive losses, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(37-13 since 1997.) (74%, +22.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(54-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.1%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - after one or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG).
(36-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after being beaten by the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games.
(28-5 since 1997.) (84.8%, +21.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(30-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +15.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(35-16 since 1997.) (68.6%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(30-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team.
(24-9 since 1997.) (72.7%, +17.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(36-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (72%, +18.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(57-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SEATTLE) - an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential) against a poor team (-3 to -7 PPG differential), after a win by 10 points or more.
(22-7 since 1997.) (75.9%, +16.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(54-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.1%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(35-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +12.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(42-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +12.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(54-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +26.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| SEATTLE | 81 | | 30-64 | 46.6% | 7-20 | 33.6% | 14-17 | 78.6% | 42 | 8 | 14 | | ATLANTA | 79 | | 30-72 | 41.1% | 4-15 | 28.3% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 45 | 14 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, SEATTLE won the game straight up 535 times, while ATLANTA won 433 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SEATTLE is 63-34 against the money line (+43.9 Units) when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.8, OPPONENT 67.0 | SEATTLE is 10-5 against the money line (+10.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.5, OPPONENT 79.8 | SEATTLE is 69-29 against the money line (+52.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.8, OPPONENT 73.8 | SEATTLE is 28-20 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.7, OPPONENT 81.6 | ATLANTA is 8-19 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 83.1 | ATLANTA is 18-62 against the money line (-64.5 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 85.2 | ATLANTA is 7-13 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 82.9 | ATLANTA is 10-18 against the money line (-18.7 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 80.5 | ATLANTA is 11-19 against the money line (-20.0 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 80.5 | ATLANTA is 27-42 against the money line (-26.7 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 80.3 | ATLANTA is 4-16 against the money line (-11.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.1, OPPONENT 88.0 | ATLANTA is 112-135 against the money line (-55.8 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.6, OPPONENT 85.3 | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 86.9 | ATLANTA is 4-13 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 82.5 |
|
SEATTLE is 7-17 against the money line (-14.9 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.7, OPPONENT 81.2 | SEATTLE is 2-8 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in road games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.0, OPPONENT 85.2 | SEATTLE is 2-6 against the money line (-10.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.6, OPPONENT 85.3 | SEATTLE is 6-15 against the money line (-19.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.5, OPPONENT 88.0 | SEATTLE is 6-12 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.1, OPPONENT 82.2 | SEATTLE is 8-12 against the money line (-13.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.6, OPPONENT 86.9 | SEATTLE is 5-8 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.8, OPPONENT 80.4 | ATLANTA is 8-3 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in home games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 86.3, OPPONENT 80.8 | ATLANTA is 11-4 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.7, OPPONENT 81.0 | ATLANTA is 23-18 against the money line (+12.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 87.8, OPPONENT 86.7 |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 104-93 against the money line (+29.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 145-139 against the money line (+22.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 119-101 against the money line (+23.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.8, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 87-58 against the money line (+22.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-9 against the money line (-7.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 28-43 against the money line (-23.3 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-12 against the money line (-10.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-12 against the money line (-10.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 1-8 against the money line (-7.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 22-46 against the money line (-27.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.5, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 36-62 against the money line (-30.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.7, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-12 against the money line (-9.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-18 against the money line (-13.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-21 against the money line (-13.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.5, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 35-62 against the money line (-37.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the money line (-7.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-11 against the money line (-9.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 17-31 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 36-58 against the money line (-43.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 14-26 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-16 against the money line (-23.1 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 3-8 against the money line (-9.3 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-13 against the money line (-10.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 20-35 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-10 against the money line (-7.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.6, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 18-29 against the money line (-16.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.7, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-13 against the money line (-10.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-19 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-12 against the money line (-9.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.3, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 65-97 against the money line (-41.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 17-26 against the money line (-19.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.8, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-17 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.3, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-15 against the money line (-10.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 6-14 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 10-15 against the money line (-12.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 3-8 against the money line (-8.0 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.2, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 3-10 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.5, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 7-12 against the money line (-11.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.9, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 10-14 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.0, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 9-13 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.0, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 4-10 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 9-15 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 6-12 against the money line (-9.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.3, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 93.0, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 85-62 against the money line (+22.3 Units) when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.9, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 119-105 against the money line (+28.5 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 31-19 against the money line (+15.7 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.1, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 21-15 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 15-8 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 159-140 against the money line (+41.1 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.6, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 171-193 against the money line (-74.7 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 93-73 against the money line (-45.3 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 5-13 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 56-79 against the money line (-50.3 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 14-26 against the money line (-14.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 16-28 against the money line (-16.7 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-13 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 8-18 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.3, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 41-54 against the money line (-26.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-9 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 52-60 against the money line (-30.1 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 9-22 against the money line (-20.1 Units) off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 8-19 against the money line (-18.1 Units) off a road cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 47-65 against the money line (-37.8 Units) off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 83-104 against the money line (-38.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 16-27 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 13-25 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 119-139 against the money line (-53.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 11-18 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 6-15 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 5-11 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 86-111 against the money line (-56.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-9 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-12 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.8, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 2-9 against the money line (-8.0 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-14 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-15 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-11 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 48-60 against the money line (-40.1 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 109-117 against the money line (-45.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 68-77 against the money line (-33.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 18-28 against the money line (-20.2 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 77-106 against the money line (-61.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 14-40 against the money line (-28.2 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-7.0 Units) after 4 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
SEATTLE is 2-6 against the money line (-10.2 Units) as a road favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.3, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 1-5 against the money line (-7.9 Units) as a road favorite of -245 or less over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.2, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 4-10 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.5, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 4-10 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.5, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 4-10 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.5, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 6-9 against the money line (-10.2 Units) against Eastern conference opponents this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.7, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-15 against the money line (-11.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.3, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 5-13 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.2, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 4-8 against the money line (-13.0 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 1-5 against the money line (-8.3 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 6-9 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in non-conference games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.7, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 7-11 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after one or more consecutive overs this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 3-7 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.7, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 3-12 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.1, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 3-10 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in road games after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 1-8 against the money line (-10.1 Units) off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 10-37 against the money line (-23.4 Units) in road games off an upset win as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 66.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 8-27 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in road games off an upset win as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 66.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 15-39 against the money line (-22.0 Units) in road games off a road win since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 67.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 3-13 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.5, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 9-14 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 9-14 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.5, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 5-12 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.8, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 5*) | SEATTLE is 6-13 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 9-13 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 5-11 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 2-7 against the money line (-6.9 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.4, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 4-16 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.7, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 10-19 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 5-16 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 69.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 19-12 against the money line (+14.5 Units) as a home underdog of +200 or less since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-5 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-5 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 85.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 8-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 87.5, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 10-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 85.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-2 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in home games after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 11-5 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in home games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 85.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 11-8 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.8, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 14-6 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 14-16 | -9.4 | 13-17 | 19-11 | 82.1 | 41.5 | 47.5% | 37.5 | 81.8 | 42.1 | 43.8% | 42.0 | | Road Games | 4-10 | -8.6 | 6-8 | 9-5 | 81.5 | 40.9 | 47.1% | 38.3 | 84.0 | 43.4 | 45.1% | 43.3 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +5 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 82.6 | 45.0 | 46.5% | 40.2 | 75.6 | 38.2 | 42.4% | 43.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.1 | 41.5 | 30-63 | 47.5% | 7-20 | 36.6% | 15-18 | 80.4% | 37 | 6 | 20 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.4 | 40.9 | 30-67 | 44.2% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.5 | 40.9 | 31-65 | 47.1% | 8-21 | 36.5% | 12-17 | 73.8% | 38 | 6 | 22 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.8 | 42.1 | 30-70 | 43.8% | 7-19 | 34.7% | 14-18 | 79.8% | 42 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.5 | 41 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 6-17 | 33.7% | 16-20 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.0 | 43.4 | 31-69 | 45.1% | 6-18 | 35.1% | 15-20 | 76.1% | 43 | 10 | 18 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 10-20 | -8.4 | 12-17 | 16-14 | 79.6 | 39.1 | 41.2% | 44.3 | 83.0 | 42.7 | 43.4% | 45.9 | | Home Games | 7-8 | -1.5 | 6-9 | 7-8 | 80.4 | 38.6 | 41.1% | 45.4 | 79.7 | 42.2 | 43.3% | 46.5 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -6 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 75.6 | 36.6 | 38.8% | 46.6 | 86.8 | 47.8 | 45.1% | 45.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.6 | 39.1 | 29-72 | 41.2% | 4-15 | 28.7% | 16-21 | 76.9% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.7 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 16-20 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.4 | 38.6 | 29-72 | 41.1% | 4-14 | 30.0% | 17-23 | 74.8% | 45 | 11 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 11 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.0 | 42.7 | 30-68 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 31.1% | 18-22 | 80.1% | 46 | 9 | 19 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 82 | 41.4 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 79.7 | 42.2 | 30-68 | 43.3% | 5-16 | 28.6% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 46 | 9 | 20 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 6 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: SEATTLE 70.7, ATLANTA 70.9 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/15/2017 | ATLANTA | 90-84 | W | -270 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 37 | 13 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 40 | 12 | | 7/18/2017 | CHICAGO | 83-94 | L | -250 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 37 | 18 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 36 | 9 | | 7/25/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 60-68 | L | +325 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 37 | 18 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 48 | 11 | | 7/28/2017 | DALLAS | 109-93 | W | -250 | 40-65 | 61.5% | 31 | 12 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 38 | 15 | | 7/30/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 82-93 | L | +550 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 33 | 11 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 45 | 10 | | 8/4/2017 | @ DALLAS | 80-93 | L | -110 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 32 | 9 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 50 | 14 | | 8/5/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 80-87 | L | -330 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 44 | 17 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 56 | 22 | | 8/8/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | 71-84 | L | +180 | 27-75 | 36.0% | 45 | 12 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 50 | 10 | | 8/12/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 98-89 | W | +175 | 36-64 | 56.2% | 37 | 10 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 41 | 13 | | 8/16/2017 | MINNESOTA | 62-61 | W | +220 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 38 | 12 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 49 | 11 | | 8/18/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 79-78 | W | -550 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 32 | 7 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 42 | 16 | | 8/20/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 103-66 | W | +105 | 41-78 | 52.6% | 49 | 10 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 34 | 16 | | 8/23/2017 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2017 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2017 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/15/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 84-90 | L | +210 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 40 | 12 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 37 | 13 | | 7/18/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 88-75 | W | -500 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 51 | 10 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 48 | 16 | | 7/19/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 96-100 | L | +145 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 43 | 12 | 37-89 | 41.6% | 53 | 12 | | 7/25/2017 | PHOENIX | 99-91 | W | -250 | 36-82 | 43.9% | 58 | 18 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 44 | 19 | | 7/28/2017 | MINNESOTA | 80-90 | L | +250 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 35 | 17 | 37-66 | 56.1% | 36 | 14 | | 7/30/2017 | WASHINGTON | 70-77 | L | +105 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 38 | 6 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 58 | 12 | | 8/3/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 54-69 | L | +500 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 46 | 22 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 42 | 17 | | 8/5/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 86-91 | L | -125 | 35-83 | 42.2% | 57 | 12 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 31 | 6 | | 8/8/2017 | MINNESOTA | 72-81 | L | +250 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 43 | 11 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 45 | 12 | | 8/11/2017 | NEW YORK | 77-83 | L | -140 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 48 | 10 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 44 | 11 | | 8/12/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 68-84 | L | -155 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 38 | 14 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 39 | 11 | | 8/15/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 75-96 | L | +175 | 30-82 | 36.6% | 56 | 12 | 35-74 | 47.3% | 43 | 11 | | 8/19/2017 | @ DALLAS | 86-90 | L | +175 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 48 | 13 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 54 | 8 | | 8/23/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/26/2017 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2017 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| ATLANTA is 11-14 (-2.0 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
| ATLANTA is 4-4 (+1.8 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| ATLANTA is 8-4 (+2.6 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
| ATLANTA is 3-1 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/15/2017 | ATLANTA | 84 | 161 | ATS | 43 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 40 | 11 | 12 | | | SEATTLE | 90 | -6.5 | SU Over | 45 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 37 | 3 | 13 | 6/13/2017 | ATLANTA | 91 | 164 | SU ATS | 42 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 45 | 10 | 17 | | | SEATTLE | 86 | -9 | Over | 38 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-26 | 19.2% | 25-30 | 83.3% | 41 | 8 | 15 | 9/21/2016 | SEATTLE | 85 | -4.5 | Over | 45 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 22-24 | 91.7% | 37 | 11 | 6 | | | ATLANTA | 94 | 161 | SU ATS | 37 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 43 | 10 | 9 | 9/4/2016 | SEATTLE | 91 | 162.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 16-16 | 100.0% | 40 | 9 | 14 | | | ATLANTA | 82 | -4 | Over | 33 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 4-8 | 50.0% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 38 | 6 | 9 | 7/5/2016 | SEATTLE | 64 | 168 | Under | 28 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 10-10 | 100.0% | 37 | 4 | 16 | | | ATLANTA | 77 | -6 | SU ATS | 28 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 1-10 | 10.0% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 42 | 16 | 11 | 6/28/2016 | ATLANTA | 81 | 165 | ATS | 35 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 3-17 | 17.6% | 10-19 | 52.6% | 45 | 16 | 12 | | | SEATTLE | 84 | -5.5 | SU | 45 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 33 | 6 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Boucek is 20-19 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 6-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.9, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 15-13 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 63-73 against the money line (-33.9 Units) in all games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 16-28 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in August or September games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 23-33 against the money line (-19.4 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 38-41 against the money line (-19.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 21-34 against the money line (-26.8 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.7, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 17-28 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 3-11 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 18-25 against the money line (-19.7 Units) off a road loss as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.9, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 15-18 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.1, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 41-57 against the money line (-28.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 34-51 against the money line (-31.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 28-47 against the money line (-30.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 23-43 against the money line (-31.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 45-54 against the money line (-25.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 31-42 against the money line (-20.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 22-31 against the money line (-26.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 14-26 against the money line (-25.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Cooper is 12-19 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 34-40 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 2-8 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.8, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 12-25 against the money line (-26.0 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Cooper is 27-42 against the money line (-31.0 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 43-49 against the money line (-24.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 44-47 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 30-32 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.7, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 13-22 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 40-45 against the money line (-22.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 22-32 against the money line (-22.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 25-39 against the money line (-37.8 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Cooper is 28-37 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 32-38 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 34-37 against the money line (-38.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 20-23 against the money line (-18.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 30-44 against the money line (-22.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 45-62 against the money line (-34.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 24-41 against the money line (-20.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 12-29 against the money line (-23.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.9, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 22-37 against the money line (-18.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.5, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 19-34 against the money line (-25.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 32-44 against the money line (-24.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 28-43 against the money line (-23.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 45-60 against the money line (-29.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 20-34 against the money line (-24.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.2, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 33-49 against the money line (-31.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 3-9 against the money line (-10.8 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 5-13 against the money line (-15.0 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 29-43 against the money line (-25.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.0, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 44-61 against the money line (-34.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 20-29 against the money line (-20.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.0, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 30-43 against the money line (-28.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 30-43 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 41-59 against the money line (-27.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 12-18 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 24-28 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 25-37 against the money line (-15.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.4, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 33-47 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Boucek is 2-6 against the money line (-10.2 Units) as a road favorite as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.3, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 1-5 against the money line (-7.9 Units) as a road favorite of -245 or less as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.2, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 17-29 against the money line (-18.5 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 11-19 against the money line (-16.1 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 2-8 against the money line (-7.3 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 17-29 against the money line (-18.5 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 9-17 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 12-19 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 3-10 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in road games after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 1-8 against the money line (-10.1 Units) off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Boucek is 4-17 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.6, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 5*) | Boucek is 23-35 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.7, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 16-23 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 6-25 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 73.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 11-19 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 17-30 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 12-26 against the money line (-20.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Boucek is 6-14 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 10-31 against the money line (-17.5 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 11-19 against the money line (-10.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.9, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 16-33 against the money line (-25.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.1, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Boucek is 24-32 against the money line (-16.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.4, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 4-10 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in road games versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 26-44 against the money line (-20.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 13-11 against the money line (+10.5 Units) as a home underdog as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.0, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 11-6 against the money line (+10.1 Units) as a home underdog of +200 or less as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.5, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 20-3 against the money line (+16.2 Units) in home games on Wednesday in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 80.1, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 20-10 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in home games against Western conference opponents as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 124-74 against the money line (+32.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 77.6, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 20-10 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in home games in non-conference games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 13-5 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 86.4, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 27-17 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after allowing 90 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 79.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 10-3 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in home games after a loss by 6 points or less as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 32-21 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 79.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 18-3 against the money line (+14.3 Units) in home games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 80.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 14-7 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.9, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 50 times, while the home underdog won straight up 31 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 14 times, while the home underdog won straight up 9 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [G] 08/19/2017 - Bria Holmes out indefinitely ( Achilles ) | | [F] 05/13/2017 - Angel McCoughtry out indefinitely ( Personal ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/27/2024 1:15:24 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|